Showing posts with label WaterPlus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WaterPlus. Show all posts

Monday, May 19, 2014

Only Recourse for Residential Water Customers Is To Support Measure O: Residential Water Customers Are Subsidizing Other Water Customer Classes

ABSTRACT: In the Guest Commentary, “Residential ratepayers will bear brunt of fine if O fails,” by Ron Weitzman, WaterPlus President, (05/17/2014), in The Monterey County Herald, Weitzman explains reasons why residential water customers/voters should support Measure O, including the following relevant, highlight excerpts:
“Different from Cal Am's residential customers, its business customers are well organized into groups like the Monterey County Association of Realtors and the Monterey County Hospitality Association. These commercial groups have made a pact with Cal Am: They would support its water-supply project if it would persuade the Public Utilities Commission to eliminate tiered rates based on usage for commercial customers. Both sides have kept their part of the bargain. Though good for them, it is far from good for Cal Am's unorganized residential customers, who are now substantially subsidizing commercial and other customers. That is what a graph in a filing by the Office of Ratepayer Advocates of the PUC (March 28, 2014, p. 2-22, pertaining to Application 13-07-002) clearly shows. The only recourse residential customers have is to support Measure O.”
“In doing so, they would be going against the mayors they elected. That is because the mayors have chosen to support their business constituents instead of their residential ones. The mayors are rightfully concerned about the economic well-being of their cities. So, politically, we residents are on our own, not only without political power behind us, but even with it against us. All the television ads and mailers featuring the mayors and financially supported by Cal Am amply testify to that.”
“The state would impose the fine on Cal Am, but Cal Am, following its customary practice, would seek authorization from the PUC to recover the cost of the fine from ratepayers. If Cal Am succeeded with the PUC, residential ratepayers would bear the brunt of the fine because, as shown in the ORA graph, we are substantially subsidizing other local water users. We could assure Cal Am would succeed with the PUC at our expense if we voted no on Measure O because then we would be voting in unison with the mayors and the business community in favor of Cal Am's project and so would deserve the fine when the project fails to meet the state deadline. To prevent Cal Am from recovering the cost of the fine from us, we residential ratepayers should vote yes on Measure O.”

The aforementioned graph entitled Figure 1-A: Revenue vs. Consumption shows residential customers subsidizing other water customer classes in Monterey based on 2012 Recorded %Revenue/%Consumption and 2015 Forecasted %Revenue/%Consumption. The OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION “ORA Analysis and Recommendations on OPERATING REVENUES, RATE DESIGN and SPECIAL REQUESTS: 5, 6, 8, 9, 21, 24, 25 of California American Water Company Application 13-07-002” PUBLIC VERSION, March 28, 2014 document is embedded. Information regarding 2012 Revenue/Consumption vs. 2015 Revenue/Consumption is reproduced from pages 2-20 and 2-21 and Figure 1-A: Revenue vs. Consumption page 2-22 is embedded.

OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
ORA Analysis and Recommendations on OPERATING REVENUES, RATE DESIGN and
SPECIAL REQUESTS: 5, 6, 8, 9, 21, 24, 25 of California American Water Company
Application 13-07-002
PUBLIC VERSION
San Francisco, California
March 28, 2014

ii) 2012 Revenue/Consumption vs. 2015 Revenue/Consumption

ORA concluded from this analysis that although Cal Am’s testimony states rates are designed so that the proportion of revenue from each class approximates the proportion of consumption in the class,121 the proportionality seems to be diverging, rather than converging, between present and proposed rate designs. In the majority of Districts, Residential customers will be contributing more revenue proportional to the quantity of water consumed.

The following chart shows the percentage of total revenues generated by the residential class in each District and how the percentage revenues is proportional to the percentage of total consumption by the residential class in each District in Year 2012 and Year 2015. As a general example, if a Residential customer class in a District generates 25% of the total revenue for that District and, as a class, consumes, 25% of the total consumption in that District, this is reflected in the table as 100%, or direct proportionality. From the chart, it is clear that a greater proportion of total revenues relative to total consumption will be collected from the residential customer class for all Districts in 2015. This also means that the Residential customers are subsidizing other water customer classes. A dramatic example of this is shown in the chart below is of the revenue versus consumption proportionality in Monterey in 2015, where clearly the Residential customers are responsible for a greater percentage of the total revenues not proportional to the amount of water they consume at 115%. This does not validate Cal Am’s testimony that rates are designed so that the proportion of revenue from each class approximates the proportion of consumption in the class.

Figure 1-A: Revenue vs. Consumption (2-22)

Source: OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
ORA Analysis and Recommendations on OPERATING REVENUES, RATE DESIGN and SPECIAL REQUESTS: 5, 6, 8, 9, 21, 24, 25 of California American Water Company Application 13-07-002
PUBLIC VERSION
San Francisco, California
March 28, 2014

REFERENCES:
A1307002 – Proceeding
Filed By: California-American Water Company
Filing Date: July 1, 2013
Category: Ratesetting
Current Status: ACTIVE
Description: Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Authorization to Increase its Revenues for Water Service by $18,473,900 or 9.55% in the year 2015, by $8,264,700 or 3.90% in the year 2016, and by $6,654,700 or 3.02% in the year 2017.

Saturday, March 09, 2013

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PREPARED TESTIMONY OF RON WEITZMAN ON BEHALF OF WATER PLUS, Dated February 22, 2013

ABSTRACT:  PREPARED TESTIMONY OF RON WEITZMAN ON BEHALF OF WATER PLUS, Dated February 22, 2013, BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Re:  Application of California-American Water Company (U210W) for Approval of the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and Authorization to Recover All Present and Future Costs in Rates,  A.12-04-019 (Filed April 23, 2012) document is embedded.  Particularly significant testimony includes The Current Cal Am Water Supply Project is Doomed to Failure, Open-ocean Intake Is Superior to Intake from Slant Wells Almost Generally and Particularly in Monterey County and The Pending Deal between Cal Am and the Monterey Peninsula Mayors Costing Ratepayers Hundreds of Millions of Dollars Stands on a Shaky Legal Foundation. 

   
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Dated February 22, 2013

Saturday, October 13, 2012

WaterPlus: ‘THE ONLY LOCAL ORGANIZATION LOOKING OUT FOR YOU, THE RATEPAYER’ Presents Leadership in Action Water Forum on the new Pacific Grove Desalination Project

ABSTRACT: WaterPlus, a public benefit nonprofit corporation, is “THE ONLY LOCAL ORGANIZATION LOOKING OUT FOR YOU, THE RATEPAYER.” THE NEW WATERPLUS MISSION STATEMENT: “Since the collapse of the regional desalination project, in which WaterPlus advocated for community control by promoting the municipalization of Cal Am, WaterPlus has expanded its mission as follows: To advocate in behalf of local Cal Am ratepayers for an adequate and affordable water supply by all reasonable means, including (its original mission) the persuasion or creation of a public agency to purchase Cal Am.” And IMPLEMENTATION: “To implement this new mission, WaterPlus is promoting the development of a desalination plant that will be sufficiently large to constitute a drought-proof water supply for the Monterey Peninsula, at the least possible cost to local ratepayers.” The WaterPlus Forum video(s) on the Pacific Grove Desalination Project, July 16, 2012, including Segments #1 - #6 and the entire 1:20:51 WATER PLUS FORUM ON THE PACIFIC GROVE DESALINATION PROJECT, are embedded.


Richard Stillwell and Ron Weitzman, President, WaterPlus Monterey
Segment #1 of the July 16, 2012 WaterPlus Forum

Daniel Miller, Pacific Grove Councilmember, Water Committee
Segment #2 of the July 16, 2012 WaterPlus Forum

Rudy Fischer, Pacific Grove Councilmember, Water Committee
Segment #3 of the July 16, 2012 WaterPlus Forum

Cameron Weist, Attorney at Law, Specializing in Public Financing
Segment #4 of the July 16, 2012 WaterPlus Forum

Paul Hart, Attorney at Law
Segment #5 of the July 16, 2012 WaterlPlus Forum

Robert Barminski, Hydrologist, Environmental Scientist
Mike Mickley, P.E., Ph.D, Science and Engineering Consultant
Segment #6 of the July 16, 2012 WaterPlus Forum

WATER PLUS FORUM ON THE PACIFIC GROVE DESALINATION PROJECT
July 16, 2012 (Segments #1 - #6)