TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
MONTEREY PENINSULA REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY (MPRWA)
June 4, 2018
Thursday, May 31, 2018
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY (MPRWA) AGENDA & MINUTES, June 4, 2018
TAC MPRWA Agenda Packet 06-04-18 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd
AGENDA PACKET, REGULAR MEETING
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
MONTEREY PENINSULA REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY (MPRWA)
June 4, 2018
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
MONTEREY PENINSULA REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY (MPRWA)
June 4, 2018
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDAS– WORKSHOPS Strategic Plan, May 29 & June 1, 2018
Agenda 05-29-18 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - WORKSHOP
Friday, June 1, 2018
Sunset Center Chapman Room
OPEN SESSION
1:00 PM
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - WORKSHOP
Tuesday, May 29, 2018
Sunset Center Chapman Room
OPEN SESSION
11:00 AM
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - WORKSHOP
Friday, June 1, 2018
Sunset Center Chapman Room
OPEN SESSION
1:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - WORKSHOP
Tuesday, May 29, 2018
Sunset Center Chapman Room
OPEN SESSION
11:00 AM
Monday, May 28, 2018
COMMENTARY An Indictment of the Current City Council: 'it was clear that this had been hatched.' 'I do not think we have a transparent and open government that communicates with people.'
In an article entitled “Hardy, Theis seek reelection; Baron to challenge,” The Carmel Pine Cone, May 25, 2018, the article states, in part, as follows:
Regarding the remodel and expansion proposed for the 60-year-old police station, for instance, “We’re not thinking big enough,” he (Jeff Baron) said.
“I’m afraid that we’re putting a band-aid on something where we just need to start over,” he said. “I would want to understand what our options are.”
The Carmel P.D. project also raises concerns about transparency, according to Baron. At a recent budget discussion, the council increased the project by $400,000, to $1.9 million, but the idea wasn’t raised until after the public-comment period had closed — “which means they don’t want public comment on the $400,000.”
“When I was sitting there in the audience and that was happening, it was clear that this had been hatched,” he said. “I do not think we have a transparent and open government that communicates with people.”
Resident and city council candidate Jeff Baron’s comment “that this had been hatched” and the increased expenditure of $400,000 wasn’t broached until after public comment “means they don’t want public comment on the $400,000” is insightful. Not only is this anecdotal evidence that the current city government is operating in a manner antithetical to open and transparent city government, but the current city council appears to evince a contempt and disdain for the public at large generally and public input into the governmental process specifically.
L. A. Paterson
REFERENCE:
Hardy, Theis seek reelection; Baron to challenge Three candidates step up well in advance of November council race, By MARY SCHLEY, The Carmel Pine Cone, May 25, 2018. 1A & 18A &19A
“When I was sitting there in the audience and that was happening, it was clear that this had been hatched,” he said. “I do not think we have a transparent and open government that communicates with people.”
L. A. Paterson
REFERENCE:
Hardy, Theis seek reelection; Baron to challenge Three candidates step up well in advance of November council race, By MARY SCHLEY, The Carmel Pine Cone, May 25, 2018. 1A & 18A &19A
Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts, the City Council & FREE SPEECH, MONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY, 02.01.18
ABSTRACT: Regarding the CITY COUNCIL Staff Report May 1, 2018, Consider Continuing, Modifying, or Eliminating Home Mail Delivery Service Provided by the City, a resident contacted the author of the Staff Report, Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts (APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator) with queries on May 18 and 19, 2018. The body of the communication is reproduced. Additionally, the Staff Report, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Peninsula Messenger Service On-site Mail Delivery Service (October 1, 2016 – June 30, 2018) and HOME MAIL DELIVERY REQUEST LIST (March 2018) document copies are embedded. Neither Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts, nor any member of the city council responded to the communication, antidotal evidence of the contention of Nikki Moore, general counsel, California News Publishers Association, namely, “They don’t feel they have a duty as a governing agency to get back to you,” as reported in MONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY.
Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts:
Please address the following queries:
I. From the BACKGROUND/SUMMARY of your Staff Report, please provide the source document for the statement “During FY 2000-2001, the Council decided to contract with a courier service to provide home mail delivery to residents “who are physically unable or who for some other reason cannot obtain their mail on a regular basis from the post office located in Carmel-by-the-Sea”.” (please provide source document as an attachment in your response)
II. RE: Peninsula Messenger Service's contract, entered into in September 2015, provided for charges to the City based on a rate of $33.00 per home delivery address per month during the initial year (FY 2015-2016). The rate applicable to years two and three of the contract (FY 2016-2017 and FY 2017-2018) increased to $35.00 per home delivery address per month. For a number of years preceding the contract, the participation rate had remained fairly stable at approximately 125 residents. Thus for the nine months of service rendered in FY 2015- 2016, the total cost was projected at $37,125 per year and was assumed to be $52,500 per year for the two full subsequent fiscal years (for a total contract amount of $142,125). Since mid-2016, the number of participants has increased by nearly 13% to 141 residents as of April 2018.
Compensation. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT in an amount not to exceed $142,125.00, which said sum shall include all costs, as presented in the proposal dated August 6, 2015 (Exhibit "A"), and in accordance with this Contract. The cost breakdown is as follows:
a) October 1, 2015- June 30, 2016: $33.00 per client; assumes 125 clients a month for nine months for a total of $37, 125.00;
b) July 1, 2016- June 30, 2017: $35.00 per client; assumes 125 clients a month for twelve months for a total of $52,500;
c) July 1, 2017- June 30, 2018: $35.00 per client; assumes 125 clients a month for twelve months for a total of $52,500;
SOURCE: CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Peninsula Messenger Service
On-site Mail Delivery Service
September 14, 2015
COMMENT: Your Staff Report states “per home delivery address,” whereas the Professional Services Agreement states “per client.” Moreover, your Staff Report states “141 residents as of April 2018,” whereas the HOME MAIL DELIVERY REQUEST LIST (March 2018) has 141 home delivery addresses and 153 residents, excluding Carmel Police, City Hall and Fire Ambulance.
Explain the discrepancies between your Staff Report and the PSA and HOME MAIL DELIVERY REQUEST LIST (March 2018). Additionally, this LIST is not up-to-date as there are deceased persons on the LIST.
III. RE: Exhibit B CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ON-SITE MAIL DELIVERY SERVICES RFP#15-16-01: ON-SITE MAIL DELIVERY SERVICES
1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea is seeking to enter into a three (3) year service agreement for on-site mail delivery services within the city limits of Carmel-by-the-Sea. As such, the City is soliciting, through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, firms interested in providing said service. The selected firm will be expected to deliver mail to a variety of recipients including residents and City staff in a timely, consistent, courteous and customer focused manner, in accordance with US Postal Service standards.
IV. RE: FY 2018-2019 POLICY DIRECTION
Options 1-4
Given the stated “expense” concern of the HOME MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE, why not eliminate the entire expenditure with another Option, USPS home mail delivery to all residents who want it by assigning home addresses and allowing mail boxes in the public right-of-way?
V. Is the USPS obligated to deliver mail to handicapped persons at their residences? And are there currently any handicapped Carmel-by-the-Sea residents receiving mail via USPS at their residences?
VI. If “physically unable” was the standard for courier mail delivery service, then how is it that City Hall, Carmel Police and Fire Ambulance qualified for courier mail delivery service?
Thank you for your responses. Ms. Paterson
CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
May 1, 2018
ORDERS OF BUSINESS
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Consider Continuing, Modifying, or Eliminating Home Mail Delivery Service Provided by the City.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Peninsula Messenger Service
On-site Mail Delivery Service
October 1, 2016 – June 30, 2018
REFERENCE:
FREE SPEECH, The Buzz 02.01.18, Feb 1, 2018, MONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY
Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts:
RE: CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
May 1, 2018
ORDERS OF BUSINESS
SUBJECT: Consider Continuing, Modifying, or Eliminating Home Mail Delivery Service Provided by the City.
CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
May 1, 2018
ORDERS OF BUSINESS
SUBJECT: Consider Continuing, Modifying, or Eliminating Home Mail Delivery Service Provided by the City.
I. From the BACKGROUND/SUMMARY of your Staff Report, please provide the source document for the statement “During FY 2000-2001, the Council decided to contract with a courier service to provide home mail delivery to residents “who are physically unable or who for some other reason cannot obtain their mail on a regular basis from the post office located in Carmel-by-the-Sea”.” (please provide source document as an attachment in your response)
II. RE: Peninsula Messenger Service's contract, entered into in September 2015, provided for charges to the City based on a rate of $33.00 per home delivery address per month during the initial year (FY 2015-2016). The rate applicable to years two and three of the contract (FY 2016-2017 and FY 2017-2018) increased to $35.00 per home delivery address per month. For a number of years preceding the contract, the participation rate had remained fairly stable at approximately 125 residents. Thus for the nine months of service rendered in FY 2015- 2016, the total cost was projected at $37,125 per year and was assumed to be $52,500 per year for the two full subsequent fiscal years (for a total contract amount of $142,125). Since mid-2016, the number of participants has increased by nearly 13% to 141 residents as of April 2018.
Compensation. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT in an amount not to exceed $142,125.00, which said sum shall include all costs, as presented in the proposal dated August 6, 2015 (Exhibit "A"), and in accordance with this Contract. The cost breakdown is as follows:
a) October 1, 2015- June 30, 2016: $33.00 per client; assumes 125 clients a month for nine months for a total of $37, 125.00;
b) July 1, 2016- June 30, 2017: $35.00 per client; assumes 125 clients a month for twelve months for a total of $52,500;
c) July 1, 2017- June 30, 2018: $35.00 per client; assumes 125 clients a month for twelve months for a total of $52,500;
SOURCE: CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Peninsula Messenger Service
On-site Mail Delivery Service
September 14, 2015
Explain the discrepancies between your Staff Report and the PSA and HOME MAIL DELIVERY REQUEST LIST (March 2018). Additionally, this LIST is not up-to-date as there are deceased persons on the LIST.
III. RE: Exhibit B CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ON-SITE MAIL DELIVERY SERVICES RFP#15-16-01: ON-SITE MAIL DELIVERY SERVICES
1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea is seeking to enter into a three (3) year service agreement for on-site mail delivery services within the city limits of Carmel-by-the-Sea. As such, the City is soliciting, through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, firms interested in providing said service. The selected firm will be expected to deliver mail to a variety of recipients including residents and City staff in a timely, consistent, courteous and customer focused manner, in accordance with US Postal Service standards.
QUESTION:
“Variety of recipients” appears not to discriminate between “physically
unable” and physically able? Do you agree?
Options 1-4
Given the stated “expense” concern of the HOME MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE, why not eliminate the entire expenditure with another Option, USPS home mail delivery to all residents who want it by assigning home addresses and allowing mail boxes in the public right-of-way?
VI. If “physically unable” was the standard for courier mail delivery service, then how is it that City Hall, Carmel Police and Fire Ambulance qualified for courier mail delivery service?
NOTE: Peninsula Messenger Service LLC is compensated "per home address," according to Stephanie Morse, Peninsula Messenger LLC
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
May 1, 2018
ORDERS OF BUSINESS
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Consider Continuing, Modifying, or Eliminating Home Mail Delivery Service Provided by the City.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Peninsula Messenger Service
On-site Mail Delivery Service
October 1, 2016 – June 30, 2018
REFERENCE:
FREE SPEECH, The Buzz 02.01.18, Feb 1, 2018, MONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY
Saturday, May 26, 2018
JOINT INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT, STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
ABSTRACT: On May 15, 2018, STEVEN J. ANDRE, Attorney for Plaintiff STACY LININGER and RYAN THOMPSON, Attorneys for Defendants RONALD PFLEGER and CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA submitted JOINT INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT, , STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. The JOINT INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT document copy is embedded.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants.
Case No. 5:17-cv-03385-SVK
JOINT INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
Lininger Document 52 05-15-18 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants.
Case No. 5:17-cv-03385-SVK
JOINT INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
NOTICE OF APPEAL, STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, v. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ABSTRACT: On April 16, 2018, Steven J. Andre,. Attorney for Plaintiff, STACY LININGER filed a NOTICE OF APPEAL, STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, v. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. “Notice is hereby given that plaintiff, STACY LININGER, in the above-named case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the order dismissing Plaintiff’s action as to defendant, DEAN FLIPPO, entered in this action on the fourth day of April, 2018, with plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of that order denied on April 26, 2018.” The NOTICE OF APPEAL document copy is embedded.
STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, v. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants,
Case No 5:17-cv-03385-SVK
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Lininger Document 53 05-15-18 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, v. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants,
Case No 5:17-cv-03385-SVK
NOTICE OF APPEAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, STACY LININGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RONALD PFLEGER, Sergeant; CITY OF CARMEL; FLIPPO DEAN, District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.
ABSTRACT: RE: Office
of the Clerk
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STACY LININGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RONALD PFLEGER, Sergeant; CITY OF CARMEL; FLIPPO DEAN, District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 18-15886
D.C. No. 5:17-cv-03385-SVK
U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Jose
TIME SCHEDULE ORDER
United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box
193939
San Francisco,
California 94119-3939
415-355-8000Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
May 16, 2018
No.: 18-15886
D.C. No.:
5:17-cv-03385-SVK
Short Title:
Stacy Lininger v. Ronald Pfleger, et al
Post Office Box
193939
San Francisco,
California 94119-3939
May 16, 2018
No.: 18-15886
D.C. No.:
5:17-cv-03385-SVK
Short Title:
Stacy Lininger v. Ronald Pfleger, et al
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STACY LININGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RONALD PFLEGER, Sergeant; CITY OF CARMEL; FLIPPO DEAN, District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 18-15886
D.C. No. 5:17-cv-03385-SVK
U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Jose
TIME SCHEDULE ORDER
Thursday, May 24, 2018
PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (PRA) LOG MARCH 2018, PRA 2018-28 through PRA 2018-053
ABSTRACT: For the month of March 2018, the City Clerk’s Office received twenty-six California Public Records Act requests, specifically PRA 2018-028 through PRA 2018-053, according to the CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA Monthly Report April 2018 to Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, SUBMITTED BY Thomas A. Graves, City Clerk and APPROVED BY Chip Rerig, City Administrator. Information for each PRA request, including REQUEST NUMBER, REQUEST DATE, COMPLETED DATE, REQUESTOR and INFORMATION REQUESTED and City Response document copies are embedded.
PRA 2018-039 City Response
PRA LOG
MARCH 2018
PRA 2018-028
through PRA 2018-053
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-028
REQUEST DATE 3/1/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/6/2018
REQUESTOR Mary Schley - Pine Cone
INFORMATION
REQUESTED RE: US Treasury, $12,100 federal tax penalty 2015 - Elaborate on
the penalty? What happened to make the filing late? How was the
penalty calculated? Didn't realize local governments had to pay federal
taxes…What does Carmel pay taxes on? How much are the taxes?
PRA 2018-028 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-029
REQUEST DATE 3/2/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/12/2018
REQUESTOR Paterson
INFORMATION
REQUESTED E-copies
of the City's responses to PRA requests, City Clerk's Office, REQUEST NUMBERS
2018-001 through 2018-016, sent electronically to requestors
PRA 2018-029 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-030
REQUEST DATE 3/2/2018 3/5/18
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018;
Completed - contained in response to 038-047
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
building & code violations on: Mission St., San Carlos St., Junpero St.,
Santa Fe. CLARIFICATION - all building and code violations on these
streets for the past 6 months, Sept. 6, 2017 to March 6, 2018
NOTES 3/5/18 request for clarification –
street location and timeframe
PRA 2018-030 City
Response
View PRA 2018-038
– PRA 2018-047 City Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-031
REQUEST DATE 3/5/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/13/2018
REQUESTOR Mary Schley - Pine Cone
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Provide
an accounting of all costs related to the Simonelli v Carmel cases, to date
PRA 2018-031 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-032
REQUEST DATE 2/9/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/7/2018
REQUESTOR JSR – Attorney with JRG
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Fink/Goodhue
Trust Trash Enclosure Encroachment (EN 17-67) and Fink/Goodhue Condominium (DS
16-477) See PRA request letter for details.
PRA 2018-032 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-033
REQUEST DATE 3/12/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/12/2018
REQUESTOR Paterson
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Electronic
copies of the following: 1. 12.29.17 Letter from J. Retterer to G. Mozingo
re Fink Appeal 2. 2.9.18 Letter to Graves re Public Records Act
Request 3. Woody_s Group_Inc. v. City of Newport Beach (2015) 233
Cal. App. 4th 1012 4. Kathleen Fitzgerald letter
PRA 2018-033 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-034
REQUEST DATE 3/13/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/14/2018
REQUESTOR Paterson
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Electronic
copies of Attachment “A” (photographic inventory) and Attachment “B” (User
Agreement) addressing Grant of license; license area; condition of license area;
permitted uses; submittal of performance/rehearsal/technical work schedules;
move-in-and move-out procedures; outdoor theater hours of operation (including
restrictions and limitations); rental rates; housekeeping responsibilities;
payment schedules; Forest Theater rules and regulations; building use regulations;
handling of hazardous building materials; compliance with legal requirements,
including maintenance of Workers' Compensation Insurance; indemnity; liability
of user; retention of deposit; security; inspection; liability insurance; and
books and records; protection of property and facilities and food and beverage
service, of FOREST THEATER LEASE AGREEMENT Between CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA A
Municipal Corporation and SUNSET CULTURAL CENTER A California Nonprofit Public
Benefit Corporation, July 1, 2017.
PRA 2018-034 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-035
REQUEST DATE 3/13/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/13/2018
REQUESTOR Paterson
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Follow-up
to PRA 2018-029: electronic copies of omitted documents as follows: PRA
2018-006; PRA 2018-009; PRA 2018-012 PDF SOQ Municipal Services.pdf
PRA 2018-035 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-036
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/14/2018
REQUESTOR Paterson
INFORMATION
REQUESTED 1.
Electronic copies of City's response to REQUESTOR Richard Andre stating The
City has no responsive records pursuant to this request or other statement of
responses to his INFORMATION REQUESTED Copies of letters submitted at August
meeting regarding beach fires. 2. Electronic copy of City's response to
REQUESTOR Mary Schley - Carmel Pine Cone stating The City has no responsive
records pursuant to this request or other statement of response to her INFORMATION
REQUESTED 2017 Salary Suvey - annual accounting of all salaries, OT, medical
benefits, AD&D, vision, dental, retirement, vacation, holiday, medical, uniform
allowance, etx. For everyone on the city payroll 3. Electronic copies of
Copies of letters submitted at August meeting regarding beach fires 4. Electronic
copies of 2017 Salary Survey - annual accounting of all salaries, OT, medical
benefits, AD&D, vision, dental, retirement, vacation, holiday, medical, uniform
allowance, etc. for everyone on the city payroll
PRA 2018-036 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-037
REQUEST DATE 3/8/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/14/2018
REQUESTOR Lawton Dodd, KSBW
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Any
and all documentation in possession of Carmel city officers regarding the
"assault for hire" referenced by City Attorney Glen Mozingo during
the city council meeting/press conference on Wednesday morning, March 7, 2018.
More specifically, during the press conference, Mr. Mozingo stated that the
city discovered a plot involving a person from Salinas hired for $100 to go to
a Carmel bar and attempt to start a "bar room brawl" with Mayor Steve
Dallas in order to embarrass the mayor.
PRA 2018-037 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-038
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: 2nd ave, 3rd Ave, 4th Ave, 5th Ave.
PRA 2018-038 City
Response through PRA 2018-047
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-039
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: 6th Ave, 7th Ave, 8th Ave, 9th Ave
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-040
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: 14th Ave, 15th Ave, Lincoln St, Valley Way
PRA 2018-040 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-041
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: Atherton Dr, Rio Rd, Santa Lucia Ave, Scenic
Rd
PRA 2018-041 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-042
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: 10th Ave, 11th Ave, 12th Ave, 13th Ave
PRA 2018-042 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-043
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: Carmel Gate, N Casanova St, Casanova St, Palou
Ave
PRA 2018-043 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-044
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: Dolores St, San Carlos St, 1st Ave, Santa
Rita
PRA 2018-044 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-045
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: Guadalupe St, Carpenter St, Lobos St, Monte Verde
St
PRA 2018-045 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-046
REQUEST DATE 3/14/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: Lorca Ln, Camino Del Monte, Torres St, Vista
Ave
PRA 2018-046 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-047
REQUEST DATE 3/15/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/15/2018
REQUESTOR Denise Eccher
INFORMATION
REQUESTED All
Building & code violations on: N. San Antonio, San Antonio Ave, Camino
Real, Ocean Ave
PRA 2018-047 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-048
REQUEST DATE 3/16/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/23/2018
REQUESTOR Paterson
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Electronic
copies of all public legal documents regarding M130393, Sand, Gerit et al. vs.
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
PRA 2018-048 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-049
REQUEST DATE 3/27/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/29/2018
REQUESTOR Mary Schley - Pine Cone
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Correspondence
received/sent by the city this week regarding restaurant seats. I understand
Rich Pepe sent emails focusing on La Bicyclette and would like copies of all email
involving them, as well as any other correspondence on the subject received
this week, if any.
PRA 2018-049 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-050
REQUEST DATE 3/27/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/29/2018
REQUESTOR Royal Calkins
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Accounting
of all payments from the city to Glen Mozingo, Gerard Rose and Jon Giffen since July of 2017
and any written explanation of each of the payments
PRA 2018-050 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-051
REQUEST DATE 3/27/2018
COMPLETED DATE 3/29/2018
REQUESTOR Gabe Georis
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Copy
of the email or request from Richard Pepe to have seats examined in neighboring
restaurants
PRA 2018-051City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-052
REQUEST DATE 3/30/2018 4/3/18
4/4/18
COMPLETED DATE 4/2/2018
4/3/2018 4/5/18
REQUESTOR Cody Phillips
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Number
of hotel units from which the City receives transient occupancy taxes Followup
request: how many units the City received TOT for in each bi-monthly
period of 2017 Follow-up Request #2: Breakdown by property (i.e. hotel)
for the number of units occupied during the May-June and July-August periods
PRA 2018-052 City
Response
REQUEST NUMBER 2018-053
REQUEST DATE 3/30/2018
COMPLETED DATE 4/3/2018
REQUESTOR Sushma Alvar
INFORMATION
REQUESTED Business
information (for profit and nonprofit) of companies (LLC, Ccorp, Scorp, PC, LP)
and organizations operating in Carmel since August of 2016 to present
PRA 2018-053 City
Response
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)