LIVE: Arizona State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 Election
Monday, November 30, 2020
ORDER & ORDER (Second Order) & ORDER (Third Order) Timothy C. Batten, Sr. United States District Judge IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CORECO JA'QAN PEARSON, VIKKI TOWNSEND CONSIGLIO; GLORIA KAY GODWIN; JAMES KENNETH CARROLL; CAROLYN HALL FISHER; CATHLEEN ALSTON LATHAM; and BRIAN JAY VAN GUNDY, Plaintiffs, v. BRIAN KEMP; BRAD RAFFENSPERGER; DAVID J. WORLEY; REBECCA N. SULLIVAN; MATTHEW MASHBURN; and ANH LE, Defendants.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AHiDqWujx-kvMzMKfp9oP7YU5Lw1zwGU/view?usp=sharing
O R D E R
(Third Order)
November 29, 2020
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:
1. Defendants shall have until Wednesday, December 2, at 5:00 p.m. EST, to file a brief setting forth in detail the factual bases they have, if any, against allowing the three forensic inspections. The brief should be accompanied and supported by affidavit or other evidence, if appropriate.
2. Defendants are hereby ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from altering, destroying, or erasing, or allowing the alteration, destruction, or erasure of, any software or data on any Dominion voting machine in Cobb, Gwinnett, and Cherokee Counties.
3. Defendants are ORDERED to promptly produce to Plaintiffs a copy of the contract between the State and Dominion.
This temporary restraining order shall remain in effect for ten days, or until further order of the Court, whichever comes first.
O R D E R
(Second Order)
November 29, 2020
With respect to these issues, the Court sets the following schedule: Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs’ motion will be due on Wednesday, December 2, by 3:00 p.m., EST. Any reply brief will be due Thursday, December 3, by 3:00 p.m., EST. The Court will hold an in-person hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion on Friday, December 4, at 10:00 a.m., EST,
O R D E R
Timothy C. Batten, Sr.
United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
CORECO JA'QAN PEARSON, VIKKI TOWNSEND CONSIGLIO; GLORIA KAY GODWIN; JAMES KENNETH CARROLL; CAROLYN HALL FISHER; CATHLEEN ALSTON LATHAM; and BRIAN JAY VAN GUNDY, Plaintiffs,
v.
BRIAN KEMP; BRAD RAFFENSPERGER; DAVID J. WORLEY; REBECCA N. SULLIVAN; MATTHEW MASHBURN; and ANH LE, Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
FILE
NO. 1:20-cv-4809-TCB
November 29, 2020
Barnes and Baris on Election 2020 Anomalies: What Are the Odds?
Barnes and Baris on Election 2020 Anomalies: What Are the Odds?
'Skeptical of Voter Fraud in 2020? Here’s Your Evidence.'
Restoring Common Sense
Skepticalof Voter Fraud in 2020? Here’s Your Evidence.
Posted on 0
[Updated Nov 25th at 2:55 PM MST]
Spoliation Letter L. Lin Wood, Jr. vs. Brad Raff'ensperger, et al. Case No. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG Fulton County- Ballot Auditing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JuwKFifqZgl_Foy3Vg6c89CDmWoGBo-F/view?usp=sharing
Spoliation Letter
L. Lin Wood, Jr. vs. Brad Raff'ensperger, et al.
Case No. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG
Fulton County- Ballot Auditing
SMITH & LISS, LLC
Ray S. Smith, III
Sunday, November 29, 2020
AMERICAN GREATNESS & American Thinker
Reality and the Narrative
"Despite the blandishments of the narrative, which seek to seduce you into acquiescence with rumors of inevitability, we really do not know how this story, which seems so familiar, will end."
"Despite the blandishments of the narrative, which seek to seduce you into acquiescence with rumors of inevitability, we really do not know how this story, which seems so familiar, will end."
By Roger Kimball November 28, 2020
AMERICAN GREATNESS
AMERICAN GREATNESS
November 28, 2020
By Patricia McCarthy
American Thinker
"... the Democrats stole the election. They planned it, carefully and in advance by years. But they've been caught red-handed. They've massively cheated in the most corrupt Democrat-run cities and counties in the nation."
November 29, 2020
By Paul Dowling
American Thinker
"Little did the Democrats suspect that their villainous strength — the ability to win elections by cheating — was about to become an eminently indictable weakness."November 27, 2020
By Brian C. Joondeph, M.D.
American Thinker
"In his view, COVID is no crisis, only a political opportunity for his party to beat on the president and create election rules facilitating electoral cheating. Even the Democrat-defending New York Times took notice,"
"Flouting his own guidelines and exhortations to Californians to avoid socializing, Governor Newsom and his wife joined a birthday celebration for a friend — and prominent lobbyist — at the luxurious French Laundry restaurant in the Napa Valley. It is hard to say which was more astounding, the hypocrisy or the hubris"
"Flouting his own guidelines and exhortations to Californians to avoid socializing, Governor Newsom and his wife joined a birthday celebration for a friend — and prominent lobbyist — at the luxurious French Laundry restaurant in the Napa Valley. It is hard to say which was more astounding, the hypocrisy or the hubris"
Saturday, November 28, 2020
PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRITS & DECLARATORY RELIEF IMMEDIATE CONSIDERATION REQUESTED FOR DECISION BEFORE DECEMBER 8, 2020 STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE SUPREME COURTANGELIC JOHNSON, and LINDA LEE TARVER, PETITIONERS, v JOCELYN BENSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State; JEANNETTE BRADSHAW, in her official capacity as Chair of the Board of State Canvassers for Michigan; BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS FOR MICHIGAN; and GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of Michigan, RESPONDENTS.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ghKluXqaOLutKP65rspX6KIwtybc_Dhz/view?usp=sharing
PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRITS & DECLARATORY RELIEF
IMMEDIATE CONSIDERATION REQUESTED FOR DECISION BEFORE DECEMBER 8, 2020
STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE SUPREME COURT
ANGELIC JOHNSON, and LINDA LEE TARVER, PETITIONERS,
v
JOCELYN BENSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State; JEANNETTE BRADSHAW, in her official capacity as Chair of the Board of State Canvassers for Michigan; BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS FOR MICHIGAN; and GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of Michigan, RESPONDENTS.
THOMAS MORE SOCIETY— AMISTAD PROJECT
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Due Process)
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Equal Protection)
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Article II, section 1, clause 2)
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Mandamus and Quo Warranto)
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Petitioners ask this Court to narrowly tailor its relief to:
A) ensure the Separation of Powers and protect the accuracy and integrity of the November 2020 General Election by giving the Michigan Legislature an opportunity to finish its constitutionally-mandated work to pick Michigan’s electors;
B) take custody and control of all ballots, ballot boxes, poll books, and other indicia of the Election from Respondents or their designee to prevent further irregularities and to ensure the Michigan Legislature and this Court have a chance to perform a constitutionally sound audit of lawful votes;
C) segregate any ballots counted or certified inconsistent with Michigan Election Law;
D) declare that Respondent Benson violated Petitioners’ fundamental constitutional rights as explained in this Petition;
E) segregate any ballots attributable to the Secretary of State’s absentee ballot scheme and declare the Secretary of State’s absentee ballot scheme unlawful;
F) appoint a special master or committee from both chambers of the Michigan Legislature to investigate all claims of mistake, irregularity, and fraud at the TCF Center and to verify and certify the legality of all absentee ballots ordered through the Secretary of State’s absentee ballot scheme. The special master may recommend, including a recommendation with
findings, that illegal votes can be separated from legal votes to determine a proper tabulation, or that the fraud is of such a character that the correct vote cannot be determined;
G) alternatively, to enjoin Respondents or Governor Whitmer from finally certifying the election results and declaring winners of the 2020 general election to the United States Department of State or United States Congress until after a special master can be appointed to review and certify the legality of all absentee ballots ordered through the Secretary of State’s absentee ballot scheme;
H) alternatively, to enjoin Respondents from finally certifying the election results and declaring winners of the 2020 general election until a special master can be appointed to independently review the election procedures employed at the TCF Center and throughout the State;
I) alternatively, to enjoin Respondents from finally certifying the election results and declaring winners of the 2020 general election until a special master can be appointed to review and certify the legality of all absentee ballots submitted in Wayne County and throughout the State;
J) to grant such other and further relief as this Court should find just and proper.
ORDER, CONCURRING STATEMENT & CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT THE HONORABLE MIKE KELLY, SEAN PARNELL, THOMAS A. FRANK, NANCY KIERZEK, DEREK MAGEE, ROBIN SAUTER, MICHAEL KINCAID, AND WANDA LOGAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, HONORABLE THOMAS W. WOLF, KATHY BOOCKVAR APPEAL OF: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HONORABLE THOMAS W. WOLF, KATHY BOOCKVAR
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yS62HIdtj1JcvIh7lpVKO6GtGx_FYR_L/view?usp=sharing
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT
THE HONORABLE MIKE KELLY, SEAN PARNELL, THOMAS A. FRANK, NANCY KIERZEK, DEREK MAGEE, ROBIN SAUTER, MICHAEL KINCAID, AND WANDA LOGAN
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, HONORABLE THOMAS W. WOLF, KATHY BOOCKVAR
APPEAL OF: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HONORABLE THOMAS
W. WOLF, KATHY BOOCKVAR
No. 68 MAP 2020
November 28, 2020
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2020, pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 726,1 we GRANT the application for extraordinary jurisdiction filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Governor Thomas W. Wolf, and Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar (“Commonwealth”), VACATE the Commonwealth Court’s order preliminarily enjoining the Commonwealth from taking any further action regarding the certification of the results of the 2020 General Election, and DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE the petition for review filed by the Honorable Mike Kelly, Sean Parnell, Thomas A. Frank, Nancy Kierzek, Derek Magee, Robin Sauter, and Wanda Logan (“Petitioners”). All other outstanding motions are DISMISSED AS MOOT.
CONCURRING STATEMENT
JUSTICE WECHT
Filed: November 28, 2020
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT
CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR
Filed: November 28, 2020
“…there is a component of Appellees’ original complaint, filed in the Commonwealth Court, which seeks declaratory relief and is unresolved by the above remedial assessment. Additionally, I find that the relevant substantive challenge raised by Appellees presents troublesome questions about the constitutional validity of the new mail-in voting scheme.”
Justice Mundy joins this Concurring and Dissenting Statement.
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE AFFIDAVITS UNDER SEAL AND FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION CORECO JA’QAN PEARSON, VIKKI TOWNSEND CONSIGLIO, GLORIA KAY GODWIN, JAMES KENNETH CARROLL, CAROLYN HALL FISHER, CATHLEEN ALSTON LATHAM, and BRIAN JAY VAN GUNDY, Plaintiffs. v. BRIAN KEMP, in his official capacity as Governor of Georgia, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and Chair of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, REBECCA N.SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, MATTHEW MASHBURN, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, and ANH LE, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, Defendants.
PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION CORECO JA’QAN PEARSON, VIKKI TOWNSEND CONSIGLIO, GLORIA KAY GODWIN, JAMES KENNETH CARROLL, , CAROLYN HALL FISHER, CATHLEEN ALSTON LATHAM, and BRIAN JAY VAN GUNDY, Plaintiffs. v. BRIAN KEMP, in his official capacity as Governor of Georgia, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and Chair of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, REBECCA N.SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, MATTHEW MASHBURN, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, and ANH LE, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, Defendants.
BEFORE: HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge OPINION NOT REPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION BY JUDGE McCULLOUGH FILED: November 27, 2020 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA The Honorable Mike Kelly, Sean Parnell, Thomas A. Frank, Nancy Kierzek, Derek Magee, Robin Sauter, Michael Kincaid, and Wanda Logan, Petitioners v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania General Assembly, Honorable Thomas W. Wolf, Kathy Boockvar, Respondents
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kBkqUh3tlPnTYEo-JOEjcmq3ZtpdWixM/view?usp=sharin
BEFORE: HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge
OPINION NOT REPORTED
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BY JUDGE McCULLOUGH
FILED: November 27, 2020
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
The Honorable Mike Kelly, Sean Parnell, Thomas A. Frank, Nancy Kierzek, Derek Magee, Robin Sauter, Michael Kincaid, and Wanda Logan, Petitioners
v.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania General Assembly, Honorable Thomas W. Wolf, Kathy Boockvar, Respondents
No. 620 M.D. 2020
FROM HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge, MEMORANDUM OPINION:
The “Safe Harbor” provision of 3 U.S.C. §5 does not expire until December 8, 2020,
and the Electoral College does not vote for president and vice president until December 14, 2020. Additionally, Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim.
Friday, November 27, 2020
OPINION* UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 20-3371 DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.; LAWRENCE ROBERTS; DAVID JOHN HENRY, Appellants v. SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CENTRE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; PHILADELPHIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f9RHvGYAurTPzEYY_moY6KcvHerWYcix/view?usp=sharing
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_______________
No. 20-3371
_______________
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.;
LAWRENCE ROBERTS; DAVID JOHN HENRY,
Appellants
v.
SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA;
ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CENTRE COUNTY BOARD
OF ELECTIONS; CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DELAWARE
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF
ELECTIONS; NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS;
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
_______________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. No. 4:20-cv-02078)
District Judge: Honorable Matthew W. Brann
_______________
Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)
on November 25, 2020
Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, and CHAGARES and BIBAS, Circuit Judges
(Filed: November 27, 2020)
_______________
OPINION*
_______________
Thursday, November 26, 2020
MOTION FOR AUDIT, BRIEF IN SUPPORT, AND PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, JR., Plaintiffs, -vs- CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; Janice M. Winfrey, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; Cathy M. Garrett, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Defendants, -and- MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Intervenor Defendant.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19GMleAgFPcqwYTPaO4cN3bVfrrVjNRoy/view?usp=sharing
MOTION FOR AUDIT, BRIEF IN SUPPORT, AND PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
-vs-
CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; Janice M. Winfrey, in
her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; Cathy M. Garrett, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS,
Defendants,
-and-
MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY,
Intervenor Defendant.
CIRCUIT CT. NO: 20-014780-AW
HON. TIMOTHY M. KENNY
PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge, ORDER, IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA The Honorable Mike Kelly, Sean Parnell, Thomas A. Frank, Nancy Kierzek, Derek Magee, Robin Sauter, Michael Kincaid, and Wanda Logan, Petitioners v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania General Assembly, Honorable Thomas W. Wolf, Kathy Boockvar, Respondents
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1izj0Xle4IYqDGfwuYisNazSi0Ky0e9tw/view?usp=sharing
PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge
ORDER
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
The Honorable Mike Kelly, Sean Parnell, Thomas A. Frank, Nancy Kierzek, Derek Magee, Robin Sauter, Michael Kincaid, and Wanda Logan, Petitioners
v.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania General Assembly, Honorable Thomas W. Wolf, Kathy Boockvar, Respondents
No. 620 M.D. 2020
November 25, 2020
NOTE: Evidentiary hearing, Friday, November 27, 2020 at 11:30 am via WebEx.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION CORECO JA’QAN PEARSON, VIKKI TOWNSEND CONSIGLIO, GLORIA KAY GODWIN, JAMES KENNETH CARROLL, , CAROLYN HALL FISHER, CATHLEEN ALSTON LATHAM, and BRIAN JAY VAN GUNDY, Plaintiffs. v. BRIAN KEMP, in his official capacity as Governor of Georgia, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and Chair of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, REBECCA N.SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, MATTHEW MASHBURN, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, and ANH LE, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, Defendants.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Si-npTqOF0DE960kAl5kw5Nd_eahxnns/view?usp=sharing
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION
CORECO JA’QAN PEARSON, VIKKI TOWNSEND CONSIGLIO, GLORIA KAY GODWIN, JAMES KENNETH CARROLL, , CAROLYN HALL FISHER, CATHLEEN ALSTON LATHAM, and BRIAN JAY VAN GUNDY,
Plaintiffs.
v.
BRIAN KEMP, in his official capacity as Governor of Georgia, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and Chair of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, REBECCA N.SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, MATTHEW MASHBURN, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, and ANH LE, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, Defendants.
November 25, 2020
COUNT I
DEFENDANTS VIOLATED THE ELECTIONS CLAUSE AND 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUNT II
THE SECRETARY OF STATE AND GEORGIA COUNTIES VIOLATED THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT U.S. CONST. AMEND. XIV, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENIAL OF EQUAL PROTECTION
INVALID ENACTMENT OF REGULATIONS AFFECTING OBSERVATION AND MONITORING OF THE ELECTION
COUNT III
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE U.S. CONST. AMEND. XIV, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS
DISPARATE TREATMENT OF ABSENTEE/MAIL-IN VOTERS AMONG DIFFERENT COUNTIES
COUNT IV
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, U.S. CONST. ART. I § 4, CL. 1; ART. II, § 1, CL. 2; AMEND. XIV, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS ON THE RIGHT TO VOTE
COUNT V
THERE WAS WIDE-SPREAD BALLOT FRAUD.
OCGA 21-2-522
REQUEST FOR RELIEF
208.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek an emergency order instructing Defendants to de-certify the results of the General Election for the Office of President.
209.
In the alternative, Plaintiffs seek an emergency order prohibiting Defendants from including in any certified results from the General Election the tabulation of absentee and mailing ballots which do not comply with the Election Code, including, without limitation, the tabulation of absentee and mail-in ballots Trump Campaign’s watchers were prevented from observing or based on the tabulation of invalidly cast absentee and mail-in ballots which (i) lack a secrecy envelope, or contain on that envelope any text, mark, or symbol which reveals the elector’s identity, political affiliation, or candidate preference, (ii) do not include on the outside envelope a completed declaration that is dated and signed by the elector, or (iii) are delivered in-person by third parties for non-disabled voters.
210.
When we consider the harm of these uncounted votes, and ballots not ordered by the voters themselves, and the potential that many of these unordered ballots may in fact have been improperly voted and also prevented proper voting at the polls, the mail ballot system has clearly failed in the state of Georgia and did so on a large scale and widespread basis. The size of the voting failures, whether accidental or intentional, are multiples larger than the margin in the state. For these reasons, Georgia cannot reasonably rely on the results of the mail vote. Relief sought is the elimination of the mail ballots from counting in the 2020 election. Alternatively, the electors for the state of Georgia should be disqualified from counting toward the 2020 election. Alternatively, the electors of the State of Georgia should be directed to vote for President Donald Trump.
211.
For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in their favor and provide the following emergency relief:
1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election;
4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted;
10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by plaintiffs’ expects;
11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law;
12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3.
14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988.
Pearson v. Kemp (1:20-cv-04809)
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Case No. 1:20-cv-4809-TCB
Exhibit Affidavit Exh. 1, Report of William Briggs — Document #1, Attachment #1
Exhibit Affidavit Redacted Affidavit — Document #1, Attachment #2
Exhibit Affidavit of Anna Mercedes Diaz Cardozo — Document #1, Attachment #3Exhibit Exhibit SoS Certification of Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite 5.5 — Document #1, Attachment #6
Exhibit Exhibit Study "Ballot-Marking Devices (BMDs) Cannot Assure the Will — Document #1, Attachment #8
Exhibit Report of Texas Secretary of State Rejecting Dominion Voting Systems — Document #1, Attachment #23
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRCT OF MICHIGAN TIMOTHY KING,MARIAN ELLEN SHERIDAN, JOHN EARL HAGGARD, CHARLES JAMES RITCHARD, JAMES DAVID HOOPER and DAREN WADE RUBINGH, Plaintiffs. v. GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan, JOCELYN BENSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State and the Michigan BOARD OFSTATE CANVASSERS. Defendants.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T4CWiuwPSKSiiHhWdMkeu8Jb0ZrKp9yz/view?usp=sharin
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRCT OF MICHIGAN
TIMOTHY KING,MARIAN ELLEN SHERIDAN, JOHN EARL HAGGARD, CHARLES JAMES RITCHARD, JAMES DAVID HOOPER and DAREN WADE RUBINGH,
Plaintiffs.
v.
GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan, JOCELYN BENSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State and the Michigan BOARD OFSTATE CANVASSERS.
Defendants.
Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW
November 25, 2020
COUNT I
Defendants Violated the Elections and Electors Clauses and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
COUNT II
Governor Whitmer, Secretary Benson and Other Defendants Violated The Fourteenth Amendment U.S. Const. Amend. XIV, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denial of Equal Protection
Invalid Enactment of Regulations Affecting Observation and Monitoring of the Election
COUNT III
Fourteenth Amendment, U.S. Const. Art. I § 4, cl. 1; Art. II, § 1, cl. 2; Amend. XIV, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denial of Due Process On The Right to Vote
COUNT IV
Wide-SpreadBallot Fraud
COUNT V
MICHIGAN STATUTORY ELECTION LAW VIOLATIONS
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
207. Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek an emergency order instructing Defendants to de-certify the results of the General Election for the Office of President.
208. Alternatively, Plaintiffs seek an order instructing the Defendants to certify the results of the General Election for Office of the President in favor of President Donald Trump.
209. In the alternative, Plaintiffs seek an emergency order prohibiting Defendants from including in any certified results from the General Election the tabulation of absentee and mailing ballots which do not comply with the Michigan Election Code, including, without limitation, the tabulation of absentee and mail-in ballots Trump Campaign’s watchers were prevented from observing or based on the tabulation of invalidly cast absentee and mail-in ballots which (i) lack a secrecy envelope, or contain on that envelope any text, mark, or symbol which reveals the elector’s identity, political affiliation, or candidate preference, (ii) do not include on the outside envelope a completed declaration that is dated and signed by the elector, (iii) are delivered in-person by third parties for non-disabled voters, or (iv) any of the other Michigan Election Code violations set forth in Section II of this Complaint.
210. Order production of all registration data, ballots, envelopes, etc. required to be maintained by law. When we consider the harm of these uncounted votes, and ballots not ordered by the voters themselves, and the potential that many of these unordered ballots may in fact have been improperly voted and also prevented proper voting at the polls, the mail ballot system has clearly failed in the state of Michigan and did so on a large scale and widespread basis. The size of the voting failures, whether accidental or intentional, are multiples larger than the margin in the state. For these reasons, Michigan cannot reasonably rely on the results of the mail vote. Relief sought is the elimination of the mail ballots from counting in the 2020 election. Alternatively, the electors for the State of Michigan should be disqualified from counting toward the 2020 election. Alternatively, the electors of the State of Michigan should be directed to vote for President Donald Trump.
211. For these reasons, Plaintiffs ask this Court to enter a judgment in their favor and provide the following emergency relief:
1. An order directing Secretary Benson, Governor Whitmer, the Board of State Canvassers and Wayne County to de-certify the election results;
2. An order enjoining Secretary Benson and Governor Whitmer from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
3. An order requiring Governor Whitmer to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election;
4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Michigan for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Michigan’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
7. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violatesthe Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
8. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted;
9. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by Plaintiffs’ expects;
10. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law;
11. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
12. Immediate production of 48 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at the TCF Center for November 3 and November 4.
13. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988.
King v. Whitmer
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Docket Number: 2:20-cv-13134
Date Filed: November 25th, 2020
Referred To: R. Steven Whalen
Heather Mac Donald: 'Our current Thanksgiving Day mantras — ‘Stay within your pod. Stay within your bubble. Stay within your household’ (in the words of a University of California, San Francisco, epidemiologist); don’t travel, don’t share food, don’t touch your family members or friends, speak only in hushed tones — make a mockery of the spirit that creates a country and sustains human life.'
Coronavirus panic has set America back hundreds of years
Heather Mac Donald
Heather Mac Donald
Wednesday, November 25, 2020
PENNSYLVANIA SENATE MAJORITY POLICY COMMITTEE HEARING, November 25, 2020
Live: Giuliani attends election hearing in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
REFERENCE:
PENNSYLVANIA SENATE MAJORITY POLICY COMMITTEE
SENATOR DAVID G. ARGALL
CHAIR
Posted on Nov 24, 2020
Senate Majority Policy Committee
Wednesday, November 25, 2020 | 12:30 p.m.
Wyndham Hotel
95 Presidential Circle, Gettysburg, PA 17325
12:30 p.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks
EMERGENCY PETITION FOR ORIGINAL ACTION Donald Trump, et al. v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al. In the Supreme Court of Wisconsin
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Cvd6QGe-5bWFKdoB5JjienFP0lV6wafg/view?usp=sharing
EMERGENCY PETITION FOR ORIGINAL ACTION
Donald Trump, et al. v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al.
In the Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Wisconsin Voters Alliance, Ronald H. Heuer, William Joseph Laurent, Richard Kucksdorf, James Fitzgerald, Kelly Ruh, William Berglund, John Jaconi, Donna Utschig, JeffWellhouse, Kurt Johnson, Thomas Reczek, Linda Sinlmla, Atilla Thorbjorsson, Jeff Kleiman, Navin Jarugumilli, Jonathan Hunt, Suzanne Vlach, Jacob Blazkovec, Donald Utschig, Carol Aldinger, Jay Plaumann, Deborah Gorman, Robert R. Liebeck, Valerie M. Bruns Liebeck, Edward Hudak, Ron Cork, Charles Risch, Karl Lehrke, Arnet Holty and Joseph McGrath, PETITIONERS,
v.
Wisconsin Elections Commission, and its members Ann S. Jacobs, Mark L. Thomsen, Marge Bostelman, Julie M. Glancey, Dean Knudson, Robert F. Spindell, Jr., in their official capacities, Governor Tony Evers, in his official capacity, RESPONDENTS
On Petition For Original Action Before this Court
November 23, 2020
REFERENCE:
Posted on November 24, 2020
Citizen WElls News
Tuesday, November 24, 2020
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RULE 27 DISCOVERY (Election Contest): IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA KELLI WARD, Plaintiff; vs. CONSTANCE JACKSON; FELICIA ROTELLINI: FRED YAMISHITA; JAMES MCLAUGHLIN: JONATHAN NEZ; LUIS ALBERTO HEREDIA; NED NORRIS; REGINA ROMERO; SANDRA D. KENNEDY; STEPHEN ROE LEWIS; and STEVE GALLARDO, Defendants
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kmGwYYRgOUyEvGOSZlFTJdhHVJ8rJO5l/view?usp=sharing
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RULE 27 DISCOVERY (Election Contest)
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND GRANTING ALTERNATIVE SERVICE AND SERVICE BY PUBLICATION
SUMMONSES
CIVIL COVERSHEET
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
KELLI WARD, Plaintiff;
vs.
CONSTANCE JACKSON; FELICIA ROTELLINI: FRED YAMISHITA; JAMES MCLAUGHLIN: JONATHAN NEZ; LUIS ALBERTO HEREDIA; NED NORRIS; REGINA ROMERO; SANDRA D. KENNEDY; STEPHEN ROE LEWIS; and STEVE GALLARDO, Defendants
Case No. CV2020-015285
November 24, 2020
WB WILENCHIK & BARTNESS
Elections Contest Filings – Ward v. Jackson, et al. (Trump – Biden Elections Contest)
Published on November 24, 2020
Elections Contest Filings – Ward v. Jackson, et al. (Trump – Biden Elections Contest)
Published on November 24, 2020
UPDATE: STATE OF GEORGIA Georgia Presidential Electors Challenge
Georgia Presidential Electors Challenge
November 13, 2020
Lawsuit challenging the inclusion of absentee ballots for the general election in Georgia.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
L. LIN WOOD, JR., Plaintiff,
v.
BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Georgia, et al., Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL (EMERGENCY)
Filed 11/24/20
November 13, 2020
Lawsuit challenging the inclusion of absentee ballots for the general election in Georgia.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
L. LIN WOOD, JR., Plaintiff,
v.
BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Georgia, et al., Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL (EMERGENCY)
Filed 11/24/20
New statistical analysis points to election fraud … ‘extraordinarily anomalous vote updates demand immediate investigation’ …
Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020
A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote
Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night
Vote
Integrity
November 24, 2020
Gofile
Monday, November 23, 2020
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE HONORABLE MIKE KELLY, SEAN PARNELL, THOMAS A. FRANK, NANCY KIERZEK, DEREK MAGEE, ROBIN SAUTER, MICHAEL KINCAID, and WANDA LOGAN, Plaintiffs, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, HONORABLE THOMAS W. WOLF, KATHY BOOCKVAR, Defendants.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cQ_s8e-jnv17cpOCt4pAAb5Yb_0pT7bW/view?usp=sharing
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THE HONORABLE MIKE KELLY, SEAN PARNELL, THOMAS A. FRANK, NANCY KIERZEK, DEREK MAGEE, ROBIN SAUTER, MICHAEL KINCAID, and WANDA LOGAN, Plaintiffs,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, HONORABLE THOMAS W. WOLF, KATHY BOOCKVAR, Defendants.
Docket No.___ M.D. 2020
Filed 11/21/2020
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Honorable Court enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction that prohibits Defendants from certifying the results of the General Elections which include mail-in ballots which Defendants improperly permitted on a statewide basis; prohibits Defendants from certifying the results of the General Elections which include the tabulation of unauthorized votes, including mail-in ballots which did not meet the Constitutional requirements and, instead, compels Defendants to certify the results of the election based solely on the legal votes or, alternatively, directs that the Pennsylvania General Assembly choose Pennsylvania's electors; award Plaintiffs' reasonable costs and expenses of this action, including attorneys' fees and costs; and provide such other and further legal and equitable relief as this Court deems just and proper.
UPDATE: STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania Democratic Counties Challenge
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
November 10, 2020
Trump Campaign lawsuit filed against Democratic counties in Pennsylvania. The suit challenges the results of the election and asks the court to prohibit the certification of results.
APPELLANTS’ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW
Date Filed: 11/22/2020
APPELLANTS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW
Date Filed: 11/23/2020
APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO SUBMIT EMERGENCY TRO MOTION WITH A 6,500-WORD LIMIT
Date Filed: 11/23/2020
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS’ OPENING BRIEF
Date Filed: 11/23/2020
EMERGENCY MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS UNDER FRAP 8 FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL TO STAY EFFECT OF CERTIFICATION AND EXPEDITED RESPONSE
Date Filed: 11/23/2020
SOURCES:
Pennsylvania Democratic Counties Challenge | Democracy Docket
Pennsylvania | Democracy Docket
Date Filed: 11/22/2020
APPELLANTS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW
Date Filed: 11/23/2020
APPELLANTS’ MOTION TO SUBMIT EMERGENCY TRO MOTION WITH A 6,500-WORD LIMIT
Date Filed: 11/23/2020
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS’ OPENING BRIEF
Date Filed: 11/23/2020
EMERGENCY MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS UNDER FRAP 8 FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL TO STAY EFFECT OF CERTIFICATION AND EXPEDITED RESPONSE
Date Filed: 11/23/2020
SOURCES:
Pennsylvania Democratic Counties Challenge | Democracy Docket
Pennsylvania | Democracy Docket
Order, MARKMAN, J., joins the statement of ZAHRA, J. VIVIANO, J. (dissenting): CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr., Plaintiff, -vs CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Defendants.
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Michigan Detroit Election
Challenge
November 9, 2020
Lawsuit claiming multiple fraud
conspiracies in the Michigan election. The challenge asks the Board of
Elections to conduct an audit of the election, prohibit the certification of
the election, and order a new election to be held.
CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr., Plaintiff,
-vs
CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in her
official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of
the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official capacity as
the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS,
Defendants.
November 8, 2020
Order, MARKMAN, J., joins the statement of ZAHRA, J. VIVIANO, J. (dissenting): CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v CITY OF DETROIT, DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION, DETROIT CITY CLERK, WAYNE COUNTY CLERK, and WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Defendants-Appellees, and MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.
Order
November 23, 2020
Michigan Supreme Court
Lansing, Michigan
MARKMAN, J., joins the statement of ZAHRA, J. VIVIANO, J. (dissenting).
On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and the motion to file supplemental response are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. ZAHRA, J. (concurring).
SOURCES:
Michigan Detroit Election Challenge | Democracy Docket
Michigan | Democracy Docket
UPDATE: STATE OF NEVADA Nevada Election Law Contest
STATE OF NEVADA
Nevada Election Law Contest
November 17, 2020
Election contest backed by the Trump Campaign alleging voter fraud in Nevada.
STATEMENT OF CONTEST OF THE NOVEMBER 3, 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PURSUANT TO NRS 293.407 AND 293.410
IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CARSON CITY, NEVADA
Jesse Law, an individual; Michael McDonald; an individual; James DeGraffenreid III, an individual; Durward James Hindle III, an individual; Eileen Rice, an individual; Shawn Meehan, an individual, as candidates for presidential electors on behalf of Donald J. Trump. Contestants,
vs.
Judith Whitmer, an individual; Sarah Mahler, an individual; Joseph Throneberry, an individual; Artemesia Blanco, an individual; Gabrielle D'Ayr, an individual; and Yvanna Cancela, an individual, as candidates for presidential electors on behalf of JosepH R. Biden, Jr., Defendants
IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CARSON CITY, NEVADA
Jesse Law, an individual; Michael McDonald; an individual; James DeGraffenreid III, an individual; Durward James Hindle III, an individual; Eileen Rice, an individual; Shawn Meehan, an individual, as candidates for presidential electors on behalf of Donald J. Trump. Contestants,
vs.
Judith Whitmer, an individual; Sarah Mahler, an individual; Joseph Throneberry, an individual; Artemesia Blanco, an individual; Gabrielle D'Ayr, an individual; and Yvanna Cancela, an individual, as candidates for presidential electors on behalf of JosepH R. Biden, Jr., Defendants
Explosive: New Data From Rigorous Statistical Analysis Points to Voter Fraud in Montgomery County, PA
Explosive: New Data From Rigorous Statistical Analysis Points to Voter Fraud in Montgomery County, PA (Part One)
November 21, 2020
Statistical Analyst Reveals Scenario of How Dems May Have Pulled Off Massive Fraud in Montgomery County, PA (Part Two)
November 23, 2020
November 21, 2020
revolver.news
Statistical Analyst Reveals Scenario of How Dems May Have Pulled Off Massive Fraud in Montgomery County, PA (Part Two)
November 23, 2020
revolver.news
Sunday, November 22, 2020
Noteworthy Trump Post-Election ‘Active’ & ‘Impact’ Legal Cases in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia & Nevada
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Pennsylvania Democratic Counties Challenge
November 10, 2020
Trump Campaign lawsuit filed against Democratic counties in Pennsylvania. The suit challenges the results of the election and asks the court to prohibit the certification of results.
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.; LAWRENCE ROBERTS; and DAVID JOHN HENRY; Plaintiffs,
v.
KATHY BOOCKVAR, in her capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CENTRE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; and PHILADELPHIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; Defendants.Case 4:20-cv-02078-MWB
Filed 11/09/20
FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Filed 11/15/20
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Filed 11/15/20
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PETITION OF RUDOLPH WILLIAM GIULIANI
Filed 11/17/20
PLAINTIFFS’ OMNIBUS OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF 125)
Files 11/18/20
Oral Argument
Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar, et al.
4:20-CV-02078
November 17, 2020
4:20-CV-02078
November 17, 2020
PLAINTIFFS’ OMNIBUS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF RENEWED MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Filed 11/21/20
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NOVEMBER 21, 2020
Judge Brann
Filed 11/21/20
Filed 11/22/20
SOURCES:
Pennsylvania Democratic Counties Challenge | Democracy Docket
Pennsylvania | Democracy Docket
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Michigan Wayne County Results Challenge
November 11, 2020
Trump lawsuit claiming fraud in Wayne County election. The suit seeks to halt the certification of election results in Wayne County and statewide.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEFIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., MATTHEW SEELY, ALEXANDRA SEELY, PHILIP O’HALLORAN, ERIC OSTERGREN, MARIAN SHERIDAN, MERCEDES WIRSING, and CAMERON TARSA, Plaintiffs,
v.
JOCELYN BENSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State, MICHIGAN BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS, WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN, and WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY CANVASSERS, Defendants.
Filed 11/11/20
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
JOCELYN BENSON, et al., Defendants.
Case No. 1:20CV1083
Hon. Janet T. Neff
Filed 11/19/20
SOURCES:
Michigan Wayne County Results Challenge | Democracy Docket
Michigan | Democracy Docket
Michigan Detroit Election Challenge
November 9, 2020
CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr., Plaintiff,
-vs
CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Defendants.
November 8, 2020
MOTION FOR TRO, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION FOR AN EX-PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, SHOW CAUSE ORDER, AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
November 8, 2020
STATE OF MICHIGAN
November 9, 2020
Lawsuit claiming multiple fraud conspiracies in the Michigan election. The challenge asks the Board of Elections to conduct an audit of the election, prohibit the certification of the election, and order a new election to be held.
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO FILE QUO WARRANTO COMPLAINT EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTEDCHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr., Plaintiff,
-vs
CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official capacity as the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Defendants.
November 8, 2020
MOTION FOR TRO, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION FOR AN EX-PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, SHOW CAUSE ORDER, AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
November 8, 2020
STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
OPINION & ORDER
Hon. Timothy M. Kenny
November 13, 2020
OPINION & ORDER
Hon. Timothy M. Kenny
November 13, 2020
STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
COA NO.:
CIRCUIT CT. NO: 20-014780-AW
HON. TIMOTHY M. KENNY
November 16, 2020
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan
Michael J. Riordan
Presiding Judge
Cynthia Diane Stephens
Anica Letica
Judges
November 16, 2020
November 16, 2020
PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS’APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL AND PROOF OF SERVICE
November 17, 2020
SOURCES:
Michigan Detroit Election Challenge | Democracy Docket
Michigan | Democracy Docket
Wisconsin 2020 Election Recount
November 18, 2020
Petition filed by the Trump Campaign claiming fraud in the Wisconsin 2020 election. The petition requests a recount in Dane and Milwaukee county. Verified Petition for Recount
November 18, 2020
SOURCES:
Wisconsin 2020 Election Recount | Democracy Docket
Wisconsin | Democracy Docket
Georgia 2020 Election Recount
November 22, 2020
Petition filed by the Trump Campaign for a recount of the 2020 election results in Georgia.
RECOUNT DEMAND
November 21, 2020
SOURCES:
Georgia 2020 Election Recount | Democracy Docket
Georgia | Democracy Docket
November 13, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
L. LIN WOOD, JR., Plaintiff,
v.
BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Georgia, REBECCA N. SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J . WORLEY, in his official capacity as a Member of the Georgia State Election Board, MATTHEW MASHBURN, in his official capacity as a Member of the Georgia State Election Board, and ANH LE, in her official capacity as a Member of the Georgia State Election Board, Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
November 17, 2020
SOURCES:
Michigan Detroit Election Challenge | Democracy Docket
Michigan | Democracy Docket
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Wisconsin 2020 Election Recount
November 18, 2020
Petition filed by the Trump Campaign claiming fraud in the Wisconsin 2020 election. The petition requests a recount in Dane and Milwaukee county. Verified Petition for Recount
November 18, 2020
SOURCES:
Wisconsin 2020 Election Recount | Democracy Docket
Wisconsin | Democracy Docket
STATE OF GEORGIA
Georgia 2020 Election Recount
November 22, 2020
Petition filed by the Trump Campaign for a recount of the 2020 election results in Georgia.
RECOUNT DEMAND
November 21, 2020
SOURCES:
Georgia 2020 Election Recount | Democracy Docket
Georgia | Democracy Docket
November 13, 2020
Lawsuit challenging the inclusion of absentee ballots for the general election in Georgia.
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEFUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
L. LIN WOOD, JR., Plaintiff,
v.
BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Georgia, REBECCA N. SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J . WORLEY, in his official capacity as a Member of the Georgia State Election Board, MATTHEW MASHBURN, in his official capacity as a Member of the Georgia State Election Board, and ANH LE, in her official capacity as a Member of the Georgia State Election Board, Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
FILE NO. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG
Filed 11/13/20
Filed 11/13/20
VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Filed 11/16/20
OPINION AND ORDER
Steven D. Grimberg
United States District Court Judge
Filed 11/20/20
Filed 11/16/20
OPINION AND ORDER
Steven D. Grimberg
United States District Court Judge
Filed 11/20/20
SOURCES:
Georgia Presidential Electors Challenge | Democracy Docket
Georgia | Democracy Docket
STATE OF NEVADA
Nevada Election Law ContestNovember 17, 2020
Election contest backed by the Trump Campaign alleging voter fraud in Nevada.
STATEMENT OF CONTEST OF THE NOVEMBER 3, 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PURSUANT TO NRS 293.407 AND 293.410IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CARSON CITY, NEVADA
Jesse Law, an individual; Michael McDonald; an individual; James DeGraffenreid III, an individual; Durward James Hindle III, an individual; Eileen Rice, an individual; Shawn Meehan, an individual, as candidates for presidential electors on behalf of Donald J. Trump. Contestants,
vs.
Judith Whitmer, an individual; Sarah Mahler, an individual; Joseph Throneberry, an individual; Artemesia Blanco, an individual; Gabrielle D'Ayr, an individual; and Yvanna Cancela, an individual, as candidates for presidential electors on behalf of JosepH R. Biden, Jr., Defendants
SOURCES:
Nevada Election Law Contest | Democracy Docket
Nevada | Democracy Docket
Saturday, November 21, 2020
Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge, MEMORANDUM OPINION NOVEMBER 21, 2020: ‘I grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss Plaintiffs’ action with prejudice.’
https://drive.google.com/file/d/110mXYygKhPAbtfcrp6K8tzj6CsUWLrMD/view?usp=sharing
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NOVEMBER 21, 2020
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
KATHY BOOCKVAR, et al., Defendants.
No. 4:20-CV-02078
(Judge Brann)
CONCLUSION
Defendants’ motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint are granted with prejudice. Leave to amend is denied. “Among the grounds that could justify a denial of leave to amend are undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, prejudice, and futility.”140 Given that: (1) Plaintiffs have already amended once as of right; (2) Plaintiffs seek to amend simply in order to effectively reinstate their initial complaint and claims; and (3) the deadline for counties in Pennsylvania to certify their election results to Secretary Boockvar is November 23, 2020, amendment would unduly delay resolution of the issues. This is especially true because the Court would need to implement a new briefing schedule, conduct a second oral argument, and then decide the issues.
EXCLUSIVE: Brilliant! America’s Online Minutemen and Women Just Uncovered the Dominion Plot Transferring Vote Ratios between Pennsylvania Precincts
EXCLUSIVE: Brilliant! America’s Online Minutemen and Women Just Uncovered the Dominion Plot Transferring Vote Ratios between Pennsylvania Precincts (VIDEO)
By Joe Hoft
Published November 21, 2020
(thegatewaypundit.com)
Smoking Gun: Dominion Transferring Vote Ratios between Precincts in PA. -
By: Edward Solomon
2one3studio
Published November 20, 2020
Friday, November 20, 2020
Declaration of Professor of Mathematics, Steven J Miller, Ph.D.
Declaration of Professor of Mathematics, Steven J Miller, Ph.D.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The analysis was performed on a data set provided by Matt Braynard and his firm, Election Data Services.
• Estimate of
ballots requested in the name of a registered Republican by someone other than
that person: 40,875 to 53,909.
• Estimate of Republican ballots that the requester returned but were not counted: 48,522 to 44,892 (these go in the opposite order as the previous: if more of the ballots are requested by someone other than the registered voter, that means there are fewer ballots left that we estimate were incorrectly returned.).
Thus I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801.
Doing a more detailed
analysis with confidence intervals, I estimate that almost surely (based on the
data I received) that the number of ballots requested by someone other than the
registered Republican is between 37,001 and 58,914, and almost surely the
number of ballots requested by registered Republicans and returned but not
counted is in the range from 38,910 to 56,483.
SOURCE:
In sworn statement, prominent mathematician flags up to 100,000 Pennsylvania ballotsBy Daniel Payne and John Solomon
Just the News
November 19, 2020
NOTE:
Joe Biden 3,456,632 votesDonald Trump 3,375,636
(as of November 20, 2020)
Margin:
80,996 votes
SOURCE: POLITICO
Thursday, November 19, 2020
SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.; LAWRENCE ROBERTS; and DAVID JOHN HENRY; Plaintiffs, v. KATHY BOOCKVAR, in her capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CENTRE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; and PHILADELPHIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; Defendants.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z-PjmFH954wpxcVOcROkTCpMMyJk9ETd/view?usp=sharing
SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.; LAWRENCE ROBERTS; and DAVID JOHN HENRY; Plaintiffs,
v.
KATHY BOOCKVAR, in her capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CENTRE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; and PHILADELPHIA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
No. 20-CV-02078
November 18, 2020
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
324. WHEREFORE, in addition to any other affirmative relief that the Court may deem necessary and proper, Plaintiffs ask this Court to enter judgment in their favor and provide the following alternative relief:
325. That, as a result of Defendants’ violations of the United States Constitution and violations of other federal and state election laws, this Court should enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction that prohibits Defendants from certifying the results of the 2020 presidential general election in Pennsylvania on a statewide basis;
326. Ultimately, that, as a result of Defendants' violations of the United States Constitution and violations of other federal and state election laws, this Court should enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction prohibiting Defendants from certifying the results of the General Elections which include the tabulation of unauthorized votes, including mail ballots which did not meet the statutory requirements, mail ballots which were cured without authorization, and any other vote cast in violation of law, and, instead, compel Defendants to certify the results of the election based solely on the legal votes.
327. Alternatively, that, as a result of Defendants' violations of the United States Constitution and violations of other federal and state election laws, this Court should enter an order, declaration, and/or injunction that the results of the 2020 presidential general election are defective and providing for the Pennsylvania General Assembly to choose Pennsylvania’s electors.
328. A temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction granting the above relief during the pendency of this action;
329. Plaintiffs’ reasonable costs and expenses of this action, including attorneys’ fees; and cost; and
330. Any and other such further relief that this Court deems equitable and just or to which Plaintiffs might be entitled.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)