Tuesday, December 27, 2022

Twitter File Release #11 – The Government Censorship Campaign to Control COVID-19 Information, Sundance

Twitter File Release #11 – The Government Censorship Campaign to Control COVID-19 Information 

December 26, 2022 | Sundance

Twitter File release #11 hits on the long-anticipated information surrounding how the platform was instructed by various government agencies to remove content adverse to the expressed opinion of CDC, HHS, and DHS officials. [Release #11 Here]

[Twitter File #11 – Release Here]

The COVID-19 narrative becomes a tool to achieve a variety of objectives: debate controls; the deployed ‘excuse‘ for a very visible lack of voter enthusiasm for the puppet (Biden); the use of fraudulent ‘mail-in ballots’; the keeping of socially distant physical auditors, etc.  Without COVID as a tool the manufactured process is more difficult. The ‘never let a crisis go to waste‘ strategy includes the creation of a crisis.

The COVID-19 narrative held four primary benefits.  Without COVID weaponized we would not see:

  • (1) Mail-in ballots.  The origination material of the 2020 fraud.
  • (2) Breaking down of alliance-minded gathering and assemblies.  COVID blocked group gatherings to discuss what was around us and stopped us from recognizing the scale of our assembly.  COVID also took down faith-based leadership and church assembly when it was needed most.
  • (3) Spending packages that were really blue state bailouts justified under the auspices of COVID relief.
  • (4) Government providing the crisis solution (and all the ramifications therein).

 Follow Up, Qatar Data Point and Twitter Release #8, Sundance

 Follow Up, Qatar Data Point and Twitter Release #8

December 27, 2022 | Sundance |

As a reminder, release #8, was essentially a basic outline is showing how the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and U.S. State Department (DoS) work with the social media platform to amplify messaging and create specifically anonymous government accounts intended to spread propaganda globally. [Twitter File Release #8 Here] The govt then asked the platform engineering side to boost the messaging of the government accounts and use the internal tools to promote government users. Essentially, social media propaganda.

In 2020, despite the visibility of the radical leftists (BLM, Antifa), U.S. candidate Joe Biden ran on a platform for change as a moderate.  He was supported by Obama, James Clyburn and the social media messaging deployed by the U.S. government.  Once he achieved victory Biden governed as a hardline leftist.

These strategic political similarities are not coincidental.

As you can see from above, the use of social media had both an international and domestic value as considered by those in the Obama sphere who constructed the partnership with government.   Twitter’s curation of the timeline is intended to hide this ‘Bigger Picture.’

Monday, December 26, 2022

BREAKING: Another Twitter Files Drop: How Twitter Rigged the COVID Debate, Cristina Laila

BREAKING: Another Twitter Files Drop: How Twitter Rigged the COVID Debate

By Cristina Laila
Published December 26, 2022

Elon Musk on Monday released another Twitter files drop: How Twitter rigged the Covid debate:

– By censoring info that was true but inconvenient to US government policy
– By discrediting doctors and other experts who disagreed
– By suppressing ordinary users, including some sharing the CDC’s *own data*

39. What might this pandemic and its aftermath have looked like if there had been a more open debate on Twitter and other social media platforms—not to mention the mainstream press—about the origins of Covid, about lockdowns, about the true risks of Covid in kids, and much more?

— David Zweig (@davidzweig) December 26, 2022

Twitter Files Release #10 – A Whole of Govt Approach to Control American Speech, Sundance

Twitter Files Release #10 – A Whole of Govt Approach to Control American Speech

December 25, 2022 | Sundance

Twitter File release #10 was shared by journalist Matt Taibbi on Christmas Eve [Outline Here].  In many ways this is the most important release so far; not from the context of the internal Twitter communication Taibbi cites, but rather from what it means in the bigger picture.

[Twitter File Release #10 Here]

The larger objective of U.S. government involvement in social media has always been monitoring and surveillance of the public conversation, shaping and influencing public opinion, and ultimately controlling outcomes.  Put another way, the illusion of freedom.

Friday, December 23, 2022

Canine Merry Christmas Tree, Mission Trail Nature Preserve (2022)

 





MERRY CHRISTMAS 2022! 


FOUNDATION FOR FREEDOM ONLINE

FOUNDATION FOR FREEDOM ONLINE

Defending digital liberties

Protecting Americans From Internet Censorship

Foundation For Freedom Online (FFO) is a free speech watchdog dedicated to restoring the promise of a free and open Internet.

Our Mission

Through educational reports, legal assistance, and public policy analysis concerning developing threats to digital liberties, we seek to provide nonpartisan insights and assistance to all peoples taking a stand for freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and the free exchange of ideas online.

REPORTS ARCHIVE

Part 2 – Why Curation of Twitter File Release #8 Was So Important – The 2011 BETA Test Went Live in 2020, Sundance

Part 2 – Why Curation of Twitter File Release #8 Was So Important – The 2011 BETA Test Went Live in 2020

December 21, 2022 | Sundance

Factually, and not surprisingly, dozens of former IC officials are still currently working in Twitter and hundreds more are identified working inside Facebook.  This is the overlay to the second part of why Twitter File Release #8 was so carefully curated.

In Part 1 [Go Deep Here], we walked through President Obama’s use of social media during the 2010/2011 ‘Arab Spring.’  This was the origination of the U.S. government using Twitter, Facebook and other social media platforms as tools to accomplish their strategic objectives.

In Part 1 we also walked through specific examples of identical ideology and specific actions displayed in the 2011 elections (Egypt), and 2020 elections (USA). The similarities are not coincidental, and we left off by saying 2011 was the BETA test for what we saw in 2020.

Take that BETA test forward into 2020 when the ODNI, DHS, FBI, DoD and IC influence over social media was deployed domestically to support Joe Biden.

Much like the Egyptian election of Mohammed Morsi, U.S. candidate Joe Biden was installed by the collective weight of an intentionally manipulated information system being controlled and influenced by the United States intelligence community.

Tuesday, December 20, 2022

Twitter Files Part 7 – The DHS/FBI Teleporter One-Way Telecommunications Channel into Twitter, How the FBI Used and Paid Twitter for Censorship, Sundance

Twitter Files Part 7 – The DHS/FBI Teleporter One-Way Telecommunications Channel into Twitter, How the FBI Used and Paid Twitter for Censorship

December 19, 2022 | sundance

Twitter file release #7 comes from Michael Shellenberger and focuses on how the FBI specifically engaged with Twitter before, during and after the Hunter Biden Laptop story surfaced.  [RELEASE HERE]

There are some interesting facets to the Shellenberger outline including his naming of the communications method, “Teleporter, a one-way communications channel from the FBI to Twitter, ” and Shellenberger’s identification of payments from the FBI to Twitter in order to cover the expenses related to the censorship they requested.

In summary, the Twitter File #7 release shows an active 2020 political operation conducted by the FBI in advance of the election mirroring the FBI operation in 2016 around the fraudulent Trump-Russia construct.  The FBI is conducting domestic political intelligence operations on behalf of the United States government.

The FBI is essentially the soviet-era FSB.

Social media is under DHS surveillance, facilitated by platform partnerships and the FBI mission is based on the results.  Domestic thought crimes and wrong-speak are a high priority.

Twitter File Release #8 – Evidence Showing Pentagon/State Dept using Twitter for Propaganda, Release Curated to Protect Barack Obama, Sundance

Twitter File Release #8 – Evidence Showing Pentagon/State Dept using Twitter for Propaganda, Release Curated to Protect Barack Obama

December 20, 2022 | sundance |

In release #8, the basic outline is showing how the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and U.S. State Department (DoS) work with the social media platforms to amplify messaging and create specifically anonymous government accounts intended to spread propaganda globally. [Twitter File Release #8 Here]  The government then asks the platform engineering side to boost the messaging of the government accounts and use the internal tools to promote government users.  Essentially, social media propaganda.

This release of information was filtered to avoid revealing that President Obama was the originator of this activity.  Twitter is trying to protect President Obama because, beyond the ideological alignment, the monopolistic social media system, a partnership between the U.S. government and Big Tech, was essentially designed as a purposeful oligarchical system.

As you can see from above, the use of social media had both an international and domestic value as considered by those in the Obama sphere who constructed the partnership with government.   Twitter’s curation of the timeline is intended to hide this ‘Bigger Picture.’

To Mitigate Risks to the DOJ and FBI Narrative, Special Counsel Lead Andrew Weissmann Snooped on Congress, Sundance

To Mitigate Risks to the DOJ and FBI Narrative, Special Counsel Lead Andrew Weissmann Snooped on Congress

December 20, 2022 | sundance

In one division there was the Special Counsel Robert Mueller team in control of everything related to DOJ and FBI activity around the 2016 election, with emphasis on the Trump-Russia headlines.  This division handled 100% of everything that was sucking up the oxygen in Washington DC.  Andrew Weissmann was in charge of this division.

In the second division, there was everything else the DOJ was doing, which is to say not much. Attorney General Jeff Sessions was heading this division.

This context matters because it is much more of an explosive revelation to realize there were two sets of investigators, each investigating each other. Devin Nunes was investigating a corrupt DOJ and FBI. Weissmann and team trying to cover for corruption within the DOJ and FBI.

Saturday, December 17, 2022

Release #6 – DHS and FBI Content Removal Requests to Twitter, Sundance

Release #6 – DHS and FBI Content Removal Requests to Twitter

December 16, 2022 | Sundance

Independent journalist Matt Taibbi has released the sixth installment after review of more Twitter File data [SEE HERE].  Keep in mind, the research group containing Mr. Taibbi are only seeing the consequences side of the content removal process.  What specifically happened in/around the portal of information flowing into Twitter HQ is a different division.  Taibbi et al are only seeing the consequences from the requests that entered the Twitter system.

[Twitter Release #6, Here]

Taibbi begins by noting, “Twitter’s contact with the FBI was constant and pervasive, as if it were a subsidiary.”  I would safely take that a step further, yes there is a subsidiary relationship; however, as years of government involvement continued by 2016 Twitter became the subsidiary of DHS, not vice-versa.

As we have noted from the lead into and out of the 2016 election, the surveillance state took action specifically to protect itself from President Trump.   This activity included the NSA, FISA court, FBI, DOJ-NSD, CIA, ODNI while specifically and purposefully enmeshing the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).

 

(1) The Patriot Act turned the intel surveillance radar from foreign searches for terrorists to domestic searches for terrorists.

(2) Obama/Biden then redefined what is a “terrorist” to include their political opposition.

(3) The DHS, ODNI, DOJ-NSD and FISC became the four pillars of this new surveillance system. Atop these pillars is where you will find the Fourth Branch of Government..

DEEP DIVE HERE

This is the scale of corrupt political compromise on both sides of the DC dynamic that we are up against.  Preserving this system is also what removing Donald Trump is all about.  The targeting of President Trump in order to preserve the system, the system that was weaponized during the Obama administration, is what the actions of the DOJ and FBI are all about.

 Matt Taibbi Discusses Ongoing ‘Big Picture’ Review of Twitter Files, Sundance

 Matt Taibbi Discusses Ongoing ‘Big Picture’ Review of Twitter Files

December 15, 2022 | Sundance

During a podcast Matt Taibbi describes the big picture takeaway of the data they have been permitted to review so far. {Direct Rumble Link}

They are also limited in only seeing the activity that is taken within the action division where the accounts are restricted.  The division within Twitter that was in the process of amplifying or boosting accounts, is a different silo.

Additionally, as Taibbi also notes, if the scale of what they are seeing in Twitter is representative of outside contacts to other social media platforms, then he is sure Facebook, YouTube, Google, Microsoft, Instagram, Apple etc. also have a process to receive and act upon these inbound DHS/FBI instructions.  WATCH:

 

Matt Taibbi Explains How Government Agencies Exchanged Data With Twitter to Control Free Speech
Chief Nerd Published December 15, 2022
(3:56)

Tuesday, December 13, 2022

Kash Patel Asks Why Isn’t Elon Musk Releasing the FBI Emails and DHS Contact Documents with Twitter? Sundance

Kash Patel Asks Why Isn’t Elon Musk Releasing the FBI Emails and DHS Contact Documents with Twitter?

December 13, 2022 | Sundance

Former House Intelligence Committee lead investigator Kash Patel appeared on Steve Bannon’s podcast to discuss the Twitter Files. {Direct Rumble Link} Within the interview Mr. Patel asks the obvious question: Why are we not seeing the document trail where the FBI is making contact with Twitter?

The contacts are noted within the Twitter File release, but the specific methods, people and documents or email requests from the U.S. government into Twitter are not being released. Kash Patel asks Elon Musk to release these documents and asks why are we not seeing them? WATCH:

 

Kash Patel ask Elon Musk to release the communications between Twitter and the FBI.
RealDirty Published December 12, 2022
(11:22)

Twitter Files #4 Released, Rules Changed to Target Trump – While Elon Musk Hints COVID Censorship Files Are Forthcoming, Sundance

Twitter Files #4 Released, Rules Changed to Target Trump – While Elon Musk Hints COVID Censorship Files Are Forthcoming

December 11, 2022 | Sundance

The fourth installment of the Twitter Files release dropped yesterday evening as presented by Michael Shellenberger [SEE HERE].  Overall, the Shellenberger angle covers the conversation within Twitter to block the communication and information from President Donald Trump.

Essentially, the executive filtration team in control of Twitter content was looking for ways to stop Donald Trump from using the platform and they modified all existing rules and moderation guidelines to target and censor President Trump.

[Read Twitter File Release #4 HERE]

Twitter Files #5 Released – The Banning of President Trump by Bari Weiss: Just a Few Rogue Actors, Sundance

Twitter Files #5 Released – The Banning of President Trump by Bari Weiss: Just a Few Rogue Actors 

December 12, 2022 | Sundance


The fifth installment of the Twitter Files release drops today courtesy of Ms. Bari Weiss [READ HERE]. The focus of Ms Weiss was on the decision to ban President Donald Trump from the platform, and her outline walks through the events leading up to the decision to remove him.

Apparently, DHS, FBI and CISA officials were involved in direct contact with Twitter through their DHS “trusted partnership” portal to get rid of innocuous rebel voices and influence agents like Dan Bongino, Q conspiracy theorists, and various COVID doctors who were providing information against the interests of the government.

However, when it came to removing the most powerful voice of President Donald John Trump, there was nothing but static radio silence from the government side of the DHS portal.

You getting this?

Do you see how this is presented?  “A handful of people at a private company,” that’s the story and they are sticking to it. Swear.

COMPLAINT IN SPECIAL ACTION AND VERIFIED STATEMENT OF ELECTION CONTEXT PURSUANT TO A.R.S. § 16-672: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MOHAVE Joseph “Sonny” Borrelli and Jane and John Doe, et al., Plaintiffs v. Katie Hobbs, in her capacity as Secretary of State and in her personal capacity; Stephen Richer, in his official capacity as Maricopa County Recorder and in his personal capacity; Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, and Steve Gallardo, in their official capacities as members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and in their personal capacities; and Scott Jarrett, in his official capacity as Maricopa Director of Elections and in his personal capacity, Defendants.

 

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xu6Pgq98XvRUuVGfdiPrWOs9kD1bSSWP/view?usp=sharing

COMPLAINT IN SPECIAL ACTION AND VERIFIED STATEMENT OF ELECTION CONTEXT PURSUANT TO A.R.S. § 16-672

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MOHAVE

Joseph “Sonny Borrelli and Jane and John Doe, et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.
Katie Hobbs, in her capacity as Secretary of State and in her personal capacity; Stephen Richer, in his official capacity as Maricopa County Recorder and in his personal capacity; Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, and Steve Gallardo, in their official capacities as members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and in their personal capacities; and Scott Jarrett, in his official capacity as Maricopa Director of Elections and in his personal capacity,
Defendants.


COUNT 1:
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION 

COUNT 2:
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS VIOLATION

COUNT 3:
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 –
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO VOTE

COUNT 4:
Breach of A.R.S. §§ 16-550(A), 16-672(A)(4)


PRAYER AND REQUESTED RELIEF



89. Plaintiffs respectfully request the following relief:

a. Declare impermissible and unlawful the use of unproven and opaque third-party computer software that delegates the function of determining, initially or otherwise, the validity or invalidity or likely validity or invalidity of a ballot affidavit signature, under A.R.S. Section 16-672, et seq and unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and find and conclude that in doing so or allowing it to be done during or in connection with the 2022 general election for governor, Defendants violated those provisions.

b. Declare impermissible and unlawful the use of unproven and opaque third-party computer software to delegate to artificial intelligence the function of determining, initially or otherwise, the validity or invalidity or likely validity or invalidity of a ballot affidavit signature and unveiling that determination to the human assigned the task of ballot signature verification before he or she does his or her job, under A.R.S. Section 16-672, et seq. and unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and to find and conclude that in doing so or allowing it to be done during or in connection with the 2022 general election for governor, Defendants violated those provisions.

c. Temporarily, preliminarily, and permanently restrain and enjoin the state of Arizona and Maricopa County from using unproven and opaque nongovernmental, third-party software vendors and artificial intelligence to perform the function of determining, initially or otherwise, the validity or invalidity or likely validity or invalidity of a ballot affidavit signature.

d. Enjoin the use of signature verification software for which software code, AI training methods and data, manual curve-fitting practices, error rates including false negatives (or rejects) and false positives (or “accepts”), and similar data have not been made reasonably available for public notice and comment.

e. Mandate that elections officials in Arizona seek to extend the time and resources available for signature verification to ensure such verification is constitutionally adequate to the task of verifying millions of signatures.

f. Affirm that Mohave County voters’ early voting ballots meeting the statutory requirements and verified by trained human beings are counted in the 2022 general election for governor.

g. Invalidate and set aside the 2022 Maricopa County general election results for the race for governor, and/or and invalidate and set aside all Maricopa County mail-in ballots in the 2022 general election for governor.

h. Award Plaintiffs attorney fees in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b).

i. Award Plaintiffs their costs of suit.

j. Grant and impose any other remedy and grant and impose such other and further relief, at law or equity, that this Court deems just and proper in the circumstances.

Dated: December 12, 2022

Saturday, December 10, 2022

COMPLAINT IN SPECIAL ACTION AND VERIFIED STATEMENT OF ELECTION CONTEST PURSUANT TO A.R.S. § 16-672: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA Kari Lake,. Contestant/Plaintiff, v. Katie Hobbs, personally as Contestee and in her official capacity as Secretary of State; Stephen Richer in his official capacity as Maricopa County Recorder; Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, and Steve Gallardo, in their official capacities as members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; Scott Jarrett, in his official capacity as Maricopa County Director of Elections; and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Defendants.

 

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z7Ym3k6nhCy-Iny7Kf5hAIFKWgwL6vEx/view?usp=sharing

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA


Kari Lake,.
Contestant/Plaintiff,
v.
Katie Hobbs, personally as Contestee and in her official capacity as Secretary of State; Stephen Richer in his official capacity as Maricopa County Recorder; Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, and Steve Gallardo, in their official capacities as members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; Scott Jarrett, in his official capacity as Maricopa County Director of Elections; and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,
Defendants

COMPLAINT IN SPECIAL ACTION AND VERIFIED STATEMENT OF ELECTION CONTEST PURSUANT TO A.R.S. § 16-672

Case No. CV2022-095403


COUNT I.
Freedom of Speech
U.S. Const. amend. I, Ariz. Const. art, II, § 6
Misconduct, A.R.S. § 16-672(A)(l)

CO UNT II.
Illegal Tabulator Configurations
52 U.S.C. § 21081; A.R.S. § 16-442CB)
Misconduct and Illegal Votes, A.R.S. § 16-672(A)(l), (A)( 4)

COUNT III.
Mail-In Ballots with Invalid Signatures
A.R.S. § 16-SSO(A)
Misconduct, A.R.S. § l6-672(A)(l)

COUNT IV.
Invalid Chain of Custody
A.R.S. §§ 16-621(E), 16-1016
Misconduct, A.R.S. § 16-672(A)(t)

COUNT V.
Equal Protection
U.S. Con st. amend. XIV, § 1, cl. 4, Ariz. Const. art, II, § 6
Misconduct and Illegal Votes, A.R.S. § 16-672(A)(l), (A)(4)

COUNT VI.
Due Process
U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, cl. 3, Ariz. Const. art, II, § 6
Misconduct and Illegal Votes, A.R.S. § 16-672(A)(l), (A)(4)

COUNT VII.
Non-Secret Mail-In Ballots
U.S. Const. amend. XVI, § 1, cl. 3, Ariz. Const. art, VII, § l
Illegal Votes, A.R.S. § 16-672(A)(4) 

COUNT VIII
Incorrect Certification
A.R.S. § 16-650
Illegal Votes and Erroneous Count of Votes, A.R.S. § 16-672(A)(4)-(5) 

 COUNT IX.
Inadequate Remedy
A.R.S. § 16-672
Declaratory Judgment, A.R.S. §§ 12-1831-1846

COUNT X.
Federal Constitutional Rights
U.S. Const. amend. XIV,§ l, cl. 3-4
Civil Rights Action, 42 U.S.C. § 1983

 

DEMAND FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Contestant Kari Lake demands relief in the following forms:

 

  1. An opportunity to inspect Maricopa County ballots from the 2022 general election, including ballot signature envelopes and the corresponding signatures on file with Maricopa County, prior to trial;
  2. A root cause analysis and forensic examination into the causes and extent of the printer-tabulator problems encountered on election day;
  3. Trial of all disputed factual issues;
  4. An order striking all signatures on file with Maricopa County that are not the "registration record" pursuant to A.R.S. §I 6-550(A);
  5. An order striking any invalid ballots or types of ballots on an absolute or prorated basis;
  6.  An order setting aside the certified result of the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election and declaring that Kari Lake is the winner of the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election, pursuant to A.R.S. § 16-676;
  7. In the alternative, an order vacating the certified results of the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election, pursuant to A.R.S. § 16-676 or 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and an injunction requiring that Maricopa County re-conduct the gubernatorial election in confmmance with all applicable law and excluding all improper votes, under the direction of a special master;
  8. Recusal of defendants Hobbs and Richer from further participation in matters involving the 2022 general election, including any new election and the review of any issues related to the 2022 general election and any new election.

DATED this 9th day of December 2022

REFERENCE:

News

Kari Lake Officially Files 70-Page Lawsuit Challenging the 2022 Election - Here Are the Details

 By Carson Choate  December 10, 2022