Thursday, June 30, 2022

VSRF call today: Brook Jackson, Robert Barnes, and Marcus Thornton, Steve Kirsch

 VSRF call today: Brook Jackson, Robert Barnes, and Marcus Thornton

Brook is the Pfizer whistleblower and Robert Barnes is her attorney. Marcus Thornton is President of Feds for Medical Freedom who just won a major victory in the courts. You don't want to miss this.

Steve Kirsch
June 30, 2022

VSRF Weekly Update
TONIGHT: Thursday, June 30
7pm Eastern / 4pm Pacific

Register here to watch on Zoom
Or
Live stream on Rumble

Watch the preview for this week’s episode with Pfizer Whistleblower Brook Jackson, Civil Rights Attorney Robert Barnes, and the President of Feds for Medical Freedom, Marcus Thornton

   

Full Episode #36: Pfizer Whistleblower Brook Jackson

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation Published July 1, 2022

(1:31:51)

Latest survey shows the COVID vaccines are a disaster: ~750,000 dead in US, Steve Kirsch

 Latest survey shows the COVID vaccines are a disaster: ~750,000 dead in US

In US, ~5M people who got the vaccine are now unable to work and ~750,000 are dead. The rate of heart issues is 6.6%, far more than they claimed. No wonder our government isn't doing these surveys!

Steve Kirsch
June 25

The survey and underlying data

Jun 25 survey

1.      Jun 25 Pollfish survey summary

2.      Jun 24 Pollfish survey response detail

Earlier survey

1.      Jun 24 Pollfish survey summary

2.      Jun 24 Pollfish survey response detail

Latest survey where we broke out the myocarditis rates

1.      Jun 27 Pollfish survey summary

2.      Jun 27 Pollfish survey response detail

COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 1,874 studies

 COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 1,874 studies

Home   COVID-19 treatment studies   Select treatment

Early treatment is more effective

All studies (pooled effects, all stages) c19early.com Jun 28, 2022

Early treatment studies (pooled effects) c19early.com Jun 28, 2022

All mortality results (all stages) c19early.com Jun 28, 2022

Early treatment mortality results c19early.com Jun 28, 2022

Prophylaxis studies (pooled effects) c19early.com Jun 28, 2022

Prophylaxis mortality results c19early.com Jun 28, 2022

LATE TREATMENT, EARLY TREATMENT-32 physicians/teams

Recent studies (see the individual treatment pages for all studies):

We aim to cover the most promising early treatments for COVID-19. We use pre-specified effect extraction criteria that prioritizes more serious outcomes, for details see methods. For specific outcomes and different treatment stages see the individual pages. Not all treatments are covered here, effectiveness has been reported for many other treatments in studies. Of the 1,874 studies, 1,259 present results comparing with a control group, 1,133 are treatment studies, and 126 analyze outcomes based on serum levels. There are 25 animal studies, 52 in silico studies, 101 in vitro studies, and 99 meta analyses.

Tucker Carlson Walks Through a List of Political Dissidents the Biden Administration Has Targeted in the Last 18 Months, Sundance

 Tucker Carlson Walks Through a List of Political Dissidents the Biden Administration Has Targeted in the Last 18 Months

June 29, 2022 | Sundance |

In his opening monologue tonight, Fox News host Tucker Carlson outlined a political list of DOJ and FBI targets over the past 18 months.  Some of these examples are probably forgotten; however, when you see the examples highlighted with a timeline it really does showcase how our system of government has been weaponized by a corrupt Dept of Justice and corrupt FBI.

The part where the political dissidents are outlined begins at 05:39 (prompted) WATCH:

 

Tucker Carlson: Why are they so angry?
June 29, 2022

Sanity Prevails, Supreme Court Strikes Down EPA Cap and Trade Scheme for Power Plants, Sundance

 Sanity Prevails, Supreme Court Strikes Down EPA Cap and Trade Scheme for Power Plants

June 30, 2022 | Sundance

The Environmental Protect Agency (EPA) was attempting to restrict the energy production from coal-based power plants through a regulatory cap-and-trade scheme intended to limit the emissions from electricity plants. However, by a 6-3 vote the Supreme Court said today the Clean Air Act does not give the EPA broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. [pdf Ruling Here] The regulation -if any- must come from congress, not regulatory fiat from an executive agency

Saturday, June 25, 2022

Neil Oliver Outlines Madness of New Push to Vaccinate Children 6 Months to 5 Years Old, Sundance


 

NHS should 'leave our kids alone': Neil Oliver says it's 'unforgivable' to advertise children's jabs
Jun 25, 2022
(9:39)

In this week’s discussion monologue, Neil Oliver outlines a recent push by U.S. and U.K. authorities to vaccinate children under 5-years of age.   Despite almost zero risk to their health from COVID-19 or any variant, in the U.S. the FDA has recently approved vaccinations for babies 6-months and older.

[Transcript]

Harmeet Dhillon Gives a Pragmatic Legal Perspective on Supreme Court Ruling

Harmeet Dhillon Gives a Pragmatic Legal Perspective on Supreme Court Ruling

June 24, 2022 | Sundance

  

Tucker Carlson and Harmeet Dhillon react to the Roe decision

The Post Millennial Clips Published June 24, 2022

Supreme Court Reverses Roe, Overturns Constitutional Right to Abortion and Returns Abortion Law to the States

Supreme Court Reverses Roe, Overturns Constitutional Right to Abortion and Returns Abortion Law to the States

June 24, 2022 | Sundance

The 213-page Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs -v- Jackson (Mississippi case) is FOUND HERE.  The ruling in the Dobbs case was 6-3 in favor of allowing Mississippi to place limits on abortion after 15 weeks.   However, in combination with the Dobbs decision the court has overturned (by a 5-4 vote) the 1972 Roe -vs- Wade decision that created a constitutional right to abortion.

Thursday, June 23, 2022

Opinion of the Court SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 20–843 NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. KEVIN P. BRUEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF NEW YORK STATE POLICE, ET AL.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UcuL5brBWtNlnBahN1QwQsagiJ4Rz3jG/view?usp=sharing

Opinion of the Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 20–843

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. KEVIN P. BRUEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF NEW YORK STATE POLICE, ET AL.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

[June 23, 2022]

JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guaran­tees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government offic­ers some special need. That is not how the First Amend­ment works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion. It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense.

New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Four­teenth Amendment in that it prevents law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for further pro­ceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ALITO, J., concurring (pages 70-78)

KAVANAUGH, J., concurring (79-81)

BARRETT, J., concurring (pages 82-83)

BREYER, J., dissenting (pages 84-135)

REFERENCE:

Supreme Court Rejects New York Special Need Limitation on Carrying a Firearm, Affirms Inherent Right to Carry

June 23, 2022 | Sundance

In a 6-3 ruling [pdf HERE] the Supreme Court has ruled that New York state cannot require an individual to prove a “special need” in order to carry a firearm for self-protection.  The ruling, likely to have ramifications for other gun restricting states, affirms the constitutional right of an individual to carry a firearm, and blocks the efforts of states to make the individual prove they have a need for one.