Friday, December 12, 2025

U.S. Govt Agency Verifies that Nine Large U.S. Banks Conducted Ideological Debanking Operations (December 12, 2025) | Sundance |

 

U.S. Govt Agency Verifies that Nine Large U.S. Banks Conducted Ideological Debanking Operations

| Sundance |

 

The United States Office of the Comptroller for the Currency (OCC) has delivered the preliminary results of an investigation into large U.S. banks and the practice of “debanking” customers based on ideology. [PDF HERE]

 

Between 2020 and 2023, the OCC found that JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co., U.S. Bancorp, Capital One Financial Corp., PNC Financial Services Group Inc., Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal, all maintained policies that restricted legal companies from access to banking based on the “values” of the bank.

According to the OCC report, “these nine banks made inappropriate distinctions among customers in the provision of financial services on the basis of their lawful business activities by maintaining policies restricting access to banking services or requiring escalated reviews and approvals before providing certain customers access to financial services.”

Press Release – […] The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) today released preliminary findings from its supervisory review of debanking activities at the nine largest national banks it supervises: JPMorgan Chase Bank, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo Bank, U.S. Bank, Capital One, PNC Bank, TD Bank, and BMO Bank.

The OCC conducted its supervisory review in accordance with the President’s Executive Order “Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans” to determine whether these institutions debanked or discriminated against any customers or potential customers on the basis of their political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities.

“The OCC is committed to ending efforts – whether instigated by regulators or banks – that would weaponize finance,” said Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan V. Gould. “Although our work continues, the OCC is today providing visibility into the debanking actions against customers and lawful businesses taken by the nation’s largest banks to ensure public awareness, and to halt these harmful and unfair practices.”

The OCC’s preliminary findings show that, between 2020 and 2023, these nine banks made inappropriate distinctions among customers in the provision of financial services on the basis of their lawful business activities by maintaining policies restricting access to banking services or requiring escalated reviews and approvals before providing certain customers access to financial services. For example, the OCC identified instances where at least one bank imposed restrictions on certain industry sectors because they engaged in “activities that, while not illegal, are contrary to [the bank’s] values.” Sectors subjected to restricted access included oil and gas exploration, coal mining, firearms, private prisons, tobacco and e-cigarette manufacturers, adult entertainment, and digital assets.

The OCC’s findings confirm that these or similar policies and practices were in place at each of the banks reviewed. In a reaction to the observations Comptroller Gould stated, “It is unfortunate that the nation’s largest banks thought these harmful debanking policies were an appropriate use of their government-granted charter and market power. While many of these policies were undertaken in plain sight and even announced publicly, certain banks have continued to insist that they did not engage in debanking. Going forward, the OCC will hold banks accountable for these actions and ensure unlawful debanking does not continue.”

This review was first announced by the OCC in September 2025. While the OCC is releasing preliminary findings, its work continues to better understand the full extent and effect of these actions and their impact on affected industries and the American economy. The OCC is also still reviewing thousands of complaints to identify instances of political and religious debanking, which it will report on in due course and as appropriate. (LINK)

The six-page report identifies several industries that faced uphill climbs securing banking services, including oil and gas companies, cryptocurrency firms, tobacco and e-cigarette manufacturers, and firearm companies. The OCC said that many of these banks had publicly disclosed relevant policies, often tied to environmental, social and governance goals.

The report also found some banks adopted heightened reviews for potential customers based on negative coverage in the media.

The OCC will complete their investigation and could send recommendations to the DOJ requesting prosecution.

Small Details Help Understand Big Picture Politics (December 12, 2025) | Sundance |

 

Small Details Help Understand Big Picture Politics

| Sundance |

There was a rather disposable and brief discussion that surfaced during the Patrick David Bet podcast that helps to frame perspective on the current state of U.S. UniParty politics.  Normally, this interview segment wouldn’t be of much value; however, given the specifics of the names involved and some confusion about alliances and allegiances there is something to be remembered.  This interview is a good reminder.

John Morgan is the head of a massive law firm based in Florida.  As a strong democrat Morgan was one of Barack Obama’s biggest bundlers in the state.  Many high-profile lawyers including current Attorney General Pam Bondi and current HHS Secretary RFK Jr have worked for and with John Morgan.  This is why the best advice is to stay emotionally detached from reliance on these people.  At the core of everything it’s the money that matters.

In this interview John Morgan, a man of generally horrid character and disposition, highlights some of his influence in state, regional and national politics; giving details about the relationships he holds.  It’s a good reminder of exactly how the UniParty operates when contrast against the forces opposed to President Trump.  WATCH:

"Biden Was On Life Support" - DNC Mega Donor EXPOSES Backroom Politics To Save 2024 Campaign

Valuetainment

(12:09)

The Pandemic Revealed the Most Cowardly Society of AllTime, Filipe Rafaeli (December 10, 2025)

 

The Pandemic Revealed the Most Cowardly Society of AllTime

By Filipe Rafaeli   December 10, 2025

 

Cold War: smaller in global scale, generated questioning and a monumental cultural explosion. 

Covid: the greatest disruption in modern history, generated absolute cultural emptiness. 

And where is the movement that emerged from this collective experience of fear? Nothing. We have TikTok dances. Humanity went through the biggest collective trauma since World War II and came out…smaller. More fearful. More cowardly. More willing to obey. More willing to sacrifice the young to protect the old. And not even with a single Woodstock to show for it.

When Science, the Wall Street Journal, and even the scientific community itself admit that mandates no longer make sense? Silence. No one apologizes. No one reflects. They simply change the subject. In many places, the mandates continue to this day, as in Brazil.

 

The Five Big Lies of Vaccinology, Clayton J. Baker, MD (December 11, 2025)

 

The Five Big Lies of Vaccinology

By Clayton J. Baker, MD   December 11, 2025  

 

The Five Big Lies of Vaccinology

Big Lie #1: Equating Antibody Production with Immunity to Disease

Big Lie #2: Using Fake Placebos

Big Lie #3: Insisting My Immunity is Dependent on Your Vaccination

Big Lie #4: Declaring Multiple Simultaneous Injections to be Safe

Big Lie #5: Declaring Vaccines Fundamentally “Safe and Effective” as a Class

Honorable Mention 1: Declaring mRNA Gene Therapies to be “Vaccines”

Honorable Mention 2: Allowing Criminal Corporations to Conduct their own Clinical Studies 

Monday, December 08, 2025

Making Citizens, Spencer Davis

Salvo 11.14.2025

Making Citizens

Spencer Davis

Forming Americans who are worthy to carry on the country’s legacy.

Washington was hailed as Cincinnatus for restraint. Adams read Cicero to learn the duties of a citizen. Madison, Hamilton, and Jay argued like Romans about factions, offices, and law in The Federalist. Tocqueville saw that institutions float on habits formed long before statutes are passed. These classical measures met the republic’s better religious energies. Courage was yoked to limits, ambition was answerable to judgment, and liberty was disciplined by reverence. It was a living grammar, producing men who knew that freedom without a proper moral foundation soon degenerates into a mass of individuals with unbalanced appetites.

America’s generals were heirs to the same tradition. Robert E. Lee, schooled at West Point when Latin and moral philosophy still shaped a man, read Plutarch’s Lives and Marcus Aurelius until duty became instinct. His letters breathe that Stoic air—self-command, reverence, and the conviction that honor isn’t pride but proportion. “Duty, then, is the sublimest word in our language,” he wrote, echoing Marcus Aurelius’s injunction: “Do every act of your life as though it were the very last act of your life.” Though defeated on the battlefield, Lee carried himself with a Roman dignity that turned surrender into an act of moral victory.

Ulysses S. Grant, Lee’s opposite in temperament, was no philosopher, but the same formation ran in his marrow. He wrote like Caesar: plain, spare, factual, and untouched by ornament or self-pity. His Memoirs possess that austere honesty the ancients called gravitas. Where Lee personified Stoic resignation, Grant embodied virtue—the quiet courage to endure, to press on after failure, and to be magnanimous in victory.

Their causes divided them; their formation united them. Each, in defeat or triumph, acted as the Romans would have understood: disciplined, modest, untheatrical. They were the last products of an education that taught duty before ideology and character before charisma—a republic that still produced adults.

House Releases Text of 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Codifying 15 Trump Executive Orders December 8, 2025 | Sundance |

 

House Releases Text of 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Codifying 15 Trump Executive Orders

 

December 8, 2025 | Sundance

The House Armed Services Committee has released the full text of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2026 [SEE TEXT HERE]. The massive bill consists of 3,086 pages, making the fiscal year 2026 NDAA longer than the manuscript of War and Peace. Most people will never read it, so a 24-page Summary Version is Here.

The FY 2026 NDAA authorizes $892.6B for defense, which includes $153B for procurement, $142B for Research and Development, and $235B for military personnel. The legislation: Codifies 15 Trump EOs on military reform, border security, and DEI elimination. Boosts shipbuilding, aircraft, munitions, funds Taiwan aid and Israel programs, reforms acquisitions, enhances border support including $900M for counter-narcotic operations and includes a 3.8% pay raise and quality-of-life improvements.

There is a $400 million authorization for Ukraine support, however, the amount is ‘authorized’ not ‘appropriated’ – which would have to come in a separate spending bill.

Other Ukraine-Related Provisions (No Specific Funding). These sections emphasize oversight, reporting, and strategic support but do not authorize new funding:

SEC. 1244 (Military Intelligence Support for Ukraine): Directs the provision of military intelligence to Ukraine but without dollar figures.

SEC. 1245 (Report Relating to Allied and Partner Support to Ukraine): Requires the Secretary of Defense to report on U.S. and allied contributions, including unobligated balances in the USAI account and plans for using funds to bolster Ukraine’s defense. Covers bilateral aid, Jumpstart/PURL initiatives, and deterrence against Russia.

SEC. 1246–1250: Broader provisions on NATO’s eastern flank, Baltic security, U.S. basing/training in NATO countries, and European deterrence reports. These indirectly support Ukraine via enhanced regional posture but lack Ukraine-specific funding.

No other sections in the amendment (e.g., those on Indo-Pacific, cyber, or appropriations for unrelated programs) mention Ukraine funding. The total direct authorization for Ukraine in FY 2026 appears to be $400 million under USAI, building on prior years’ initiatives. This is an authorization bill, so final funding levels depend on the appropriations process and conference reconciliation between House and Senate versions.