Wednesday, April 29, 2020

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING, May 4, 2020


CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Monday, May 4 2020

ELEVEN NOTEWORTHY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS, May 5, 2020

ABSTRACT:  Eleven Noteworthy City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Items, May 5 , 2020,  including PUBLIC APPEARANCES, ANNOUNCEMENTS, CONSENT AGENDA including Approve March 30, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes, April 6, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes, April 7, 2020 Meeting Minutes, and April 15, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes as presented. Review monthly reports for March: 1). City Administrator Contract Log; 2.) Community Planning and Building Department Reports; 3.) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports; 4.) Public Records Act Requests, and 5.) Public Works Department Report.March 2020 Check Register Summary and Adopt Resolution 2020-029, amending Policy C95-01 Claims Against the City; ORDERS OF BUSINESS including Ordinance temporarily prohibiting evictions of tenants arising from income loss or substantial medical expenses related to the Coronavirus pandemic, Verbal report on Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) issues and Second Review of the proposed Fiscal Year 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program and Provide Direction to Staff; PUBLIC HEARINGS including Adopt Resolution 2020-030 adopting a schedule of fees for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 for Administrative Services, Community Activities, Community Planning and Building, Public Safety and Public Works Services and provide direction to staff and Discuss adoption of a Resolution establishing the value of parking in-lieu fees at $105,044, per parking space based on the recently adopted 2019 California Building Codes; discuss other options regarding the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program; and provide direction to staff. The CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, May 5, 2020 and Staff Report document copies are embedded. 

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
OPEN SESSION 4:30 PM

Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20 has allowed local legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. Also, see the Order by the Monterey County Public Health Officer issued March 17, 2020. The health and well-being of our residents is the top priority for the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea. To that end, this meeting will be held via teleconference and web-streamed on the City’s website ONLY.

To attend via Teleconference; Dial in number 1-267-819-1664 PIN: 579 602 152#

The public can also email comments to cityclerk@ci.carmel.ca.us. Comments must be received 2 hours before the meeting in order to be provided to the legislative body. Comments received after that time and up to the beginning of the meeting will be added to the agenda and made part of the record.

OPEN SESSION
4:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Dave Potter, Council Members Jeff Baron, Jan Reimers, Bobby Richards, and Carrie Theis

PUBLIC APPEARANCES
Members of the Public are invited to speak on any item that does not appear on the Agenda and that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. The exception is a Closed Session agenda, where speakers may address the Council on those items before the Closed Session begins. Speakers are usually given three (3) minutes to speak on any item; the time limit is in the discretion of the Chair of the meeting and may be limited when appropriate. Applicants and appellants in land use matters are usually given more time to speak. If an individual wishes to submit written information, he or she may give it to the City Clerk. Speakers and any other members of the public will not approach the dais at any time without prior consent from the Chair of the meeting.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are routine in nature and do not require discussion or independent action. Members of the Council, Board or Commission or the public may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of Council, Board or Commission discussion and/ or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions.

1. Approve March 30, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes, April 6, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes, April 7, 2020 Meeting Minutes, and April 15, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes as presented.
Approve March 30, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes, April 6, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes, April 7, 2020 Meeting Minutes, and April 15, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes as presented.

2. Review monthly reports for March: 1). City Administrator Contract Log; 2.) Community Planning and Building Department Reports; 3.) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports; 4.) Public Records Act Requests, and 5.) Public Works Department Report.
Review monthly reports for March: 1). City Administrator Contract Log; 2.) Community Planning and Building Department Reports; 3.) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports; 4.) Public Records Act Requests, and 5.) Public Works Department Report.

3. March 2020 Check Register Summary
March 2020 Check Register Summary

5. Adopt Resolution 2020-029, amending Policy C95-01 Claims Against the City
Adopt Resolution 2020-029, amending Policy C95-01 Claims Against the City

ORDERS OF BUSINESS
Orders of Business are agenda items that require City Council, Board or Commission discussion, debate, direction to staff, and/or action.

6. Ordinance temporarily prohibiting evictions of tenants arising from income loss or substantial medical expenses related to the Coronavirus pandemic.
Ordinance temporarily prohibiting evictions of tenants arising from income loss or substantial medical expenses related to the Coronavirus pandemic.

7. Verbal report on Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) issues
Verbal report on Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) issues

8. Second Review of the proposed Fiscal Year 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program and Provide Direction to Staff
Second Review of the proposed Fiscal Year 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program and Provide Direction to Staff

PUBLIC HEARINGS
9. Adopt Resolution 2020-030 adopting a schedule of fees for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 for Administrative Services, Community Activities, Community Planning and Building, Public Safety and Public Works Services and provide direction to staff
Adopt Resolution 2020-030 adopting a schedule of fees for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 for Administrative Services, Community Activities, Community Planning and Building, Public Safety and Public Works Services and provide direction to staff

10. Discuss adoption of a Resolution establishing the value of parking in-lieu fees at $105,044, per parking space based on the recently adopted 2019 California Building Codes; discuss other options regarding the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program; and provide direction to staff
Discuss adoption of a Resolution establishing the value of parking in-lieu fees at $105,044, per parking space based on the recently adopted 2019 California Building Codes; discuss other options regarding the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program; and provide direction to staff

ADJOURNMENT

Monday, April 27, 2020

HOOVER INSTITUTION: Peter Robinson Interview With Victor Davis Hanson on Corona, California, and the Classical World


Victor Davis Hanson on Corona, California, and the Classical World
April 24, 2020

HOOVER INSTITUTION: Peter Robinson Interviews with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya


Questioning Conventional Wisdom in the COVID-19 Crisis, with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
March 31, 2020

The Fight against COVID-19: An Update from Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
April 17, 2020

DRS. DAN ERICKSON & ARTIN MASSIHI, ACCELERATED URGENT CARE, ON COVID-19

CONCEPTS ON COVID-19 IN CALIFORNIA
HERD IMMUNITY VS. SOCIAL ISOLATION
DATA VS. MODELS
BACK TO WORK VS. SHELTER-IN-PLACE
SWEDEN (NO LOCKDOWN) VS. NORWAY (LOCKDOWN)

Dr Dan Erickson & Dr Artin Massihi - We're Speaking Up - Full Video
April 25, 2020

Wednesday, April 15, 2020

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA, April 15, 2020


CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Wednesday, April 15, 2020

Friday, April 10, 2020

Sharon Friedrichsen, Director, Contracts and Budgets, and Chip Rerig, City Administrator, Mislead City Council and Public with Fallacious Narrative on Home Mail Delivery Service

With regard to the City’s Home Mail Delivery Service, the May 1, 2018 CITY COUNCIL Staff Report SUBMITTED BY Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts and APPROVED BY Chip Rerig, City Administrator stated:

During FY 2000-2001, the Council decided to contract with a courier service to provide home mail delivery to residents “who are physically unable or who for some other reason cannot obtain their mail on a regular basis from the post office located in Carmel-by-the-Sea”.

The Council implemented the home mail delivery service in 2001 in response to public demand for mail delivery for those were physically unable to retrieve mail at the Carmel-by-the-Sea post office.
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
May 1, 2018
ORDERS OF BUSINESS
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Consider Continuing, Modifying, or Eliminating Home Mail Delivery Service Provided by the City.

Nearly two years later, the March 3, 2020 CITY COUNCIL Staff Report SUBMITTED BY Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts and APPROVED BY Chip Rerig, City Administrator stated:
:
The rationale for imposing disability as a criteria is that it correlates to the program’s intent of assisting “residents that are physically unable to visit the post office”. In order to impose this criteria, the City would require the submission of a disability exemption waiver form.

As stated within Resolution 2003-91, the purpose of the City contracting for home mail delivery service was to provide “as an essential community service for those residents that are physically unable to visit the post office or who, for some other reason, cannot obtain mail on a regular basis”. Council may wish to consider what constitutes “other reasons” for not being able to obtain mail on a regular basis, determine whether such reasons justify the use of public funds for the service and impose associated criteria.”

NOTE: Resolution 2003-91 not included as an ATTACHMENT
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
March 3, 2020
ORDERS OF BUSINESS
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Sharon Friedrichsen - Director, Contracts and Budgets
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Receive a report on options related to the home mail delivery services program and provide direction to staff
:
One month later, the April 7, 2020 CITY COUNCIL Staff Report SUBMITTED BY Sharon Friedrichsen, Director of Budget and Contracts and APPROVED BY Chip Rerig, City Administrator stated:

As stated within Resolution 2003-091, the City contracts for courier service to provide home mail delivery services “as an essential community service for those residents that are physically unable to visit the post office or who, for some other reason, cannot obtain mail on a regular basis.”

The rationale for establishing disability as a criteria is that it correlates to the program’s intent of assisting “residents that are physically unable to visit the post office”.

WHEREAS, the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea contracts for courier service for home mail delivery with the intended purpose of providing “an essential community service for those residents that are physically unable to visit the post office or who, for some other reason, cannot obtain mail on a regular basis” as referenced in Resolution 2003-91;

NOTE: Resolution 2003-91 not included as an ATTACHMENT
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL
Staff Report
April 7, 2020
CONSENT AGENDA
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Sharon Friedrichsen - Director, Contracts and Budgets
APPROVED BY: Chip Rerig, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution 2020-027 affirming modification to the home mail delivery program to include the use of eligibility criteria and provide direction to staff.

Contradicting the City’s narrative that the “intended purpose” of contracting with a courier service for home mail delivery was “for those residents that are physically unable to visit the post office or who, for some other reason, cannot obtain mail on a regular basis as referenced in Resolution 2003-91,” the July 1, 2003 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CHECK LIST, including Guillen staff report dated 6/24/03 and Resolution No. 2003-91, which states in RESOLUTION NO. 2003-91:

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that continuing full mail delivery is an essential community service for those residents who desire this service.
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA CHECK LIST
MEETING DATE: 1 JULY 2003
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Guillen staff report dated 6/24/03
2. Resolution No. 2003-91

Moreover, the CITY COUNCIL Minutes of Meeting 1 July 2003 state:
COUNCIL MEMBER ROSE RETURNED TO HIS ORIGINAL MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2003-91 AS SUBMITTED. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY ELY.

THE MOTION CARRIED ON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ely, Rose, McCloud
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Hazdovac
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Livingston
City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
1 July 2003
X. Resolutions
A. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION No. 2003-91 AUTHORIZING MODIFICATION OF
THE RESIDENTIAL HOME MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE PROGRAM FROM THREE TO SIX DAYS EACH WEEK AND INCREASING ANNUAL PROGRAM FUNDING FROM $24,000 TO $40,000.
Pages 10-11

To corroborate CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2003-91 stating, in part, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that continuing full mail delivery is an essential community service for those residents who desire this service, specifically with respect to the intent of the RESOLUTION, the following excerpts from The Carmel Pine Cone regarding home mail delivery:

City council learns the price of private home delivery
By TAMARA GRIPPI
CARMEL PINE CONE 2001-01-05
2A The Carmel Pine Cone January 5, 2001
Several council members expressed hope at recent meetings that a private courier service will be the compromise to settle the year-long mail debate begun by home-delivery activist Joe Steinfeld.

Carmel officials are trying to strike a balance between preserving Carmel’s tradition of no mailboxes while satisfying those who either require or request home delivery.”

Guillen will present his report at the council’s Jan. 9 meeting, which begins at 3:30 p.m.


Council ready to pick up the post
By TAMARA GRIPPI
CARMEL PINE CONE 2001-01-12
2A The Carmel Pine Cone January 12, 2001

THE CARMEL City Council approved, in theory, a compromise that will provide home delivery to anyone who wants it, while still defending the city against an onslaught of mail boxes and street addresses.

Voting 4-1, with councilwoman Barbara Livingston dissenting, the council authorized city administrator Rich Guillen to negotiate a contract with The Carmel mailbox to provide door-to-door delivery.

Guillen advised the council to enter into the contract for one year and then revisit the decision in 2002.  The city administrator also recommended that the council implement the service on July 1 – the start of the next fiscal year.


Carmel’s elderly taking advantage of home delivery
By TAMARA GRIPPI
CARMEL PINE CONE 2002-06-07
5A The Carmel Pine Cone June 7, 2002

CARMEL’S GREAT mail delivery debate, which dominated the talk at nearly every city council meeting with activist Joe Steinfeld stoking the fires, is now hardly mentioned.

Nearly a year ago, the Carmel City Council began paying a private courier to provide home delivery to residents requesting it, so the rest of the town could continue the Carmel tradition of making a daily trek to the post office.

Peninsula Messenger Service, the courier hired by the city to handle the door-to-door delivery, is currently taking mail to 140 residents, which reflects a bit of an increase since the service began last July.

Ron Campbell, owner of Peninsula Messenger Service, said most of his clients are elderly.  “Some are handicapped people, though certainly not the majority,” Campbell said. “But 85 to 90 percent are elderly at the very least.”


City-sponsored home mail delivery clients hold steady
By MARY BROWNFIELD
Published: March 25, 2005
CARMEL PINE CONE 2005-03-05
3A The Carmel Pine Cone March 25, 2005

The city implemented home mail delivery to settle the debate between those who favor street addresses, mailboxes and traditional mail delivery and others who hold the daily trek to the Carmel Post Office as a sacred tradition.

“Anyone who lives within the city limits, who has a post office box and who would like to have their mail come to their home can request it,” city administrative assistant Stephanie Pearce said. To limit the service to disabled or homebound residents would be unlawful.


Most of the residents who have signed up are seniors or disabled, according to Campbell, though
some able-bodied citizens take advantage of the convenience, too.

SOURCE: INTERNET ARCHIVE
Harrison Memorial Library
bit.ly/carmelpinecone


ADDENDUM:
Pursuant to a Public Records Act request submitted to the City on February 27, 2020, Britt Avrit, MMC, City Clerk, responded on March 16, 2020 with RESOLUTION NO. 2003-91, SIGNED by SUE McCLOUD, MAYOR and ATTESTED by Karen Crouch, City Clerk, stating, in part, as follows:

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that continuing full mail delivery are an essential community service for those residents who are physically unable to visit the post office or who for some other reason cannot obtain their mail on a regular basis.
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA AUTHORIZING MODIFICATION OF THE RESIDENTIAL HOME MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE PROGRAM FROM THREE TO SIX DAYS EACH WEEK AND INCREASING ANNUAL PROGRAM FUNDING FROM $24,000 TO $40,000

The aforementioned “WHEREAS…” is not supported by the 2003 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CHECK LIST including Guillen staff report dated 6/24/03 and Resolution No. 2003-91 and the CITY COUNCIL Minutes of Meeting 1 July 2003.  Nor is it supported by the contemporaneous reporting in The Carmel Pine Cone.

Sunday, April 05, 2020

LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Representing Almost 500 Cities Requests Governor ‘take immediate action to pause certain statutory requirements, so that cities can devote the resources necessary to protect the health and safety of all Californians,’ including ‘Suspend the provision of Government Code 6253(c) that limits the extension to respond to 14 days for all Public Records Act requests other than those for records created during, and relating to, the State of Emergency.’

ABSTRACT: In a letter dated March 22, 2020 from Carolyn M. Coleman Executive Director, League of California Cities, to The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, Coleman requests that Newsom “take immediate action to pause certain statutory requirements, so that cities can devote the resources necessary to protect the health and safety of all Californians” including “Requested Relief” for Review and Approval of Development Projects, Housing Elements, California Environmental Quality Act, Transportation Funding, Public Records Act, Political Reform Act - Form 700, California Government Claims Act, Solar Permits, Wireless Telecommunication Facilities, Financial Reports and Police Department Registration. Regarding the Public Records Act, Relief Requested: State that the phrase “unusual circumstances” found in Section 6253(c) includes the State of Emergency. Suspend the provision of Government Code 6253(c) that limits the extension to respond to 14 days for all Public Records Act requests other than those for records created during, and relating to, the State of Emergency. In response, David Synder, Executive Director, First Amendment Coalition, stated “I don’t think it’s necessary for the governor to do this,” “If the governor were to do this, it would open the door to further abuses of the Public Records Act by agencies." “There could — and I think likely would — be a massive."


REFERENCES:

California Cities Want Public Records Act Suspended
donal brown April 1, 2020

California cities ask Newsom to suspend public records deadlines due to coronavirus
By Aaron Leathley
03/28/2020 03:26 PM EDT

California cities want transparency rules waived in pandemic
By Juliet Williams | AP
April 1, 2020 at 1:07 AM EDT

https://firstamendmentcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/132-Organizations-Sign-Statement-on-Government-Coronavirus-Emergency-Transparency-and-Public-Access.pdf

132 Organizations Sign Statement on Government Coronavirus Emergency Transparency and Public Access 
March 20, 2020

Wednesday, April 01, 2020

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING, April 6, 2020


CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
Monday, April 6, 2020

ELEVEN NOTEWORTHY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS, April 7, 2020

ABSTRACT:  Eleven Noteworthy City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Items, April 7 , 2020,  including PUBLIC APPEARANCES, ANNOUNCEMENTS;  CONSENT AGENDA including Approve March 2, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes, March 3, 2020 Meeting Minutes, March 13, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes and March 23, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes as presented, Review monthly reports for February: 1). City Administrator Contract Log; 2.) Community Planning and Building Department Reports; 3.) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports; 4.) Public Records Act Requests, and 5.) Public Works Department Report, February 2020 Check Register Summary, Adopt Resolution 2020-023 declaring the results of the Election held on March 3, 2020 for the submission of an ordinance amending Article IV, Transactions and Use Tax, of Chapter 3.28, Sales and Use Tax, of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code to increase the Transactions and Use Taxes (Sales Tax) rate to one and one half percent (1.5%) for a period of twenty (20) years for general purposes, 1. Adopt Resolution 2020-024 authorizing the City Administrator to execute agreements with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration for implementation of a local transactions and use tax; and 2. Adopt Resolution 2020-025 authorizing the examination of Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax Records, Adopt Resolution 2020-026, approving a list of streets to be repaved for inclusion in the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Capital Improvement Plan and Budget partially funded by SB1; the Road Repair and Accountability Act and Adopt Resolution 2020-027 affirming modification to the home mail delivery program to include the use of eligibility criteria and provide direction to staff; ORDERS OF BUSINESS including Receive a presentation on the proposed Fiscal Year 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program and Five Year Capital Improvement Plan and provide direction to staff and Ordinance temporarily prohibiting evictions of tenants arising from income loss or substantial medical expenses related to the Coronavirus pandemic. The CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, April 7, 2020 and Staff Report document copies are embedded. 

Governor Newsome’s Executive Order N-29-20 has allowed local legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. Also, see the Order by the Monterey County Public Health Officer issued March 17, 2020. The health and well-being of our residents is the top priority for the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea. To that end, this meeting will be held via teleconference and web-streamed on the City’s website ONLY. 

To attend via Teleconference; Dial in number 1-414-909-5052; PIN 474750181# 

The public can also email comments to cityclerk@ci.carmel.ca.us. Comments must be received 2 hours before the meeting in order to be provided to the legislative body. Comments received after that time and up to the beginning of the meeting will be added to the agenda and made part of the record.

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, April 7, 2020
OPEN SESSION 4:30 PM

CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Dave Potter, Council Members Jeff Baron, Jan Reimers, Bobby Richards, and Carrie Theis

PUBLIC APPEARANCES
Members of the Public are invited to speak on any item that does not appear on the Agenda and that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. The exception is a Closed Session agenda, where speakers may address the Council on those items before the Closed Session begins. Speakers are usually given three (3) minutes to speak on any item; the time limit is in the discretion of the Chair of the meeting and may be limited when appropriate. Applicants and appellants in land use matters are usually given more time to speak. If an individual wishes to submit written information, he or she may give it to the City Clerk. Speakers and any other members of the public will not approach the dais at any time without prior consent from the Chair of the meeting.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are routine in nature and do not require discussion or independent action. Members of the Council, Board or Commission or the public may ask that any items be considered individually for purposes of Council, Board or Commission discussion and/ or for public comment. Unless that is done, one motion may be used to adopt all recommended actions.
1. Approve March 2, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes, March 3, 2020 Meeting Minutes, March 13, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes and March 23, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes as presented.
Approve March 2, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes, March 3, 2020 Meeting Minutes, March 13, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes and March 23, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes as presented.

2. Review monthly reports for February: 1). City Administrator Contract Log; 2.) Community Planning and Building Department Reports; 3.) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports; 4.) Public Records Act Requests, and 5.) Public Works Department Report.
Review monthly reports for February: 1). City Administrator Contract Log; 2.) Community Planning and Building Department Reports; 3.) Police, Fire, and Ambulance Reports; 4.) Public Records Act Requests, and 5.) Public Works Department Report.

3. February 2020 Check Register Summary
February 2020 Check Register Summary

4. Adopt Resolution 2020-023 declaring the results of the Election held on March 3, 2020 for the submission of an ordinance amending Article IV, Transactions and Use Tax, of Chapter 3.28, Sales and Use Tax, of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code to increase the Transactions and Use Taxes (Sales Tax) rate to one and one half percent (1.5%) for a period of twenty (20) years for general purposes.
Adopt Resolution 2020-023 declaring the results of the Election held on March 3, 2020 for the submission of an ordinance amending Article IV, Transactions and Use Tax, of Chapter 3.28, Sales and Use Tax, of the Carmel-by-the-Sea Municipal Code to increase the Transactions and Use Taxes (Sales Tax) rate to one and one half percent (1.5%) for a period of twenty (20) years for general purposes.

5. 1. Adopt Resolution 2020-024 authorizing the City Administrator to execute agreements with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration for implementation of a local transactions and use tax; and
2. Adopt Resolution 2020-025 authorizing the examination of Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax Records.
1. Adopt Resolution 2020-024 authorizing the City Administrator to execute agreements with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration for implementation of a local transactions and use tax; and
2. Adopt Resolution 2020-025 authorizing the examination of Transactions (Sales) and Use Tax Records.

6. Adopt Resolution 2020-026, approving a list of streets to be repaved for inclusion in the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Capital Improvement Plan and Budget partially funded by SB1; the Road Repair and Accountability Act
Adopt Resolution 2020-026, approving a list of streets to be repaved for inclusion in the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Capital Improvement Plan and Budget partially funded by SB1; the Road Repair and Accountability Act

7. Adopt Resolution 2020-027 affirming modification to the home mail delivery program to include the use of eligibility criteria and provide direction to staff.
Adopt Resolution 2020-027 affirming modification to the home mail delivery program to include the use of eligibility criteria and provide direction to staff.

ORDERS OF BUSINESS
Orders of Business are agenda items that require City Council, Board or Commission discussion, debate, direction to staff, and/or action.
8. Receive a presentation on the proposed Fiscal Year 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program and Five Year Capital Improvement Plan and provide direction to staff
Receive a presentation on the proposed Fiscal Year 2020/21 Capital Improvement Program and Five Year Capital Improvement Plan and provide direction to staff

9. Ordinance temporarily prohibiting evictions of tenants arising from income loss or substantial medical expenses related to the Coronavirus pandemic.
Ordinance temporarily prohibiting evictions of tenants arising from income loss or substantial medical expenses related to the Coronavirus pandemic.

ADJOURNMENT