ORDER, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, STACY LININGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RONALD PFLEGER, Sergeant; CITY OF CARMEL; FLIPPO DEAN, District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Jose

Lininger Order No. 18-15886 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

FILED JUN 27 2018
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STACY LININGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RONALD PFLEGER, Sergeant; CITY OF CARMEL; FLIPPO DEAN, District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 18-15886
D.C. No. 5:17-cv-03385-SVK
U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Jose
ORDER

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: Stacy Lininger v. Ronald Pfleger, et al.

General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Court of Appeals Docket #: 18-15886 Docketed: 05/16/2018 Nature of Suit: 3440 Other Civil Rights Stacy Lininger v. Ronald Pfleger, et al Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Northern California, San Jose . Fee Status: Due

Case Type Information:      1) civil      2) private      3) null

Originating Court Information:      District: 0971-5 : 5:17-cv-03385-SVK      Trial Judge: Susan G. Van Keulen, Magistrate Judge      Date Filed: 06/12/2017      Date Order/Judgment:      Date Order/Judgment EOD:      Date NOA Filed:      Date Rec'd COA:      04/26/2018      04/26/2018      05/15/2018      05/15/2018

05/16/2018  1  DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/23/2018. Appellant Stacy Lininger opening brief due 07/16/2018. Appellees City of Carmel, Flippo Dean and Ronald Pfleger answering brief due 08/16/2018. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [10874723] (RT) [Entered: 05/16/2018 01:45 PM] 05/29/2018  2  Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): It appears that the district court’s order challenged in this appeal may not have disposed of the action as to all claims and all parties. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1981). If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. A review of this court’s docket also reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. If appellant elects to show cause, appellant shall also pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 21 days after the date of this order. If appellant does not fully comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. The Clerk shall serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant. [10887380] (AF) [Entered: 05/29/2018 10:19 AM]

18-15886 Documents 1 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

05/16/2018

1

DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/23/2018. Appellant Stacy Lininger opening brief due 07/16/2018. Appellees City of Carmel, Flippo Dean and Ronald Pfleger answering brief due 08/16/2018. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [10874723] (RT) [Entered: 05/16/2018 01:45 PM]

18-15886_Documents 2 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

05/29/2018

2

Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): It appears that the district court’s order challenged in this appeal may not have disposed of the action as to all claims and all parties. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1981). If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. A review of this court’s docket also reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. If appellant elects to show cause, appellant shall also pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 21 days after the date of this order. If appellant does not fully comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. The Clerk shall serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant. [10887380] (AF) [Entered: 05/29/2018 10:19 AM]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, STACY LININGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RONALD PFLEGER, Sergeant; CITY OF CARMEL; FLIPPO DEAN, District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.

ABSTRACT: RE: Office of the Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Post Office Box 193939

San Francisco, California 94119-3939

415-355-8000
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court

May 16, 2018

No.: 18-15886

D.C. No.: 5:17-cv-03385-SVK

Short Title: Stacy Lininger v. Ronald Pfleger, et al

Lininger Document 54 05-16-18 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

Office of the Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Post Office Box 193939

San Francisco, California 94119-3939

May 16, 2018

No.: 18-15886

D.C. No.: 5:17-cv-03385-SVK

Short Title: Stacy Lininger v. Ronald Pfleger, et al

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STACY LININGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RONALD PFLEGER, Sergeant; CITY OF CARMEL; FLIPPO DEAN, District Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 18-15886
D.C. No. 5:17-cv-03385-SVK
U.S. District Court for Northern  California, San Jose
TIME SCHEDULE ORDER