Two Noteworthy 31 October 2016 Special Meeting Agenda Items

ABSTRACT: Two Noteworthy 31 October 2016 Agenda Items, namely PUBLIC APPEARANCES and TOUR OF INSPECTION, are presented. TOUR OF INSPECTION:

A. Carmel Police Department located on the eastside of Junipero Street between 4th and 5th Avenues
B. Flanders Mansion located at 25800 Hatton Road, Carmel, CA 93923
C. Rio Park at the Lasuen Road entrance
D. North Dunes of Carmel Beach accessible from the NW corner of San Antonio
E. Harrison Memorial Library Park Branch located on the NE corner of Mission Street and 6th Avenue.

Tour of Inspection Agenda 10-31-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
TOUR OF INSPECTION
Monday, October 31, 2016

CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

PUBLIC APPEARANCES Members of the public are entitled to speak on matters of municipal concern not on the agenda during Public Appearances. Each person’s comments shall be limited to 3 minutes, or as otherwise established by the City Council, Board or Commission. Matters not appearing on the City Council, Board or Commission’s agenda will not receive action at this meeting but may be referred to staff for a future meeting. Persons are not required to give their names, but it is helpful for speakers to state their names so that they may be identified in the minutes of the meeting.

TOUR OF INSPECTION (Beginning at 3:00 p.m.) The Council will meet in the Council Chamber to an on-site tour of inspection of all properties listed on the Agenda. Members of the public are welcome to participate in the tour.

A. Carmel Police Department located on the eastside of Junipero Street between 4th and 5th Avenues

B. Flanders Mansion located at 25800 Hatton Road, Carmel, CA 93923

C. Rio Park at the Lasuen Road entrance

D. North Dunes of Carmel Beach accessible from the NW corner of San Antonio

E. Harrison Memorial Library Park Branch located on the NE corner of Mission Street and 6th Avenue.

Twelve Noteworthy 1 November 2016 Regular Meeting Agenda Items

ABSTRACT: Twelve Noteworthy 1 November 2016 Regular Meeting Agenda Items are featured, including CLOSED SESSION, PUBLIC APPEARANCES, ANNOUNCEMENTS, Monthly Reports for September 2016. Consideration of a resolution accepting the new Memorial Bell installed in the World War I Memorial Arch at the intersection of Ocean Avenue and San Carlos Street, Consideration of a resolution affirming the City’s intent to participate in governance and financing discussions for the proposed Monterey Bay Community Power Joint Power Authority, Consideration of a Resolution authorizing the City Administrator to execute an agreement with Municipal Resource Group (MRG) LLC for Facilitated Evaluation Services for City Administrator and City Attorney, Authorization of the City Administrator to Execute Various Tree Trimming and Tree Maintenance Services Contracts for a Not to Exceed Amount of $680,000 for the Term of November 2, 2016 through June 30, 2018, Authorization of the City Administrator to execute an agreement with SSB Construction for the Vista Lobos Community Room roof project for an amount not to exceed $30,000.00, Adopt addendum to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for represented employees of the general employees union and management employees union, LIUNA/UPEX, Local 792, AFL-CIO bargaining agreement City of Carmel-by-the-Sea [N1636/N1636B] adopting preferred schedule effective January 1, 2012,  1. Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea to include provisions pursuant to Government Code 20516 “Cost Sharing” for Miscellaneous members in accordance with the previously approved Memorandum of Understanding and 2. Adoption of an Ordinance Authorizing an Amendment to the contract between the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea and the Board of Administration California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to deny Design Study (DS 15-217) and associated Coastal Development Permit application for the demolition of an existing residence and construction of a new residence located in the Single-Family Residential (R-1), Beach and Riparian (BR) and Archaeological Significance (AS) Overlay Zoning Districts. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING and Staff Reports document copies are embedded.

Agenda Regular Meeting 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, November 01, 2016
CLOSED SESSION 3:30 p.m.
OPEN SESSION 4:30 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

CLOSED SESSION

A. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a)
Agency Designated Representatives: Zutler
Employee Organization: Ambulance, General Employees, Management, Police

B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(D)(1)
Name of Case: City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff v. Pacific Harvest Seafoods, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, Defendants, Santa Clara County Case No. 16CV296492

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(D)(1)
Name of Case: Jacqueline Simonelli, Antonio C. Simonelli, Petitioners/Plaintiffs v. City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, Christopher Tescher, Dennis Levett, Pot D'Oro, LLC, and Doe 1 through Doe 100, inclusive, Respondents/Defendants Monterey County Superior Court Case No. M123079

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(D)(1)
Name of Case: Gerit Sand; Cobblestone Bakery, a sole proprietorship, Plaintiff v. City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Defendant - Monterey County Superior Court Case No. M130393

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(D)(1)
Name of Case: State Farm General Insurance Company, Plaintiff v. City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, and Does I through 10, Defendant - Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 16CV002381

C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 54956.9: 2 cases

 
PUBLIC APPEARANCES Members of the public are entitled to speak on matters of municipal concern not on the agenda during Public Appearances. Each person’s comments shall be limited to 3 minutes, or as otherwise established by the City Council, Board or Commission. Matters not appearing on the City Council, Board or Commission’s agenda will not receive action at this meeting but may be referred to staff for a future meeting. Persons are not required to give their names, but it is helpful for speakers to state their names so that they may be identified in the minutes of the meeting.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

A. Announcements from Closed Session
B. Announcements and reports from City Council Members
C. Announcements from City Administrator
D. Announcements from City Attorney

CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are routine in nature and do not require discussion or independent action. Members of the Council, Board or Commission or the public may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of Council, Board or Commission discussion and/ or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions.

3. Monthly Reports for September 2016.
Monthly Reports 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Monthly Reports for September 2016

4. SR 2016-1193 Consideration of a resolution accepting the new Memorial Bell installed in the World War I Memorial Arch at the intersection of Ocean Avenue and San Carlos Street.
Resolution Accepting the New Memorial Bell World War I Memorial Arch 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Consideration of a resolution accepting the new Memorial Bell installed in the World War I Memorial Arch at the intersection of Ocean Avenue and San Carlos Street.

7. SR 2016-1196 Consideration of a resolution affirming the City’s intent to participate in governance and financing discussions for the proposed Monterey Bay Community Power Joint Power Authority.
Monterey Bay Community Power Joint Powers Authority 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Consideration of a resolution affirming the City’s intent to participate in governance and financing discussions for the proposed Monterey Bay Community Power Joint Power Authority.

8. SR 2016-1197 Consideration of a Resolution authorizing the City Administrator to execute an agreement with Municipal Resource Group (MRG) LLC for Facilitated Evaluation Services for City Administrator and City Attorney.
Agreement With Municipal Resource Group 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Consideration of a Resolution authorizing the City Administrator to execute an agreement with Municipal Resource Group (MRG) LLC for Facilitated Evaluation Services for City Administrator and City Attorney.

10. SR 2016-1199 Authorization of the City Administrator to Execute Various Tree Trimming and Tree Maintenance Services Contracts for a Not to Exceed Amount of $680,000 for the Term of November 2, 2016 through June 30, 2018.
Various Tree Trimming and Tree Maintenance Services Contracts 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Authorization of the City Administrator to Execute Various Tree Trimming and Tree Maintenance Services Contracts for a Not to Exceed Amount of $680,000 for the Term of November 2, 2016 through June 30, 2018.

13. SR 2016-1202 Authorization of the City Administrator to execute an agreement with SSB Construction for the Vista Lobos Community Room roof project for an amount not to exceed $30,000.00.
Agreement With SSB Construction 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Authorization of the City Administrator to execute an agreement with SSB Construction for the Vista Lobos Community Room roof project for an amount not to exceed $30,000.00

PUBLIC HEARINGS

15. SR 2016-1204 Adopt addendum to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for represented employees of the general employees union and management employees union, LIUNA/UPEX, Local 792, AFL-CIO bargaining agreement City of Carmel-by-the-Sea [N1636/N1636B] adopting preferred schedule effective January 1, 2012.
Addendum to Memorandum of Understanding 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Adopt addendum to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for represented employees of the general employees union and management employees union, LIUNA/UPEX, Local 792, AFL-CIO bargaining agreement City of Carmel-by-the-Sea [N1636/N1636B] adopting preferred schedule effective January 1, 2012

16. SR 2016-1205 1. Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea to include provisions pursuant to Government Code 20516 “Cost Sharing” for Miscellaneous members in accordance with the previously approved Memorandum of Understanding and 2. Adoption of an Ordinance Authorizing an Amendment to the contract between the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea and the Board of Administration California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS).
Amendment CalPERS 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

1. Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea to include provisions pursuant to Government Code 20516 “Cost Sharing” for Miscellaneous members in accordance with the previously approved Memorandum of Understanding and 2. Adoption of an Ordinance Authorizing an Amendment to the contract between the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea and the Board of Administration California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS).

17. SR 2016-1206 Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to deny Design Study (DS 15-217) and associated Coastal Development Permit application for the demolition of an existing residence and construction of a new residence located in the Single-Family Residential (R-1), Beach and Riparian (BR) and Archaeological Significance (AS) Overlay Zoning Districts. The applicant/property owner is Art Chadwick.
Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Decision 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to deny Design Study (DS 15-217) and associated Coastal Development Permit application for the demolition of an existing residence and construction of a new residence located in the Single-Family Residential (R-1), Beach and Riparian (BR) and Archaeological Significance (AS) Overlay Zoning Districts. The applicant/property owner is Art Chadwick.

CITY COUNCIL: Draft Minutes for the Special Council Meeting September 19, 2016, Draft Minutes for the Special Council Meeting October 3, 2016 & Draft Minutes for the Regular Council Meeting October 4, 2016

DRAFT Minutes 11-01-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Draft Minutes for the Special Council Meeting September 19, 2016
Draft Minutes for the Special Council Meeting October 3, 2016
Draft Minutes for the Regular Council Meeting October 4, 2016

Mission Trail Nature Preserve Mountain View Avenue Entrance Project: (Photographic) PROGRESS REPORT WEEK TWELVE

View to the East, From Mountain View Avenue Entrance, Mission Trail Nature Preserve

Proceeding Number I.14-11-008 SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION’S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

ABSTRACT: Re: BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Investigation And Order to Show Cause on the Commission’s Own Motion into the Operations and Practices of Pacific Gas and Electric Company with Respect to Facilities Records for its Natural Gas Distribution System Pipelines, the SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION’S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING document copy is embedded. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Rule 16.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (“Rules”), the Safety and Enforcement Division (“SED”) hereby submits its application for rehearing of Decision (“D.”) 16-08-020 (“Decision”). Rule 16.1(c) explains that “[t]he purpose of an application for rehearing is to alert the Commission to a legal error, so that the Commission may correct it expeditiously.”1 To that end, SED advises the Commission that the Decision errs in its determination regarding PG&E’s violation of 49 Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) § 192.619, which is related to maximum allowable operating pressure (“MAOP”). The Decision’s determination that SED did not meet its burden in proving the 49 CFR § 192.619 violation is not supported by substantial evidence in light of the record, which includes PG&E’s admission to that violation. The Commission further errs in failing to adopt SED’s fine recommendation regarding MAOP, which was not disputed by PG&E in the event that PG&E was found in violation of that code section.

There are other errors in the Decision which will also be identified in this application. First, the Decision erroneously asserts that PG&E’s system is generally complaint and that “a system that works over 99% of the time is not a system in need of improvement.”2 Second, the Decision uses the wrong end date for the missing De Anza Records violations. Third, the Decision erroneously describes the applied fine for the Fresno Incident.
CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, SED’s recommendations should be adopted.

Safety and Enforcement Division’s Application for Rehearing 9-26-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 9-26-16
SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION’S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

Proceeding Number I.14-11-008 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF DECISION 16-08-020 SUBMITTED BY THE SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION

ABSTRACT: Re: BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Investigation And Order to Show Cause on the Commission’s Own Motion into the Operations and Practices of Pacific Gas and Electric Company with Respect to Facilities Records for its Natural Gas Distribution System Pipelines, the PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF DECISION 16-08-020 SUBMITTED BY THE SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION document copy is embedded. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Rule 16.1(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) hereby responds in opposition to the Safety and Enforcement Division’s (SED) application for rehearing of Decision 16-08-020 (Application).  SED’s Application disputes the evidentiary findings underlying the Decision or raises non-legal issues. The Application, therefore, fails to identify a “legal error” warranting rehearing by the Commission. The questions raised in the OII were thoroughly investigated over the course of nearly 18 months, including more than 400 pages of written testimony from eight fact witnesses and five experts on gas distribution recordkeeping.1 The parties submitted extensive post-trial briefing.2 SED and the City of Carmel unsuccessfully appealed the same issues raised in this Application.3 Because the Application fails to identify any legal error, it should be denied.

PG&E’s brief is organized as follows:

First, PG&E demonstrates that the Commission’s determination that PG&E’s “alternative method” for setting maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) for certain distribution systems complies with the applicable regulations is supported by substantial evidence, and thus does not constitute legal error.

Second, PG&E explains that the Commission’s finding that PG&E’s distribution system is “generally compliant” is supported by substantial evidence, that the isolated instances identified by SED are not sufficient to undermine the Commission’s determination, and that this finding thus does not constitute legal error.

Third, PG&E shows that there was no legal error in setting the $12.052 million fine for the missing De Anza Division paper records because that finding is fully supported by the factual record.

Fourth, PG&E explains that a typographical, but non-substantive, error in the description of the Fresno incident is not legal error warranting a rehearing.

Fifth, PG&E attaches as an Appendix—and incorporates by reference—its response to the appeals of SED and Carmel, which provides further support for the Commission’s findings that are challenged in the Application.4
CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, PG&E respectfully requests that SED’s Rehearing Application be denied.

Pg&e Company's Response to the Application for Rehearing of Decision 16-08-020 10-11-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-11-16
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO THE APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF DECISION 16-08-020 SUBMITTED BY THE SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 

North Dunes Area Of Carmel Beach, Carmel, Monterey: Consideration of a five year, renewable Coastal Development Permit (CDP 16-315) for habitat restoration, monitoring, and maintenance activities in the North Dunes area of Carmel Beach

CURRENTLY APPEALABLE LOCAL PERMITS

Central Coast District covering Santa Cruz, Monterey, and San Luis Obispo Counties

Local Government CDP Actions Appealable as of: October 27, 2016

Local Application No. CDP 16-315

CCC Post-Cert No. 3-CML-16-0998

Local Jurisdiction City of Carmel
Final Local Action Approved With Conditions
Applicant(s) Marc Weiner

Project Location North Dunes Area Of Carmel Beach, Carmel, Monterey County Apn: 06053-010321007000

Project Description Consideration of a five year, renewable Coastal Development Permit (CDP 16-315) for habitat restoration, monitoring, and maintenance activities in the North Dunes area of Carmel Beach.

Dates

Local Action 10/4/16

Local Action Notice Received 10/14/16

Appeal Period Starts 10/14/16

Appeal Period Ends 10/28/2016

Mission Trail Nature Preserve Mountain View Avenue Entrance Project: (Photographic) PROGRESS REPORT WEEK ELEVEN

View to the East, From Mountain View Avenue Entrance, Mission Trail Nature Preserve

Proceeding Number A.15-07-019 DECISION ADDRESSING WRAM BALANCES, RATE DESIGN, CONSERVATION AND RATIONING RULES, AND OTHER ISSUES FOR THE MONTEREY DISTRICT

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Authorization to Modify Conservation and Rationing Rules, Rate Design, and Other Related Issues for the Monterey District, the PROPOSED DECISION, DECISION ADDRESSING WRAM BALANCES, RATE DESIGN, CONSERVATION AND RATIONING RULES, AND OTHER ISSUES FOR THE MONTEREY DISTRICT document copy is embedded. IT IS ORDERED that:
1. California-American Water Company shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, file a Tier 2 advice letter in conformance with General Order 96-B. The advice letter shall request recovery of the 2013 and 2014 Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism/Modified Cost Balancing Account balance for the Monterey District of $39.8 million authorized in this decision, to be recovered over five years with interest at the 90-day commercial paper rate. The recovery shall be by a fixed monthly surcharge assessed on the basis of meter size using standard meter ratios. The multiple volumetric surcharges now in place for this recovery shall be terminated concurrent with the advice letter becoming effective.
2. Future Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism/Modified Cost Balancing Account advice letters filed and served by California-American Water Company (Cal-Am) for the Monterey District shall request recovery of under-collections (or refunds of over-collections) by a uniform surcharge (or surcredit) on each unit of water sold (volumetric rate) including Tier 1. Cal-Am shall provide customer notice of each such advice letter consistent with General Order (GO) 96-B. In addition, for each of the next three advice letter requests, Cal-Am shall notify all customers in the Monterey District by bill insert or direct mail of the request even if that notice is not otherwise required by GO 96-B. The Notice shall be approved by the Commission’s Public Advisor before it is issued by Cal-Am.
3. California-American Water Company (Cal-Am) shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, file a Tier 2 advice letter in conformance with General Order 96-B. The advice letter shall include tariffs for the Monterey District that: (a) eliminate the residential allotment system, (b) recover 30 percent of residential customer fixed costs in the residential monthly service charge, (c) use the temporary modification to standard residential meter ratios recommended by Cal-Am for recovery of the increased percentage of fixed costs in the residential monthly service charge, (d) use the standardized residential rate design recommended by Cal-Am in which each customer gets the same amount of water in each tier at the tier break points and modified block widths, (e) reduce the multiple of Tier 5 to Tier 1 residential rates to 8 as proposed by Cal-Am, (f) use 2015 residential consumption data for rate development, (g) apply a 30 percent discount from the monthly service charge and the rates in Tier 1 through 4 for customers in the low income ratepayer assistance program, and (h) move 8.4 percent of forecast revenue collection from residential to non-residential customers. Cal-Am shall, and parties may, as soon as feasible, recommend elimination of the temporary modification to the standard residential meter ratios for recovery of the increased percentage of fixed costs in the residential monthly service charge.
4. California-American Water Company shall study the following issue and report its findings along with its recommendations in Application 16-07-002. The issue is the potential for automatic enrollment in the low income ratepayer assistance program, along with coordination with energy utilities, municipalities, and community based organizations to provide conservation information and tools to its customers.
5. The June 17, 2016 Motion for Adoption of Settlement Agreement Between California-American Water Company and Monterey Peninsula Water Management District on the Annual Consumption True-Up Pilot Program and on the Modifications to Monterey District Rule 14.1.1 and Tariff Schedule MO-14.1.1 is denied. California-American Water Company and parties are encouraged to file and serve a motion for Commission adoption of an improved annual consumption true-up pilot program, with the improvements incorporating those stated in the body of this decision as well as addressing the issues also stated in the body of the decision. That motion, if any, shall be filed and served within 60 days of the date of this decision. The Administrative Law Judge may extend the 60 day deadline for good cause.
6. California-American Water Company (Cal-Am) shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, file a Tier 2 advice letter in conformance with General Order 96-B. The advice letter shall include a modified Monterey District Rule 14.1.1 and Tariff Schedule MO-14.1.1 that is consistent with the proposal attached to July 13, 2016 Reply Comments filed by Cal-Am and Monterey Peninsula Water Management District with one modification: Schedule 14.1.1 part B.4 (and related part(s) in Rule 14.1.1 if any) shall be modified to read: “Once the Schedule is activated, utility can implement Stages 2, 3, and 4 or change levels of the Emergency Conservation Rates, of the Schedule by filing a Tier 2 advice letter.”
7. Application 15-07-019 remains open to address (a) a motion, if filed, for Commission adoption of an improved annual consumption true-up pilot program, and (b) a penalty phase.

Proposed Decision of Alj Weatherford a1507019 10-18-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-18-16
DECISION ADDRESSING WRAM BALANCES, RATE DESIGN, CONSERVATION AND RATIONING RULES, AND OTHER ISSUES FOR THE MONTEREY DISTRICT 

Mission Trail Nature Preserve Mountain View Avenue Entrance Project: (Photographic) PROGRESS REPORT WEEK TEN

View to the East, From Mountain View Avenue Entrance, Mission Trail Nature Preserve

PLANNING COMMISSION REVISED REGULAR MEETING AGENDA, October 12, 2016

ABSTRACT: The CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA PLANNING COMMISSION REVISED REGULAR MEETING AGENDA and Planning Commission Reports documents copies for October 12, 2016 are embedded. PUBLIC HEARINGS, including Consideration of Concept Design Study (DS 16-378) for the demolition of an existing residence and construction of a new single-family residence located in the Single-Family Residential (R-1) Zoning District (Adam Jeselnick, Architect, NE Corner of 9th Avenue and Monte Verde), Consideration of a Use Permit (UP 16-191) application from the establishment of a full-line restaurant in the Service Commercial (SC) Zoning District (Fred Kern, SE Corner of Dolores & 7th) and Review of Municipal Code Title 17.14 (Commercial Zoning Districts) in order to evaluate if amendments should be made to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain land uses (Carmel-by-the-Sea Commercial Zoning Districts) are presented.

PC AGENDA 10-12-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

PLANNING COMMISSION REVISED REGULAR MEETING AGENDA, October 12, 2016

A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

Commissioners: Don Goodhue, Chair
Keith Paterson, Vice-Chair
Michael LePage
Julie Wendt
Gail Lehman

H. PUBLIC HEARINGS

If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.

1. DS 16-378 (Henkel)
Adam Jeselnick, Architect
NE Corner of 9th Avenue and Monte Verde
Block: 94; lot: 20
APN: 010-193-009
Consideration of Concept Design Study (DS 16-378) for the demolition of an existing residence and construction of a new single-family residence located in the Single-Family Residential (R-1) Zoning District
Henkel 10-12-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Consideration of Concept Design Study (DS 16-378) for the demolition of an existing residence and construction of a new single-family residence located in the Single-Family Residential (R-1) Zoning District

2. UP 16-191 (CPines7, LLC)
Fred Kern
SE Corner of Dolores & 7th
Block: 91; Lot(s): 2, 4, 6, & 8;
APN: 010-145-020
Consideration of a Use Permit (UP 16-191) application from the establishment of a full-line restaurant in the Service Commercial (SC) Zoning District.
CPines 7, LLC 10-12-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Consideration of a Use Permit (UP 16-191) application from the establishment of a full-line restaurant in the Service Commercial (SC) Zoning District.

3. Carmel-by-the-Sea
Commercial Zoning Districts
Review of Municipal Code Title 17.14 (Commercial Zoning Districts) in order to evaluate if amendments should be made to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain land uses
Review of Municipal Code Title 17.14 10-12-16 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Review of Municipal Code Title 17.14 (Commercial Zoning Districts) in order to evaluate if amendments should be made to require a Conditional Use Permit for certain land uses

Mission Trail Nature Preserve Mountain View Avenue Entrance Project: (Photographic) PROGRESS REPORT WEEK NINE

View to the East, From Mountain View Avenue Entrance, Mission Trail Nature Preserve

Carmel Art Association Presents GROUP SHOW 10 PERSPECTIVES – GROUP SCULPTURE SHOW & GALLERY SHOWCASE ALICIA MEHEEN ‘THE HIGH COUNTRY’ & GALLERY SHOWCASE TIM SLOAN

Carmel Art Association

Mission Statement: 
The Association exists to provide its members with a permanent art gallery, to advance knowledge of, and interest in the arts, and to create a spirit of cooperation and fellowship among artists and the community. 

A Proud Heritage: 

The legendary Carmel Art Association was formed on August 8, 1927 by a small group of artists who gathered at “Gray Gables,” the modest home/studio of Josephine Culbertson and Ida Johnson at the corner of Seventh and Lincoln in Carmel-by-the-Sea. These nineteen “pioneers”—who grew up in the 19th century and individually found their respective paths to Carmel from all corners of the world—each desired a greater sense of community, a spirit of collaboration, and a place to show their work. Before the meeting concluded, they had established an association with a mission “to advance art and cooperation among artists, secure a permanent exhibition space, and promote greater fellowship between artists and the public.” 

W/s Dolores St. between 5th Av. & 6th Av.
10:00 A.M. – 5:00 P.M., Daily
Open to the Public at No Charge

For more information, Online or (831) 624-6176.

Carmel Art Association Presents GROUP SHOW 10 PERSPECTIVES – GROUP SCULPTURE SHOW & GALLERY SHOWCASE ALICIA MEHEEN ‘THE HIGH COUNTRY’ & GALLERY SHOWCASE TIM SLOAN

Thursday, October 6 – Tuesday, November 1, 2016

GROUP SHOW 10 PERSPECTIVES – GROUP SCULPTURE SHOW

EleenAuvil, Blaine Black, Kathleen Crocetti, Micah Curtis, Laurent Davidson, Douglas Downs, Yves Goyatton, Peter Hiers, Chris Sawyer, Gustavo Torres.

GALLERY SHOWCASE ALICIA MEHEEN “THE HIGH COUNTRY”
Alicia Meheen presents "The High Country", a new collection of paintings in watercolor. View twenty-four watercolor and oil images including “Fall Day On Ebbetts Pass,” “Fading Light,” “Morning Light,” “A Touch of Winter,” “Weathered,” “Sierra Fall,” “Valley View,” “Kirkwood Lake,” “Woods Lake Fall,” “Jake’s Pond,” “In the High Country,” “Glacier Park 2,” “Glacier Park 1,” “Fall Wild Sunflowers,” “Lake Tahoe,” “Sierra Fall,” “South Of Seal Rock, Pebble Beach,” “Summer Mood, Pebble Beach,” “Carmel River Lagoon Spring,” “Spring Field,” “Fishermans Wharf,” “Cypress Pt.,” “Carmel Mission” and “Carmel Beach.”

GALLERY SHOWCASE TIM SLOAN
Tim Sloan shows new oils inspired by scenes from the Coast to the Central Valley. View twenty-nine oil painting images including “Monterey Wharf,” “Harbor Scene,” “Big Sur Spring,” “Young Cypress,” “Chinese Door,” “Lunch in Monterey,” “Valley Meadow,” “Old Corner Market,” “Spring Blossoms,” “Monterey Wharf,” “Monterey Morning,” “Morning Fog,” “Bayside Cypress,” “Haystacks,” “Sunflower Fields,” “Point Sur,” “Cypress by the Sea,” “Sunset,” “Mist at Red Fish Lake,” “Vernal Pools,” “Sierra Pine,” “Hope Valley Fall,” “The Old Corral,” “Coffee Break,” “Mt. Tallac,” “American River,” “The Yellow Hat,” “Reflection” and “Resting On Pillows,”

Opening Reception: Saturday, October 8, 5:00 P.M. – 7:00 P.M.

MEET THE ARTISTS
Sculpture Demonstrations
Saturday, October 8, 3:00 P.M. -5:00 P.M.

Yves Goyatton, Kathleen Crocetti and Douglas Downs will do sculpture demonstrations outdoors in our beautiful sculpture garden. Free.

ADDENDUM:
Carmel Art Association on facebook