Democrat Senator Mark Warner Advocates for Military Coup against President Trump
December 4, 2025 | Sundance |
While Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin advances the efforts of the Intelligence Community to undermine, isolate, ridicule and marginalize President Trump, ultimately a seditious coup, Virginia Senator Mark Warner now calls for the military to engage in supporting that coup.
As with all things espoused by the professional, the language is worded for plausible deniability; however the expressed intent is clear for those non-pretending. What else is meant by:
…”I think in many ways the uniformed military may help save us from this president and his lame people like Hegseth. Because I think that their commitment is to the constitution and obviously not to Trump.”
'I want to get the truth': Intel Cmte. Vice Chair on briefing with Admiral Bradley
(6:45)
Now put your mindset back about a decade, and ask yourself what would have been the response from media if Senator Jeff Sessions said it was his hope the U.S. military would reject instructions from President Obama, and instead follow the guidelines of his political opposition?
But rather than play ‘whataboutism’, let’s evaluate if Mark Warner was successful. What exactly does that success look like?
A military overthrow of the United States government from within?
A follow up question should be: “Senator Warner, are you asking for a military led overthrow of the United States government?” If no, then how is your expressed preference any different? Please explain the distinction.
In the background, 99% of Washington DC “reporting” is not “reporting”, rather it’s transactional business exchanges, generated for income. [Screenplay distribution]
If “conservative reporters” based in DC were actually involved in the process of ‘journalism’, they would be interviewing and questioning people (McCord, Wolfe, Jones, Warner and various staff), not merely discussing them.
Rather than talk about what [XXX] is doing, or what motivates [XXX], they would simply be going to [XXX] asking questions (on/off camera) and then reporting on what [XXX] responds with.
Instead, what we are getting is a screenplay, that the ‘journalists’ (battling for influence) sell through various platforms.
From here on out when I see the screenplay, I will strongly draw attention to it. After a few examples it will become obvious. Within the process, once again we won’t be making any friends amid the tribes; but then again – we never have.