Pfizer Used Dangerous Assumptions, Rather than Research, to Guess at Outcomes, Robert W. Chandler, M.D., M.B.A. & Compilation of 2,074 Case Reports Documenting Vaccine Injuries, Aaron Hertzberg

Pfizer Used Dangerous Assumptions, Rather than Research, to Guess at Outcomes
August 1, 2022 • by Robert W. Chandler, M.D., M.B.A. - Team 5

Several serious questions are raised by these results:

1. How long does the BNT162b2 mRNA persist in human tissues? Where does it go in the host cell? How long does it persist inside the cell? What proteins does it produce, and for how long?
2. Is there any possibility that the BNT162b2 mRNA can be transcribed into DNA, then incorporate into the host genome? If this happens what are the implications?
3. What are the toxicities from the lipid nanoparticle coating?
4. Was Pfizer obligated to answer these questions prior to human testing?
5. Doesn’t proper informed consent require answers to these questions?

In conclusion, many negatively consequential shortcuts were made in the development of BNT162b2.

Assumptions rather than actual research to determine where BNT162b2 goes, what it does, and how long it lasts were made that proved to be false and constitute intentional mis/dis/mal information.

 

Compilation of 2,074 Case Reports Documenting Vaccine Injuries
August 1, 2022 • by Aaron Hertzberg

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YCBI6qNRUsW0RB6nVnvTGUsmgH467lr0/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=101370370110450072552&rtpof=true&sd=true