CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA EMPLOYMENT TURNOVER REPORT FOR THE PERIOD OF 03/01/16 TO 10/19/17

ABSTRACT:  For the period beginning with the employment of Chip Rerig, City Administrator, on March 1, 2016, to October, 19, 2017, fifteen (15) city employees have left city employment, specifically five (5) city employees in 2016 and ten (10) in 2017.  Fifteen (15) city employees represents 16% of 91 total city employees. A Table entitled CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA EMPLOYMENT TURNOVER REPORT  FOR THE PERIOD OF 03/01/16 TO 10/19/17 is featured, with NAME, TITLE DESCRIPTION, HIRE DATE, TERMINATION DATE and YEARS OF CITY EMPLOYMENT.  CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA TERMINATED EMPLOYEES FOR THE PERIOD OF 03-01-16 TO 10-19-17 document copy per public records act request is embedded. 

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA EMPLOYMENT TURNOVER REPORT FOR THE PERIOD OF 03/01/16 TO 10/19/17

(chronologically by TERMINATION DATE)

NAME	TITLE DESCRIPTION	HIRE DATE	TERMINATION DATE	YEARS OF EMPLOYMENT
WOOD, TIMOTHY K	SR. MAINT. WORKER	04/1987	05/31/16	29
AMBRO, KATHLEEN D.	LIB. ASST. I (HRLY)	04/2001	07/21/16	15
VANDERFORD ANDREW K	PUBLIC WORKS TECHS.	02/2014	07/29/16	2
HEADLEY, JOSEPH G	BUILDING OFFICIAL	06/2014	08/29/16	2
CALHOUN, MICHAEL B.	PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECT	08/1984	12/30/16	32
WOOD , WILLIAM P	FINANCE MANAGER	01/2014	01/23/17	3
MULLANE, ROBERT ANDREW	DIR. PUBLIC WORKS	08/2013	03/17/17	4
WANGERIN, SHOSHANA M	PLANNING TECH	02/2016	05/17/17	1
SPELLMAN, TINA	OFFICE ASSISTANT	01/2014	07/10/17	3
AIELLO, LORI M	COMMUNITY SYS ASST	06/2014	08/02/17	3
BOMBARD, JANET L.	LIBRARY DIRECTOR	11/1988	08/04/17	29
ROTHAL, JEFFREY N	HRLY LIBRARIAN I	07/2014	08/05/17	3
PARTIDO, ESTHER V.	POLICE SVCS OFFICER	04/1993	09/15/17	24
FREEMAN, DONALD G.	CITY ATTORNEY	02/1984	09/16/17	33
LOPEZ, CAROLINA	OFFICE ASSISTANT	04/2011	09/30/17	6

City of Carmel-By-The-sea Terminated Employees for the Period of 03-01-16 to 10-19-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

CITY OF CARME-BY-THE-SEA TERMINATED EMPLOYEES FOR THE PERIOD OF 03-01-16 TO 10-19-17

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND TO SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND TO SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME document copy is embedded. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, California American Water respectfully requests that the assigned Administrative Law Judge strike the portions of the testimonies identified in Appendix A as improper and impermissible.

Cal-Am's Motion to Strike Testimony & to Shorten Response Time 10-12-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-12-17

CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND TO SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

Appendix a CAW 10-12-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-12-17

AppendixA

Proceeding A.12-04-009

CAW MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND TO SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 CITY OF MARINA AND MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the CITY OF MARINA AND MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME document copy is embedded. REQUESTED RELIEF For the reasons stated above, Marina and MCWD request that the Commission act promptly to reject CalAm’s October 12 pleading in full for its failure to comply with Commission rules. If that action is not taken or even if CalAm acts to correct that error, Marina and MCWD request that CalAm’s request to shorten response time contained in its October 12 motion be denied with prejudice. Marina, MCWD, and the other parties to this proceeding must be afforded the ordinary time allowed by Rule 11.1(e) to fully and appropriately respond to CalAm’s requests to strike testimony contained in CalAm’s October 12 Motion.

City of Marina & Mcwd Joint Response in Opposition to Cal-Am Motion for Order Shortening Time 10-13-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-13-17

CITY OF MARINA AND MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 RESPONSE BY WATER PLUS TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the RESPONSE BY WATER PLUS TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME document copy is embedded.

Response by Water Plus to Cal-Am's Motion to Strike Testimony & Shorten Response Time 10-16-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-16-17

RESPONSE BY WATER PLUS TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

Appendix Water Plus 10-16-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

APPENDIX TO WATER PLUS RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 JOINDER BY WATER PLUS TO CITY OF MARINA AND MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME IN A.12-04-019

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the JOINDER BY WATER PLUS TO CITY OF MARINA AND MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME IN A.12-04-019 document copy is embedded.

Joinder by Water Plus to City of Marina & Mcwd Joint Response 10-16-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-16-17

JOINDER BY WATER PLUS TO CITY OF MARINA AND MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME IN A.12-04-019

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S RULING REGARDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PARTIES TO PROVIDE PRIOR TO EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S RULING REGARDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PARTIES TO PROVIDE PRIOR TO EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS document copy is embedded.

Alj's Ruling Regarding Additional Information for Parties to Provide Prior to Evidentiary Hearings 10-16-17... by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-16-17

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S RULING REGARDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PARTIES TO PROVIDE PRIOR TO EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 E-MAIL RULING SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the E-MAIL RULING SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME document copy is embedded. IT IS RULED that Applicant's motion to shorten time is granted in part. Responses to Applicant's October 12, 2017 motion to strike shall be filed and served by October 20, 2017.

E-mail Ruling Shortening Time for Response to Cal-Am Motion to Strike Testimony & Shorten Response Time 10-... by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-17-17

E-MAIL RULING SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 JOINDER BY WATER PLUS TO CITY OF MARINA AND MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME IN A.12-04-019

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the JOINDER BY WATER PLUS TO CITY OF MARINA AND MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME IN A.12-04-019 document copy is embedded.

Joinder by Water Plus to City of Marina & Mcwd Joint Response 10-16-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-16-17

JOINDER BY WATER PLUS TO CITY OF MARINA AND MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME IN A.12-04-019

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S RULING REGARDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PARTIES TO PROVIDE PRIOR TO EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S RULING REGARDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PARTIES TO PROVIDE PRIOR TO EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS document copy is embedded.

Alj's Ruling Regarding Additional Information for Parties to Provide Prior to Evidentiary Hearings 10-16-17... by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-16-17

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S RULING REGARDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PARTIES TO PROVIDE PRIOR TO EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 E-MAIL RULING SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the E-MAIL RULING SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME document copy is embedded. IT IS RULED that Applicant's motion to shorten time is granted in part. Responses to Applicant's October 12, 2017 motion to strike shall be filed and served by October 20, 2017.

E-mail Ruling Shortening Time for Response to Cal-Am Motion to Strike Testimony & Shorten Response Time 10-... by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-17-17

E-MAIL RULING SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 JOINDER BY WATER PLUS TO CITY OF MARINA TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY REBUTTAL TESTIMONY

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the JOINDER BY WATER PLUS TO CITY OF MARINA TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY REBUTTAL TESTIMONY document copy is embedded.

Joinder by Water Plus to Motion of City of Marina to Strike Portions of Cal-Am Rebuttal Testimony 10-20-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-20-17

JOINDER BY WATER PLUS TO CITY OF MARINA TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY REBUTTAL TESTIMONY

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 RESPONSE OF CITY OF MARINA IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the RESPONSE OF CITY OF MARINA IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE document copy is embedded. CONCLUSION For the multiple reasons detailed above, CalAm’s Motion to strike designated portions of Marina’s Direct Testimony is completely without merit. No basis or grounds has been stated by CalAm that support striking any of the passages or statements in Marina’s Direct Testimony listed in Appendix A of that Motion. Instead, the Commission should promptly deny with prejudice CalAm’s Motion.

Response of City of Marina in Opposition to Cal-Am's Motion to Strike 10-20-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-20-17

RESPONSE OF CITY OF MARINA IN OPPOSITION TO CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE OCTOBER 12, 2017 MOTION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO STRIKE TESTIMONY

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE OCTOBER 12, 2017 MOTION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO STRIKE TESTIMONY document copy is embedded. CONCLUSION For all of the reasons stated above, all of MCWD’s evidence that Cal-Am seeks to exclude from the Commission’s consideration is relevant to issues of consequence in this proceeding, as set forth in the Issues Ruling. None of the challenged MCWD testimony impermissibly states a legal conclusion. Cal-Am’s motion to strike constitutes yet another attempt by Cal-Am to silence opinions contrary to its own view and to deprive the Commission of a full and up-to-date factual record. Cal-Am’s motion to strike should be denied.

Mcwd's Response in Opposition to the October 12, 2017 Motion of Cal-Am to Strike Testimony 10-20-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-20-17

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE OCTOBER 12, 2017 MOTION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO STRIKE TESTIMONY

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 E-MAIL RULING SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSES TO CITY OF MARINA MOTION TO STRIKE

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the E-MAIL RULING SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSES TO CITY OF MARINA MOTION TO STRIKE document copy is embedded. IT IS RULED that responses to the City of Marina motion to strike portions of the rebuttal testimony of California American Water Company shall be filed and served by October 24, 2017.

E-mail Ruling Shortening Time for Responses to City of Marina Motion to Strike 10-20-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-20-17

E-MAIL RULING SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSES TO CITY OF MARINA MOTION TO STRIKE

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 MOTION OF CITY OF MARINA TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY REBUTTAL TESTIMONY

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the MOTION OF CITY OF MARINA TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY REBUTTAL TESTIMONY document copy is embedded.

Motion of City of Marina to Strike Portions of Cal-Am Rebuttal Testimony 10-20-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-20-17

MOTION OF CITY OFMARINA TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY REBUTTALTESTIMONY

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT’S RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF THE OCTOBER 20, 2017 MOTION OF THE CITY OF MARINA TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF CAL-AM’S REBUTTAL TESTIMONY

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT’S RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF THE OCTOBER 20, 2017 MOTION OF THE CITY OF MARINA TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF CAL-AM’S REBUTTAL TESTIMONY document copy is embedded. The City’s motion to strike should be granted. However, should the City’s motion be denied and the challenged testimony and/or exhibits be received into the record, those materials should be afforded little or no weight.

Mcwd's Response in Support of the October 20, 2017 Motion of City of Marina 10-23-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-23-17

MARINACOAST WATER DISTRICT’S RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF THE OCTOBER 20, 2017 MOTION OFTHE CITY OF MARINA TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF CAL-AM’S REBUTTAL TESTIMONY

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 RESPONSE OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO CITY OF MARINA’S MOTION TO STRIKE

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the RESPONSE OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO CITY OF MARINA’S MOTION TO STRIKE document copy is embedded. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, California American Water respectfully requests that the Commission deny Marina’s Motion to Strike in its entirety.

RESPONSE OF CAL-AM TO CITY OF MARINA’S MOTION TO STRIKE 10-24-17.pdf by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-24-17

RESPONSE OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO CITY OF MARINA’S MOTION TO STRIKE

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 SURFRIDER FOUNDATION’S RESPONSE TO THE CITY OF MARINA’S MOTION TO STRIKE

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the SURFRIDER FOUNDATION’S RESPONSE TO THE CITY OF MARINA’S MOTION TO STRIKE document copy is embedded. Conclusion For these reasons and the additional reasons raised by the City of Marina, the Commission should grant the Marina Motion.
SURFRIDER FOUNDATION’S RESPONSE TO THE CITY OF MARINA'S MOTION TO STRIKE 10-24-17.pdf by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-24-17

SURFRIDER FOUNDATION’S RESPONSE TO THE CITY OF MARINA’S MOTION TO STRIKE

Proceeding Number A.12-04-019 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES’ RULING GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING THE REST OF THE MOTION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND TO SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

ABSTRACT: Re: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates, the ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES’ RULING GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING THE REST OF THE MOTION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND TO SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME document copy is embedded.

Aljs' Ruling Granting in Part & Denying the Rest of the Motion of Cal-Am 10-27-17 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED 10-27-17

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES’ RULING GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING THE REST OF THE MOTION OF CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO STRIKE TESTIMONY AND TO SHORTEN RESPONSE TIME

FORTY-TWO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTANTS SUBMITED FIFTY-FIVE STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR NINETEEN SERVICE AREAS INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

ABSTRACT: As of September 29, 2017, forty-two professional services consultants submitted fifty-five Statements of Qualifications for nineteen services areas including Architecture, Engineering, Municipal Administration and other professional services.
Statement of Qualifications for Architecture, Service Area No. 1: Kasavan Architects, LCA Architects, Inc. & Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP
Statement of Qualifications for Building Code Plan Check and Inspection Services, Service Area No. 2: California Code Check, A Bureau Veritas Company, CSG Consultants, Inc. & EsGil, a SAFEbuilt Company
Statement of Qualifications for Civil Engineering, Service Area No. 3: Donald C. Urfer & Associates, Inc., Harris & Associates, Ifland Engineers, Inc. & TRC Engineers, Inc.
Statement of Qualifications for Construction Management and Inspection Services, Service Area No. 4: CSG Consultants, Inc., Cumming Construction Management, Inc. & Harris & Associates
Statement of Qualifications for Electrical Engineering, Service Area No. 5: Aurum Consulting Engineers Monterey Bay Inc.
Statement of Qualifications for Environmental Services, Service Area No. 6: Albion Environmental, Inc., Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc., Dudek, EMC Planning Group, Inc., Jeffrey B. Froke, PhD / dba CALIFAUNA, LSA Associates, Inc., Nicole Nedeff Consulting & Soar Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Statement of Qualifications for Financial Services, Service Area No. 7: Lechowicz & Tseng Municipal Consultants & Regional Government Services Authority Services Authority
Statement of Qualifications for Geotechnical Engineering, Geologic, Geomorphic, and Materials Testing Services, Service Area No. 8: Balance Hydrologics, Moore Twining Associates, Inc. & Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Consultants
Statement of Qualifications for GIS and Asset Management, Service Area No. 9: GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION CENTER California State University, Chico & Turf Image, Inc.
Statement of Qualifications for Hazardous Materials Testing and Monitoring Services, Service Area No. 10: Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences Consultants & Vista Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Statement of Qualifications for Human Resources Administration, Service Area No. 11: CPS HR Consulting & Regional Government Services Authority
Statement of Qualifications for Landscape Architecture and Arboricultural Services, Service Area No. 12: BFS Landscape Architects, Gates + Associates, Rana Creek Design, Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey, SSA Landscape Architects, Inc., Tanaka Design Group & Verde Design, Inc.
Statement of Qualifications for Mechanical Engineering, Service Area No. 13: Axiom Engineers, Inc., dba Lee and Associates
Statement of Qualifications for Network System Services, Service Area No. 14: App Gap, LLC
Statement of Qualifications for Planning Services, Service Area No. 15: EMC Planning Group Inc., Gates + Associates, LSA Associates, Inc. & Regional Government Services Authority
Statement of Qualifications for Public Relations/ Outreach, Service Area No. 16: Burghardt+Doré Advertising, Inc. & Regional Government Services Authority
Statement of Qualifications for Graphics Design, Service Area No. 17: Burghardt+Doré Advertising, Inc., Gates + Associates & Studio Percolate Design and Photography LLC
Statement of Qualifications for Structural Engineering, Service Area No. 18: Ryan Joyce Structural Design & TRC Engineers, Inc.
Statement of Qualifications for Surveying, Mapping, and Right-of-Way Engineering, Service Area No. 19: None
Statement of Qualifications for Traffic Engineering, Service Area No. 20: TJKM Transportation Consultants
Successive posts of Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for each of the Service Areas (No. 1 – No. 20), including embedded SOQ document copies.

Statement of Qualifications for Architecture, Service Area No. 1: Kasavan Architects, LCA Architects, Inc. & Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP

ABSTRACT: As of September 29, 2017, three consultants submitted Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for Architecture, namely Kasavan Architects, LCA Architects, Inc. and Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP. Each SOQ document copy is embedded.

Statement of Qualifications for Architecture, Service Area No. 1

Kasavan Architects Architecture by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Kasavan Architects

60 W. Market Street, Ste. 300

Salinas, CA 93901

Statement of Qualifications for Architectural Services

September 29, 2017

LCA Architects, Inc.-architecture_Redacted by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

LCA Architects, Inc.

 590 Ygnacio Valley Rd., Suite 310

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Request for Qualifications: Service Area No. 1, Architectural Services

September 30, 2017

Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP-Architecture by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP

2340 Garden Road, Suite 100

Monterey, CA 93940

Statement of Qualifications for Architectural Services

September 29, 2017