Showing posts with label 2012 Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (RDEIR) for the Sale of the Flanders Mansion Property. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2012 Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (RDEIR) for the Sale of the Flanders Mansion Property. Show all posts

Friday, December 07, 2012

Final Recirculated Draft EIR (RDEIR) Revised Alternative Section Responses to Comments, FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the FLANDERS MANSION, November 2012

ABSTRACT: The Final Recirculated Draft EIR (RDEIR) Revised Alternative Section Responses to Comments, FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the FLANDERS MANSION, dated November 30, 2012, and prepared by Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. for the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, was made available to the public on December 6, 2012. The City has scheduled Special Meetings of the Forest and Beach Commission on Monday, December 10, 2012, at 1:30 P.M. and the Historic Resources Board on Monday, December 10, 2012, at 4:00 P.M. in City Hall Chambers for the purpose of reviewing the REPORT and making recommendations to the City Council; and a Special Meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled on Wednesday, December 12, 2012.  The Report is expected to be an Agenda Item on the City Council's January 8, 2013 City Council Agenda.  Agenda Packets PENDING.   The FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the FLANDERS MANSION document and the Recirculated Draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the SALE OF FLANDERS MANSION PROPERTY REVISED ALTERNATIVES SECTION document are embedded; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS for the FLANDERS MANSION PROPERTY, 2012, PENDING.
Final Environmental Impact Report for the Flanders Mansion (Rfeir) 11-30-12.

Monday, July 30, 2012

COMMENT LETTER (& Attachments A, B & C) on the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (RDEIR) for the Sale of Flanders Mansion Property

ABSTRACT: One Comment Letter on the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Sale of Flanders Mansion Property (RDEIR) is featured with Attachment A Les and Patricia Albiol Correspondence, Attachment B Flanders Foundation Correspondence and Attachment C Joseph and Nancy Telese Correspondence, all embedded. Highlights include, as follows:
  • “I don't think an unsolicited proposal would be helpful right now while we are in the process of seeking reconsideration. Let's talk after that has been decided.” (January 24, 2012 e-mail from City Council Member Jason Burnett to Les and Patricia Albiol, Subject: Re: Available for Flanders Restoration) 
  • “I have been very disturbed for sometime now by the way the city of Carmel has handled our offer of the Flanders home…I am shocked that our offer has to this date, still been ignored…I am greatly disappointed that the city of Carmel, has treated a prospective resident, who wishes to do something good to help the community, in this manner.”  (July 27. 2000 Letter from Nancy Telese to Flanders Foundation/Melanie Billig, cc. City Hall-Mayor and City Council & Carmel Pine Cone)
  • “In a spirit of cooperation and a desire to work toward healing community division over the sale of Flanders Mansion, we would like to work with the council and staff on a resolution that is a "win-win" for an. We realize that the council is facing many more pressing problems; however, to positively resolve Flanders without further acrimony or cost would be a major accomplishment. We would truly like to explore whether this is possible. We are confident that given the new city dynamic that a fresh approach to this issue is possible and in the best long-term interest of all concerned.”  “The foundation continues to explore a variety of solutions and would like to know if the council is interested in partnering with us on any level.”  (April 23, 2012 Letter to Honorable Mayor Burnett & City Council Members from Melanie C. Billig, President, Flanders Foundation) 
  • “In closing, we have tried to work with the city over the years; yet, it has remained steadfast in its desire to sell regardless of opportunities to lease. What a pity. Together we could have accomplished something truly unique for our community.”  (March 6, 2012 Letter from Melanie C. Billig, President of the Flanders Foundation to Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers)
COMMENT LETTER on the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Sale of Flanders Mansion Property 

Attachment A Les and Patricia Albiol Correspondence

Attachment B Flanders Foundation Correspondence

Attachment C Joseph and Nancy Telese Correspondence

Saturday, July 14, 2012

‘MINUTES’ for One Noteworthy 11 July 2012 Planning Commission Agenda Item


CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
PLANNING COMMISSION – “MINUTES”
July 11, 2012


I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

PRESENT: Commission Members: Goodhue, Dallas, LePage, Paterson, Reimers
STAFF PRESENT: Sean Conroy, Planning & Building Services Manager
Margi Perotti, Administrative Coordinator

IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS

If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.

6. Flanders Mansion
City of Carmel
25800 Hatton Road

Public hearing for receiving comments on the re-circulated draft environmental impact report prepared for the sale of the Flanders Mansion Project.

Janet Reimers, Chair, introduced the agenda Item.

Sean Conroy, Planning & Building Services, stated that the City has been in the process of looking at the potential of selling the Flanders Mansion for several years.  The City completed an EIR in 2009 which was legally challenged.  As part of the Court decision, the City was required to amend the EIR to include some additional analysis.  The City has prepared a RDEIR; there is a 45-day public comment period.  At the end of the 45-day comment period, the City will prepare responses to the comments and prepare a Final EIR.  Then, the Historic Resources Board, Forest and Beach Commission and Planning Commission will review the RFEIR and make recommendations to the City Council.  The City Council is the final decision-making body.  Conroy reiterated that the agenda item is receiving public comments on the adequacy of the RDEIR only. 

Janet Reimers, Chair, opened the meeting to public comment.

Joyce Stevens focused on Mission Trail Nature Preserve (34.17 acres), a “little dream of a park,” and characterized the Park as “smothered by invasive plants” and maintenance and improvement tasks undone.
Two recommendations:
1. The City begin a holistic, in-depth study of the park, including Flanders Mansion, as a unit, and develop a plan that considers the “highest and best use” for the entire glorious canyon that is geographically and historically one of Carmel’s best and uncelebrated assets.
2. If the City is fiscally or otherwise incapable, the City should consider transferring ownership and/or management of MTNP, including the Flanders Mansion, over to the Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District which has an excellent stewardship record.

Skip Lloyd addressed the Court’s judgment, specifically the size of the parcel, and referred to CBRE appraiser’s report of comparable sales used for likely sales price using many parcels of residences on 50 x 100 ft. lots. Therefore the City does not need a whole lot of land for Flanders Mansion for a saleable product. It should be looked at from the standpoint of the Park. The aim is to “achieve a reasonable objective, but have the least overall impact on the Park.” “The problem with the RDEIR is that there is not a sufficient range of alternatives presented.”

Janet Reimers, Chair, closed the meeting to public comment.

ADJOURNMENT

ADDENDUM:

RDEIR Flanders Mansion Property June 2012 Maps

Monday, July 09, 2012

One Noteworthy 11 July 2012 Planning Commission Agenda Item

ABSTRACT: One Noteworthy 11 July 2012 Planning Commission Agenda Item, namely, Public hearing for receiving comments on the re-circulated draft environmental impact report prepared for the sale of the Flanders Mansion Project, is presented. Staff Report is embedded.

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
PLANNING COMMISSION

Regular Meeting                                                                       July 11, 2012
City Hall                                                                                   Wednesday
East side of Monte Verde Street                                               Tour – 2:45 p.m.
Between Ocean & Seventh Avenues                                    Meeting – 4:00 p.m.


I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

Commissioners: Don Goodhue
Steve Dallas
Michael LePage
Keith Hillyard, Vice-chair
Janet Reimers, Chair

II. TOUR OF INSPECTION

Shortly after 2:45 p.m. the Commission will leave the Council Chambers for an onsiteTour of Inspection of all properties listed on this agenda (including those on the Consent Agenda). The Tour may also include projects previously approved by the City and not on this agenda. Prior to the beginning of the Tour of Inspection, the Commission may eliminate one or more on-site visits. The public is welcome to follow the Commission on its tour of the determined sites. The Commission will return to the Council Chambers at 4:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.

III. ROLL CALL

IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS


If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.

6. Flanders Mansion
City of Carmel
25800 Hatton Road

Public hearing for receiving comments on the re-circulated draft environmental impact report prepared for the sale of the Flanders Mansion Project.
Staff Report

Friday, June 15, 2012

FLANDERS MANSION PROPERTY: Recirculated Draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the SALE OF FLANDERS MANSION PROPERTY REVISED ALTERNATIVES SECTION & Notice of Availability for the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (RDEIR) for the Sale of the Flanders Mansion Property

ABSTRACT:  The Recirculated Draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the SALE OF FLANDERS MANSION PROPERTY REVISED ALTERNATIVES SECTION, June 2012 and Notice of Availability for the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (RDEIR) for the Sale of the Flanders Mansion Property are embedded.  The Proposed Project consists of the sale of the Flanders Mansion Property, a 1.252-acre parcel together with all improvements. The project site is considered parkland and is zoned P-2 (Improved Parkland). Refer to Figure 1-1 for depiction of the Proposed Project and existing parcel boundary. The grounds of the Flanders Mansion Property have historically been used by the public for passive recreational activities and the property provides a number of park benefits. Surrounding the property is an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) zoned P-1. This area plus the project site are all part of the City’s largest park, the Mission Trail Nature Preserve. The building on the property (the Flanders Mansion) is recognized as a historic resource and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The Project proposes the sale of the Flanders Mansion parcel zoned P-2. The Mission Trail Nature Preserve area zoned P-1 is to be retained as public parkland, including the Lester Rowntree Arboretum. And The Proposed Project would result in potentially significant impacts in the following categories, as described in this RDEIR: aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, and transportation/traffic3. All impacts associated with the Proposed Project can be reduced to a less-than-significant level with implementation of mitigations identified in this RDEIR, with the exception of impacts related to (1) land use and planning and (2) parks and recreation. The following significant, unavoidable impacts were identified for the sale of Flanders Mansion:
 Sale of the Flanders Mansion Property would conflict with certain goals, objectives, and policies identified in the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan related to parkland, including G5-6, O5-21, P5-46, and P5-107,4 and
 Sale of the Flanders Mansion Property would result in the loss [of] locally significant parkland that is considered an integral component of the Mission Trail Nature Preserve.  This would represent a permanent loss of publicly owned parkland. Since this loss of parkland is locally significant, this is considered a significant unavoidable impact that cannot be reduced to a less-than-significant level.
 “The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea requests that reviewers limit their comments to only those portion that are being recirculated, consistent with the provisions of CEQA Guidelines §15088.5(f)(2).  Written comments on the 2012 RDEIR will be accepted from Thursday, 14 June 2012 through Monday, 30 July 2012.”
Submit Written Comments to: 
Sean Conroy, Planning & Building Services Manager
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
P.O. Drawer G
Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA.  93921
e-mail: sconroy@ci.carmel.ca.us
Recirculated Draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the SALE OF FLANDERS MANSION PROPERTY
REVISED ALTERNATIVES SECTION
SCH #: 2005011108
June 2012
Notice of Availability for the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (RDEIR) for the Sale of the Flanders Mansion Property, 14 June 2012

ADDENDUM:
The California Environmental Quality Act
Title 14. California Code of Regulations
Chapter 3. Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act


15088.5. Recirculation of an EIR Prior to Certification

(f) The lead agency shall evaluate and respond to comments as provided in Section 15088.Recirculating an EIR can result in the lead agency receiving more than one set of comments from reviewers. The following are two ways in which the lead agency may identify the set of comments to which it will respond. This dual approach avoids confusion over whether the lead agency must respond to comments which are duplicates or which are no longer pertinent due to revisions to the EIR. In no case shall the lead agency fail to respond to pertinent comments on significant environmental issues.

(2) When the EIR is revised only in part and the lead agency is recirculating only the revised chapters or portions of the EIR, the lead agency may request that reviewers limit their comments to the revised chapters or portions of the recirculated EIR. The lead agency need only respond to (i) comments received during the initial circulation period that relate to chapters or portions of the document that were not revised and recirculated, and (ii) comments received during the recirculation period that relate to the chapters or portions of the earlier EIR that were revised and recirculated. The lead agency's request that reviewers limit the scope of their comments shall be included either within the text of the revised EIR or by an attachment to the revised EIR.