Friday, July 23, 2021

WATCHING THE WATCHMEN (BuzzFeedNews)

WATCHING THE WATCHMEN
The Michigan kidnapping case is a major test for the Biden administration’s commitment to fighting domestic terrorism — and a crucible for the fierce ideological divisions pulling the country apart.
Ken Bensinger BuzzFeed News Reporter Jessica GarrisonBuzzFeed News Reporter

Why Not Award Ashli Babbitt’s Killer the Medal of Honor? A January 6 Detainee Speaks Out & Biden Regime Jails a ‘Domestic Terrorist’

ELECTIONS
If the killing of the Air Force veteran in the Capitol on January 6 was a salvific act, why hide the killer? Why not celebrate him?
By Angelo Codevilla July 22, 2021


In fact, the Justice Department lists some 15 participants in the event against whom it brings no charges, either for “insurrection” or even for trespassing, because these individuals are paid infiltrators. They work for the FBI or other U.S. intelligence agencies. The U.S. government refuses to expose what these persons did because they did it on the government’s behalf.

Because the government had such a hand—big and unpalatable to Americans—in the events of January 6, it is now impossible for the U.S. government to detail factually who “the enemy” was on January 6 without indicting itself.




ELECTIONS
He corroborates accounts from other detainees, including reports of abuse by prison guards, inedible food, and zero access to the outdoors, religious services, or physical activity.
By Julie Kelly July 22, 2021


Curzio is one of nearly 100 defendants kept behind bars for months under pre-trial detention orders sought by federal prosecutors. (Not all have been housed in the D.C. jail.) In several instances, the defendants, like Curzio, aren’t accused of committing a violent crime.

But the Justice Department, with the consent of federal judges in Washington, D.C., repeatedly seeks to punish Americans for protesting the election of Biden by keeping them in jail awaiting trials that won’t begin until next year or until they accept a plea deal.

 

ELECTIONS

It’s clear the Biden regime, in cooperation with federal judges, will stop at nothing to destroy the lives of people who protested the 2020 presidential election.
By Julie Kelly July 19, 2021


“We are a country ruled by cancel culture now,” Leduc told me. “There is no compassion or grace.”

And nowhere was that more evident than in the Washington, D.C. federal courtroom of Judge Randolph Moss on Monday.

Thursday, July 22, 2021

BASES2021 SARS CoVd2 Gain of Function Research Violations of Law

 

 
BASES2021 SARS CoVd2 Gain of Function Research Violations of Law 
(1:42:33)

A 1-hour 43-minute Masterclass Presentation

with Host Miles Johnston.

Dr Richard Fleming's ZOOM presentation for the BASES2021 released on July 11th 2021. This is a crucial and extremely detailed presentation over the severe issues including violations of the Biological Weapons Convention Treaty.

REFERENCE:

RICHARD M. FLEMING, PhD MD JD

S. THOMAS ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION, ROBERT HOLMAN, Plaintiff, VS. THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, and ZACH DUCHENEAUX, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Farm Service Agency, Defendants.

About the Case

As part of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 signed by President Biden, Congress created a farm loan forgiveness program for non-white farmers. Under the program the U.S. Department of Agriculture is automatically forgiving federal farm loans at 120 percent of the loan value, unless the farmer is white. The federal government’s exclusion of white farmers is illegal and unconstitutional. That is why SLF and Mountain State Legal Foundation (MSLF) filed a lawsuit in federal court on behalf of Rob Holman, a fourth-generation Tennessee farmer who is excluded from the program solely because of his skin color.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN DIVISION
ROBERT HOLMAN, Plaintiff,
VS.
THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, and ZACH DUCHENEAUX, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Farm Service Agency, Defendants.
No. 21-1085-STA-jay
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Summary and Conclusion


The Court finds that Plaintiff has shown a substantial likelihood that he will prevail on his claim that Section 1005 violates his right to equal protection under the law. Absent action by the Court, socially disadvantaged farmers will obtain debt relief, while Plaintiff will suffer the irreparable harm of being excluded from that program solely on the basis of his race. Despite the arguments of Defendants, the Court cannot re-write Section 1005 and order that Plaintiff receive equivalent relief. While an injunction may harm socially disadvantaged farmers, the Court has balanced the equities and determines that they favor enjoining Section 1005. The Court agrees with Judge Howard’s reasoning that “the remedy chosen and provided in Section 1005 appears to fall well short of the delicate balance accomplished when a legislative enactment employs race in a narrowly tailored manner to address a specific compelling governmental interest.” Wynn, 2021 WL 2580678, at *17.

Although this Court has reservations about issuing a nationwide injunction, in this type of case such an injunction is warranted.19 As explained by Judge Howard,

Here, despite exploring any possible more narrow option, the Court cannot identify any relief short of enjoining the distribution of Section 1005’s payments and debt relief that will maintain the status quo and provide Plaintiff the opportunity to obtain any relief at all. As noted by the Supreme Court, “[o]nce a constitutional violation is found, a federal court is required to tailor the scope of the remedy to fit the nature and extent of the constitutional violation.” Dayton Bd. of Ed. v. Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406, 420, 97 S. Ct. 2766, 53 L.Ed.2d 851 (1977) (internal quotations and citations omitted); see also Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682, 702, 99 S. Ct. 2545, 61 L.Ed.2d 176 (1979) (noting, in the context of a nationwide class action, “the scope of injunctive relief is dictated by the extent of the violation established, not by the geographical extent of the plaintiff class.”). Plaintiff has shown a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim that Section 1005 is unconstitutional and, if implemented, would deprive him of his right to equal protection under the law. The implementation of Section 1005 will be swift and irreversible, meaning the only way to avoid Plaintiff’s irreparable harm is to enjoin the program. The Court can envision no other remedy that will prevent the likely violation of Plaintiff’s constitutional right which absent an injunction cannot be remedied in this action.

Wynn, 2021 WL 2580678, at *17 (footnotes omitted). See also Faust at *5 (quoting City of Chicago v. Barr, 961 F.3d 882, 916–17 (7th Cir. 2020) (“While universal injunctions are rare, they ‘can be necessary to provide complete relief to plaintiffs, to protect similarly-situated nonparties, and to avoid the chaos and confusion that comes from a patchwork of injunctions.’”)) Faust also found that a nation-wide injunction was appropriate because “Defendants’ proposal to set aside funds to pay off any of Plaintiffs’ qualified loans is unworkable. If the USDA forgave Plaintiffs’ loans, it would be required to forgive every farmer’s loan, since the only criteria for loan forgiveness is the applicant’s race.”20 Id. Therefore, the only way to preserve the status quo is for the Court to issue a nationwide injunction.

 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED, and Defendants are hereby enjoined from implementing Section 1005. Defendants Thomas J. Vilsack, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Agriculture and Zach Ducheneaux, in his official capacity as Administrator, Farm Service Agency, their agents, employees, and all others acting in concert with them, who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are immediately enjoined from issuing any payments, loan assistance, or debt relief pursuant to Section 1005(a)(2) of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 until further orders of the Court.

The government has not opposed Plaintiff’s request that the Court waive the bond requirement. Therefore, Plaintiff will not be required to post a bond or other security

No later than fourteen (14) days from the entry of this order, the parties must confer and submit to the undersigned Judge’s ECF inbox a proposed scheduling order in word processing format. A scheduling conference will be set by separate order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


s/ S. Thomas Anderson
S. THOMAS ANDERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date: July 8, 2021

REFERENCES:  

Southeastern Legal Foundation

Wednesday, July 21, 2021

PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA , AMERICA’S FRONTLINE DOCTORS, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1As2M6xYg8zNmMniJZSA0xtGljMYJHLbg/view?usp=sharing 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

AMERICA’S FRONTLINE DOCTORS, et al., Plaintiffs,
vs.
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants.
Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-00702-CLM
PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


CONCLUSION

Accordingly, and for all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs move under Rule 65, Fed.R.Civ.P., for a preliminary injunction against Defendants enjoining them from continuing to authorize the emergency use of the so-called “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine” pursuant to their respective EUAs, and from granting full FDA approval of the Vaccines:
 
(i) for the under-18 age category;
 
(ii) for those, regardless of age, who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination; and
 
(iii) until such time as the Defendants have complied with their obligation to create and maintain the requisite “conditions of authorization” under Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3(e), thereby enabling Vaccine candidates to give truly voluntary, informed consent.

Dated: July 19, 2021.

REFERENCE:
Motion seeking immediate injunctive relief in Alabama Federal District Court to stop Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the experimental COVID-19 injections

Cyber Symposium: Prove Mike Wrong

Cyber Symposium: Prove Mike Wrong

Events / By LindellTV

Anthony Fauci, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases & Gain-of-Function Research

GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH


EXCLUSIVE
AUDIO: Fauci-Funded Researcher Describes Gain-Of-Function ‘Collaboration’ With Wuhan Lab, Reveals NIH Was ‘Very Supportive.’
JUNE 23, 2021NATALIE WINTERS


EXCLUSIVE
Disgraced Daszak Defended Fauci-Funded Gain-Of-Function Coronavirus Manipulation With ‘Pandemic Potential’.
JUNE 22, 2021RAHEEM KASSAM AND NATALIE WINTERS


EXCLUSIVE
Zuckerberg Group Funnels Six-Figures To Wuhan Lab Partner, Gain-Of-Function Advocate.
JUNE 14, 2021RAHEEM KASSAM AND NATALIE WINTERS


EXCLUSIVE
WATCH: Explosive, Unearthed Video Shows Peter Daszak Describing ‘Chinese Colleagues’ Developing ‘Killer’ Coronaviruses.
JUNE 8, 2021NATALIE WINTERS


EXCLUSIVE
EXC: Wuhan Lab Director Told NIH Conference Of ‘No Regulation’ On Chinese Bat Virus Manipulation, Gain-Of-Function Experiments.
JUNE 2, 2021NATALIE WINTERS


NEWS
Unearthed Evidence Shows Fauci Defended ‘Integral’ Gain-Of-Function Research Despite Pandemic ‘Risks’.
MAY 28, 2021NATALIE WINTERS


EXCLUSIVE
EXCLUSIVE: Fauci Headlined Panel With Wuhan Lab ‘Gain Of Function’ Adviser.
MAY 25, 2021NATALIE WINTERS


EXCLUSIVE
REVEALED: White House Visitor Logs Reveal Fauci/Klain Situation Room Meeting After Gain Of Function Moratorium.
MAY 17, 2021MIKE MCCORMICK


EXCLUSIVE
Wuhan Lab DELETED Fauci’s NIH And Gain Of Function Mentions From Old Web Pages In Early 2021.
MAY 15, 2021NATALIE WINTERS


EXCLUSIVE
EXC: Fauci-Funded Researchers Headlined Wuhan Lab ‘Gain Of Function’ Conference.
MAY 12, 2021NATALIE WINTERS