April 29, 2021
'Worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War!' Can Biden really be this dumb?
By Patricia McCarthy
No doubt millions of Americans who bothered to watch Biden's speech were horrified by his claim that the January 6 not-insurrection was the "worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War." It was an appalling statement, a monumental lie that betrayed his administration's contempt for the American people. These people must be defeated.
Thursday, April 29, 2021
Steve Deace on lockdown passivity: 'A culture has to be conditioned to be this compliant'
"COVID is not an outlier, it is an omen," the activist/talk show host warned.
By Natalia Mittelstadt
Updated: April 29, 2021
By Natalia Mittelstadt
Updated: April 29, 2021
"Anthony Fauci on CNN talked about gun violence, a public health issue. Two weeks ago, the head of CDC ... she talked about insufficient wokeism is now a public health issue. They're going to make everything a public health issue, because look what it's done."
REFERENCE:
Faucian Bargain: The Most Powerful and Dangerous Bureaucrat in American History.
Steve Deace and Todd Erzen
Post Hill Press (March 26, 2021)
Steve Deace and Todd Erzen
Post Hill Press (March 26, 2021)
Stanford prof: CDC has sown 'fear and panic,' paved way for 'institutionalization of hypochondria'
Stanford prof: CDC has sown 'fear and panic,' paved way for 'institutionalization of hypochondria'
"It's going to be very difficult to undo" the public fixation on "disease avoidance" provoked by public health agency's COVID hypervigilance, said Jay Bhattacharya.
By Sophie Mann
Updated: April 28, 2021 -
"We basically have said, look at disease avoidance as the central problem in your life, no matter who you are," he explained. "It's not taking care of your kids. It's not practicing your faith. It's not doing doing as well as you can in your in your profession. None of that is as important as avoiding disease. And I think it's going to be very difficult to undo that."
"It's going to be very difficult to undo" the public fixation on "disease avoidance" provoked by public health agency's COVID hypervigilance, said Jay Bhattacharya.
By Sophie Mann
Updated: April 28, 2021 -
Wednesday, April 28, 2021
EIGHT NOTEWORTHY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA ITEMS, May 3, 2021
ABSTRACT: Eight Noteworthy City Council Special Meeting Agenda Items, May 3, 2021, including EXTRAORDINARY BUSINESS, PUBLIC APPEARANCES, ANNOUNCEMENTS; CONSENT AGENDA including April 6, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes, Monthly Reports for March: 1) City Administrator Contract Log; 2) Community Planning and Building Department Reports; 3) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports; 4) Public Records Act Requests, and 5) Public Works Department Report and March 2021 Check Register Summary; ORDERS OF BUSINESS including Update on paid parking in Carmel-by-the-Sea and provide direction to staff and Resolution 2021-015 authorizing the City Administrator to execute a Lease Agreement with GTE MOBILNET of California Limited Partnership, a California Limited Partnership, D/B/A Verizon Wireless and a Memorandum of Building and Rooftop Lease Agreement. The CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING Monday, May 3, 2021 and Staff Report document copies are embedded.
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Monday, May 3, 2021
4:30 PM
Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20 has allowed local legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. Also, see the Order by the Monterey County Public Health Officer issued March 17, 2020. The health and well-being of our residents is the top priority for the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea. To that end, this meeting will be held via teleconference and web-streamed on the City’s website ONLY.
To attend via Zoom click here (or copy and paste the link into your browser); https://zoom.us/j/91673190361?; Meeting ID (if needed): 916 7319 0361; Passcode (if needed): 813020; or to attend via telephone, dial 1-669-900-9128
The public can also email comments to cityclerk@ci.carmel.ca.us. Comments must be received 2 hours before the meeting in order to be provided to the legislative body. Comments received after that time and up to the beginning of the meeting will be added to the agenda and made part of the record.
Mayor Dave Potter, Council Members Jeff Baron, Karen Ferlito, Bobby Richards, and Carrie Theis
A. Visit Carmel Presentation
B. Monterey County Convention & Visitors Bureau (MCCVB) Presentation
C. Sunset Center Presentation
Members of the Public are invited to speak on any item that does not appear on the Agenda and that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. The exception is a Closed Session agenda, where speakers may address the Council on those items before the Closed Session begins. Speakers are usually given three (3) minutes to speak on any item; the time limit is in the discretion of the Chair of the meeting and may be limited when appropriate. Applicants and appellants in land use matters are usually given more time to speak. If an individual wishes to submit written information, he or she may give it to the City Clerk. Speakers and any other members of the public will not approach the dais at any time without prior consent from the Chair of the meeting.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. City Administrator Announcements
B. City Attorney Announcements
C. Councilmember Announcements
CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are routine in nature and do not require discussion or independent action. Members of the Council, Board or Commission or the public may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of Council, Board or Commission discussion and/ or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions.
1. April 6, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17C0P__67f3vGE7JY2UyykrEEhCGcU1CY/view?usp=sharing
April 6, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes
2. Monthly Reports for March: 1) City Administrator Contract Log; 2) Community Planning and Building Department Reports; 3) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports; 4) Public Records Act Requests, and 5) Public Works Department Report
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T2s8yJRggCHSpI-AUUXeL472GdOVO_h6/view?usp=sharin
Monthly Reports for March: 1) City Administrator Contract Log; 2) Community Planning and Building Department Reports; 3) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports; 4) Public Records Act Requests, and 5) Public Works Department Report
3. March 2021 Check Register Summary
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B-idSe_6g6W5yKc7IopV5q9ZOCq4hett/view?usp=sharing
March 2021 Check Register Summary
Orders of Business are agenda items that require City Council, Board or Commission discussion, debate, direction to staff, and/or action.
6. Update on paid parking in Carmel-by-the-Sea and provide direction to staff
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17UP2cImUfAOBg79jJLjH9Wvw_WmV6gLe/view?usp=sharing
Update on paid parking in Carmel-by-the-Sea and provide direction to staff 7. Resolution 2021-015 authorizing the City Administrator to execute a Lease Agreement with GTE MOBILNET of California Limited Partnership, a California Limited Partnership, D/B/A Verizon Wireless and a Memorandum of Building and Rooftop Lease Agreement
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CD1H54jBB766Mi9vumgznk8Bx8jogNd-/view?usp=sharing
Resolution 2021-015 authorizing the City Administrator to execute a Lease Agreement with GTE MOBILNET of California Limited Partnership, a California Limited Partnership, D/B/A Verizon Wireless and a Memorandum of Building and Rooftop Lease Agreement SIX NOTEWORTHY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS, May 4, 2021
ABSTRACT: Six Noteworthy City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Items, May 4, 2021, including PUBLIC APPEARANCES; CONSENT AGENDA including Resolution 2021-018 approving a list of street projects for Fiscal Year 2021/22 funded by SB 1: the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017; ORDERS OF BUSINESS including Resolution 2021-017 authorizing the City Administrator to restore voluntary compensation reductions, in whole or in part, for At Will Executives and for classifications covered under the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Officers Association, Receive the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Recommended Budget and Progress report on the Outdoor Seating Ad-Hoc Committee and consideration of expiration dates for parklet permits; PUBLIC HEARINGS including Resolution 2021-019 adopting the Fiscal Year 2021- 2022 Fee Schedule for Administrative Services, Community Planning and Building, Public Safety and Public Works Services. The CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, May 4, 2021 and Staff Report document copies are embedded.
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, May 4, 2021
To attend via Zoom click here(or copy and paste the link into your browser); https://zoom.us/j/95806441379?, Meeting ID (if needed): 958 0644 1379, Passcode (if needed): 173007; or to attend via telephone, dial 1-669-900-9128
The public can also email comments to cityclerk@ci.carmel.ca.us. Comments must be received 2 hours before the meeting in order to be provided to the legislative body. Comments received after that time and up to the beginning of the meeting will be added to the agenda and made part of the record.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are routine in nature and do not require discussion or independent action. Members of the Council, Board or Commission or the public may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of Council, Board or Commission discussion and/ or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions.
ORDERS OF BUSINESS
Orders of Business are agenda items that require City Council, Board or Commission discussion, debate, direction to staff, and/or action.
6. Receive the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Recommended Budget Receive the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Recommended Budget
7. Progress report on the Outdoor Seating Ad-Hoc Committee and consideration of expiration dates for parklet permits
ADJOURNMENT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, May 4, 2021
Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20 has allowed local legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. Also, see the Order by the Monterey County Public Health Officer issued March 17, 2020. The health and well-being of our residents is the top priority for the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea. To that end, this meeting will be held via teleconference and web-streamed on the City’s website ONLY.
The public can also email comments to cityclerk@ci.carmel.ca.us. Comments must be received 2 hours before the meeting in order to be provided to the legislative body. Comments received after that time and up to the beginning of the meeting will be added to the agenda and made part of the record.
OPEN SESSION
4:30 PM
Mayor Dave Potter, Council Members Jeff Baron, Karen Ferlito, Bobby Richards, and Carrie Theis
PUBLIC APPEARANCES
Members of the Public are invited to speak on any item that does not appear on the Agenda and that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. The exception is a Closed Session agenda, where speakers may address the Council on those items before the Closed Session begins. Speakers are usually given three (3) minutes to speak on any item; the time limit is in the discretion of the Chair of the meeting and may be limited when appropriate. Applicants and appellants in land use matters are usually given more time to speak. If an individual wishes to submit written information, he or she may give it to the City Clerk. Speakers and any other members of the public will not approach the dais at any time without prior consent from the Chair of the meeting.
Members of the Public are invited to speak on any item that does not appear on the Agenda and that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. The exception is a Closed Session agenda, where speakers may address the Council on those items before the Closed Session begins. Speakers are usually given three (3) minutes to speak on any item; the time limit is in the discretion of the Chair of the meeting and may be limited when appropriate. Applicants and appellants in land use matters are usually given more time to speak. If an individual wishes to submit written information, he or she may give it to the City Clerk. Speakers and any other members of the public will not approach the dais at any time without prior consent from the Chair of the meeting.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are routine in nature and do not require discussion or independent action. Members of the Council, Board or Commission or the public may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of Council, Board or Commission discussion and/ or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions.
1. Resolution 2021-018 approving a list of street projects for Fiscal Year 2021/22 funded by SB 1: the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
Resolution 2021-018 approving a list of street projects for Fiscal Year 2021/22 funded by SB 1: the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 Orders of Business are agenda items that require City Council, Board or Commission discussion, debate, direction to staff, and/or action.
4. Resolution 2021-017 authorizing the City Administrator to restore voluntary compensation reductions, in whole or in part, for At Will Executives and for classifications covered under the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Officers Association
Resolution 2021-017 authorizing the City Administrator to restore voluntary compensation reductions, in whole or in part, for At Will Executives and for classifications covered under the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Police Officers Association
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m4_cKCjsQdG_KwER2-Wed8sLELhR_mKU/view?usp=sharing Progress report on the Outdoor Seating Ad-Hoc Committee and consideration of expiration dates for parklet permits
PUBLIC HEARINGS
8. Resolution 2021-019 adopting the Fiscal Year 2021- 2022 Fee Schedule for Administrative Services, Community Planning and Building, Public Safety and Public Works Services
Resolution 2021-019 adopting the Fiscal Year 2021- 2022 Fee Schedule for Administrative Services, Community Planning and Building, Public Safety and Public Works Services 8. Resolution 2021-019 adopting the Fiscal Year 2021- 2022 Fee Schedule for Administrative Services, Community Planning and Building, Public Safety and Public Works Services
Maricopa County Superior Court judge won't pause vote audit; allows for appeal
BREAKING
Maricopa County Superior Court judge won't pause vote audit; allows for appeal
AZFAMILY.COM NEWS STAFF, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Maricopa County Superior Court judge won't pause vote audit; allows for appeal
AZFAMILY.COM NEWS STAFF, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
PHOENIX (3TV/CBS 5) -- Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Daniel Martin has dismissed a temporary restraining order aimed at pausing the Arizona Senate's recount of 2.1 million 2020 election ballots after hearing more arguments over voter privacy laws. Judge Martin said the plaintiffs failed to show enough evidence that there would be harm to voters due to the audit procedures currently being used.
Tuesday, April 27, 2021
Judicial Watch: Documents Show CA State Officials Coordinated with Big Tech to Censor Americans’ Election Posts
PRESS RELEASES
APRIL 27, 2021|JUDICIAL WATCH
Judicial Watch: Documents Show CA State Officials Coordinated with Big Tech to Censor Americans’ Election Posts
(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch announced today that it received 540 pages and a supplemental four pages of documents from the office of the Secretary of State of California revealing how state officials pressured social media companies (Twitter, Facebook, Google (YouTube)) to censor posts about the 2020 election. Included in these documents were “misinformation briefings” emails that were compiled by communications firm SKDK, that lists Biden for President as their top client of 2020.
“These new documents suggest a conspiracy against the First Amendment rights of Americans by the California Secretary of State, the Biden campaign operation, and Big Tech,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These documents blow up the big lie that Big Tech censorship is ‘private’ – as the documents show collusion between a whole group of government officials in multiple states to suppress speech about election controversies.”
Monday, April 26, 2021
Recall effort against Gov. Gavin Newsom has enough valid signatures to get on ballot
Recall effort against Gov. Gavin Newsom has enough valid signatures to get on ballot
By Jesus Reyes
Apirl 26, 2021
Recall of Governor Gavin Newsom (Filed by Orrin E. Heatlie)
By Jesus Reyes
Apirl 26, 2021
Recall of Governor Gavin Newsom (Filed by Orrin E. Heatlie)
Cumulative Statewide Summary as of 04/19/21
(Circulation Deadline: March 17, 2021*** Final signature verification due 04/29/21)
(Circulation Deadline: March 17, 2021*** Final signature verification due 04/29/21)
TOTAL
VALID SIGNATURES: 1,626,042 (80.23%)
The recall effort needed 1,495,709 verified signatures to trigger a recall election. That number makes up 12% of the 12,464,235 votes cast in the last election for Governor, according to the Secretary of State's website.
County election officials…must report the final signature verification on April 29, 2021.
30-business day period: voters who want to have their names removed from recall petitions. County elections officials must report the total number of withdrawn signatures to the Secretary of State by June 22, 2021.
The Department of Finance will consult with county elections officials and the Secretary of State within 30 business days of this notification to estimate the costs of the recall election.
The Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) then has 30 days to review and comment on the estimate
provided to them by the Department of Finance. After these 30 days, the
Secretary of State will certify that the proponents have submitted enough valid signatures to qualify the recall for the ballot.
The Lieutenant Governor is required to call a recall election to be held no less than 60 days nor more than 80 days from the date of certification of sufficient signatures.
These Key Similarities Between Lenin’s Red Terror and America’s Woke Culture Reveal Left’s Blueprint For Complete Takeover & The New Antiracism Is the Old Racism
These Key Similarities Between Lenin’s Red Terror and America’s Woke Culture Reveal Left’s
Blueprint For Complete Takeover
April 24, 2021
But the second reason why the left constantly escalates its terrorism is more basic: Keeping power. Marx’s colleague Friedrich Engels wrote that “Terror is the needless cruelties perpetrated by terrified men.” The left is already inclined toward cruelty by disposition, but once frightened at the prospect of actual defeat, they go into a frenzy.
But the common denominator of wokeism is rank ignorance: ignorance that a multiracial democracy is a combustible, fragile structure, easy for the arsonist to destroy but hard for first responders to save; ignorance that the wealth fueling the thousands in the street, equity commissars, the human resources sleuths, and the professionally aggrieved is predicated on a meritocracy that ensures in a ruthless world Americans and their political and economic system can outperform the competition that has no illusions about the evils of tribalism; and ignorance that the vision of wokeness is not just racialist payback but the nihilism of the Balkans sort.
GREAT AMERICA
The benchmarks of the Black Lives Matter and affiliated woke movements are overt racism, systemic untruth, and the hypocritical privilege of their elite architects.
By Victor Davis Hanson April 25, 2021
But the common denominator of wokeism is rank ignorance: ignorance that a multiracial democracy is a combustible, fragile structure, easy for the arsonist to destroy but hard for first responders to save; ignorance that the wealth fueling the thousands in the street, equity commissars, the human resources sleuths, and the professionally aggrieved is predicated on a meritocracy that ensures in a ruthless world Americans and their political and economic system can outperform the competition that has no illusions about the evils of tribalism; and ignorance that the vision of wokeness is not just racialist payback but the nihilism of the Balkans sort.
Friday, April 23, 2021
AZ Audit
Cameras 1-9
BREAKING – HUGE UPDATE IN AZ: Democrats in Arizona Won’t Post $1 Million Bond So
Election Audit Continues
By Joe Hoft
Published April 23, 2021
BREAKING: Judge Orders TEMPORARY HALT to Arizona Forensic Ballot Audit Until Monday after Democrats File Suit to Shut Down Process
By Jim Hoft
Published April 23, 2021
REFERENCE:
Arizona Democrats file last-ditch lawsuit to stop Senate audit of Maricopa County election
by Kaelan Deese, Breaking News Reporter | | April 22, 2021 10:41 PM
by Kaelan Deese, Breaking News Reporter | | April 22, 2021 10:41 PM
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUCTIVE RELIEF
ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT
MARICOPA COUNTY
ARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, an Arizona political party and political action committee; and
STEVE GALLARDO, a qualified elector, Plaintiffs,
v.
KAREN FANN, in her official capacity as President of the Arizona Senate; WARREN PETERSEN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee; KEN BENNETT, in his official capacity as the liaison of the Arizona Senate; and CYBER NINJAS, INC., a Florida corporation, Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, FORT WORTH DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; U.S. DEP’T OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES; CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION; U.S. DEP’T OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION; U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary, U.S. Dep’t of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity; ROCHELLE WALENSKY, Director, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, in her official capacity; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Security, in his official capacity; TROY MILLER, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner, U.S. Customs & Border Protection, in his official capacity; TAE JOHNSON, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Defendants.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WE6gEzU6_xkqpKETQnCTHxPlLRflJ5Zs/view?usp=sharing
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS,
FORT WORTH DIVISION
a. Hold unlawful and set aside the CDC’s February Order promulgated at 86 Fed. Reg. 9,942 (Feb. 17, 2021);
b. Issue nationwide preliminary and permanent injunctive relief enjoining Defendants from enforcing the February Order promulgated at 86 Fed. Reg. 9,942 (Feb. 17, 2021), and order Defendants to continue to apply the rules in place on January 19, 2021 to all covered aliens until Defendants amend such rules pursuant to the APA’s notice-and-comment rulemaking and 30-day-notice requirements or pursuant to a lawful exception from those requirements;
c. Declare that Defendants have a nondiscretionary duty under the APA and the Take Care Clause either to (i) return all covered aliens to Mexico under Title 42 or (ii) detain and quarantine under 8 U.S.C. § 1222(a) all aliens who could carry a communicable disease of public health significance for at least fourteen days before releasing them into the United States;
d. Issue nationwide preliminary and permanent injunctive relief under the APA and the Take Care Clause enjoining Defendants from not applying Title 42 to all covered aliens until Defendants amend such rules pursuant to the APA;
e. Issue nationwide preliminary and permanent injunctive relief under the APA and the Take Care Clause enjoining Defendants from failing to detain, quarantine, and test under 8 U.S.C. § 1222(a) all aliens arriving who could carry a communicable disease of public health significance before releasing them into the United States;
f. Award Texas the costs of this action and reasonable attorney’s fees; and g. Award such other and further relief as the Court deems equitable and just.
Respectfully submitted on April 22, 2021,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS,
FORT WORTH DIVISION
STATE OF TEXAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; U.S. DEP’T OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES; CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION; U.S. DEP’T OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION; U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary, U.S. Dep’t of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity; ROCHELLE WALENSKY, Director, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, in her official capacity; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Security, in his official capacity; TROY MILLER, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner, U.S. Customs & Border Protection, in his official capacity; TAE JOHNSON, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 4:21-cv-00579
CLAIMS
COUNT I
Arbitrary and Capricious Agency Action: Lack of Reasoned Decision-Making
COUNT II
Arbitrary and Capricious Agency Action: Failure to Consider State Reliance Interests
COUNT III
Arbitrary and Capricious Agency Action: Failure to Consider Alternative Approaches
COUNT IV
Arbitrary and Capricious Agency Action: No Stated Basis for Agency Action
COUNT V
Lack of Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking
COUNT VI
Failure to Follow Agency Rules
COUNT VII
Failure to Detain Aliens under 8 U.S.C. § 1222(a)
COUNT VIII
Violation of the Take Care Clause
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
For these reasons, Texas asks this Court to:
a. Hold unlawful and set aside the CDC’s February Order promulgated at 86 Fed. Reg. 9,942 (Feb. 17, 2021);
b. Issue nationwide preliminary and permanent injunctive relief enjoining Defendants from enforcing the February Order promulgated at 86 Fed. Reg. 9,942 (Feb. 17, 2021), and order Defendants to continue to apply the rules in place on January 19, 2021 to all covered aliens until Defendants amend such rules pursuant to the APA’s notice-and-comment rulemaking and 30-day-notice requirements or pursuant to a lawful exception from those requirements;
c. Declare that Defendants have a nondiscretionary duty under the APA and the Take Care Clause either to (i) return all covered aliens to Mexico under Title 42 or (ii) detain and quarantine under 8 U.S.C. § 1222(a) all aliens who could carry a communicable disease of public health significance for at least fourteen days before releasing them into the United States;
d. Issue nationwide preliminary and permanent injunctive relief under the APA and the Take Care Clause enjoining Defendants from not applying Title 42 to all covered aliens until Defendants amend such rules pursuant to the APA;
e. Issue nationwide preliminary and permanent injunctive relief under the APA and the Take Care Clause enjoining Defendants from failing to detain, quarantine, and test under 8 U.S.C. § 1222(a) all aliens arriving who could carry a communicable disease of public health significance before releasing them into the United States;
f. Award Texas the costs of this action and reasonable attorney’s fees; and g. Award such other and further relief as the Court deems equitable and just.
Respectfully submitted on April 22, 2021,
VERIFIED PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDATE TO ENFORCE THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT; EXHIBITS A – D [Cal. Gov’t Code § 6250 et seq.; Code Civ. Proc. § 1085 et seq.] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF VENTURA FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION, a California non-profit corporation, Petitioner, vs. COUNTY OF VENTURA, AND DOES 1-10 inclusive, Respondent.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WDlYdILUoGBjFIrOQ96ix0sF5NTUoEkX/view?usp=sharing
VERIFIED PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDATE TO ENFORCE THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT; EXHIBITS A – D
[Cal. Gov’t Code § 6250 et seq.; Code Civ. Proc. § 1085 et seq.]
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF VENTURA
FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION, a
California non-profit corporation,
Petitioner,
vs.
COUNTY OF VENTURA, AND DOES 1-10
inclusive,
Respondent.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Petitioner First Amendment Coalition respectfully prays that this Court:
A. Issue a writ of mandate directing the County to comply fully and without further
delay with the California Public Records Act to provide FAC with those public documents
responsive to the January Request and the March Request that are not subject to any exemption,
and to specifically identify and describe any documents allegedly exempt from disclosure;
B. Declare that the County has violated FAC’s rights under the CPRA, Gov. Code §
6250 et seq., and the California Constitution, Art. I § 3, by failing to substantively respond to
FAC’s requests;
C. Enter an injunction directing that because the County’s failure to comply with its
obligations under the CPRA was without substantial justification, the County must waive all fees
associated with FAC’s requests;
D. Award FAC reasonable attorney fees and costs as authorized by Government Code
§ 6259, Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and any other applicable provisions of law; and
E. Grant FAC such additional relief as the Court may deem proper and just.
DATED: April 22, 2021
Thursday, April 22, 2021
The Biden White House: A Diversity of Racists and Anti-Semites, David Horowitz and John Perazzo
The Biden White House: A Diversity of Racists and Anti-Semites
They may look like America – but they don’t think like Americans.
Wed Apr 14, 2021
David Horowitz and John Perazzo
Vice Presidential Kamala Harris
Assistant Secretary of Health Rachel Levine
Assistant Attorney General in charge of Civil Rights Kristen Clarke
Linda Thomas-Greenfield U.S. Ambassador to the UN
Susan Rice Director of the United States Domestic Policy Council,
Administrator of USAID Samantha Power
Undersecretary of Defense Colin Kahl
Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Uzra Zeya
Wendy Sherman Deputy Secretary of State nominee
Symone Sanders Senior Advisor and Chief Spokesperson to Vice President, Kamala Harris.
Secretary of State Anthony Blinken
Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines
Deputy Director of the White House Office of Legislative Affairs Reema Dodin
Special U.S. Envoy for Iran Robert Malley,
Senior Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council Maher Bitar.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Israel and Palestinian Affairs Hady Amr.
In sum, while the Biden White House may “look like” America, once one gets past skin color and gender, it is a team of racists and anti-Semites. “Diversity” is exposed as a racist rationale for assembling an anti- American coalition in the heart of the White House itself.
They may look like America – but they don’t think like Americans.
Wed Apr 14, 2021
David Horowitz and John Perazzo
Vice Presidential Kamala Harris
Assistant Secretary of Health Rachel Levine
Assistant Attorney General in charge of Civil Rights Kristen Clarke
Linda Thomas-Greenfield U.S. Ambassador to the UN
Susan Rice Director of the United States Domestic Policy Council,
Administrator of USAID Samantha Power
Undersecretary of Defense Colin Kahl
Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Uzra Zeya
Wendy Sherman Deputy Secretary of State nominee
Symone Sanders Senior Advisor and Chief Spokesperson to Vice President, Kamala Harris.
Secretary of State Anthony Blinken
Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines
Deputy Director of the White House Office of Legislative Affairs Reema Dodin
Special U.S. Envoy for Iran Robert Malley,
Senior Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council Maher Bitar.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Israel and Palestinian Affairs Hady Amr.
In sum, while the Biden White House may “look like” America, once one gets past skin color and gender, it is a team of racists and anti-Semites. “Diversity” is exposed as a racist rationale for assembling an anti- American coalition in the heart of the White House itself.
David Horowitz Video: 'The Enemy Within'
David Horowitz Video: 'The Enemy Within'
Freedom Center founder reveals how a totalitarian movement is destroying America.
Fri Apr 16, 2021
Frontpagemag.com
REFERENCE:
The Enemy Within: How a Totalitarian Movement is Destroying America
David Horowitz
Regnery Publishing (April 6, 2021)
Freedom Center founder reveals how a totalitarian movement is destroying America.
Fri Apr 16, 2021
Frontpagemag.com
REFERENCE:
The Enemy Within: How a Totalitarian Movement is Destroying America
David Horowitz
Regnery Publishing (April 6, 2021)
Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Monday, April 19, 2021
FLASH: Capitol Police Officer Sicknick ‘Died Of Natural Causes’, Medical Examiner Admits.
NEWS
FLASH: Capitol Police Officer Sicknick ‘Died Of Natural Causes’, Medical Examiner Admits.
None of it was true, but that did not matter — and it still does not to them — because truth, as always, has nothing to do with their actual function. If anything, truth is an impediment to it.
No resignations, apologies, or retractions are expected at this time—by anyone.
APRIL 19, 2021 RAHEEM KASSAM
Glenn Greenwald
The Media Lied Repeatedly About Officer Brian Sicknick's Death. And They Just Got Caught.
Just as with the Russia Bounty debacle, they will never acknowledge what they did. Their audience wants to be lied to for partisan gain and emotional pleasure.Glenn Greenwald
None of it was true, but that did not matter — and it still does not to them — because truth, as always, has nothing to do with their actual function. If anything, truth is an impediment to it.
ELECTIONS
This was just another massive lie used to gaslight the American people and justify an ongoing manhunt for Trump supporters who had the audacity to protest an illegitimate election.
By Julie Kelly April 19, 2021
No resignations, apologies, or retractions are expected at this time—by anyone.
BREAKING: JAMES O’KEEFE SUES TWITTER in New York Supreme Court for ‘FALSE AND DEFAMATORY’ Statements Following Ban From Platform … Intends to Prove Twitter Acted With ‘RECKLESS DISREGARD’ For the Truth
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UyoopPJOSmcLEpaHD-19slgyDP21kPme/view?usp=sharing
COMPLAINT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER
JAMES O’KEEFE III, Plaintiff,
v.
TWITTER, INC., Defendant.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Mr. O’Keefe respectfully prays for judgment as follows:
A. For judgment in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant;
B. For general, special, and compensatory damages and according to proof;
C. For punitive and exemplary damages according to proof;
D. For a permanent injunction enjoining Twitter, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and all other persons acting in concert or participation with Twitter from further dissemining the false, misleading, and defamatory representations of fact concerning Mr. O’Keefe discussed above, and requiring Twitter to remove such statements in all forums in which they are posted; E. That this Court award Mr. O’Keefe all reasonable costs; and
F. That this Court grant such other and further relief as this Court deems equitable and just under the circumstances.
Date: April 19, 2021
House Energy & Commerce Committee Republican Leaders Request Information From U.S. Group Affiliated With Chinese Lab at Center of COVID-19 Origin Investigation 04.16.21
LETTER PRESS RELEASE
04.16.21
Washington, D.C. — House Energy & Commerce Committee Republican Leader Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Subcommittee on Health Republican Leader Brett Guthrie (R-KY), and Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Republican Leader Morgan Griffith (R-VA) sent a letter Friday afternoon to Dr. Peter Daszak with EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) requesting information and documents that could be useful to a comprehensive investigation into the origins of COVID-19.
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
April 16, 2021
Mr. Peter Daszak, PhD
President EcoHealth Alliance
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xpPfKcchTsTES2lOMr4jHCTHaXRkKk8_/view?usp=sharing
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCEMarch 18, 2021
The Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Director National Institutes of Health
Saturday, April 17, 2021
Journalists, Learning They Spread a CIA Fraud About Russia, Instantly Embrace a New One, Glenn Greenwald
Journalists, Learning They Spread a CIA Fraud About Russia, Instantly Embrace a New One
The most significant Trump-era alliance is between corporate outlets and security state agencies, whose evidence-free claims they unquestioningly disseminate.
Glenn Greenwald
April 16, 2021
The most significant Trump-era alliance is between corporate outlets and security state agencies, whose evidence-free claims they unquestioningly disseminate.
Glenn Greenwald
April 16, 2021
RE: Russia placed "bounties” on the heads of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan
Any journalist who treats unverified stories from the CIA or other government agencies as true, without needing any evidence or applying any skepticism, is worthless. Actually, they are worse than worthless: they are toxic influences who deserve pure contempt.
…These are not journalists. They are obsequious spokespeople for the CIA and other official authorities. Even when they learn that they deceived millions of people by uncritically repeating a story that the CIA told them was true, they will — on the very same day that they learn they did this — do exactly the same thing, this time with a one-paragraph Treasury Department Press Release. These are agents of disinformation: state media.
Twenty-Six Signatories: OPEN LETTER Call for a Full and Unrestricted International Forensic Investigation into the Origins of COVID-19 March 4, 2021 & Twenty-Four Signatories: OPEN LETTER April 7, 2021 CALL FOR A FULL INVESTIGATION INTO THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mwYyvKkZRokRHJP3pXHdI_NfppfISThA/view?usp=sharing
OPEN LETTER
Call for a Full and Unrestricted International Forensic Investigation into the Origins of COVID-19 March 4, 2021
With more than two million deaths, more than a hundred million infected by COVID-19 worldwide, and a massive global disruption impacting some of the world’s most vulnerable populations, we cannot afford an investigation into the origins of the pandemic that is anything less than absolutely thorough and credible. If we fail to fully and courageously examine the origins of this pandemic, we risk being unprepared for a potentially worse pandemic in the future.
OPEN LETTER
April 7, 2021
CALL FOR A FULL INVESTIGATION INTO THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19
Understanding how the SARS-CoV-2 virus emerged and spread to humans is an essential foundation for prioritizingfuture pandemic prevention and responsestrategies. Yet well over a year after the initialoutbreak,no robust process for examiningthe originsof the pandemichas been establishedand criticalrecordsand biologicalsamples that could provide essentialinsights into pandemic origins remain inaccessible. These shortcomings pose a significant threat to everyoneand future generations.
In our previous open letter, we outlined our fears that the joint international committee/Chinese government team “did not have the mandate, the independence,or the necessary accesses to carry out a full and unrestricted investigation into all the relevant SARS-CoV-2 origin hypotheses.”Havingread the report entitled‘WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2: China part’ and reviewed the statementsmadein the March 30, 2021 WHO-organized press event announcing the report’s release, we have regrettably concluded that our concerns were fully justified.
REFERENCE:
Chaos Under Heaven: Trump, Xi, and the Battle for the Twenty-First Century
Josh Rogin
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (March 9, 2021)
With more than two million deaths, more than a hundred million infected by COVID-19 worldwide, and a massive global disruption impacting some of the world’s most vulnerable populations, we cannot afford an investigation into the origins of the pandemic that is anything less than absolutely thorough and credible. If we fail to fully and courageously examine the origins of this pandemic, we risk being unprepared for a potentially worse pandemic in the future.
April 7, 2021
CALL FOR A FULL INVESTIGATION INTO THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19
In our previous open letter, we outlined our fears that the joint international committee/Chinese government team “did not have the mandate, the independence,or the necessary accesses to carry out a full and unrestricted investigation into all the relevant SARS-CoV-2 origin hypotheses.”Havingread the report entitled‘WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2: China part’ and reviewed the statementsmadein the March 30, 2021 WHO-organized press event announcing the report’s release, we have regrettably concluded that our concerns were fully justified.
Chaos Under Heaven: Trump, Xi, and the Battle for the Twenty-First Century
Josh Rogin
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (March 9, 2021)
Friday, April 16, 2021
COMPLAINT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION THE STATE OF TEXAS, THE STATE OF TEXAS and THE STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America; The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; TROY MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the United States Customs and Border Protection; UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; TAE JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; TRACY RENAUD, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Defendants.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GlfsQAFO2_-dqDEVpkvKQ-zQWF8Mj5-r/view?usp=sharing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION
THE STATE OF TEXAS
THE STATE OF TEXAS and THE STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiffs,
v.
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America; The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; TROY MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the United States Customs and Border Protection; UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; TAE JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; TRACY RENAUD, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Defendants.
COMPLAINT
No. 2:21-cv-00067-Z
Filed 04/13/21
In the first several hours following President Biden’s inauguration, the incoming Administration suspended the successful Migrant Protection Protocols (“MPP”). These regulations required individuals who both lacked a legal basis to be present in the United States and who had passed through Mexico en route to the United States to remain in Mexico pending adjudication of their immigration claims. Prior to the MPP, individuals passing through Mexico could enter the United States, raise asylum claims, expect to be released into the United States in violation of statutory requirements mandating their detention, and stay in the U.S. for years pending the resolution of their claims—even though most were ultimately rejected in court. MPP changed the incentives for economic migrants with weak asylum claims, and therefore reduced the flow of aliens—including aliens who are victims of human trafficking—to the southern border.
CLAIMS
COUNT I
(Arbitrary and Capricious Agency Action—Lack of Reasoned Decision-Making)
COUNT II
(Arbitrary and Capricious Agency Action—Failure to Consider State Reliance Interests)
COUNT III
(Arbitrary and Capricious Agency Action—Failure to Consider Alternative Approaches)
COUNT IV
(Arbitrary and Capricious Agency Action—No Stated Basis for Agency Action)
COUNT V
(Failure to Provide Notice to, and Consult with, Texas)
COUNT VI
(Violation of Section 1225)
COUNT VII
(Failure to Take Care that the Laws be Faithfully Executed)
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court:
a. Hold unlawful and set aside the January 20 Memorandum suspending new enrollments into the MPP;
b. Declare that the January 20 Memorandum is unlawful;
c. Issue preliminary and permanent injunctive relief enjoining Defendants nationwide from enforcing or implementing the January 20 Memorandum suspending new enrollments into the MPP;
d. Award Texas and Missouri the costs of this action and reasonable attorney’s fees; and
e. Award such other and further relief as the Court deems equitable and just.
REFERENCES:
KEN PAXTON
ATTORNEY GENERAL of TEXAS
April 13, 2021 | Press Release | Immigration AG Pax¬ton Sues Biden Administration to Reinstate Migrant Protection ProtocolsState of Texas v. Joseph R Biden (2:21-cv-00067)
District Court, N.D. Texas
CORRECTED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA State of Arizona, Plaintiff, v. Alejandro Mayorkas in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; United States Department of Homeland Security; Troy Miller in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Tae Johnson in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Defendants.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UO55SSb0HL1FM6d6E2EOBP8Y8_Z4xBDe/view?usp=sharing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
MARK BRNOVICH
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Monday, April 12, 2021
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
State of Arizona, Plaintiff,
v.
Alejandro Mayorkas in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; United States Department of Homeland Security; Troy Miller in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Tae Johnson in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Defendants.
CORRECTED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF No. 2:21-cv-00617-DWL
INTRODUCTION
This is an action challenging Defendants’ pervasive violations of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”) as it relates to immigration
policy. Although those immigration policies undeniably have significant effects on the
environment, Defendants have not even attempted to comply with NEPA.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
NEPA Violations
68. The allegations in the preceding paragraphs are reincorporated herein.
69. Population growth in the State of Arizona is the reasonably foreseeable,
direct, and proximate result of the Defendants actions, individually and when considered
collectively along with all past, present and reasonably foreseeable future actions.
70. Population growth has significant environmental effects within the State,
which Defendants were required to analyze under NEPA.
71. Each of the actions had other significant environmental effects which DHS
similarly failed to consider. In particular, Defendants have not prepared either an EIS or
EA to study the pertinent environmental effects.
72. In taking the above-referenced major federal actions without conducting any sort of environmental analysis, Defendants have taken final agency actions that are arbitrary, capricious, and otherwise not in accordance with law, or without observance of procedure required by law, within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. § 706(2). As such, Defendants’ actions should be held unlawful and set aside. Id.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Plaintiff respectfully request that this Court enter judgment:
A. Declaring that Defendants have violated NEPA by halting the construction of the
border wall in Arizona and by processing migrants into the United States who were
and who would have been covered by the MPP without preparing an EIS or EA;
B. Enjoining Defendants from continuing to take actions, including diverting and
impounding appropriated funds, to prevent the continuation of construction of border
wall under contracts already entered into by the United States until such time as
Defendants comply with NEPA;
C. Enjoining Defendants any further from processing migrants into the United States,
who were and who would have been covered by the MPP until such time as
Defendants comply with NEPA;
D. Enjoining Defendants to secure the border in Arizona to the satisfaction of this Court
to prevent additional unlawful migration until such time as Defendants comply with
NEPA;
E. Awarding Plaintiff costs of litigation, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, under the
Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412; and
F. Granting any and all other such relief as the Court finds appropriate.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 11th day of April, 2021.
ATTORNEY GENERAL
REFERENCE:
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich Attorney General Mark Brnovich Sues Federal Government Over Environmentally Harmful Immigration Decisions Monday, April 12, 2021
Wednesday, April 14, 2021
Richard M Fleming, PhD, MD, JD: Masterclass on SARS-CoV-2 with Host Miles Johnston
A 2-1/2 hour Masterclass on SARS-CoV-2 with Host Miles Johnston.
March 21, 2021 (2:29:17)
How Often Did People NOT Develop Covid-19?
Pfizer 17403/17411 (at 7-days after 2nd dose)
No Vaccine 17439/17511
Moderna 13923/13934 (at 14-days after 2nd dose)
No Vaccine 13698/13883
No statistical difference in the number of cases of Covid-19 whether vaccinated or not vaccinated.
Ergo, are these vaccines beneficial? Based on Pfizer, Moderna EUA (emergency use authorization) data and documents, “No.”
Vaccine Efficacy: How many people got Covid-19 in the vaccine group over the number of people who got Covid-19 in the non-vaccinated group (risk ratio).
1 – risk ratio = vaccine efficacy
Risks from vaccine: inflammation and blood clotting, affecting all population groups, healthy and people with comorbidities.
Spike proteins, product of gain-of-function, not natural, cross blood-brain barrier; animal models develop mad cow disease and lewy bodies and inflammation, causing neurological disorders translate to 1 1/2 years to develop in humans.
No statistically significant benefit from drug company’s EUA documents vs. inflammation and blood clotting, lewy bodies, mad cow disease
Experimental drug with people not signing informed consent forms.
Recommendation to Biden:
1. Immediate cessation of vaccinations of Americans and immediate reevaluation of vaccines (efficacy, potential consequences to vaccinated individuals)
2. Review of data and individuals involved in gain-of-function research and promulgation of vaccines
Monday, April 12, 2021
The Insurrection That Wasn’t: Anti-MAGA January 6th Documentary Accidentally Vindicates Trump Supporters: ‘You now have it from Bellingcat: the entire "threat to democracy" from 1/6 was not from events that actually happened, but from hypothetical events that *never* actually happened.’
The Insurrection That Wasn’t: Anti-MAGA January 6th Documentary Accidentally Vindicates Trump Supporters
April 12, 2021
One of the most important political themes Revolver covers is the complete weaponization of America’s national security apparatus against its own people — particularly Trump supporters.
You now have it from Bellingcat: the entire "threat to democracy" from 1/6 was not from events that actually happened, but from hypothetical events that *never* actually happened.
If the big conclusion is ominous speculation about what “might have been”, the hidden and embarrassing implication is there was a whole lot of nothing.
Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis: ‘Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression.’
Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
Published online 2020 Nov 22.
Conclusion
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISON LATINOS FOR TRUMP, BLACKS FOR TRUMP, JOSHUA MACIAS, M.S., B.G., J.B., J.J., Plaintiffs. v. PETE SESSIONS, MITCH McCONNELL, NANCY PELOSI, MARK ZUCKERBERG, CHUCK SCHUMER, ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, ALL MEMBERS OF THE 117TH U.S. CONGRESS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-CV-43
Latinos for Trump v. Sessions (6:21-cv-00043)
District Court, W.D. Texas
COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14386818). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Latinos for Trump. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - List of State Governors and Secretaries of State, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Cain Declaration 20210118, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Global Risk Analysis: Special Report, # 4 Exhibit 4-1, # 5 Exhibit 4-2, # 6 Exhibit 4-3, # 7 Exhibit 4-4, # 8 Exhibit 4-5, # 9 Exhibit 4-6, # 10 Exhibit 4-7, # 11 Exhibit 4-8, # 12 Exhibit 4-9, # 13 Exhibit 4-10, # 14 Exhibit 4-11, # 15 Exhibit 4-12, # 16 Exhibit 4-13, # 17 Exhibit 4-14, # 18 Exhibit 4-15, # 19 Exhibit 4-16, # 20 Exhibit 4-17, # 21 Exhibit 4-18, # 22 Exhibit 4-19, # 23 Exhibit 4-20, # 24 Exhibit 4-21, # 25 Exhibit 4-22, # 26 Exhibit 4-23, # 27 Exhibit 4-24, # 28 Exhibit 4-25)(Davis, Paul) (Entered: 01/18/2021)
January 18, 2021
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Latinos for Trump. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Joshua Macias, # 2 Exhibit Expert Report of Steve Vanderbol, # 3 Exhibit CV of Steve Vanderbol, # 4 Proposed Order Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Davis, Paul) (Entered: 01/19/2021) January 19, 2021
Amended MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Oral Hearing Requested by Latinos for Trump. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Global Risk Analysis: Special Report:, # 2 Exhibit B - CV of J.S. Vanderbol III, # 3 Exhibit C - Full Text of HAVA with Highlights, # 4 Exhibit D - Second Declaration of Joshua Macias, # 5 Exhibit E - Virginia Voter Registrationa Application, # 6 Exhibit F - Expressvote Screenshot, # 7 Exhibit G - Declaration of J.J., # 8 Exhibit H - Ballotopedia, Voting in Alabama, # 9 Proposed Order Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Davis, Paul) (Entered: 01/21/2021)
January 21, 2021
AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Class Action Complaint and Application for Injunctive Relief against All Defendants amending, filed by Blacks for Trump, J.J., B.G., Joshua Macias, Latinos for Trump, M.S., J.B.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Davis, Paul) (Entered: 02/10/2021)
February 10, 2021
AMENDED COMPLAINT SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants amending 12 Amended Complaint,., filed by Blacks for Trump, J.J., B.G., Joshua Macias, Latinos for Trump, M.S., J.B.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Davis, Paul) (Entered: 02/16/2021)
February 16, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISON
LATINOS FOR TRUMP, BLACKS FOR TRUMP, JOSHUA MACIAS, M.S., B.G., J.B., J.J., Plaintiffs.
v.
PETE SESSIONS, MITCH McCONNELL, NANCY PELOSI, MARK ZUCKERBERG, CHUCK SCHUMER, ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, ALL MEMBERS OF THE 117TH U.S. CONGRESS, et al., Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-CV-43
JURY TRIAL REQUESTED
District Court, W.D. Texas
January 18, 2021
Main Document
Complaint
Attachment 1 Exhibit 1 - List of State Governors
and Secretaries of State
Attachment 2 Exhibit 2 - Cain Declaration 20210118
Attachment 3 Exhibit 3 - Global Risk Analysis:
Special Report
Attachment 4 Exhibit 4-1
Attachment 5 Exhibit 4-2
Attachment 6 Exhibit 4-3
Attachment 7
Exhibit 4-4
Attachment 8 Exhibit 4-5
Attachment 9 Exhibit 4-6
Attachment 10 Exhibit 4-7
Attachment 11 Exhibit 4-8
Attachment 12 Exhibit 4-9
Attachment 13 Exhibit 4-10
Attachment 14 Exhibit 4-11
Attachment 15 Exhibit 4-12
Attachment 16 Exhibit 4-13
Attachment 17 Exhibit 4-14
Attachment 18 Exhibit 4-15
Attachment 19 Exhibit 4-16
Attachment 20 Exhibit 4-17
Attachment 21 Exhibit 4-18
Attachment 23 Exhibit 4-20
Attachment 24
Exhibit 4-21
Attachment 25 Exhibit 4-22
Attachment 26 Exhibit 4-23
Attachment 27 Exhibit 4-24
Attachment 28 Exhibit 4-25
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Latinos for Trump. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Joshua Macias, # 2 Exhibit Expert Report of Steve Vanderbol, # 3 Exhibit CV of Steve Vanderbol, # 4 Proposed Order Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Davis, Paul) (Entered: 01/19/2021) January 19, 2021
Main Document
Temporary Restraining Order
Attachment 1 Affidavit Declaration of Joshua Macias
Attachment 2 Exhibit Expert Report of Steve
Vanderbol
Attachment 3 Exhibit CV of Steve Vanderbol
Attachment 4 Proposed Order Proposed Temporary
Restraining Order
Amended MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Oral Hearing Requested by Latinos for Trump. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Global Risk Analysis: Special Report:, # 2 Exhibit B - CV of J.S. Vanderbol III, # 3 Exhibit C - Full Text of HAVA with Highlights, # 4 Exhibit D - Second Declaration of Joshua Macias, # 5 Exhibit E - Virginia Voter Registrationa Application, # 6 Exhibit F - Expressvote Screenshot, # 7 Exhibit G - Declaration of J.J., # 8 Exhibit H - Ballotopedia, Voting in Alabama, # 9 Proposed Order Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)(Davis, Paul) (Entered: 01/21/2021)
January 21, 2021
Main Document
Temporary Restraining Order
Attachment 1 Exhibit A - Global Risk Analysis:
Special Report:
Attachment 2 Exhibit B - CV of J.S. Vanderbol III
Attachment 3 Exhibit C - Full Text of HAVA with
Highlights
Attachment 4 Exhibit D - Second Declaration of Joshua
Macias
Attachment 5 Exhibit E - Virginia Voter
Registrationa Application
Attachment 6 Exhibit F - Expressvote Screenshot
Attachment 7 Exhibit G - Declaration of J.J.
Attachment 8 Exhibit H - Ballotopedia, Voting in
Alabama
Attachment 9 Proposed Order Proposed Temporary
Restraining Order
AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Class Action Complaint and Application for Injunctive Relief against All Defendants amending, filed by Blacks for Trump, J.J., B.G., Joshua Macias, Latinos for Trump, M.S., J.B.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Davis, Paul) (Entered: 02/10/2021)
February 10, 2021
Main Document
Amended Complaint
Attachment 1
Exhibit 1
Attachment 2
Exhibit 2
Attachment 3
Exhibit 3
Attachment 4
Exhibit 4
Attachment 5
Exhibit 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants amending 12 Amended Complaint,., filed by Blacks for Trump, J.J., B.G., Joshua Macias, Latinos for Trump, M.S., J.B.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Davis, Paul) (Entered: 02/16/2021)
February 16, 2021
Main Document
Amended Complaint
Attachment 1 Exhibit 1
Attachment 2 Exhibit 2
Attachment 3 Exhibit 3
Attachment 4 Exhibit 4
Attachment 5 Exhibit 5
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fCxnMkbVnn0aNY1QF7bicb9bunn3Hz-m/view?usp=sharing
PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEFUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISON
LATINOS FOR TRUMP, BLACKS FOR TRUMP, JOSHUA MACIAS, M.S., B.G., J.B., J.J., Plaintiffs.
v.
PETE SESSIONS, MITCH McCONNELL, NANCY PELOSI, MARK ZUCKERBERG, CHUCK SCHUMER, ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, ALL MEMBERS OF THE 117TH U.S. CONGRESS, et al., Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-CV-43
JURY TRIAL REQUESTED
This Lawsuit is about how both state and federal officials acted together as both “Democrats” and “Republicans” and as part of a “well-funded cabal”1 and “conspiracy”2 with various private persons, including persons in the news media, social media, and technology industry, high net worth individuals, and others, to willfully deprive the American People of their “most precious” and fundamental right: the right to the “Republican Form of Government” guaranteed by Article IV, Section 4 (the “Guarantee Clause”) of the Constitution of the United States and other fundamental civil rights.
COUNT ONE – Conspiracy and conduct to deprive of constitutional rights related to suffrage and the right to a republican form of government under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
COUNT TWO – Conspiracy and conduct to deprive of First Amendment rights and retaliate for the free exercise thereof under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, upon jury trial of this matter, plead for judgment against Defendants for the following:
a. Permanent injunctive relief in the form of a new federal election for both Congress and the President and Vice President.
b. Permanent injunctive relief forever restraining Defendants from participating in any action relating to the process of electing public officials, other than casting their own lawful vote as a citizen of the United States, or at least restraining Defendants from such participation in the new federal election to be ordered after trial on the merits,
c. Permanent injunctive relief forever restraining Defendants from violating Plaintiffs constitutional rights described herein,
d. General Damages in an amount to be determined at the time of trial;
e. Punitive Damages in an amount to be determined at the time of trial;
f. Reasonable attorneys fees’ and costs of suit; g. Prejudgment and postjudgment interest.
And all other general and special relief, whether at law or in equity as the Court may deem necessary or proper to which the Plaintiffs may be justly entitled.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)