Promethean Action Give Their Perspective on UK Reaction to U.S. Strikes Against Iran
March 3, 2026 | Sundance |
Susan Kokinda and the Lyndon LaRouche network give their perspective on the British reaction to the U.S. strikes against Iran. The analysis has value from a review of the historic relationship of the British imperialist policy toward matters of foreign entanglement and the control mechanisms that have historically flowed from the U.K
As a consequence of British government policy much of the Kokinda analysis accurately touches on the root cause of U.K response. However, the emphasis on the modern UK government as the lead of a global network is not always as severe or ¹complicated as the Lyndon LaRouche network would espouse. WATCH:
BOLTON SCREAMS: It’s All Over for Them
(10:55)
The Monday Brief - BOLTON SCREAMS: It’s All Over for Them - March 2, 2026
The neocons say Trump has no plan. Chatham House says you can't do regime change from the air. Then Iran's new leadership called Washington and Trump picked up. The special relationship is cracking open — and the men who ran it are on the chopping block.
Susan Kokinda argues that John Bolton and the
foreign policy establishment are alarmed not by U.S. strikes on Iran, but by
President Trump’s refusal to commit to a managed regime-change architecture.
She contrasts Bolton, Anne Applebaum, and Chatham House criticizing a lack of
strategy with Trump telling The Atlantic he has agreed to talk with Tehran,
framing this as a break from “The Great Game” geopolitics. Kokinda says the
strikes publicly cracked the U.S.–UK “special relationship,” citing that
Britain was informed but not included, Starmer refused U.S. use of British
bases, and European leaders issued statements emphasizing non-participation.
She claims Tehran is calling Washington, not London, and links this shift to
arrests of former Prince Andrew and Lord Peter Mandelson, described as key operators
connected to Epstein-file allegations.
00:00 The Monday Brief - BOLTON SCREAMS: It’s All Over for Them - March 2, 2026
02:36 The Regime Changers Are Not in the Room
05:10 The Special Relationship Shatters
07:56 The Operative Gets Arrested
¹Great Britain has imported a large percentage of extreme Islamists. As Iran is confronted, and as Israel is viewed as a significant beneficiary to that confrontation, the leftist British government -represented by majority base supporting Prime Minister Keir Starmer- is politically trying to retain stability. Starmer does not want to upset the Muslim population within the U.K. That is a significant political facet undiscussed in the Kokinda review of British response.
Additionally, the Trump Doctrine in confronting totalitarian dictators, or oppressive government systems, has always been to support the rise of the authentic ‘nationalist’ voice of the nation in question. President Trump has no personal or policy motive to drive the outcome when the authentic rise of the voice happens. Instead, he seeks to remove the anti-American sentiment carried by the former -hopefully replaced- regime.
In all of President Trump’s prior foreign policy examples we see he focuses on creating opportunity for liberty and freedom, but he does not seek to determine how that liberty and freedom are ultimately expressed – so long as there is no negative outcome to American interests.
President Trump positions the United States to remain the biggest, most powerful and influential nation in the world.
To the extent that Chinese tentacles need to be severed, Trump policy delivers. (North Korea, Panama Canal, Canada, Venezuela, Iran)
To the extent that malicious actors in the world need to be removed, his policy delivers. (Venezuela, Iran)
To the extent that American economic interests are represented in all of the outcomes, he forces reciprocity. (Canada, EU, NATO, ASEAN, trade tariffs)
America-First. Let each nation compete on equal footing; but let there be no doubt – America has the biggest footprint.
No comments:
Post a Comment