On 2019: Lininger v. Pfleger et al., Sunset Cultural Center, Inc. (SCC) $17,700.00 Cal/OSHA Penalty, & Harary “Nameless Bafoon (sic)" Fiasco

"...2019 was a fantastic year in the Village,..." 

CR

To paraphrase Kimberly A. Strassel (2019’s Adult of the Year, WSJ, Friday, January 3, 2020), it is the rare official who does not circle the wagons, also “the rare person willing to subject his institution to scrutiny for its own good-and that of the country” (city).

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. BILL OF COSTS, ITEMIZATION OF BILL OF COSTS EXHIBITS 1-8

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, BILL OF COSTS, ITEMIZATION OF BILL OF COSTS EXHIBITS 1-8 document copy is embedded.

BILL OF COSTS
ITEMIZATION OF BILL OF COSTS
EXHIBITS 1-8
Filed 07/09/19

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF STACY LININGER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, POINTS & AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF STEVEN J. ANDRE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF STACY LININGER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING HER TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER AL!.OWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF STACY LININGER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, POINTS & AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF STEVEN J. ANDRE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF STACY LININGER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING HER TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT document copies are embedded.

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DECLARATION OF STACY LININGER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
POINTS & AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DECLARATION OF STEVEN J. ANDRE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DECLARATION OF STACY LININGER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING HER TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Filed 06/18/19

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DECLARATION

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DECLARATION document copy is embedded.
CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Lininger’s first and second claims (ECF 66). The Court further ORDERS as follows:

• The Court STRIKES the Andre OSJ Declaration (ECF 70-4).

• The Court STRIKES pages 26–46 of Lininger’s opposition brief (ECF 70-1 at 26–46).

• The Court STRIKES Lininger’s objections to evidence (ECF 70).

• The Court GRANTS Defendants’ request for judicial notice (ECF 66-1).

• The Court DENIES Lininger’s motion to file her declaration in opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF 77).

• The Court DENIES AS MOOT Lininger’s counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel (ECF 74).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2019

SUSAN VAN KEULEN

United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL;
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DECLARATION
Filed 06/28/19

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. JUDGMENT

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, JUDGMENT document copy is embedded. Pursuant to the Court’s June 28, 2019 order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the Court hereby ENTERS judgment in favor of Defendants. The Clerk of Court shall close the file in this matter.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2019

SUSAN VAN KEULEN

United States Magistrate Judge

JUDGMENT
Filed 06/28/19

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. REPLY BRIEF OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56], REPLY DECLARATION OF VINCENT HURLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (May 21, 2019) & REPLY DECLARATION OF RONALD PFLEGER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (May 21, 2019)

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, REPLY BRIEF OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (May 21, 2019) , REPLY DECLARATION OF VINCENT HURLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (May 21, 2019) and REPLY DECLARATION OF RONALD PFLEGER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (May 21, 2019) document copies are embedded.

REPLY BRIEF OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56]

REPLY DECLARATION OF VINCENT HURLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (May 21, 2019)

REPLY DECLARATION OF RONALD PFLEGER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (May 21, 2019)

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION REGARDING THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA [U.S.D.C., Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(d)(2) (May 30, 2019)

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION REGARDING THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA [U.S.D.C., Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(d)(2) (May 30, 2019) document copy is embedded.

STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION REGARDING THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA [U.S.D.C., Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(d)(2) (May 30, 2019)

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. NOTICE OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW [ Civil Local Rule 11-5 ] (May 30, 2019), POINTS & AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW & DECLARATION OF STEVEN J. ANDRE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSELTO WITHDRAW [Civil Local Rule 11-5] (May 30, 2019)

ABSTRACT: ; RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, NOTICE OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW [ Civil Local Rule 11-5 ] (May 30, 2019), POINTS & AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW [ Civil Local Rule 11-5 ], DECLARATION OF STEVEN J. ANDRE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW [Civil Local Rule 11-5] & [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW [ Civil Local Rule 11-5 ] document copies are embedded.

NOTICE OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW [Civil Local Rule 11-5 ] (May 30, 2019)

POINTS & AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW [Civil Local Rule 11-5 ] (May 30, 2019)

DECLARATION OF STEVEN J. ANDRE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSE TO WITHDRAW [Civil Local Rule 11-5] (May 30, 2019)

[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW [ Civil Local Rule 11-5 ] (May 30, 2019)

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] & DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (April 30, 2019)

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, MOTION AND MOTION OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56], REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF SUPERIOR COURT RULING, IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA , DECLARATION OF RONALD PFLEGER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF VICTORIA WA YNER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF TRACY COOK IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY WDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF JEFF WATKINS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF MICHAEL CALHOUN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF VINCENT HURLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF DAWN ALMARIO IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF LISA JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF LUKE POWELL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF MAUREEN RODDICK IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATNE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF KEN SHEN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARATION OF PAUL TOMASI IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT and [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; ORDER GRANTING JUDICIAL NOTICE document copies are embedded.

NOTE: Date: June 4, 2019
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen
San Jose Courthouse
Courtroom 6, 4th Floor

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (April 30, 2019)

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF SUPERIOR COURT RULING, IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

DECLARATION OF RONALD PFLEGER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF VICTORIA WA YNER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF TRACY COOK IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY WDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF JEFF WATKINS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL CALHOUN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF VINCENT HURLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF DAWN ALMARIO IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF LISA JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF LUKE POWELL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF MAUREEN RODDICK IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATNE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF KEN SHEN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DECLARATION OF PAUL TOMASI IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; ORDER GRANTING JUDICIAL NOTICE

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (EXHIBITS A-X)

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (April 30, 2019) (EXHIBITS A-G) document copies are embedded.

EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (April 30, 2019)
(EXHIBITS A-G)

EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (April 30, 2019)
(EXHIBITS H-X)

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF VINCENT HURLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (May 13, 2019)

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF VINCENT HURLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] (May 13, 2019) document copy is embedded.

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF VINCENT HURLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS RONALD PFLEGER AND CITY OF CARMEL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Federal Rule Civil Procedure 56] 
May 13, 2019

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(2)], PLAINTIFF’S POINTS & AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, EXHIBITS 8-12, DECLARATION OF STEVEN J. ANDRE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and DECLARATION OF STACY LININGER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (May 14, 2019)

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION, Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK, PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(2)] , PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, EXHIBITS 8-12, DECLARATION OF STEVEN J. ANDRE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and DECLARATION OF STACY LININGER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (May 14, 2019) document copies are embedded.

PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(2)]
May 14, 2019

PLAINTIFF’S POINTS & AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(2) ]
May 14, 2019

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EXHIBITS 1-7
May 14, 2019

EXHIBITS 8-12
May 14, 2019

DECLARATION OF STEVEN J. ANDRE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
May 14, 2019

PENDING
DECLARATION OF STACY LININGER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
May 14, 2019

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:17-cv-03385-SVK: Settlement Conference held on 3/22/2019 ‘Case did not settle’

U.S. District Court

California Northern District (San Jose)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:17-cv-03385-SVK

03/22/2019

65

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi: Settlement Conference held on 3/22/2019. Case did not settle. FTR Time: n/a. Plaintiff Attorney: Steven Andre; Also present: Stacy Lininger. Defendant Attorney: Vincent Hurley; Also present: Donald Chang, Ron Pfleger, G.R.Mozingo, Paul Tomasi. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/22/2019) (Entered: 03/22/2019)

SOURCE: 

CM/ECF Filer or PACER Login 

Lininger v. Pfleger et al Assigned to: Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen Referred to: Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi (Settlement) Demand: $1,000,000,000 Case in other court:  9th circuit court of appeals, 18-15886 Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Date Filed: 06/12/2017 Jury Demand: Both Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff
Stacy Lininger	represented by	Steve J Andre  Attorney at Law 26080 Carmel Rancho Blvd. 200B Carmel, CA 93923-8736 (831)624-5786 Email: stevenjandre@hotmail.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Defendant
Sergeant Ronald Pfleger	represented by	Ryan M. Thompson  Office of the Santa Cruz County Counsel 701 Ocean Street, Room 505 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 831-454-2040 Fax: 831-454-2115 Email: ryan.thompson@santacruzcounty.us ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Vincent P. Hurley  Casey Law Group 5900 Butler Lane Suite 130 Scotts Valley, CA 95066 831-661-4800 Email: vhurley@caseylawsj.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
City of Carmel	represented by	Ryan M. Thompson  (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Vincent P. Hurley  (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

REFERENCE:

05/22/2018

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Initial Case Management Conference held on 5/22/2018. The court sets the following case schedule: Last Day to Seek Leave to Amend Pleadings: 8/13/2018. Close of Fact Discovery: 1/25/2019. Expert Disclosure: 2/8/2019. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: 3/1/2019. Close of Expert Discovery: 3/29/2019. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: 4/30/2019. Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: 6/4/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Final Pretrial Conference: 7/11/2019 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Jury Selection/Jury Trial: 8/5/2019 at time TBD in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Further Case Management Conference: 2/5/2019 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. The court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi for settlement. Parties to complete settlement conference after close of fact discovery but before hearing on summary judgment motions. Parties may also schedule earlier if necessary. Parties are instructed to contact Judge DeMarchi's Courtroom Deputy Patricia Cromwell at 408-535-5365 to schedule settlement conference. Request for Admissions: limited to 50 per side excluding those directed to document authentication; parties may make a showing for good cause to request additional. FTR Time: 9:40 to 9:50 (10 mins.) For Plaintiff(s): Steve Andre. For Defendant(s): Ryan M. Thompson. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 5/22/2018) (Entered: 05/22/2018)

STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants: JOINT FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT (January 29, 2019), JOINT STATEMENT RE: SCHEDULING OF DEFENDANT RONALD PFLEGER’S DEPOSITION ( January 31, 2019) & ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ FEBRUARY 1, 2019 JJOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (February 1, 2019)

ABSTRACT: RE: STACY LININGER, Plaintiff, vs. RONALD PFLEGER, CITY OF CARMEL, DEAN FLIPPO, District Attorney of Monterey County California, and DOES 1-50, Defendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  SAN JOSE DIVISION,  Case No. 17-cv-003385-SVK: JOINT FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT (January 29, 2019), JOINT STATEMENT RE: SCHEDULING OF DEFENDANT RONALD PFLEGER’S DEPOSITION ( January 31, 2019) & ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ FEBRUARY 1, 2019 JJOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (February 1, 2019) document copies are embedded.  Significantly, For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court ORDERS as follows:
Although Plaintiff seeks to depose Defendant Pfleger after the close of fact discovery, Plaintiff contacted Defendants to schedule the deposition on January 16, 2019, prior to the close of fact discovery. Here, the interest in the discovery of potentially relevant evidence outweighs the prejudice to Defendants. Accordingly, Defendants shall produce Defendant Ronald Pfleger for a deposition on a date of his choosing to take place no later than February 28, 2019.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2019
SUSAN VAN KEULEN
United States Magistrate Judge

JOINT FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT (January 29, 2019)

JOINT STATEMENT RE: SCHEDULING OF DEFENDANT RONALD PFLEGER’S DEPOSITION (January 31, 2019)

ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’ FEBRUARY 1, 2019 JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (February 1, 2019)

REFERENCE:

5:17-cv-03385-SVK Lininger v. Pfleger et al
Susan van Keulen, presiding
Date filed: 06/12/2017
Date of last filing: 02/05/2019

History

Doc. No.	Dates	Description
1	Filed & Entered:  06/12/2017	Complaint
2	Filed & Entered:   06/12/2017	Case Assigned by Intake
3	Filed & Entered: 06/12/2017	Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines
4	Filed & Entered:   06/12/2017	Summons Issued
5	Filed & Entered:  06/27/2017	Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination
6	Filed & Entered:   07/10/2017	Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge
7	Filed & Entered:   08/04/2017	ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options
8	Filed & Entered:   08/04/2017	Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge
9	Filed & Entered:   08/09/2017	Answer to Complaint
10	Filed & Entered:   08/09/2017	Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination
11	Filed & Entered:  08/11/2017 Terminated:11/06/2017	Motion to Dismiss
12	Filed & Entered:   08/11/2017	Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination
13	Filed & Entered:   08/11/2017	Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge
14	Filed & Entered:   08/11/2017	Clerk's Notice
15	Filed & Entered:  08/22/2017 Terminated:08/22/2017	Stipulation
16	Filed & Entered:   08/22/2017	Order on Stipulation
17	Filed & Entered:   08/22/2017	Clerk's Notice
18	Filed & Entered:   08/22/2017	ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options
19	Filed & Entered:   08/22/2017	ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options
20	Filed & Entered:  08/22/2017 Terminated:08/30/2017	Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation
21	Filed & Entered:   08/30/2017	Order Referring Case to Early Neutral Evaluation
22	Filed & Entered:  09/05/2017	Opposition/Response to Motion
23	Filed & Entered:   09/06/2017	Opposition/Response to Motion
24	Filed & Entered:  09/06/2017 Terminated:09/07/2017	Stipulation
25	Filed & Entered:   09/07/2017	Order on Stipulation
26	Filed & Entered:  09/14/2017 Terminated:09/22/2017	Stipulation
27	Filed & Entered:   09/14/2017	ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing ENE Evaluator
28	Filed & Entered:   09/19/2017	Reply to Opposition/Response
29	Filed & Entered:   09/22/2017	Order on Stipulation
30	Filed & Entered:   10/24/2017	Motion Hearing
31	Filed & Entered:   10/26/2017	Clerk's Notice
32	Filed & Entered:   11/06/2017	Order on Motion to Dismiss
33	Filed & Entered:  11/13/2017 Terminated:12/21/2017	Motion for Reconsideration
34	Filed & Entered:  11/13/2017 Terminated:11/13/2017	Motion for Reconsideration
	Filed & Entered:   11/14/2017	Set/Reset Hearings
35	Filed & Entered:   11/17/2017	Order
36	Filed & Entered:   12/08/2017	Opposition/Response to Motion
37	Filed & Entered:   12/15/2017	Reply to Opposition/Response
38	Filed & Entered:   12/21/2017	Order on Motion for Reconsideration
39	Filed & Entered:   01/22/2018	Amended Complaint
40	Filed & Entered:   02/02/2018	Certification of ADR Session
41	Filed & Entered:   02/05/2018	Answer to Amended Complaint
42	Filed & Entered:  02/05/2018 Terminated:04/04/2018	Motion to Dismiss
43	Filed & Entered:   02/20/2018	Opposition/Response to Motion
44	Filed & Entered:   02/27/2018	Reply to Opposition/Response
45	Filed & Entered:   02/27/2018	Certificate of Service
46	Filed & Entered:   03/20/2018	Motion Hearing
47	Filed & Entered:   04/04/2018	Order on Motion to Dismiss
48	Filed & Entered:   04/10/2018	Clerk's Notice
49	Filed & Entered:  04/16/2018 Terminated:04/26/2018	Motion for Reconsideration
50	Filed & Entered:   04/25/2018	Clerk's Notice
51	Filed & Entered:   04/26/2018	Order on Motion for Reconsideration
52	Filed & Entered:   05/15/2018	Joint Case Management Statement
53	Filed & Entered:   05/15/2018	Notice of Appeal
54	Filed & Entered:   05/16/2018	USCA Case Number
55	Filed & Entered:   05/22/2018	Case Management Conference - Initial
56	Filed & Entered:   05/24/2018	Digital Audio File Uploaded
57	Filed & Entered:   01/22/2019	Notice of Change of Address
58	Filed & Entered:   01/29/2019	Case Management Statement
59	Filed & Entered:  02/02/2019 Terminated:02/05/2019	Discovery Letter Brief
60	Filed & Entered:   02/04/2019	Clerk's Notice
61	Filed & Entered:   02/05/2019	Clerk's Notice
62	Filed & Entered:   02/05/2019	Digital Audio File Uploaded
63	Filed & Entered:   02/05/2019	Case Management Conference - Further
64	Filed & Entered:   02/05/2019	Order on Discovery Letter Brief