Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Curtis E. A. Karnow, Judge of the San Francisco Superior Court: ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF MONTEREY COUNTY WATER RESOURCES AGENCY FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS COMPLAINT & ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, April 15, 2014

ABSTRACT: Re: CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER CO., Plaintiff, vs. MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT, ET AL., Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS, (Case No. CGC-13-528312), Curtis E. A. Karnow, Judge of the San Francisco Superior Court, issued ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF MONTEREY COUNTY WATER RESOURCES AGENCY FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS COMPLAINT, “Monterey’s cross complaint must be filed within six court days to today’s date” of April 15, 2014, and ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE for May 20, 2014 “to discuss the next steps in this case and the setting of dates.” The ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF MONTEREY COUNTY WATER RESOURCES AGENCY FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS COMPLAINT document is embedded. Relevant Register of Actions and Documents are reproduced with links to documents.

Order Granting Motion of Monterey County Water Resources Agency for Leave to File Cross Complaint Cgc-13-52...
Date: April 15, 2014
ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF MONTEREY COUNTY WATER RESOURCES AGENCY FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS COMPLAINT

Register of Actions
Date
Proceedings
Document
Fee
APR-15-2014
ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF MONTEREY COUNTY WATER RESOURCES AGENCY FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS COMPLAINT (TRANSACTION #55307103)

APR-15-2014
ADDED TO CALENDAR FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HEARING SET FOR MAY-20-2014 AT 10:00 AM IN DEPT 304


APR-15-2014
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (TRANSACTION #55307103)


ADDENDUM:
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
Case Number: CGC 13 528312
Title: CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CO VS. MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT et al
Cause of Action: OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (- COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF)
Documents
Date
Description
JAN-29-2013
JAN-29-2013
JAN-29-2013
JAN-29-2013
JAN-29-2013
JAN-29-2013
JAN-29-2013
FEB-28-2013
MAR-14-2013
MAR-20-2013
MAR-26-2013
APR-04-2013
APR-10-2013
APR-11-2013
APR-29-2013
APR-29-2013
APR-30-2013
JUN-21-2013
JUN-21-2013
JUN-27-2013
JUN-28-2013
AUG-09-2013
AUG-09-2013
AUG-14-2013
AUG-15-2013
OCT-04-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-09-2013
OCT-10-2013
OCT-10-2013
OCT-23-2013
OCT-23-2013
OCT-23-2013
NOV-05-2013
NOV-05-2013
NOV-07-2013
NOV-07-2013
NOV-08-2013
NOV-13-2013
NOV-13-2013
NOV-15-2013
NOV-22-2013
DEC-27-2013
DEC-27-2013
DEC-27-2013
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-10-2014
JAN-23-2014
JAN-23-2014
JAN-23-2014
JAN-23-2014
JAN-23-2014
JAN-23-2014
JAN-23-2014
FEB-03-2014
FEB-04-2014
FEB-04-2014
FEB-04-2014
FEB-04-2014
FEB-04-2014
FEB-21-2014
FEB-21-2014
FEB-21-2014
FEB-25-2014
FEB-26-2014
MAR-04-2014
MAR-04-2014
MAR-04-2014
MAR-06-2014
MAR-06-2014
MAR-14-2014
MAR-14-2014
MAR-19-2014
MAR-19-2014
APR-01-2014
APR-01-2014
APR-07-2014
APR-07-2014
APR-07-2014
APR-09-2014
APR-15-2014
APR-15-2014

RELATED NEWS ARTICLE:
Monterey County can challenge regional project agreements
Karnow says statute of limitations has not yet expired
By Jim Johnson, 04/15/2014 07
Highlight Excerpts:
A San Francisco Superior Court judge has ruled Monterey County will be allowed to challenge the validity of the agreements at the heart of the failed regional desalination project.
Judge Curtis Karnow ruled Tuesday that the county can file a cross-complaint in the lawsuit aimed at unraveling the three-way partnership backing the $400 million desal project, which fell apart in the wake of revelations regarding former county water board member Steve Collins' dual role on the proposal.
Karnow gave the county six days to file its cross-complaint in the lawsuit, which was initially filed by California American Water in an effort to seek a court ruling on whether the project agreements were still valid and who should be responsible for tens of millions spent on the proposal.

No comments: