Showing posts with label STATE OF GEORGIA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label STATE OF GEORGIA. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 23, 2021

BILL OF COMPLAINT, In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF [INSERT YOUR STATE], Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, VICE- PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND STATE OF WISCONSIN, Defendants.

 

 

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NG__ixZDUa0nW3qLx39RI4z8RZovWdNT/view?usp=sharing 

No. ______, Original

In the Supreme Court of the United States

STATE OF [INSERT YOUR STATE],

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, VICE- PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND STATE OF WISCONSIN,

Defendants.

BILL OF COMPLAINT

 

COUNT I: ELECTORS CLAUSE

COUNT II: DUE PROCESS

COUNT III: GUARANTEE CLAUSE

COUNT IV: TAKE CARE CLAUSE

 

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff State respectfully requests that this Court issue the following relief:

1. Declare that Defendant States administered the November 2020 election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

2. Declare that the United States and Officer Defendants violated the Guarantee Clause and the Take Care Clause with respect to allowing the foregoing constitutional violations by the Defendant States in administering the November 2020 election.

3. Declare that the Defendant States’ certification of the November 2020 election results and of presidential electors on or about December 14, 2020, violated the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and vacate those certifications.

4. Declare that the Defendant States’ certification of the November 2020 election results and of presidential electors on or about December 14, 2020, violated the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and vacate those certifications.

5. Declare that the United States violated the Guarantee Clause in allowing the November 2020 election to proceed on the basis of the unconstitutional results in Defendant States.

6. Declare that the President, Attorney General, and Vice-President violated the Take Care Clause by failing to act to remedy the violations of the Constitution in the November 2020 election.

7. Enjoin the use of vacated certifications in Defendant States’ use of the 2020 election results for the Office of President to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College.

8. Declare that the counting of electoral votes in the Joint Session of Congress on January 6-7, 2021, violated the Electors Clause, the Due Process Clause, the Guarantee Clause, the Take Care Clause, and the Twelfth Amendment, and vacate that count.

9. Enjoin the Officer Defendants to convene special sessions of the House of Representatives and the Senate to vote for the President and Vice-President, respectively, pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment.

10. Alternatively, authorize, pursuant to the Court’s remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct a special election to appoint presidential electors.

11. Alternatively, authorize, pursuant to the Court’s remedial authority, the Defendant States to conduct an audit of their election results, supervised by a Court-appointed special master, in a manner to be determined separately.

12. Enjoin Defendant States’ use in future elections of revisions adopted by non-legislative actors to the election laws enacted by the state legislatures unless the legislature ratifies any such revisions by enacting them as state law before the election.

13. Award costs to Plaintiff State.

14. Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

November __, 2021

 

REFERENCE:

Help Save Our Country, Please Share Everywhere

By ,

Wednesday, October 13, 2021

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA, GARLAND FAVORITO, MICHAEL SCUPIN, TREVOR TERRIS, SEAN DRAIME, CAROLINE JEFFORDS, STACEY DORAN, CHRISTOPHER PECK, ROBIN SOTIR, and BRANDI TAYLOR Petitioners, vs. FULTON COUNTY, ALEX WAN, VERNETTA KEITH NURIDDIN, KATHLEEN RUTH, AARON JOHNSON, AND MARK WINGATE in their individual capacities, Respondents.

 

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/181i9MENm7jxep3HOHZ7uNLdINPReuhtd/view?usp=sharing 

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY
STATE OF GEORGIA
GARLAND FAVORITO, MICHAEL SCUPIN, TREVOR TERRIS, SEAN DRAIME, CAROLINE JEFFORDS, STACEY DORAN,
CHRISTOPHER PECK, ROBIN SOTIR, and BRANDI TAYLOR Petitioners,
vs.
FULTON COUNTY, ALEX WAN, VERNETTA KEITH NURIDDIN, KATHLEEN RUTH, AARON JOHNSON, AND MARK W
INGATE in their individual capacities, Respondents.
CIVIL ACTION FILE N0.: 2020CV343938
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

Petitioners have failed to allege a particularized injury.

An injury is particularized when it “affects the plaintiff in a personal and individual way.” Wood v. Raflensperger, 981 F.3d 1307, 1314 (11th Cir. 2020) (internal citations and styling omitted). Petitioners” allegations are, in sum, that their state equal protection and due process rights were violated because their votes, and the votes of other Georgia voters, were diluted as a result of the inclusion of fraudulent ballots that were counted because Respondents negligently oversaw the ballot processing for the General Election.

The 11th Circuit in Wood found substantially similar allegations of voter dilution insufficient to confer standing. Wood, the appellant, alleged that “irregularities in the hand recount violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Id. at 1312. He asserted he had basis for standing because “the inclusion of unlawfully processed absentee ballots diluted the weight of his vote.” Id. at 1314.

The 11th Circuit, in a unanimous opinion written by Chief Judge William Pryor, disagreed. Although it recognized that vote dilution could be a basis for standing, such as in malapportionment and gerrymandering cases, the 11th Circuit also noted that these cases typically required the plaintiffs to be compared to another group of voters. Id. at 1314 (“[V]ote dilution occurs when voters are harmed compared to ‘irrationally favored’ voters from other districts”). “By contrast, no single voter is specifically disadvantaged if a vote is counted improperly, even if the error might have a mathematical impact on the final tally and thus on the proportional effect of every vote.” Id. (citing Bognet v. Sec ’y Commonwealth 0fPa., 980 F.3d 336, 356 (3d Cir. Nov. 13, 2020), cert. granted, judgment vacated by Bognet v. Degraflenreid, 2021 WL 1520777 (Apr. 19, 2021) with instructions to dismiss case as moot) (internal quotations omitted). Thus, the llth Circuit found Wood had alleged only a generalized grievance. Id at 1314-15.

Other cases that have tangled with the issue of vote dilution in this context have concluded similarly. See Bowey v. Ducey, 506 F.Supp.3d 699, 711-12 (D. Az. Dec. 9, 2020) (finding that theory of vote dilution as a result of alleged voting fraud and manipulation does not confer standing); Moore v. Circosta, 494 F.Supp.3d 289, 3l2~13 (M.D.N.C. Oct. l4, 2020) (finding that possibility of unlawful ballots being counted is insufficient to have standing to bring vote dilution claims under the federal equal protection clause); Martel v. Condos, 487 F.Supp.3d 247, 254 (D. Ver. Sept. 16, 2020) (stating possible vote dilution caused by hypothetical “third— party’s fraudulent vote” is generalized injury).

Here, Petitioners allege a basis for standing similar to that asserted in Wood. However, as in Wood, Petitioners’ arguments are not enough to give rise to a particularized injury. Vote dilution as a result of allegedly unlawfully processed ballots is “a paradigmatic generalized grievance.” Wood, at 1315 (citation omitted). See also Paher v. Cegavske, 457 F.Supp.3d 919, 926 (D. Nev. Apr. 30, 2020) (“But Plaintiffs’ purported injury of having their votes diluted due to ostensible election fraud may be conceivably raised by any Nevada voter. Such claimed injury therefore does not satisfy the requirement that Plaintiffs must state a concrete and particularized injury”). “[A] generalized grievance, no matter how sincere, cannot support standing.” Wood, at 1314 (citing Hollingsworth v. Perry, 570 U.S. 693, 706 (2013)) (internal quotations omitted). 

Accordingly, the Court concludes the Petitioners have not alleged a particularized injury, and therefore, do not have standing.“

Having considered the evidence submitted, the arguments of counsel, and the record as a whole in the light most favorable to Petitioners, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to dismiss by Respondents Alex Wan, Vernetta Nuriddin, and Aaron Johnson is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, due to the similar lack of standing, the claims against Respondents Kathleen Ruth and Mark Wingate be, and hereby are, also DISMISSED.”

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because the Court’s final order on April 20, 2021 fully adjudged Petitioners’ ORA claims, no further relief may be accorded to Petitioners under the ORA, and therefore, Respondent Fulton County is also DISMISSED. 

SO ORDERED this 13TH October 2021.


Brian J. Amero, Chief Judge
Superior Court of Henry County
Flint Judicial Circuit
By Designation, a Fulton County
Superior Court Judge

REFERENCE:

Public Records Access Fulton County GA., Register of Actions

VotersOrganized for Trusted Election Results in Georgia

Wednesday, February 10, 2021

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES: DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021, Mike Kelly, United States Congressman, et al., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania, et al., L. Lin Wood, Jr., Petitioner v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, et al., Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Petitioner v. Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al., Donald J. Trump, et al., Petitioners v. Joseph R. Biden, et al. & Timothy King, et al., Petitioners v. Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al.

In the Supreme Court of the United States Mike Kelly, United States Congressman, et al., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania, et al

Supreme Court of the United States

No. 20-810
Title: Mike Kelly, United States Congressman, et al., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania, et al. 
Docketed: December 15, 2020 
Linked with 20A98
Lower Ct Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
Case Numbers: (68 MAP 2020)
Decision Date: November 28, 2020

  DATE                          PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS

Jan 20 2021

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.

 

In the Supreme Court of the United States L. Lin Wood, Jr., Petitioner v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, et al.

Supreme Court of the United States

No. 20-799
Title: L. Lin Wood, Jr., Petitioner v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, et al.
Docketed: December 11, 2020
Lower Ct United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Numbers: (20-14418)
Decision Date:
December 5, 2020 

 DATE                          PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS

Jan 27 2021

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.

                

In the Supreme Court of the United States Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Petitioner v. Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.

Supreme Court of the United States

No. 20-845
Title Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Petitioner v. Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.
Docketed: December 23, 2020
Lower Ct. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
Case Numbers: (149 MM 2020)
Decision Date October 23, 2020 Rule 12.4
 

DATE                          PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS

Jan 27 2021

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.


In the Supreme Court of the United States Donald J. Trump, et al., Petitioners v. Joseph R. Biden, et al.

Supreme Court of the United States

No.. 20-882
Title: Donald J. Trump, et al., Petitioners v. Joseph R. Biden, et al.
Docketed: January 4, 2021
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Case Numbers: (2020AP2038)
Decision Date: December 14, 2020

DATE                          PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS

Jan 27 2021

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.


In the Supreme Court of the United States Timothy King, et al., Petitioners v. Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al.

Supreme Court of the United States

No. 20-815
Title: Timothy King, et al., Petitioners v. Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al.
Docketed: December 15, 2020
Lower Ct United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Case Numbers: (20-2205)

 DATE                          PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS

Feb 03 2021

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.

Thursday, January 14, 2021

Yes, President Trump Won: The Case, Evidence, & Statistical Receipts Volume Three of the Navarro Report


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vCjuHNWPm5uxmvB2a9hhweDAvkqcKANP/view?usp=sharing 
Yes, President Trump Won: 
The Case, Evidence, & Statistical Receipts 
Volume Three of the Navarro Report 

Concluding Remarks 

Based on this third and final volume of The Navarro Report, and as Figure Eight demonstrates, it should be clear that there are far more questions raised about the potential illegality of the 2020 presidential election than have been answered. Clearly, the case, evidence, and statistical receipts presented in this report provide a strong case that the 2020 election may well have been stolen not just from President Trump but also from the 74 million Americans who went to the ballot box in good faith in support of President Trump.

In light of this evidence, it is impossible for anyone to claim that President Trump was in any way wrong in stoutly raising the question of election fraud and irregularities in the weeks following the November 3 election and in calling for his supporters to PEACEFULLY protest. Indeed, for the president not to rise to defend the integrity of the ballot box would have been a betrayal of the 74 million Americans who voted for the president thinking they were participating in what may well not have been a free and fair election. 

In light of this evidence, it is also irresponsible – in the extreme – for the Democrat Party and its leadership, or journalists in the mainstream media, or RINO Republicans to claim there is no evidence of election irregularities. That’s absurd on its face. As this report shows, there is an abundance of evidence – a virtual cornucopia of potentially poisonous election irregularities.  

In light of this evidence, this must also be said: Those American citizens who are now questioning the potential illegality of votes cast in the 2020 election should NOT be subjected by cable news networks, social media platforms, or the print media to the kind of abhorrent behaviors that we are now observing – social and political behaviors that are far more worthy of Communist China authoritarianism than American democracy. 

From public shaming to de-platforming, doxing, and public calls to punish and shun all those who have supported the president or worked in his administration, these types of behaviors are not the American way. Rather, this is Orwell, Kafka, and Xi Jinping all rolled up into the death of the First Amendment and the death knell of our democracy. 

Based on the analysis and the granular, documented quantities of illegal votes in this report, the only thing that must happen now as we engage in a peaceful transition of power is a FULL investigation of this matter. 
• The Department of Justice should immediately appoint a Special Counsel BEFORE the Biden administration begins. 
• State legislators and Attorneys Generals in the battleground states, particularly Republican states, must launch similar investigations. 

Absent a full investigation, we as a nation run the risk of institutionalizing a rigged electoral system in which a large segment of America will no longer have faith in. That’s why clearing the air about the 2020 presidential election is not just about Donald J. Trump but rather about something much larger and of far more import —the future of our election system, the public perception of that system, and ultimately the future of our free and democratic Republic.

Wednesday, January 06, 2021

THE VICE PRESIDENT WASHINGTON January 6, 2021 Michael R. Pence Vice President of the United States

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i9ojCg8bI0QCs4Yuc0SXSK0xXltEeHa-/view?usp=sharing 
THE VICE PRESIDENT 
WASHINGTON 
January 6, 2021 
Michael R. Pence 
Vice President of the United States

January 7, 2021

AZ Letter to VP Pence by The Western Journal

The Honorable Mike Pence, 
The Vice President of the United States 
United States Senate 
Washington, D.C. 20501 
Majority Members Arizona Legislature S
enate and House of Representatives 
1700 W. Washington Street 
Phoenix, AZ 85007 
RE: Reclamation of Electoral College Electors from Arizona 
January 1, 2021 
Rep. Steve Pierce, LD-1 Rep. Kevin Payne, LD-21 Rep. Mark Finchem, LD-11 Rep. David Cook, LD-8 Rep. John Fillmore, LD-16 Rep. Bob Thorpe, LD-6 Rep. Nancy Barto, LD-15 Rep. Kelly Townsend, LD-16 Rep. Anthony Kern, LD-20 Rep. Jay Lawrence, LD-23 Rep. Bret Roberts, LD-11 Rep. Noel Campbell, LD-1 Rep. Leo Biasiucci, LD-5 Rep. Walter Blackman, LD-6 Rep. Travis Grantham, LD-12 Rep. Tony Rivero, LD-21 Rep. Frank Carrol. LD-22 Rep. Regina Cobb, LD-5 Rep. John Allen, LD-1 5 Rep. Timothy Dunn, LD-13 Rep. Gai I Griffin, LD-13 Rep. Becky Nutt, LD-13 Rep. John Kavanagh, LD-23 Rep. Joanne Osborne, LD-13 Rep. Warren Petersen, LD-12 Rep. Thomas J. Shope, LD-8 Rep. Ben Toma, LD-22 Rep. Michelle Udall, LD-25 Rep. Jeff Weningcr. LD-17 Rep. Shawnna Bolick, LD-20 Rep. Russell Bowers, LD-LD-25, Speaker of the House Members of the Senate undersigned Sen. Sylvia Allen, LD-6 Sen. Sonny Borrelli, LD-5 Sen. Paul Boyer, LD-20 Sen. Kate Brophy Magee. LD-28 Sen. David Farnsworth, LD-16 Sen. Eddie Farnsworth. LD-12 Sen. David Gowan, LD-14 Sine Kerr LD-13 Sen. Vince Leach, LD- I I Sen. David Livingston, LD-22 Sen. J.D. Mcsnard, LD-17 Sen. Tyler Pace, LD-25 Sen. Frank Pratt. LD-8 Sen. Michelle Ugcnti-Rita Sen Karen Fann, LD-1, President of the Senate
January 2, 2021 
The White House 
Office of the Vice President 
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20500 
William T. Ligon, Chairman 
Election Law Study Subcommittee of the Standing 
Senate Judiciary Committee
 

PA Letter to VP Pence by The Western Journal

PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATURE 
January 5, 2021 
The Honorable Mike Pence 
Vice President of the United States 
United States Senate 
Washington, D.C. 20501 
Re: Reclamation of Electoral College Electors from Pennsylvania

WISCONSIS STATE LEGISLATORS 
January 5, 2021 
The Honorable Mike Pence 
Vice President of the United States 
United States Senate 
Washington, D.C. 20501 
Re: Reclamation of Electoral College Electors from the State of Wisconsin

Tuesday, January 05, 2021

Expert Edward Solomon’s Analysis of 2020 Election Shows Thousands of Ballots Switched from Trump In States He Won (MI, GA, PA) to Biden – Enough to Steal the Election

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tjAmbzFdh8WOQq48fKoV7wVptWB86e_E/view?usp=sharing
Edward Solomon’s Evidentiary Paper on Michigan. 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UxxiGqcozWIE6w877yTByQPKO3QDU07HcxBc-Eglzso/edit

Edward Solomon’s Evidentiary Paper on Georgia.

Edward Solomon’s Evidentiary Paper on Pennsylvania. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1es0uSqp_AmuvicH-R1me-PIIRjKeSNJ2/view 

REFERENCES: 
By Joe Hoft 
Published January 5, 2021 at 4:56pm 

By Joe Hoft 
Published November 21, 2020 at 11:28am 

By Joe Hoft 
Published November 10, 2020 at 6:32pm

THE IMMACULATE DECEPTION (Volume One) & THE ART OF THE STEAL (Volumes Two) of the Navarro Report

 

 
THE IMMACULATE DECEPTION: 
Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities 
The Navarro Report 
December 17, 2020 

Executive Summary 

This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states. Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations,1 testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage. 

The matrix below indicates that significant irregularities occurred across all six battleground states and across all six dimensions of election irregularities. This finding lends credence to the claim that the election may well have been stolen from President Donald J. Trump. 

 From the findings of this report, it is possible to infer what may well have been a coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket. Indeed, the observed patterns of election irregularities are so consistent across the six battleground states that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election outright, strategically game the election process in such a way as to “stuff the ballot box” and unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris ticket. Topline findings of this report include: 

 • The weight of evidence and patterns of irregularities are such that it is irresponsible for anyone – especially the mainstream media – to claim there is “no evidence” of fraud or irregularities. 

 • The ballots in question because of the identified election irregularities are more than sufficient to swing the outcome in favor of President Trump should even a relatively small portion of these ballots be ruled illegal. 

 • All six battleground states exhibit most, or all, six dimensions of election irregularities. However, each state has a unique mix of issues that might be considered “most important.” To put this another way, all battleground states are characterized by the same or similar election irregularities; but, like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, each battleground state is different in its own election irregularity way.

 • This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather than any one single “silver bullet” election irregularity.

 • In refusing to investigate a growing number of legitimate grievances, the anti-Trump media and censoring social media are complicit in shielding the American public from the truth. This is a dangerous game that simultaneously undermines the credibility of the media and the stability of our political system and Republic.

 • Those journalists, pundits, and political leaders now participating in what has become a Biden Whitewash should acknowledge the six dimensions of election irregularities and conduct the appropriate investigations to determine the truth about the 2020 election. If this is not done before Inauguration Day, we risk putting into power an illegitimate and illegal president lacking the support of a large segment of the American people. 

 • The failure to aggressively and fully investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities assessed in this report is a signal failure not just of our anti-Trump mainstream media and censoring social media but also of both our legislative and judicial branches. 

 o Republican governors in Arizona and Georgia together with Republican majorities in both chambers of the State Legislatures of five of the six battleground states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin2 – have had both the power and the opportunity to investigate the six dimensions of election irregularities presented in this report. Yet, wilting under intense political pressure, these politicians have failed in their Constitutional duties and responsibilities to do so – and thereby failed both their states and this nation as well as their party. 

 o Both State courts and Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have failed the American people in refusing to appropriately adjudicate the election irregularities that have come before them. Their failures pose a great risk to the American Republic.

 • If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again – with the down-ballot Senate races scheduled for January 5 in Georgia an initial test case of this looming risk.

THE ART OF THE STEAL 
Volume Two of the Navarro Report 
January 5, 2021 

Summary – The Art of the Steal 

The Democrat Party and its political operatives, with the unwitting aid of “useful idiots” from the Republican Party, stole the presidential election from Donald J. Trump. 

The Democrat Party used a two-pronged Grand “Stuff the Ballot Box” Strategy to flood six key battleground states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – with enough illegal absentee and mail-in ballots to turn a decisive Trump victory into a narrow and illegitimate Biden alleged “win.” 

Prong One dramatically INCREASED the amount of absentee and mail-in ballots in the battleground states. Prong Two dramatically DECREASED the level of scrutiny of such ballots – effectively taking the election “cops” off the beat. This pincer movement resulted in a FLOOD of illegal ballots into the battleground states more than sufficient to tip the scales from a decisive legal win by President Trump to a narrow and illegitimate alleged “victory” by Joe Biden. 

The Democrat Party relied primarily on legal means such as legislative and rule changes at the state level to implement its Grand Strategy and thereby achieve its illegal outcome. However, at times, political operatives advancing the Democrat Party’s Grand Strategy also bent, and sometimes broke, the laws and rules of that which is most sacred to our American public – our election system. 

Key methods used by the Democrat Party to strategically game America’s presidential election included changes in the law approved by State Legislatures; rule changes and new guidance initiated by Secretaries of State or other election officials; court rulings and interventions; and the aggressive use of so-called “public-private partnerships” to commandeer and manipulate the election process in key Democrat strongholds such as Wayne County, Michigan and Dane County, Wisconsin. 

Prong One of the Democrat Party’s Grand Strategy used seven basic gambits to dramatically INCREASE the flood of absentee and mail-in ballots: relaxing mail-in and absentee ballot rules; sending absentee or mail-in ballots or applications for such ballots to every voter (universal mailing); increasing both the legal and illegal use of drop boxes; ballot harvesting; and the use of corrupted voting machines. 

Prong Two of the Democrat Party’s Grand Strategy used five additional gambits to dramatically DECREASE the level of scrutiny of the new flood of absentee and mail-in ballots into the battleground states: relaxation of ID verification; reduced signature matching requirements; illegally counting naked ballots to increase ballot curing – both legal and illegal; and reduced poll watching and observing. 

Democrat Party operatives frequently hid behind the shield of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) virus and resultant pandemic to further their goals of boosting the absentee and mail-in ballot counts in the key battleground states. 

The practical result of the Democrat Party’s two-pronged Grand “Stuff the Ballot Box” Strategy was to flood the six key battleground states with enough illegal absentee and mail-in ballots to turn a decisive Trump victory into a narrow alleged Biden “victory.” Key political operatives assisting the Democrat Party included Wall Street oligarch George Soros, Silicon Valley oligarch and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and Marc Elias, former Hillary Clinton Campaign General Counsel and one of the alleged architects and financial conduits for Fusion GPS and the Russia Hoax designed to topple a duly-elected President. 

Soros money helped fund efforts to change election laws and rules through instruments such as referenda. Soros and his network of organizations such as the political action committee “Secretary of State Project” also helped to elect puppet Secretaries of State in Michigan (Jocelyn Benson) and Pennsylvania (Kathy Boockvar) who would play instrumental roles in bending or breaking election rules and thereby advancing the Grand “Stuff the Ballot Box” Strategy. Zuckerberg money – nearly half a billion dollars – helped engineer what was effectively a hostile Democrat Party “public-private partnership” takeover of what should otherwise be a nonpartisan election process in key Democrat strongholds such as Wayne County, Michigan and Dane County, Wisconsin. 

Useful idiots for the Democrat Party included Georgia’s Republican Governor Brian Kemp and Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger who entered into a Consent Decree that dramatically INCREASED the number of absentee and mail-in ballots while dramatically DECREASING the rejection rate of such ballots. Republican state legislators who voted for the bills that would help the Democrats advance its Grand Strategy likewise were unwitting dupes. 

By implementing its Grand “Stuff the Ballot Box” Strategy, the Democrat Party and its political operatives have strategically gamed one of the most sacred elements of American democracy, our election system. This was brass knuckle politics played at the highest level which has delivered a brutal punch to the nose of the American people and a vicious kick to the groin of American democracy. 

That the Democrat Party and its operatives have, up to this point, gotten away with their Immaculate Deception and Art of the Steal, represents a signal failure of the media, Republican state legislators, other Republican government officials across the battleground states, the US Congress, and our judicial branch of government at both the state and federal levels. 

Volumes 1 and 2 of the Navarro Report – The Immaculate Deception and The Art of the Steal – together make the strong case for a full investigation of the election irregularities and strategic gaming of our political process that in all likelihood have led to a stolen presidential election. Any such investigation must begin immediately as this nation simply cannot risk the inauguration of a president who will be perceived by a large segment of the American people as illegitimate.

Monday, January 04, 2021

Sunday, January 03, 2021

Evidence of voter, ballot, and election irregularities and lawlessness in the presidential election of November 3, 2020

Evidence of voter, ballot, and election irregularities and lawlessness in the presidential election of November 3, 2020


1. THE LEGITIMACY AND EFFECT OF PRIVATE FUNDING IN FEDERAL AND STATE ELECTORAL PROCESSES 

The Legitimacy and Effect of Private Funding in Federal and State Electoral Processes
Prepared for: Phill Kline
Thomas More Society
309 West Washington Street, Suite 1250
Chicago, IL 60606
December 14, 2020

Set In Stone?
A Historical, Constitutional, and Legal examination of Electoral College Deadlines and their implications for the 2020 Presidential Election
The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society
XII.IV.MMXX

PRESS RELEASE: Amistad Project Files Federal Lawsuit Demanding State Legislatures in Contested States Be Allowed to Certify Electors Prior to Congressional Count

4. WISCONSIN SENATE COMMITTEE ON CAMPAIGNS AND ELECTIONS

5. REPORT EXPOSES HOW MARK ZUCKERBERG’S $500 MIL CAUSED CHAOS AND INFLUENCED THE OUTCOME OF THE 2020 ELECTION  
Voices of Freedom - Phill Kline and Got Freedom
Nov 23, 2020
3:11

6. ELECTION WHISTLEBLOWERS COME FORWARD  
The Uncovering of Election Fraud Press Conference
Dec 2, 2020
1:22:12

7. SWING STATE BALLOT ANALYSIS

8. TIMELINE OF ELECTORAL POLICY ACTIVITIES, ISSUES, AND LITIGATION

Timeline of Electoral Policy Activities, Issues, and Litigation Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, 
Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada
August 2003 to November 2020

9. THE IMMACULATE DECEPTION

10. PA LAWMAKERS: NUMBERS DON’T ADD UP, CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS PREMATURE AND IN ERROR 

PA Lawmakers: Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification of Presidential Results Premature and In Error
December 28, 2020

11. PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY 
Presentation to Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity: A suggestion and some evidence, by John Lott, Jr.