Monday, November 05, 2007

“Maintenance and Upkeep” of National Register of Historic Places Flanders Mansion Property per Municipal Code 17.32.210?

Flanders Mansion
Piece of black material secured over a missing roof tile
Note: Missing roof tiles to the left

Filled pothole in the driveway with crushed rock

ABSTRACT: In early December 2007, the City will submit a response to the writ delineating a maintenance plan for the Flanders Mansion property. Meanwhile, as the court ruled the City violated the Municipal Code with regard to the maintenance and upkeep of a historic resource, the City has recently secured a piece of black plastic over a missing roof tile and filled a pothole in the driveway with crushed rock, as shown in photos. Comments are made; and National Register of Historic Places information on the Flanders Mansion is presented and the Municipal Code, HISTORIC PRESERVATION, 17.32.210 Maintenance and Upkeep, is reproduced in its entirety.

COMMENTS:
• After years and years of neglect and a refusal to comply with the City’s Municipal Code with respect to Maintenance and Upkeep of a historic resource, the City must now comply with Monterey Superior Court Judge Robert O’Farrell’s decision.

• With an annual budget of $13 million and nearly $10 million in reserve funds, it is unconscionable that the City Council only seems to respect the concept of proper stewardship of public assets when a court ruled the City Council violated the City’s Municipal Code.

• Apparently, per court order, the city will present a response to the writ to Judge Robert O’Farrell delineating a plan to maintain the Flanders Mansion property in early December 2007. Judge O’Farrell may visit the Flanders Mansion property in order to get a better understanding of the condition and maintenance requirements of the Flanders Mansion property.

REFERENCES:
National Register of Historic Places
CALIFORNIA - Monterey County


Outlands in the Eighty Acres (added 1989 - Building - #89000228)
Also known as Flanders;Paul Mansion
25800 Hatton, Carmel By-the-Sea

Historic Significance: Architecture/Engineering
Architect, builder, or engineer: Ruhl,Frederick, Gutterson,Henry Higby
Architectural Style: Tudor Revival, Other
Area of Significance: Architecture
Period of Significance: 1900-1924, 1925-1949
Owner: Local Gov't
Historic Function: Domestic
Historic Sub-function: Single Dwelling
Current Function: Education, Landscape
Current Sub-function: Park, School

(Source: http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/CA/Monterey/state.html)

NOTE: On the National Register of Historic Places, there are only three properties in the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea.
• Carmel Mission (also known as Mission San Carlos de Borromeo del Rio Carmelo), added 1966.
• Outlands in the Eighty Acres (also known as Paul Flanders Mansion), added 1989.
• Sunset Center (also known as Sunset Sehool), added 1998.

Carmel-by-the-Sea
Municipal Code
Chapter 17.32
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
17.32.210 Maintenance and Upkeep.

A. Minimum Maintenance.
1. All resources included in the inventory shall be preserved against decay and deterioration, kept in a state of good repair and free from structural defects. The purpose of this section is to prevent an owner or other person having legal custody and control over a property from facilitating demolition of a historic resource by neglecting it and by permitting damage to it by weather and/or vandalism.

2. Consistent with all other State and City codes requiring that buildings and structures be kept in good repair, the owner or other person having legal custody and control of a property shall repair such building or structure if it is found to have any of the following defects.
a. Building elements so attached that they may fall and injure members of the public or property.

b. Deteriorated or inadequate foundation.

c. Defective or deteriorated flooring.

d. Members of walls, partitions or other vertical supports that split, lean, list or buckle due to defective material or deterioration.

e. Members of ceilings, roofs, ceilings or roof supports or other horizontal members which that sag, split or buckle due to defective materials or deterioration.

f. Fireplaces or chimneys that list, bulge or settle due to defective material or deterioration.

g. Deteriorated, crumbling or loose exterior plaster.

h. Deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, foundations or floors, including broken windows or doors.

i. Defective or lack of weather protection for exterior wall coverings, including lack of paint, or weathering due to lack of paint or other protective covering.

j. Any fault, defect or deterioration in the building which that renders it structurally unsafe or not properly watertight.

3. If the Building Official determines that a historic resource or any other property is being neglected and subject to damage from weather or vandalism, the Director and/or Building Official shall meet with the owner or other person having legal custody and control of the historic resource to discuss with them ways to improve the condition of the property. If no attempt or insufficient effort is made to correct any noted conditions thereafter, the Building Official may issue a notice to comply requiring the owner or other person having legal custody and control of the historic resource to take action to require corrections of defects in the subject property in order that such historic resource may be preserved in accordance with this section.

B. Protection of Deteriorated, Vacant and Vandalized Resources.
1. The Building Official shall have the authority to issue an order to comply to any owner of any property included in the inventory if the Building Official determines that the property has become subject to vandalism or constitutes a public nuisance. In such circumstances, the Building Official shall have the authority to issue any order deemed appropriate to keep the property from being further vandalized or from becoming a public nuisance including, but not limited to, ordering that the building be secured and fenced.

2. For the purposes of this provision, the property shall include the interiors and exteriors of any accessory building located on a property in the inventory.

3. Security measures that the Building Official may order shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. The installation of the maximum allowed height, under this code, chain-link perimeter fencing with at least one securely locked pedestrian gate and the posting of “No Trespassing” signs at regular intervals.

b. Steel or plywood closures, with one-inch diameter air holes, installed at all doors and windows. (Sandwich panel installation shall be used so as to avoid drilling into window frames and sashes, doors, ornament or masonry units.)

c. The removal of all debris from the premises, including but not limited to wood, paper, cans, bottles and fecal matter.

d. Any temporary modifications required to be made to secure the building shall be reversible.

4. Any plans or proposals for work required to be performed pursuant to an order to comply to secure any building from being further vandalized or from becoming a public nuisance must first be reviewed by the Department and the Building Official to ensure that any work done to secure the building will not damage or alter the historic character of the building. This review by the Department and the Building Official shall be completed within 10 working days from the date any request for review is submitted. If the work to be performed includes substantial alteration, the procedures set forth in this section shall be utilized for review.

5. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit an owner from taking immediate temporary measures to secure a building from unauthorized entry.

6. It shall be unlawful for any property owner to fail to comply with any order to comply issued by the Building Official under this provision.

7. Additional Remedies – Notice of Intention. In addition to the remedies provided by this code, should an owner fail to comply with an order to comply, the City may take the necessary measures, including those authorized under this code, to immediately secure the property against vandalism or prevent it from becoming a public nuisance. The City shall have the authority to assess the cost of performing this work as a lien against real property on which the building is located and take whatever additional action the City deems necessary to recover its costs and further secure the property and provide for its preservation. Prior to taking these measures, the City shall send a notice of intention to the owner. (Ord. 2004-02 § 1, 2004; Ord. 2004-01 § 1, 2004).

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's interesting to note that in the Nov. issue of the Carmel Voice it was reported that the court (judge) prevented the city from selling the Flanders Mansion. When in fact the law suit was to make the city follow the law when trying to sell the property. Big difference! Was this misinformation or bias in reporting?

Anonymous said...

Our city fails to adhere to the municipal code when it pertains to itself. Now, the city has been found to have violated more laws in their foolhardy attempt to sell Flanders. We have more of an outlaw city than when Clint was mayor. At least he was the real thing. What a dubious distinction Mayor Sue.

VillageinForest said...

TO: anonymous
FROM: villageinforest

Very astute observation! Thank you for your alert about the Carmel Voice item on Flanders Mansion; very much appreciated.
(See Wednesday, November 07, 2006 Rebuttal to Carmel Voice "Flanders Failure' By Sam Salerno)