Saturday, March 14, 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, Real Party In Interest. The California Public Utilities Commission, Decisions No. 11-03-035 and No. 13-01-040 in Proceeding No. Application 10-01-012 The Honorable Maribeth A. Bushey, Administrative Law Judge Presiding Commissioner Michael R. Peevey, Assigned Commissioner

ABSTRACT:  RE:  California Supreme Court Case S208838, MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT v. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY), the California Supreme Court is expected to issue an opinion as early as June 2015 on the following issue: Does the Public Utilities Commission have the authority to review and regulate a user fee imposed by a local government entity that is collected through the bills of a regulated public utility? The California Public Utilities Commission, Decisions No. 11-03-035 and No. 13-01-040 in Proceeding No. Application 10-01-012 and the document IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY (U 210 W) FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION AND REMITTANCE OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT USER FEE are embedded. Additionally, briefs, including PETITION FOR WRIT OF REVIEW (PENDING) MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, ANSWER OF THE RESPONDENT TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF REVIEW, REAL PARTY'S ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF REVIEW and REPLY OF PETITIONER MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT documents are embedded.
Decision 11-03-035 March 24, 2011
DECISION DENYING APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION
Decision 13-01-040 January 24, 2013
ORDER MODIFYING DECISION (D.) 11-03-035 AND DENYING REHEARING, AS MODIFIED
Filing Date 01-05-10
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY (U 210 W) FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION AND REMITTANCE OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT USER FEE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF REVIEW (PENDING)
MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
02/25/2013
Filing Date April 2, 2013
ANSWER OF THE RESPONDENT TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF REVIEW

Filing Date April 2, 2013
REAL PARTY'S ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF REVIEW
Filing Date April 29, 2013
REPLY OF PETITIONER MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

REFERENCES:
Supreme Court to rule on water district ‘user fee,’ By KELLY NIX, The Carmel Pine Cone, March 13, 2015, 1A & 14A

ISSUES PENDING BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT IN CIVIL CASES
Monterey Peninsula Water Dist. v. Public Utilities Com., S208838. Original proceeding. This case presents the following issue: Does the Public Utilities Commission have the authority to review and regulate a user fee imposed by a local government entity that is collected through the bills of a regulated public utility?

Summary of Cases Accepted and Related Actions for Week of June 24, 2013
#13-54
Monterey Peninsula Water Dist. v. Public Utilities Com., S208838. Original proceeding. This case presents the following issue: Does the Public Utilities Commission have the authority to review and regulate a user fee imposed by a local government entity that is collected through the bills of a regulated public utility?

SUPREME COURT MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 2013
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
S208838
MONTEREY PENINSULA WATERMANAGEMENT DISTRICT v. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY)
Petition for review granted
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Werdegar, Corrigan, and Liu, JJ

No comments: