Wednesday, June 30, 2021

Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open

Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open
June 30, 2021


…what is the FBI and Army Counterintelligence’s relationship with Stewart Rhodes?

 

Why doesn’t anyone at the FBI or DOJ want him?

 

If 1/6 was an “insurrection,” why protect the one man who, more than any other individual referenced in the charging documents of the 530+ open criminal cases, comes closest to the media’s ravenous description of a “lead insurrectionist?”


It is astonishing to us that no one had thought to bring up the Michigan kidnapping plot in light of 1/6. The Michigan plot involved the same action (storming of the state capitol) and one of the same major militia groups (Three Percenters). Not only was that plot heavily infiltrated (at least 5 of the 18 plotters turned out to be fed operatives), but the FBI agent who oversaw that infiltration operation got promoted to the DC office where he went on to oversee the 1/6 investigation. The parallels were remarkable, and it is still more remarkable that no journalist thought to ask whether there could have been similar infiltration in 1/6 — specially in the key militia groups implicated in the most egregious and spectacular elements of 1/6.

They Don’t Make ‘Em Like They Used To: America’s Greatest Old Generals, And Their Sorry Modern Replacements (June 28, 2021)

They Don’t Make ‘Em Like They Used To: America’s Greatest Old Generals, And Their Sorry Modern Replacements
June 28, 2021


America has a great military history filled with incredibly gifted men, and the shadow they cast today only exposes the humiliating depths the U.S. military command has fallen to today.

George Washington, Hyman Rickover, Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, George Thomas

Mark Milley, Jim Mattis, Lloyd Austin, Stanley McChrystal

Sunday, June 27, 2021

Optimism, which the Golden State’s ruling class has abandoned, is nonetheless in California’s cultural DNA & Recent History Suggests FBI Involvement in January 6

GREAT AMERICA
Fixing California—First of a Nine-Part Series
The Themes That Make Anything Possible
By Edward Ring June 26, 2021

California is broken, hijacked by opportunists wielding overwhelming financial and political power. How does this change?

The solutions to be discussed can’t succeed merely on their merits, despite a compelling case for each of them. Politicians and influencers who want to fix California have to change how people think. They have to reiterate themes that change the filters through which people form opinions. California’s voters are the victims of 50 years of increasingly effective brainwashing by the media, the public school system, Democratic politicians, and more recently (and more virulently than ever), by social media. They have to be deprogrammed.


ELECTIONS
Sadly, the FBI is one of the least trustworthy agencies in the federal government—and that’s saying a lot.
By Julie Kelly June 21, 2021

If the past is prologue, there’s no reason to consider the FBI’s involvement a “conspiracy theory” rather than a solid likelihood. How many times have we been down this road over the past five years—assured that claims about the FBI’s malfeasance and abuse were “conspiracy theories” only later to learn they were true?

We were told the FBI did not use spies to infiltrate the Trump campaign. They did. We were told the FBI didn’t ambush and frame former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn. They did.

We were told the FBI would not mislead the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. They did. We were told the FBI wouldn’t doctor official reports or correspondence. They did. We were told the FBI would never use a sketchy Russian national to bolster the collusion case against Trump. They did.

We were told Officer Brian Sicknick was killed in the line of duty. He wasn’t.

We are told anywhere from five to seven people, including Sicknick, died as a result of the chaos that day. In fact, only one person, Ashli Babbitt, died by homicide that day. We were told it was an “armed” insurrection. It wasn’t. We were told rioters caused $30 million in damages to the Capitol building. They didn’t.

We were told Capitol Police didn’t let protesters into the building. They did.

Open Letter from Retired U.S. Military: Support and Defend: ‘As former members of the U.S. military who have proudly served our nation, we write to express our support for Constitutional freedom and liberty and our concern for our country as many powerful forces seek to bring Socialism and Marxism to our land...The survival of our Nation and its historic values, liberty and freedom are at stake.’


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rAk9AcLNoWXCv1cYHhZHAQKHoJri4uty/view?usp=sharing 

Open Letter from Retired U.S. Military: Support and Defend

As former members of the U.S. military who have proudly served our nation, we write to express our support for Constitutional freedom and liberty and our concern for our country as many powerful forces seek to bring Socialism and Marxism to our land.

When we agreed to serve our country, we pledged to support and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. During our active duty service, we did just that.

Today, although no longer active duty warriors, we are still bound to this pledge and believe we are ethically obligated to protect our country. As such, we put our nation’s leadership on notice. We believe the hard left turn toward Socialism and Marxism endangers our citizens and the future of this great nation. Although a difficult step to take, we believe this step is necessary for us to continue to demonstrate the integrity and moral courage our oath requires.

• We are disgusted by the dismantling of the rule of law in our great country. We never thought we would see the return to Vietnam-style disdain for public service. Unfortunately, this disregard and disrespect is corrosive and will lead to dangerous situations for citizens and law enforcement. A revolving door for criminals and a two-tiered justice system that offers up different penalties based on the viewpoints of the accused must end.

• It disturbs us to see the erosion of fair and honest elections. Civilians doubt that our electoral system accurately reflects the will of the people. Current service men and women struggle to find clear instructions on how they can execute their own constitutional right to vote and doubt their ballots will be counted. We reject efforts by those who seek to avoid fair and honest elections by deeming commonsense voting measures “racist.” The gold standard in voting, recognized throughout the world, is in-person, with identification, yet politicians are seeking to end this in the U.S.

• We oppose the politicization and ideological purging of our military. The focus of our military should be on training, readiness, and defense of our Nation, not leftist cultural “wokeness”.

• We decry the assault on our constitutional rights through censorship of written and verbal expression and we point out the complicit arrangement between private corporations and those in power to present only one point of view. Never did we think we would see the day when our media resembled Pravda.

• Bureaucratic abuses that have led to business and school closures and excessive lockdowns should not be tolerated by the American people. We do not get our rights from the CDC, the FDA or from private corporations. And, as such, we will not tolerate Soviet-style internal passports or anything resembling the Chinese social credit system where citizens are monitored and controlled, whether that system be carried out by the government or by their cooperative partners in the private sector.

• We stand with Israel and call upon all Americans to continue with the Mideast peace initiatives, the “Abraham Accords” and oppose re-engaging in the Iran Nuclear Deal. Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons is not in the interest of freedom-loving individuals. We believe it is in the self interest of all Americans to oppose this deal.

• We must continue our efforts for energy independence. We believe it is in our nation’s best interest to reopen the Keystone Pipeline and focus on regaining U.S. jobs and protecting the national security interests provided by energy independence.

• The perforation of our southern border is a lifeline for terrorists, drug cartels and human traffickers. The current administration’s position on open borders and illegal immigrants places our nation at risk from a health, economic and safety perspective. As a sovereign nation we have a right and a duty to protect our borders.

• We oppose the establishment of cooperative relations with China as we believe the Chinese Communist Party is focused on global militaristic and technological domination. It is currently amassing weapons to stage a takeover of Taiwan. America is bound by the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty which protects Taiwan from invasion by the People’s Republic of China. Our cooperation with China is at odds with our signed alliances and is not in American self-interest. We must focus on preventing Chinese expansionism and protect our nation from attacks on our infrastructure by securing our gas pipelines and electric grids from penetration.


We call upon the American people to join us in opposing the advancement of socialism by holding public officials accountable in the public square and the voting booth. We must elect local, state, and federal candidates who will always act to defend our Constitutional Republic.

The survival of our Nation and its historic values, liberty and freedom are at stake.


REFERENCE:

NEWS
By Debra Heine June 25, 2021

Over 1,000 former members of the military have signeda scathing public letter warning that the increased priority placed on “wokeness” in the military is a threat to the Constitution and the nation’s military readiness.

Two military groups—Flag Officers 4 America and the Committee to Support and Defend—have joined forces to warn that the military’s embrace of the woke ideology is a major national security issue.

One of the signatories, General Joe Arbuckle (ret.) said in a statement: “Critical Race Theory and other such programs are intentionally designed to divide people into groups based on oppressors vs oppressed; sowing discord and distrust in each other. This is exactly the opposite of the team building based on the essential trust and confidence needed in military units for unit cohesion and readiness. If allowed to continue, CRT and other such divisive programs will do tremendous damage to our military, its missions, and therefore our Nation. No doubt our adversaries across the globe are carefully watching how this unfolds.”

 

As former members of the U.S. military who have proudly served our nation, we have signed this letter to express our support for Constitutional freedom and liberty and our concern for our country as many powerful forces seek to bring Socialism and Marxism to our land. Please join us in support of the constitutional values and freedoms we've fought to preserve.

Sunday, June 20, 2021

Perspectives on the Pandemic | "Blood Clots and Beyond" | Episode 15 A CONVERSATION WITH Prof SUCHARIT BHAKDI, MD (Apr 16, 2021)

 

 
Perspectives on the Pandemic | "Blood Clots and Beyond" | Episode 15
A CONVERSATION WITH Prof SUCHARIT BHAKDI, MD
Apr 16, 2021 (43:38)
JOURNEYMAN.TV

Revolver’s Jan 6th Reporting Changed the Game: Read Our Top Investigative Stories Here

Revolver’s Jan 6th Reporting Changed the Game: Read Our Top Investigative Stories Here

June 18, 2021

MAGA Blood Libel: Why Are They Hiding The Medical Report?

Capitol Mystery: Who’s Blocking the Evidence?

 

Capitol Mystery: New Evidence Likely Clears MAGA of “Murder” Charge


FBI’s Ridiculous “Capitol Siege Pipe Bomb” Video Is An All-Out Assault on Common Sense


January 6 Narrative Collapse: Assault Charges Spell Problems for DOJ, FBI in Officer Sicknick Case

 

So-Called “Assault Video” Creates Big Problems for Prosecutors in Sicknick Capitol Riot Death Case

 

One Month Later CNN Finally Admits What Revolver Reported All Along: No Bear Spray Stream in NYT Sicknick Video

 

January 6th Commission is Coming … Here’s How MAGA Can Use it To Beat Dems at Their Own Game

 

Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge


Congressman Gaetz Leads Republican Colleagues in Push to Demand Transparency on FBI’s Involvement During January 6th Riot & Congressman Matt Gaetz Issues Letter to FBI Requesting Briefing on Wuhan Lab Whistleblower Investigation

 

Congressman Gaetz Leads Republican Colleagues in Push to Demand Transparency on FBI’s Involvement During January 6th Riot https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jCr_mbV0RBjySEtWUoHy84fFCH4pyIre/view?usp=sharing 
June 16, 2021

The Honorable Christopher Wray
Federal Bureau of Investigation
935 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20535


I am seeking your answers to clarify the following questions:

1. In the year leading up to the events on 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) infiltrated by agencies of the federal government (including the FBI), or informants of said agencies?

2. Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)?

3. Of all the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)?

Matt Gaetz
Member of Congress

Paul A. Gosar, D.D.S.
Member of Congress

Louie Gohmert
Member of Congress

Marjorie Taylor Greene
Member of Congress

Bill Posey
Member of Congress


Congressman Matt Gaetz Issues Letter to FBI Requesting Briefing on Wuhan Lab Whistleblower InvestigationJune 18, 2021

The Honorable Christopher Wray
Federal Bureau of Investigation
935 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20535


I am particularly concerned the FBI may have mislabeled Dr. Yan as a counterintelligence threat, when in reality she was a whistleblower, defector, and fact witness with critical information about the role the Chinese Communist Party had in the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

I expect this classified briefing to take place within two weeks of this request. Please be in touch with my chief of staff to organize this meeting.

Thursday, June 17, 2021

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, DAMAGES, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, ROGAN O’HANDLEY, Plaintiff, v. ALEX PADILLA, in his personal capacity; SKDKNICKERBOCKER, LLC, a Delaware company; PAULA VALLE CASTAÑON, in her personal capacity; JENNA DRESNER, in her personal capacity; SAM MAHOOD, in his personal capacity; AKILAH JONES; in her personal capacity; SHIRLEY N. WEBER, in her official capacity as California Secretary of State; TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECRETARIES OF STATE, a professional nonprofit organization; Defendants.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CoHRMRaxgXQqx_5wl8SyvOZ-IBk1eUXw/view?usp=sharing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGAN O’HANDLEY, Plaintiff,
v.
ALEX PADILLA, in his personal capacity; SKDKNICKERBOCKER, LLC, a Delaware company; PAULA VALLE CASTAÑON, in her personal capacity; JENNA DRESNER, in her personal capacity; SAM MAHOOD, in his personal capacity; AKILAH JONES; in her personal capacity; SHIRLEY N. WEBER, in her official capacity as California Secretary of State; TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECRETARIES OF STATE, a professional nonprofit organization; Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, DAMAGES, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Case Number: 2:21-cv-04954

CLAIMS

First Claim for Relief
First Amendment – Free Speech (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
(By Plaintiff Against All Defendants)

Second Claim for Relief
California Constitution art. I § 2 – Free Speech
(By Mr. O’Handley Against All Defendants)

Third Claim for Relief
Fourteenth Amendment - Equal Protection Discrimination (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
(By Mr. O’Handley Against All Defendants)

Fourth Claim for Relief
Fourteenth Amendment - Due Process Clause (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
(By Mr. O’Handley Against Defendants California Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber in her official capacity, SKDK, Twitter, Alex Padilla, Paula Valle Castañon, Jenna Dresner, Sam Mahood, and Akilah Jones)

Fifth Claim for Relief
Fourteenth Amendment – Void for Vagueness (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
(By Mr. O’Handley Against Defendant California Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber in her official capacity and Defendants Alex Padilla, Paula Valle Castañon, Jenna Dresner, Sam Mahood, and Akilah Jones in their personal capacities)

Sixth Claim for Relief
Civil Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights (42 U.S.C. § 1985)
(By Mr. O’Handley Against All Defendants)


PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Mr. O’Handley prays this Court grant the relief requested herein, specifically that the Court render the following judgment in Mr. O’Handley’s favor and against Defendants:

i. Declaratory Judgment: For entry of a Declaratory Judgment that California Election Code § 10.5, as applied to Mr. O’Handley, violates Mr. O’Handley’s state and federal constitutional rights to free speech, equal protection, and due process;

ii. Injunctive Relief: For entry of a Permanent Injunction stating that the Secretary of State and the OEC may not censor speech, work to take down the speech of private speakers, selectively enforce speech restrictions, or discriminate against those who seek to hold the current office holder accountable for perceived defects in election administration;

iii. Damages: general, nominal, statutory (pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 52) and exemplary damages, in an amount to be determined at trial;

iv. Attorneys’ fees and costs: awarded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988; California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5; Cal. Civ. Code § 52; and v. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1988, Plaintiff is entitled to declaratory relief; temporary, preliminary, and permanent injunctive relief invalidating and restraining Defendants’ enforcement of California Election Code §10.5; damages from the businesses and persons sued in their personal capacities; and attorneys’ fees.

 

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff demands trial by jury in this action of all issues so triable.

Date: June 17, 2021

COMPLAINT, United States District Court District of Minnesota, MICHAEL J. LINDELL, Plaintiff, v. US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CORPORATION, SMARTMATIC USA CORP., SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., and SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, Defendants.

Lindell v. US Dominion, Inc. (0:21-cv-01332)
District Court, D. Minnesota


United States District Court
District of Minnesota
MICHAEL J. LINDELL, Plaintiff,
v.
US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CORPORATION, SMARTMATIC USA CORP., SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., and SGO CORPORATION LIMITED, Defendants.
COMPLAINT
Case No. 0:21-cv-01332
Jury Trial Demanded

Jun 3, 2021
COMPLAINT against Dominion Voting Systems Corporation, Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., SGO Corporation Limited, Smartmatic International Holding B.V., Smartmatic USA Corp, US Dominion, Inc. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8796850) filed by Michael J Lindell. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 1, # 2 Exhibit(s) 2, # 3 Exhibit(s) 3, # 4 Exhibit(s) 4, # 5 Exhibit(s) 5, # 6 Exhibit(s) 6, # 7 Exhibit(s) 7, # 8 Exhibit(s) 8, # 9 Exhibit(s) 9, # 10 Exhibit(s) 10, # 11 Exhibit(s) 11, # 12 Exhibit(s) 12, # 13 Exhibit(s) 13, # 14 Exhibit(s) 14, # 15 Exhibit(s) 15, # 16 Exhibit(s) 16, # 17 Exhibit(s) 17, # 18 Civil Cover Sheet) (Beck, Alec) (Entered: 06/03/2021)

Main Doc Complaint



CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT ONE: ABUSE OF PROCESS
(as to the Dominion Defendants)

COUNT TWO: DEFAMATION
(as to the Dominion Defendants)

COUNT THREE: VIOLATIONS OF THE RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 1962
(as to Dominion Defendants and Smartmatic Defendants)

COUNT FOUR: VIOLATIONS OF THE “SUPPORT AND ADVOCACY” CLAUSE OF 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)
(as to Dominion Defendants and Smartmatic Defendants)

COUNT FIVE: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS BY ACTIONS UNDER COLOR OF STATE LAW
(as to Dominion Defendants)

COUNT SIX: CIVIL CONSPIRACY
(as to All Defendants)

 

DAMAGES AND OTHER RELIEF

The facts set out above and to be proven at trial will demonstrate that Plaintiff is entitled to recover against Defendants, jointly and severally, the following:

a. Actual and special damages as allowed by law, in an amount to be proven at trial, including but not limited to the following:

    a. Special damages in the form of attorneys fees and expenses incurred in defending against Dominion’s lawsuit;

    b. Damages for defamation per se for Dominion’s public attacks on his honesty and integrity; and,

    c. Damages to be determined by the trier of fact suffered as a result of the deprivation of his rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and under the “support and advocacy” clause of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3); together with,

b. Three times actual damages for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1862;

c. Punitive damages as allowed by law, in an amount to be determined by the trier of fact;

d. Reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees, as allowed by law; and,

e. Costs of suit.


PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff asks that Defendants be cited to answer and appear herein and that, after trial or other hearing on the merits, Plaintiff have and recover against the Defendants, jointly and severally, the relief requested herein, together with all writs and processes necessary to the enforcement of same, and all other relief to which he may show himself justly entitled.

Att 1 Exhibit(s) 1

Att 2 Exhibit(s) 2

Att 3 Exhibit(s) 3

Att 4 Exhibit(s) 4

Att 5 Exhibit(s) 5

Att 6 Exhibit(s) 6

Att 7 Exhibit(s) 7

Att 8 Exhibit(s) 8

Att 9 Exhibit(s) 9

Att 10 Exhibit(s) 10

Att 11 Exhibit(s) 11

Att 12 Exhibit(s) 12

Att 13 Exhibit(s) 13

Att 14 Exhibit(s) 14

Att 15 Exhibit(s) 15

 Att 16 Exhibit(s) 16

Att 17 Exhibit(s) 17

Att 18 Civil Cover Sheet

 

Jun 11, 2021
ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES. This case is reassigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz and Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz for all further proceedings. Judge Eric C. Tostrud, Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer no longer assigned to case. NOTE: The new case number is 21-cv-1332 (PJS/DTS). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 6/10/2021 and Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 6/11/2021. (lmb) (Entered: 06/11/2021) 

Main Doc Order Reassigning Case

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge (June 14, 2021)

Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge
June 14, 2021

 • In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies? 

• Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)? 

• Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)? 

Director Wray: How many of the unindicted co-conspirators in January 6 cases are now, or have been, undercover agents or confidential informants?

ELECTIONS
If the day was as bad as authorities say, why do they have to keep lying about what happened?
By Julie Kelly June 7, 2021

NEWS
By Julie Kelly
June 8, 2021

United States Senate
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20150
June 7, 2021 
The Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General 
U.S. Department of Justice 
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 
Washington, DC 20530 

Ron Johnson 
United States Senator 

Tommy Tuberville 
United States Senator 

Mike Lee 
United States Senator

Rick Scott 
United States Senator  

Ted Cruz 
United States Senator 



ELECTIONS
The rule of law for anyone involved in the events of January 6 has been flipped on its head by the U.S. justice system; defendants are presumed guilty before proven innocent.
By Julie Kelly June 10, 2021



ELECTIONS
By contradicting the groupthink on January 6, Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) is taking fire from the usual suspects while most of his Senate colleagues remain silent.
By Julie Kelly June 14, 2021

MARK BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ARIZONA June 14, 2021 Letter to Attorney General Merrick B. Garland


MARK BRNOVICH
ATTORNEY GENERAL
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF ARIZONA

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
June 14, 2021


My office looks for ways to work alongside the federal government to uphold our laws within the constraints of the 10th Amendment and the election provisions in Articles I and II. As I have demonstrated several times, however, Arizona will not sit back and let the Biden administration abuse its authority, refuse to uphold laws, or attempt to commandeer our state's sovereignty.

Thursday, June 10, 2021

LIVE FROM ‘EVENT 2021’ IN DALLAS, TX Dr. Richard Fleming presents ‘Event 2021’, A science-based presentation on the Covid Pandemic, from the Virus, to vaccines, treatments, and the Public Health response.


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DcznzQWlRmI-zf984eaUDkGsOSk-2wCd/view?usp=sharing 
LIVE FROM ‘EVENT 2021’ IN DALLAS, TX
Dr. Richard Fleming presents ‘Event 2021’, A science-based presentation on the Covid Pandemic, from the Virus, to vaccines, treatments, and the Public Health response. (4:31:58)

   
Fauci-Gate: 3,000 + Emails Confirming Gain-of-Function Bioweapon Research 
The Professor's Record with David K. Clements 
Published June 2, 2021 (39:04)

Wednesday, June 09, 2021

Investigative Corona Committee Germany

Investigative Corona Committee Germany

Since mid-July 2020, the Corona Committee has been conducting live, multi-hour sessions to investigate why federal and state governments imposed unprecedented restrictions as part of the Coronavirus response and what the consequences have been and still are for people.


Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg's summary of the corona crisis (1:24:46)
28.05.2021 James Corbett Interview (1:02:39)
28.05.2021 Brian Gerrish (Public Speaker and Investigatory Journalist) (1:21:20)
28.05.2021 Dr. Astrid Stückelberger (International Health Expert) (26:41)
28.05.2021 Dr. Simone Gold (Founder of America's Frontline Doctors) (31:06)
The Great Recall – International
Interview with Robert Kennedy Jr.
Interview with Vera Sharav
Interview with Catherine Austin Fitts
Interview with Naomi Wolf
Interview with Dr. Pam Popper


Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Senderstr. 37
37077 Goettingen
Germany

BuzzFeed News: Anthony Fauci’s Emails

Anthony Fauci’s Emails Reveal The Pressure That Fell On One Man
Thousands of pages of communications obtained by BuzzFeed News show how Fauci tried to keep Americans calm and develop an effective strategy despite conflicts with the Trump administration. 
Last updated on June 2, 2021, at 6:28 p.m. ET

 More than 3,200 pages of emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by BuzzFeed News — covering the period from January to June 2020 — provide a rare glimpse into how Fauci approached his job during the biggest health crisis of the last century, showing him dealing directly with the public, health officials, reporters, and even celebrities.



REFERENCE:
EXCLUSIVE
EXPOSED: Fauci Headlined Conference With ‘Bat Lady’ And EcoHealth’s Daszak Despite Distancing Himself From
JUNE 9, 2021  NATALIE WINTERS

COMPLAINT, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION, AARON RAYMOND BABBITT, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ashli Elizabeth Babbitt 4849 Cape May Avenue San Diego, California 92107 Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA John A Wilson Building 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Defendant,

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GluuAD-JXhk37CDLawEj0jtfjIJeppWn/view?usp=sharing 
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CIVIL DIVISION
AARON RAYMOND BABBITT, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ashli Elizabeth Babbitt 4849 Cape May Avenue San Diego, California 92107 Plaintiff,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA John A Wilson Building 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Defendant,
Civil Action No.:
COMPLAINT


COUNT 1
(Violation of FOIA)


WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court: (i) order Defendant to conduct searches for any and all records responsive to Plaintiffs FOIA requests and demonstrate that it employed search methods reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of records responsive to the requests; (ii) order Defendant to produce, by a date certain, any and all non-exempt records responsive to the Plaintiffs FOIA requests and Vaughan indices of any responsive records withheld under claim of exemption; (iii) enjoin Defendant from continuing to withhold any and all non-exempt records responsive to the FOIA requests; (iv) grant Plaintiff an award of attorney's fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in this action pursuant to DC Code Sec. 2-537 (c); (v) consolidate this action with the FOIA action filed by Judicial Watch, Inc.; and (vi) and grant Plaintiff such relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Terrell N. Roberts, III (D.C. Bar No. 965830)
ROBERTS & WOOD
Attorney for Plaintiff

Filed
D.C. Superior Court
06/01/2021 13:03PM
Clerk of the Court

Sunday, June 06, 2021

Interesting Timing – Obama Administration Lifted Block on “Gain of Function Research” Just Eleven Days Before President Trump Took Office, January 9, 2017, Sharri Markson Questions Why Biden Administration is Protecting Dr. Anthony Fauci & The Individuals Behind Obama’s Jan 2017 Memo Re-Authorizing Funding for ‘Gain of Function’ R&D Were the Same Individuals Who Lied and Claimed COVID Wasn’t Created in a Lab

Interesting Timing – Obama Administration Lifted Block on “Gain of Function Research” Just Eleven Days Before President Trump Took Office, January 9, 2017
June 5, 2021 | Sundance

Eleven Days before leaving office President Obama’s administration re-authorized funding for the creation of biological weapons using SARS viruses. However, essentially this re-authorization was only kickstarting funding within the U.S. because the funding of weaponization of SARS-CoV-2 never actually stopped in 2014.

 REFERENCES:



Sharri Markson Questions Why Biden Administration is Protecting Dr. Anthony Fauci
June 6, 2021

Sharri Markson has a book that details how the Wuhan Lab was used to create SARS-CoV-2 and how Anthony Fauci was the key decisionmaker in the U.S. who organized funding for the Chinese experiments. In this commentary she discusses some of the issues.

The bigger question of why the U.S. would fund, support and facilitate the creation of a biological weapon by the Chinese is where things really get interesting. The only reason the Pentagon (U.S. Military) would enjoin that relationship with China would be to benefit their own interests.



The Individuals Behind Obama’s Jan 2017 Memo Re-Authorizing Funding for ‘Gain of Function’ R&D Were the Same Individuals Who Lied and Claimed COVID Wasn’t Created in a Lab
By Joe Hoft
Published June 6, 2021

The same government medical professionals and doctors whose signatures supported Obama re-authorizing funding for the creation of SARS biological weapons were the ones in early 2020 to do all they could to push the lie that the China coronavirus happened in nature and was related to bat soup served at a Wuhan, China wet market.

Fauci Emails: How Top Public Health Officials Spun Tangled Web of Lies Around COVID Origin, Treatments & Fauci and Top US Doctors Caught! They CONSPIRED to Disqualify Hydroxychloroquine as COVID Treatment — MILLIONS DEAD AS A RESULT

IT’S WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT! Fauci and Top US Doctors Caught! They CONSPIRED to Disqualify Hydroxychloroquine as COVID Treatment — MILLIONS DEAD AS A RESULT
By Jim Hoft
Published June 6, 2021

There is proof that Dr. Fauci and top US medical experts all conspired using obviously false information to disqualify hydroxychloroquine and MILLIONS DIED as a result of their action.

There still is no agreed-upon treatment plan for elderly patients who catch coronavirus to assist in their recovery.

The CDC and Dr. Fauci ignored treatment plans for coronavirus patients unless the person was under severe distress.

The same people responsible for the virus were responsible for eliminating valid treatment alternatives for the same virus.


06/04/21
Fauci Emails: How Top Public Health Officials Spun Tangled Web of Lies Around COVID Origin, Treatments
Could four key public health officials have been intimately involved in the creation of the pandemic, as well as the prolongation and improper treatments used during the pandemic?
By Meryl Nass, MD

 What does all this mean?

1.      There was a conspiracy between the five authors of the Nature paper and the heads of the NIH, NIAID and Wellcome Trust to cover up the lab origin of COVID.

2.      There was a conspiracy involving Daszac, Fauci and others to push the natural origin theory. (See other emails in the recent drop.)

3.      There was a conspiracy involving Daszac to write the Lancet letter and hide its provenance, to push the natural origin theory and paint any other ideas as conspiracy theory. Collin’s blog post is another piece of this story.

4.      Farrar was intimately involved in both large hydroxychloroquine overdose trials, in which about 500 subjects total died.

5.      Farrar, Fauci and Collins withheld research funds that could have supported quality trials of the use of chloroquine drugs and ivermectin and other repurposed drugs that might have turned around the pandemic.

6.      Are the four individuals named here — Fauci, Daszak, Collins and Farrar —  intimately involved in the creation of the pandemic, as well as the prolongation and improper treatments used during the pandemic?

HON. ROGER T. BENITEZ United States District Judge DECISION: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, et al., Defendants.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xBwij75gQez4g1nnB45oFG_E9hfki-ts/view?usp=sharing 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES MILLER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No.: 19-cv-1537-BEN (JLB)
DECISION


In the end, the Bill of Rights is not a list of suggestions or guidelines for social balancing. The Bill of Rights prevents the tyranny of the majority from taking away the rights of a minority. When a state nibbles on Constitutional rights, who protects the minorities? The federal courts. The Second Amendment protects any law-abiding citizen’s right to choose to be armed to defend himself, his family, and his home. At the same time, the Second Amendment protects a citizen’s right to keep and bear arms to use should the militia be needed to fight against invaders, terrorists, and tyrants. The Second Amendment is about America’s freedom: the freedom to protect oneself, family, home, and homeland. California’s assault weapon ban disrespects that freedom.

IV. CONCLUSION

Plaintiffs challenge California Penal Code §§ 30515(a)(1) through (8) (defining an “assault weapon” by prohibited features), 30800 (deeming certain “assault weapons” a public nuisance), 30915 (regulating “assault weapons” obtained by bequest or inheritance), 30925 (restricting importation of “assault weapons” by new residents), 30945 (restricting use of registered “assault weapons”), and 30950 (prohibiting possession of “assault weapons” by minors). It is declared that these statutes unconstitutionally infringe the Second Amendment rights of California citizens. These statutes and the penalty provisions §§ 30600, 30605 and 30800 as applied to “assault weapons” defined in Code §§ 30515(a)(1) through (8) are hereby enjoined.

You might not know it, but this case is about what should be a muscular constitutional right and whether a state can force a gun policy choice that impinges on that right with a 30-year-old failed experiment. It should be an easy question and answer. Government is not free to impose its own new policy choices on American citizens where Constitutional rights are concerned. As Heller explains, the Second Amendment takes certain policy choices and removes them beyond the realm of permissible state action. California may certainly conceive of a policy that a modern rifle is dangerous in the hands of a criminal, and that therefore it is good public policy to keep modern rifles out of the hands of every citizen. The Second Amendment stands as a shield from government imposition of that policy.

There is only one policy enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Guns and ammunition in the hands of criminals, tyrants and terrorists are dangerous; guns in the hands of law-abiding responsible citizens are better. To give full life to the core right of self-defense, every law-abiding responsible individual citizen has a constitutionally protected right to keep and bear firearms commonly owned and kept for lawful purposes. In early America and today, the Second Amendment right of self-preservation permits a citizen to “‘repel force by force’ when ‘the intervention of society in his behalf, may be too late to prevent that injury.’” Heller, 554 U.S., at 594. Then, as now, the Second Amendment “may be considered as the true palladium of liberty.” Id. at 606 (citation omitted). Unfortunately, governments tend to restrict the right of self-defense. “[I]n most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine the right within the narrowest limits possible.” Id. (citation omitted). Fortunately, no legislature has the constitutional authority to dictate to a good citizen that he or she may not acquire a modern and popular gun for self-defense.

The Court does not lightly enjoin a state statute. However, while the Court is mindful that government has a legitimate interest in protecting the public from gun violence, it is equally mindful that the Constitution remains a shield from the tyranny of the majority. As Senator Edward Kennedy said, “[t]he judiciary is – and is often the only – protector of individual rights that are at the heart of our democracy.” Law-abiding citizens are imbued with the unalienable right to keep and bear modern firearms.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant Attorney General Rob Bonta, and his officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with him, and those duly sworn state peace officers and federal law enforcement officers who gain knowledge of this injunction order or know of the existence of this injunction order, are enjoined from implementing or enforcing the California Penal Code §§ 30515(a)(1) through (8) (defining an “assault weapon” by prohibited features), 30800 (deeming those “assault weapons” a public nuisance), 30915 (regulating those “assault weapons” obtained by bequest or inheritance), 30925 (restricting importation of those “assault weapons” by new residents), 30945 (restricting use of those registered “assault weapons”), and 30950 (prohibiting possession of those “assault weapons” by minors) and the penalty provisions §§ 30600, 30605 and 30800 as applied to “assault weapons” defined in Code §§ 30515(a)(1) through (8).
2. Defendant Attorney General Rob Bonta shall provide forthwith, by personal service or otherwise, actual notice of this order to all law enforcement personnel who are responsible for implementing or enforcing the enjoined statute. Within 10 days, the government shall file a declaration establishing proof of such notice. Alternatively, the parties may file a stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: June 4, 2021

HON. ROGER T. BENITEZ
United States District Judge

VIRAL INFECTION The Lab-Leak Theory: Inside the Fight to Uncover COVID-19’s Origins

VANITY FAIR
VIRAL INFECTION
The Lab-Leak Theory: Inside the Fight to Uncover COVID-19’s Origins
Throughout 2020, the notion that the novel coronavirus leaked from a lab was off-limits. Those who dared to push for transparency say toxic politics and hidden agendas kept us in the dark.
BY KATHERINE EBAN
JUNE 3, 2021

Dr. Richard Ebright, board of governors professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Rutgers University, said that from the very first reports of a novel bat-related coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, it took him “a nanosecond or a picosecond” to consider a link to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Only two other labs in the world, in Galveston, Texas, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina, were doing similar research. “It’s not a dozen cities,” he said. “It’s three places.”


REFERENCES:
DRASTIC RESEARCH
D.R.A.S.T.I.C.
(Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-19)


Vaccine researcher admits ‘big mistake,’ says spike protein is dangerous ‘toxin’

Vaccine researcher admits ‘big mistake,’ says spike protein is dangerous ‘toxin’
‘Terrifying’ new research finds vaccine spike protein unexpectedly in bloodstream. The protein is linked to blood clots, heart and brain damage, and potential risks to nursing babies and fertility.
Mon May 31, 2021
By Celeste McGovern 

May 31, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — New research shows that the coronavirus spike protein from COVID-19 vaccination unexpectedly enters the bloodstream, which is a plausible explanation for thousands of reported side-effects from blood clots and heart disease to brain damage and reproductive issues, a Canadian cancer vaccine researcher said last week.


Interview
ON Point with Alex Pierson
New peer reviewed study on COVID-19 vaccines suggests why heart inflammation, blood clots and other dangerous side effects occur