Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE OCTOBER 12, 2017 MOTION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO STRIKE TESTIMONY

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE OCTOBER 12, 2017 MOTION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO STRIKE TESTIMONY document copy is embedded. CONCLUSION For all of the reasons stated above, all of MCWD’s evidence that Cal-Am seeks to exclude from the Commission’s consideration is relevant to issues of consequence in this proceeding, as set forth in the Issues Ruling. None of the challenged MCWD testimony impermissibly states a legal conclusion. Cal-Am’s motion to strike constitutes yet another attempt by Cal-Am to silence opinions contrary to its own view and to deprive the Commission of a full and up-to-date factual record. Cal-Am’s motion to strike should be denied.

Mcwd's Response in Opposition to the October 12, 2017 Motion of Cal-Am to Strike Testimony 10-20-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-20-17

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE OCTOBER 12, 2017 MOTION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO STRIKE TESTIMONY