Wednesday, November 11, 2020

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr., Plaintiff, -vs- CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Defendants.

ABSTRACT: RE: STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr., Plaintiff, -vs- CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Defendants. November 8, 2020 "The Great Lakes Justice Center (GLJC) filed an action in Wayne County Circuit Court alleging massive fraud in the election vote-counting procedures. The suit states Wayne County election officials allowed illegal, unlawful, and fraudulent processing of votes cast in last Tuesday’s election… "

The Complaint alleges: 
1. Violation of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional right to Election Accuracy and Integrity. 
2. Violation of Plaintiffs’ Quo Warranto right to a fraud-free Election. 
3. Violation of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional Equal Protection Rights. 
4. Violation of Statutory Election Laws. 

Complaint with Exhibits 
COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO FILE QUO WARRANTO COMPLAINT

Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 
MOTION FOR TRO, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Supplemental Brief for Motion for TRO, Affidavit of Mellissa Carone, Dominion Voting Services Contractor 
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Reply Brief for Motion for TRO, Affidavit of Ruth Johnson, Former Michigan Secretary of State
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

No comments: