Opinion of the Court SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 19–1257 and 19–1258 MARK BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA, ET AL., PETITIONERS 19–1257 v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL., PETITIONERS 19–1258 v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yJT_hF5glZL8cHgU6GvKBIKsRXKpKU-c/view?usp=sharing

Opinion of the Court
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

______________
Nos. 19–1257 and 19–1258

_________________

MARK BRNOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA, ET AL., PETITIONERS
19–1257 v. 

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL.
ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL., PETITIONERS
19–1258 v.
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL.
ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[July 1, 2021]
JUSTICE ALITO delivered the opinion of the Court.

 NOTE: ALITO, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH, and BARRETT, JJ., joined. GOR-SUCH, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which THOMAS, J., joined. KAGAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BREYER and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined.

Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy and HB 2023 do not vio-late §2 of the VRA, and HB 2023 was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cases are remanded for fur-ther proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

REFERENCES:
SCOTUSblog
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee

Holding: Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy and H.B. 2023 do not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and H.B. 2023 was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Alito on July 1, 2021. Justice Gorsuch filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer and Sotomayor joined.

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

Jul 01 2021

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. VIDED.