UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA, INC., JAMES P. BRADLEY, AJA SMITH, ERIC EARLY, ALISON HAYDEN, JEFFREY GORMAN, MARK REED, BUZZ PATTERSON, MIKE CARGILE, KEVIN COOKINGHAM, GREG RATHS, Plaintiffs,
v.
ALEX PADILLA, CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE, XAVIER BECERRA, CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS REBECCA SPENCER, LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS DEAN LOGAN, VENTURA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS MARK A. LUNN, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS BOB PAGE, MONTEREY COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS CLAUDIO VALENZUELA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS COURTNEY BAILEY-KANELO, ALAMEDA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TIM DUPUIS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS DEBORAH R. COOPER, SANTA CLARA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS SHANNON BUSHEY, SAN BENITO COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS JOE PAUL GONZALES, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS GAIL L. PELLERIN, FRESNO COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS BRANDI ORTH, ORANGE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS NEAL KELLEY, Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
January 4, 2021
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
Violation of Elections Clause: Art. I, § 4, cl. 1 of U.S. Constitution; 42 USC 1983
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
Denial of Equal Protection: 14th Amendment of U.S. Constitution; 42 USC 1983
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
Denial of Due Process: 14th Amendment of U.S. Constitution; 42 USC 1983
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
Violation of Guarantee Clause: Art. IV, § 4 of U.S. Constitution; 42 USC 1983
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray judgment against Defendants as follows:
A. An immediate order directing Defendants to preserve in their current state all voting machines, software, peripherals (including flash drives and other memory storage), computers, reports generated, and other data and equipment used to cast, examine, count, tabulate, modify, store or transmit votes or voting data in the November 2020 elections in California for inspection by Plaintiffs’ experts;
B. An immediate order directing Defendants to preserve all VBM ballots, VBM ballot envelopes, RAVBM ballots, remade or duplicated ballots, adjudicated ballots and other documents used to cast votes in the November 2020 elections in California for inspection by Plaintiffs’ experts;
C. An order directing Defendants Newsom and Padilla to de-certify the election results;
D. A declaratory judgment that the following are unconstitutional:
a. California Assembly Bill 860
b. Governor Newsom’s Executive Orders numbers N-64-20 and 67- 20;
c. California Code of Regulations §§ 20910, 20960, 20961, 20962, 20980, 20981, 20982, 20983, 20984, 20985, 20990, 20991, 20992, and 20993;
d. California Elections Code § 3020;
e. The restrictions imposed on citizen observers by Defendant County Registrars during and after the November 2020 election;
E. Plaintiffs’ costs of suit; F. Reasonable attorneys’ fees; and G. Such other relief as is just and proper.
DATED: January 4, 2021
REFERENCE:
Election Integrity Project California
No comments:
Post a Comment