CITY OF WOODLAKE, ET AL., Plaintiff/Respondent,v. TULARE COUNTY GRAND JURY, Defendant/ Appellant, Case No.: F060737, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

Disposition
City of Woodlake et al. v. Tulare County Grand Jury 

Case Number F060737 Description: Reversed in Full Date: 08/01/2011 Status: Final The order of June 3, 2010, is reversed insofar as it quashed, or declined to enforce, the grand jury subpoena duces tecum, and to the extent it required the grand jury to attach "an affidavit showing good cause for the production" of documents as a condition of the issuance of any further subpoenas directing respondent City of Woodlake, or its police department, to produce records. Detjen, Cornell, Franson (12 pgs) Publication Status: Signed Published Author:  Detjen, Jennifer R.S. Participants: Cornell, Dennis A. (Concur) Franson, Jr., Donald R. (Concur)

Opinion f060737

OPINION (Filed 8/1/11)
CITY OF WOODLAKE, ET AL., Plaintiff/Respondent,v. TULARE COUNTY GRAND JURY, Defendant/ Appellant, Case No.: F060737, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

Appellant's Opening F06073

Brief	Due Date	Date Filed	Party and Attorney	Notes
Appellant's opening brief.		12/10/2010	Defendant and Appellant: Tulare County Grand Jury Attorney: John F. Sliney	with amended proof of service copy to csmgr

Respondent's Brief.pdf

Brief	Due Date	Date Filed	Party and Attorney
Respondent's brief.		01/07/2011	Plaintiff and Respondent: City of Woodlake Attorney: Thomas T. Watson

Appellant's Reply.pdf

Brief	Due Date	Date Filed	Party and Attorney
Appellant's reply brief filed.		02/24/2011	Defendant and Appellant: Tulare County Grand Jury Attorney: John F. Sliney