DEFENDANT CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT: GERIT SAND; COBBLESTONE BAKERY, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF CARMEL BY THE SEA; DOES 1 THROUGH 20 Defendant. Case No. M130393 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF MONTEREY

ABSTRACT: RE: GERIT SAND; COBBLESTONE BAKERY, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF CARMEL BY THE SEA; DOES 1 THROUGH 20 Defendant. Case No . M130393 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF MONTEREY, DEFENDANT CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (February 27, 2015) document copy is embedded. Importantly, “No opposition to Defendant's Demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint having been received from Plaintiff, Defendant CITY OF CARMEL BY THE SEA respectfully requests that the Court rule in its favor and sustain Defendant's demurrer to Plaintiff's complaint without leave to amend.

Defendant City's Reply to Plaintiff’s Non-opposition to Defendants Demurrer to Plaintiff's Compla...

DEFENDANT CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
GERIT SAND; COBBLESTONE BAKERY, A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF CARMEL BY THE SEA; DOES 1 THROUGH 20 Defendant. Case No. M130393 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF MONTEREY