Showing posts with label STATE OF ARIZONA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label STATE OF ARIZONA. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 23, 2021

BILL OF COMPLAINT, In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF [INSERT YOUR STATE], Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, VICE- PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND STATE OF WISCONSIN, Defendants.

 

 

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NG__ixZDUa0nW3qLx39RI4z8RZovWdNT/view?usp=sharing 

No. ______, Original

In the Supreme Court of the United States

STATE OF [INSERT YOUR STATE],

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, VICE- PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND STATE OF WISCONSIN,

Defendants.

BILL OF COMPLAINT

 

COUNT I: ELECTORS CLAUSE

COUNT II: DUE PROCESS

COUNT III: GUARANTEE CLAUSE

COUNT IV: TAKE CARE CLAUSE

 

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff State respectfully requests that this Court issue the following relief:

1. Declare that Defendant States administered the November 2020 election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

2. Declare that the United States and Officer Defendants violated the Guarantee Clause and the Take Care Clause with respect to allowing the foregoing constitutional violations by the Defendant States in administering the November 2020 election.

3. Declare that the Defendant States’ certification of the November 2020 election results and of presidential electors on or about December 14, 2020, violated the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and vacate those certifications.

4. Declare that the Defendant States’ certification of the November 2020 election results and of presidential electors on or about December 14, 2020, violated the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and vacate those certifications.

5. Declare that the United States violated the Guarantee Clause in allowing the November 2020 election to proceed on the basis of the unconstitutional results in Defendant States.

6. Declare that the President, Attorney General, and Vice-President violated the Take Care Clause by failing to act to remedy the violations of the Constitution in the November 2020 election.

7. Enjoin the use of vacated certifications in Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College.

8. Declare that the counting of electoral votes in the Joint Session of Congress on January 6-7, 2021, violated the Electors Clause, the Due Process Clause, the Guarantee Clause, the Take Care Clause, and the Twelfth Amendment, and vacate that count.

9. Enjoin the Officer Defendants to convene special sessions of the House of Representatives and the Senate to vote for the President and Vice-President, respectively, pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment.

10. Alternatively, authorize, pursuant to the Court’s remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct a special election to appoint presidential electors.

11. Alternatively, authorize, pursuant to the Court’s remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct an audit of their election results, supervised by a Court-appointed special master, in a manner to be determined separately.

12. Enjoin Defendant States’ use in future elections of revisions adopted by non-legislative actors to the election laws enacted by the state legislatures unless the legislature ratifies any such revisions by enacting them as state law before the election.

13. Award costs to Plaintiff State.

14. Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

November __, 2021

 

REFERENCE:

Help Save Our Country, Please Share Everywhere

By ,

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Maricopa Audit — Draft Report has been leaked…

Maricopa Audit — Draft Report has been leaked…
Posted by Kane on September 24, 2021

KEY RESULT — More than 55,000 potentially illegal ballots.

Raw Forensic Data — Read everything at this link

The number of illegal ballots found in Maricopa County (more than 55,000) is over 4 times the current amount separating President Trump and Joe Biden in Arizona.

Friday, September 17, 2021

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Mark Brnovich, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona, and the State of Arizona, Plaintiffs, v. Joseph R. Biden in his official capacity as President of the United States; Alejandro Mayorkas in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; United States Department of Homeland Security; Troy Miller in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Tae Johnson in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Defendants.

 

 

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U4Kmw6GCOG1EDz0J59BH_AI3uKkUo_Tl/view?usp=sharing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mark Brnovich, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona, and the State of Arizona, Plaintiffs,
v.
Joseph R. Biden in his official capacity as President of the United States; Alejandro Mayorkas in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; United States Department of Homeland Security; Troy Miller in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Tae Johnson in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF


CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Unconstitutional Preference For Unauthorized Aliens Over U.S. Citizens Regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Requirements
(Asserted Under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, As Incorporated Against the Federal Government Under the Fifth Amendment)

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court enter judgment:

A. Declaring unconstitutional, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, Defendants’ differential COVID-19 vaccination policies regarding (1) unauthorized aliens and (2) U.S. citizens/lawful permanent residents, including by declaring that Defendants do not have authority to impose the vaccination mandate on U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, let alone discriminate against them as compared to unauthorized aliens;

B. Enjoining Defendants from engaging in unconstitutional discrimination against U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and lawfully present aliens, and specifically enjoining Defendants from imposing on U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and lawfully present aliens any COVID-19 vaccination policies different from those imposed on unauthorized aliens already present in the United States and on aliens illegally entering the United States; 

C. Awarding Plaintiffs costs of litigation, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412; and

D. Granting any and all other such relief as the Court finds appropriate.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 14th of September, 2021.

MARK BRNOVICH
ATTORNEY GENERAL

REFERENCE:

Attorney General Mark Brnovich Joins 24-State Coalition Demanding President Biden Drop Vaccine Mandate
Thursday, September 16, 2021

PHOENIX – Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and 23 other attorneys general sent a letter to President Biden today, warning that further litigation will follow the implementation of his unconstitutional COVID-19 vaccine mandate on federal and private sector employees. The coalition of attorneys general outlined their legal and policy concerns with the mandate, which will be carried out by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) through Emergency Temporary Standards.

“President Biden’s vaccine mandate lacks both legal authority and integrity,” said Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich. “I am proud to stand alongside my colleagues to push back on this assault on state sovereignty and the liberties of Americans.”

AG Coalition Letter.

Thursday, September 09, 2021

ARIZONA: Final Election 2020 Grassroots Canvass Report

 

Final Election 2020 Grassro... by Jim Hoft

Final Election 2020 Grassroots Canvass Report

  • Lost votes are those votes where people voted but their votes were discarded.
  • Ghost votes are those votes cast by someone other than the voter assigned to the vote.
  • Dead voters accounted for a significant number of these anomalies.
REFERENCES:
HERE IT IS – Full Report from Canvassing Work Completed in Arizona’s Maricopa County
By Joe Hoft
Published September 8, 2021

Seth Keshel Breaks Down AZ Canvassing Results – We Are Talking About Serious Human Rights Violations and Lack of Equal Protection Under the Law
By Jim Hoft
Published September 8, 2021

Thursday, July 01, 2021

Opinion of the Court SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 19–1257 and 19–1258 MARK BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA, ET AL., PETITIONERS 19–1257 v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL., PETITIONERS 19–1258 v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yJT_hF5glZL8cHgU6GvKBIKsRXKpKU-c/view?usp=sharing
Opinion of the Court
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
______________
Nos. 19–1257 and 19–1258
_________________

MARK BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA, ET AL., PETITIONERS
19–1257 v. 
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL.
ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL., PETITIONERS
19–1258 v.
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL.
ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[July 1, 2021]
JUSTICE ALITO delivered the opinion of the Court.

 NOTE: ALITO, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH, and BARRETT, JJ., joined. GOR-SUCH, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which THOMAS, J., joined. KAGAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BREYER and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined.


Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy and HB 2023 do not vio-late §2 of the VRA, and HB 2023 was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cases are remanded for fur-ther proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.


REFERENCES:
SCOTUSblog
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee

Holding: Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy and H.B. 2023 do not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and H.B. 2023 was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Alito on July 1, 2021. Justice Gorsuch filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer and Sotomayor joined.

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

Jul 01 2021


Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. VIDED.

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

MARK BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ARIZONA June 14, 2021 Letter to Attorney General Merrick B. Garland


MARK BRNOVICH
ATTORNEY GENERAL
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF ARIZONA

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
June 14, 2021


My office looks for ways to work alongside the federal government to uphold our laws within the constraints of the 10th Amendment and the election provisions in Articles I and II. As I have demonstrated several times, however, Arizona will not sit back and let the Biden administration abuse its authority, refuse to uphold laws, or attempt to commandeer our state's sovereignty.

Friday, April 23, 2021

AZ Audit

AZAudit.org 

Cameras 1-9

BREAKING – HUGE UPDATE IN AZ: Democrats in Arizona Won’t Post $1 Million Bond So
Election Audit Continues

By Joe Hoft
Published April 23, 2021


BREAKING: Judge Orders TEMPORARY HALT to Arizona Forensic Ballot Audit Until Monday after Democrats File Suit to Shut Down Process
By Jim Hoft 
Published April 23, 2021

REFERENCE:

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUCTIVE RELIEF 
ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT 
MARICOPA COUNTY

ARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, an Arizona political party and political action committee; and  
STEVE GALLARDO, a qualified elector, Plaintiffs,
v.
KAREN FANN, in her official capacity as President of the Arizona Senate; WARREN PETERSEN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee; KEN BENNETT, in his official capacity as the liaison of the Arizona Senate; and CYBER NINJAS, INC., a Florida corporation, Defendants.

2021-04-22 ADP v. Fann - Co... by Andy Belt

Friday, April 16, 2021

CORRECTED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA State of Arizona, Plaintiff, v. Alejandro Mayorkas in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; United States Department of Homeland Security; Troy Miller in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Tae Johnson in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Defendants.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UO55SSb0HL1FM6d6E2EOBP8Y8_Z4xBDe/view?usp=sharing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
State of Arizona, Plaintiff, 
v.
Alejandro Mayorkas in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; United States Department of Homeland Security; Troy Miller in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Tae Johnson in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Defendants. 
CORRECTED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
No. 2:21-cv-00617-DWL 

INTRODUCTION

This is an action challenging Defendants’ pervasive violations of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”) as it relates to immigration policy. Although those immigration policies undeniably have significant effects on the environment, Defendants have not even attempted to comply with NEPA. 

CLAIM FOR RELIEF 
NEPA Violations

68. The allegations in the preceding paragraphs are reincorporated herein. 

69. Population growth in the State of Arizona is the reasonably foreseeable, direct, and proximate result of the Defendants actions, individually and when considered collectively along with all past, present and reasonably foreseeable future actions. 

70. Population growth has significant environmental effects within the State, which Defendants were required to analyze under NEPA. 

 71. Each of the actions had other significant environmental effects which DHS similarly failed to consider. In particular, Defendants have not prepared either an EIS or EA to study the pertinent environmental effects. 

72. In taking the above-referenced major federal actions without conducting any sort of environmental analysis, Defendants have taken final agency actions that are arbitrary, capricious, and otherwise not in accordance with law, or without observance of procedure required by law, within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. § 706(2). As such, Defendants’ actions should be held unlawful and set aside. Id. 

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Plaintiff respectfully request that this Court enter judgment: 

 A. Declaring that Defendants have violated NEPA by halting the construction of the border wall in Arizona and by processing migrants into the United States who were and who would have been covered by the MPP without preparing an EIS or EA; 

B. Enjoining Defendants from continuing to take actions, including diverting and impounding appropriated funds, to prevent the continuation of construction of border wall under contracts already entered into by the United States until such time as Defendants comply with NEPA; 

C. Enjoining Defendants any further from processing migrants into the United States, who were and who would have been covered by the MPP until such time as Defendants comply with NEPA; 

D. Enjoining Defendants to secure the border in Arizona to the satisfaction of this Court to prevent additional unlawful migration until such time as Defendants comply with NEPA; 

E. Awarding Plaintiff costs of litigation, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412; and 

F. Granting any and all other such relief as the Court finds appropriate. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 11th day of April, 2021. 

MARK BRNOVICH
ATTORNEY GENERAL

REFERENCE: 
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich Attorney General Mark Brnovich Sues Federal Government Over Environmentally Harmful Immigration Decisions
Monday, April 12, 2021

Thursday, January 14, 2021

Yes, President Trump Won: The Case, Evidence, & Statistical Receipts Volume Three of the Navarro Report


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vCjuHNWPm5uxmvB2a9hhweDAvkqcKANP/view?usp=sharing 
Yes, President Trump Won: 
The Case, Evidence, & Statistical Receipts 
Volume Three of the Navarro Report 

Concluding Remarks 

Based on this third and final volume of The Navarro Report, and as Figure Eight demonstrates, it should be clear that there are far more questions raised about the potential illegality of the 2020 presidential election than have been answered. Clearly, the case, evidence, and statistical receipts presented in this report provide a strong case that the 2020 election may well have been stolen not just from President Trump but also from the 74 million Americans who went to the ballot box in good faith in support of President Trump.

In light of this evidence, it is impossible for anyone to claim that President Trump was in any way wrong in stoutly raising the question of election fraud and irregularities in the weeks following the November 3 election and in calling for his supporters to PEACEFULLY protest. Indeed, for the president not to rise to defend the integrity of the ballot box would have been a betrayal of the 74 million Americans who voted for the president thinking they were participating in what may well not have been a free and fair election. 

In light of this evidence, it is also irresponsible – in the extreme – for the Democrat Party and its leadership, or journalists in the mainstream media, or RINO Republicans to claim there is no evidence of election irregularities. That’s absurd on its face. As this report shows, there is an abundance of evidence – a virtual cornucopia of potentially poisonous election irregularities.  

In light of this evidence, this must also be said: Those American citizens who are now questioning the potential illegality of votes cast in the 2020 election should NOT be subjected by cable news networks, social media platforms, or the print media to the kind of abhorrent behaviors that we are now observing – social and political behaviors that are far more worthy of Communist China authoritarianism than American democracy. 

From public shaming to de-platforming, doxing, and public calls to punish and shun all those who have supported the president or worked in his administration, these types of behaviors are not the American way. Rather, this is Orwell, Kafka, and Xi Jinping all rolled up into the death of the First Amendment and the death knell of our democracy. 

Based on the analysis and the granular, documented quantities of illegal votes in this report, the only thing that must happen now as we engage in a peaceful transition of power is a FULL investigation of this matter. 
• The Department of Justice should immediately appoint a Special Counsel BEFORE the Biden administration begins. 
• State legislators and Attorneys Generals in the battleground states, particularly Republican states, must launch similar investigations. 

Absent a full investigation, we as a nation run the risk of institutionalizing a rigged electoral system in which a large segment of America will no longer have faith in. That’s why clearing the air about the 2020 presidential election is not just about Donald J. Trump but rather about something much larger and of far more import —the future of our election system, the public perception of that system, and ultimately the future of our free and democratic Republic.

Wednesday, January 06, 2021

THE VICE PRESIDENT WASHINGTON January 6, 2021 Michael R. Pence Vice President of the United States

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i9ojCg8bI0QCs4Yuc0SXSK0xXltEeHa-/view?usp=sharing 
THE VICE PRESIDENT 
WASHINGTON 
January 6, 2021 
Michael R. Pence 
Vice President of the United States

January 7, 2021

AZ Letter to VP Pence by The Western Journal

The Honorable Mike Pence, 
The Vice President of the United States 
United States Senate 
Washington, D.C. 20501 
Majority Members Arizona Legislature S
enate and House of Representatives 
1700 W. Washington Street 
Phoenix, AZ 85007 
RE: Reclamation of Electoral College Electors from Arizona 
January 1, 2021 
Rep. Steve Pierce, LD-1 Rep. Kevin Payne, LD-21 Rep. Mark Finchem, LD-11 Rep. David Cook, LD-8 Rep. John Fillmore, LD-16 Rep. Bob Thorpe, LD-6 Rep. Nancy Barto, LD-15 Rep. Kelly Townsend, LD-16 Rep. Anthony Kern, LD-20 Rep. Jay Lawrence, LD-23 Rep. Bret Roberts, LD-11 Rep. Noel Campbell, LD-1 Rep. Leo Biasiucci, LD-5 Rep. Walter Blackman, LD-6 Rep. Travis Grantham, LD-12 Rep. Tony Rivero, LD-21 Rep. Frank Carrol. LD-22 Rep. Regina Cobb, LD-5 Rep. John Allen, LD-1 5 Rep. Timothy Dunn, LD-13 Rep. Gai I Griffin, LD-13 Rep. Becky Nutt, LD-13 Rep. John Kavanagh, LD-23 Rep. Joanne Osborne, LD-13 Rep. Warren Petersen, LD-12 Rep. Thomas J. Shope, LD-8 Rep. Ben Toma, LD-22 Rep. Michelle Udall, LD-25 Rep. Jeff Weningcr. LD-17 Rep. Shawnna Bolick, LD-20 Rep. Russell Bowers, LD-LD-25, Speaker of the House Members of the Senate undersigned Sen. Sylvia Allen, LD-6 Sen. Sonny Borrelli, LD-5 Sen. Paul Boyer, LD-20 Sen. Kate Brophy Magee. LD-28 Sen. David Farnsworth, LD-16 Sen. Eddie Farnsworth. LD-12 Sen. David Gowan, LD-14 Sine Kerr LD-13 Sen. Vince Leach, LD- I I Sen. David Livingston, LD-22 Sen. J.D. Mcsnard, LD-17 Sen. Tyler Pace, LD-25 Sen. Frank Pratt. LD-8 Sen. Michelle Ugcnti-Rita Sen Karen Fann, LD-1, President of the Senate
January 2, 2021 
The White House 
Office of the Vice President 
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20500 
William T. Ligon, Chairman 
Election Law Study Subcommittee of the Standing 
Senate Judiciary Committee
 

PA Letter to VP Pence by The Western Journal

PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATURE 
January 5, 2021 
The Honorable Mike Pence 
Vice President of the United States 
United States Senate 
Washington, D.C. 20501 
Re: Reclamation of Electoral College Electors from Pennsylvania

WISCONSIS STATE LEGISLATORS 
January 5, 2021 
The Honorable Mike Pence 
Vice President of the United States 
United States Senate 
Washington, D.C. 20501 
Re: Reclamation of Electoral College Electors from the State of Wisconsin