“MINUTES”
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
City Hall
East side of Monte
Verde Street between Ocean and Seventh Avenues
II. Roll Call
PRESENT: Council
Members Beach,
Hazdovac, Talmage and Mayor Burnett
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT (partial list): Jason Stilwell, City
Administrator
Heidi Burch, Assistant
City Administrator/City
Clerk
Don Freeman, City Attorney
Marc Wiener, Associate Planner
V. Announcements from
Closed Session, from City Council Members and the City Administrator.
A. Announcements from
Closed Session.
1. Existing Litigation -- Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
- Conference with legal counsel regarding The Flanders Foundation, a California
Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation, Petitioner v. City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Respondents – Monterey
County Superior Court Case No. M99437/State of California Court of Appeals, Sixth District,
Civil Case No. H035818.
2. Potential Litigation -- Government Code Section
54956.9(b).2 - Conference with legal counsel regarding potential litigation –
one (1) matter.
3. Property Negotiations – Gov’t. Code Section 54956.8,
Between City Administrator Jason Stilwell and Rick Stemple regarding the
Flanders Property.
4. Labor Negotiations – Government Code Section 54957.6(a)
Meet and confer with the Carmel-by-the-Sea’s Meyers-Milias Brown Act
representative, City Administrator Stilwell, to give direction regarding labor
negotiations with the two bargaining units.
City Attorney Don Freeman announced that the City Council
met in closed session on Monday and there were no announcements for the public
except regarding Gov’t. Code Section 54956.8, Between City Administrator Jason
Stilwell and Rick Stemple regarding the Flanders Property which involved real
property negotiations involving the City and the negotiating party for the
developer and only price and terms were discussed.
Related Article:
Carmel in Negotiations for Flanders Mansion Property Deal
VII. Consent Calendar
E. Consideration of a Resolution authorizing the City
Administrator to amend an existing contract with Neill Engineering for services
related to the City’s ASBS Dry Weather Diversion Grant.
Mayor
Burnett opened and closed the meeting to public comment.
Council
Member HAZDOVAC moved to approve Consent Agenda Items A-E, seconded by
Council Member TALMAGE and carried unanimously.
XI. Orders of Council
B. Provide direction
regarding the placement of a 9/11 memorial on City property.
City Administrator Stilwell presented the staff report. A group of citizens traveled to Carmel, N.Y.
to retrieve a piece of steel from the World Trade Center with the intent of it becoming a 9/11 Memorial for Carmel.
Two issues involve consideration of memorial on private property through
public hearing process or locations on public property and referred to the
Planning Commission.
Marc Wiener, Associate Planner, reviewed potential
public locations:
• In the gardens in front of the Police Station.
• Inside the Fire Station.
• Devendorf
Park
• First
Murphy Park
(possibly on the viewing platform)
• Piccadilly
Park
CarrieAnn addressed the 9/11 memorial entitled "Resolve
& Remembrance" Memorial for Carmel and recounted the cutting on March
20 in New York and thanked Monterey Firefighters Association and their families
for accompanying the piece of steel across the country to Carmel. In explaining “why Carmel,” she stated that 9/11 affected all
Americans and we all felt the loss on 9/11 and a memorial would assist us bridge
the loss. She advocated placement at Devendorf Park which was a “gift for central
gatherings.”
To Hazdovac’s query, she stated that the Carmel Firefighters would maintain
the Memorial “for life”
To Beach’s query, she circulated the proposed design for the 15” x 12”
steel piece. And she stated htat material will be supplied by John Mandurrago and designed by Jim Griffith
Mayor
Burnett opened the meeting to public comment.
Monte Miller and John Sap stated it would be
fitting for the 9/11 Memorial to be in Devendorf Park,
home to other war memorials.
Carl Iverson stated that as an “international
village” it is appropriate for a 9/11 Memorial to be in Carmel
and supported the Memorial in Devendorf
Park.
Robin Feltenberg, a volunteer member of
American legion auxiliary, stated she was “privileged and honored” to be at the
Carmel Fire Station when the piece of steel arrived in Carmel.
Diane Whitaker applauded the Council for its
wisdom in placing 9/11 Memorial in Carmel.
Chuck Danh stated that it is a “great honor”
to have a piece of history in the 9/11 Memorial in Carmel
and advocated for placement in Devendorf
Park.
John Hanson, city employee, stated that 9/11
changed his life drastically and he is proud to have the Memorial in Carmel.
Mayor
Burnett closed the meeting to public comment.
Council Member
Beach stated the Memorial represents a
location for people to remember and imaged a gathering in Devendorf Park.
She stated that 9/11 was the “most important world historic thing” which has
happened in her lifetime.
Council Member Talmage advocated that the
most appropriate place was Devendorf
Park with the other war
memorials, but he did not want to commercialize the 9/11 Memorial. He stated he did not
want a competition among artists for design.
Council Member Hazdovac suggested calling for
sculpture design submissions and refer to Planning Commission with Council and
public input for location in Devendorf
Park.
Mayor Burnett used adjectives to describe the
9/11 Memorial including “somber, private, serious, understated, discrete and
simple.” And he stated that the appropriate thing to do is
for the City Council to ask staff to take to the Planning Commission and bring
back proposal including guidelines, et cetera.
Mayor
Burnett reopened the meeting to public comment.
John Mandurrago stated that it was not
necessary to add more ornamentation.
John Sap stated he liked design with Carmel stone.
CarrieAnn stressed that the 9/11 Memorial be “accessible to all.”
Carolyn Hardy stated her concern was for the
9/11 Memorial to not overwhelm the other memorials in Devendorf Park.
Mayor
Burnett reclosed the meeting to public comment.
Council
Member TALMAGE moved to place
9/11 Memorial in Devendorf Park, ask Staff to prepare proposal for Planning
Commission and send to Planning Commission with Council direction and encourage
public participation regarding submissions for base, if appropriate, seconded
by Council Member BEACH and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: HAZDOVAC; BEACH; TALMAGE & BURNETT
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
Note:
“RESOLVE & REMEMBRANCE"
Carmel
by the Sea's
September 11th Memorial
9-11 Memorial /
Freedom
Tower Update - (April
28th, 2012)
World
Trade Center
- Craig Armstrong -
World Trade Center Theme Song
C. Receive report and
provide direction on future water supply.
Mayor Burnett spoke of Cal-Am’s presentation on a new water
supply project submitted to the California PUC.
Cal-Am proposes a three-part solution namely working with the Water
Management District on aquifer storage recovery (ASR) (13 acre-ft.), ground
water recycling/replenishment (GWR) (3500 acre-ft.) with the Water Management
District and the Pollution Control Agency and a desalination project
located in the vicinity of the land fill with slant wells near Waste Management
property and operated by Cal-Am. With
regard to ASR and GWR, Cal-Am will not provide financing for projects. Cal-Am project financed by four sources of
capital including a surcharge prior to on-line project ($100 million), line of
credit ($15-$20 million), two separate submissions to State to revolving fund
(total $100 million) and Cal-Am
equity.
City Administrator Stilwell presented a power point
presentation.
Monterey
Peninsula Regional Water
Authority
- Formed
as Joint Powers Agreement of the 6 Peninsula
cities
- Carmel City Council
appointed the Mayor and Councilmember Talmage as alternative
Goals-Based Plan
Mission
Vision
Two Goals
- Cost-Effective
Project by Deadline
- Unified
and Public Voice
JPA review and vet Cal-Am’s new Water Supply Project
Monterey
Peninsula Water Supply
Project
- Cal-Am
project application to State PUC
- 3 part
project
- new
desalination plant
- ground
water replacement (GWR)
- aquifer
storage and retrieval (ASR)
- $213
million - $260 million desalination plant
- Customer
rate surcharge proposed to begin in 2013
- New
water source begins 2017
Council Member Talmage mentioned four issues including amount
of water for growth versus status quo; desal plant ownership regarding private
versus public-private ownership; financing of private vs. public ownership; and
desal plant EIR whether revised EIR or new EIR required.
Mayor Burnett mentioned water rights issue regarding judge’s
ruling.
City Attorney Don Freeman stated the water supply project
needs to be “environmentally sensitive,” “timely” and “reliable.” He mentioned the Cease and Desist Order (CDO)
against Cal-Am and requirement to meet demand regarding over-pumping of the Carmel River.
Mayor
Burnett opened the meeting to public comment.
John Sap stated that he had worked on the Regional Desalination
Project; that Project was an alternate to Cal-Am’s proposal to the Moss Landing
desalination plant. He stressed that
Cal-Am is only addressing the CDO, i.e. over-pumping of the Carmel River. Realistically, he stated that he believed
that there will not be a project online by CDO deadline and there needs to be a
negotiation with the Board for flexibility.
Monte Miller queried about EIR process and
adequacy; authority of JPA with PUC; and liability of Pacific Grove with respect to Moss Landing
desalination plant.
Michael LePage requested Council’s discussion
regarding Cal-Am’s decision on privately owned desalination plant.
Barbara Livingston asked whether hotels have cards with
regard to towel replacement.
Carrie Theis, Carmel Innkeepers, stated there are cards in
all hotel rooms and they participate in “do not use towels” program, et cetera.
Kristy Downing queried about People’s Desalination Plant and
the possibility of joining Pacific
Grove and reasons why or why not.
Richard stated we need about 10,500 acre-feet of water;
queries involving Salinas
Valley agriculture and
peninsula users, and payment for premium recycled water.
Mayor
Burnett closed the meeting to public comment.
Mayor Burnett stated the PUC lead agency with
Cal-Am’s proposed project regarding EIR; JPA to file as party to process
involving PUC proceedings; City does not have sufficient information regarding
Pacific Grove’s decision to make a decision; Cal-Am’s private ownership and also financing and oversight regarding private
versus public ownership; expand ground water replenishment possibility.
Council Member
Beach asked estimated costs of GWR and ASR Capacity of aquifer is 48,000 acre-ft. She also asked about logic for ASR amounts;
Mayor Burnett answered that the amounts reflected system optimization from an
engineering standpoint. Therefore, she
gave direction to mayor for cost effectiveness of components.
City Attorney Freeman reviewed Seaside Basin’s water master (judge) and
salt-water intrusion possibility. To
date, there is no salt-water intrusion.
Court has stated no salt-water intrusion allowed.
Mayor Burnett pledged to bring back at least the 218
component next month with a presentation.
City Attorney Freeman mentioned independent numbers sources
from Cal-Am in its 11 alternatives analysis study and the City of Monterey consultant
engineer’s study.