FLAG OFFICERS 4 AMERICA: 'We are retired military leaders who pledged to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Although retired from active service, each of us feels bound by that oath to do what we can, in our capacity today, to protect our nation from the threats to her freedom.'

FLAG OFFICERS 4 AMERICA

Retired U.S.Generals and Admirals defending the Constitution

WHO WE ARE
We are retired military leaders who pledged to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Although retired from active service, each of us feels bound by that oath to do what we can, in our capacity today, to protect our nation from the threats to her freedom.

OPENING STATEMENT 

ISSUE AREAS
CHINA
BORDER CRISIS
BIG TECH
IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL
KEYSTONE PIPELINE
U.S. MILITARY

NEWS Unearthed Evidence Shows Fauci Defended ‘Integral’ Gain-Of-Function Research Despite Pandemic ‘Risks’. MAY 28, 2021 NATALIE WINTERS

 

NEWS
Unearthed Evidence Shows Fauci Defended ‘Integral’ Gain-Of-Function Research Despite Pandemic ‘Risks’.
MAY 28, 2021 NATALIE WINTERS


Writing for the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012, Fauci also posited that the risky form of research could “trigger” a pandemic:

“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?”

“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks,” he adds before alleging it is “more likely” that a pandemic would occur naturally in the paper first reported by The Australian’s Sharri Markson.

 

mBio-2012-Fauci-e00359-12.full by Natalie Winters

Fauci In 2012: Gain-Of-Function Research 'Worth Risk Of Lab Accident Sparking Pandemic'

Fauci In 2012: Gain-Of-Function Research 'Worth Risk Of Lab Accident Sparking Pandemic'

BY TYLER DURDEN
SATURDAY, MAY 29, 2021

America's top virologist, Anthony Fauci, argued in 2012 that the risks of a lab accident sparking a pandemic are outweighed by the potential benefits of manipulating viruses via gain-of-function research, according to previously unsurfaced remarks reported by Sharri Markson via The Australian.

 "In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?" Fauci wrote in the American Society for Microbiology in 2012, adding "Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?""Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks," Fauci continued. "It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky."

 

The experiments are also opposed by prominent scientists, including the Cambridge Working Group of 200 researchers which issued a public warning in 2014.

“Accident risks with newly created “potential pandemic pathogens” raise grave new concerns,” the group’s letter read. “Laboratory creation of highly transmissible, novel strains of dangerous viruses, especially but not limited to influenza, poses substantially increased risks.

“An accidental infection in such a setting could trigger outbreaks that would be difficult or impossible to control. Historically, new strains of influenza, once they establish transmission in the human population, have infected a quarter or more of the world’s population within two years.”

And Steven Salzberg, of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, in 2015 said the benefits of gain-of-function research were “minimal at best” and they could “far more safely be obtained through other avenues of research”.

“I am very concerned that the continuing gain-of-function research on influenza viruses, and more recently on other viruses, presents extremely serious risks to the public health,” he wrote.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ANTONIO VITOLO; JAKE’S BAR AND GRILL, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN, Administrator of the Small Business Administration, Defendant-Appellee: OPINION THAPAR, Circuit Judge. This case is about whether the government can allocate limited coronavirus relief funds based on the race and sex of the applicants. We hold that it cannot.

OPINION

 _________________ 

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. This case is about whether the government can allocate limited coronavirus relief funds based on the race and sex of the applicants. We hold that it cannot. 

Thus, we enjoin the government from using these unconstitutional criteria when processing Antonio Vitolo’s application. 

It has been twenty-five years since the Supreme Court struck down the race-conscious policies in Adarand. And it has been nearly twenty years since the Supreme Court struck down the racial preferences in Gratz. As today’s case shows once again, the “way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” Parents Involved, 551 U.S. at 748 (plurality opinion).

The government shall fund the plaintiffs’ grant application, if approved, before all later-filed applications, without regard to processing time or the applicants’ race or sex. The government, however, may continue to give veteran-owned restaurants priority in accordance with the law. This preliminary injunction shall remain in place until this case is resolved on the merits and all appeals are exhausted.

. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UCpiu4y45xfOLONdEGLl9bAf0ARUAbOb/view?usp=sharing 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
ANTONIO VITOLO; JAKE’S BAR AND GRILL, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN, Administrator of the Small Business Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 21-5517/5528
On Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal and to Expedite Appeal.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville;
No. 3:21-cv-00176—Travis Randall McDonough, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: May 27, 2021
Before: NORRIS, DONALD, and THAPAR, Circuit Judges.

REFERENCE:
Appellate Court Strikes Down a Piece of Biden's Race-Based America Rescue Plan 

Three cheers to a correct ruling by the 6th Circuit Court.

MISH

The Fall of Saint Anthony Fauci & Anthony Fauci backed virus experiments ‘despite pandemic risk’

The Fall of Saint Anthony Fauci
By MICHAEL BRENDAN DOUGHERTY May 27, 2021
On the unforced errors of America’s most political doctor

If this is the last “conspiracy theory” and disinformation campaign to become transformed into the accepted wisdom — which may shortly occur — then Fauci will have to explain why it was that he accepted the role of Pandemic Hero in the first place. Or why he joined a phony and flimsy consensus that the virus had emerged in nature. Or why he so consistently downplayed the risks early on, given what he must have known or suspected the minute reports emerged of a coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan. Given that he’s already told us he lies because the public isn’t ready for the truth, how likely are his denials to be believed?



Anthony Fauci backed virus experiments ‘despite pandemic risk’
EXCLUSIVE
SHARRI MARKSON
INVESTIGATIONS WRITER
MAY 28, 2021 

Writing in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012, Dr Fauci acknowledged the controversial scientific research could spark a pandemic.

Gain-of-function experiments – often with bat-derived coronaviruses – centre on manipulating, splicing and recombining viruses potentially into strands of highly infectious and little understood diseases.

This type of research carries such a risk of causing a pandemic that the Obama administration paused funding for gain-of-­function experiments in 22 fields in 2014, including those involving SARS, influenza and MERS.

In December 2017, the National Institute of Health, of which the NIAID is a part, announced it would resume funding the gain-of-function research.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, Dr. SHIVA AYYADURAI Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN, MICHELLE K. TASSINARI, DEBRA O’MALLEY, AMY COHEN, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ELECTION DIRECTORS, TWITTER, INC., all in their individual capacities, and WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for Massachusetts, Defendants. CASE No. 1:20-CV-11889-MLW

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kQPRqPZl6nZ-kzr1m5cWQtIuzYkP6I1r/view?usp=sharing

VERIFIED COMPLAINT & JURY DEMAND

Introduction 

This is a Complaint to redress the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' repeated violations of Plaintiff Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai's civil rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 16 of the Declaration of Rights of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

COUNT I 

Violations of the Freedom of Speech or Expression 

COUNT II 

Violations of the Right to Freedom of the Press 

COUNT III 

Violations of the Freedom to Petition the Government 

COUNT IV 

Violations of the Freedom to Peaceably Assemble 

COUNT V 

Violations of the Right to Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Speech Guaranteed by Article 16 ofthe Declaration ofRights of the Massachusetts Constitution 

PRAYER FOR RELIEF 

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff demands that Judgment be entered against the Defendant to compensate the Plaintiff for damages, and so that justice might be upheld as the Defendant violated the Plaintiffs Constitutionally-Guaranteed Rights, applicable to such parties, and order that the following damages be awarded: 

a. Damages for Loss of Liberty; 

b. Compensatory Damages; 

c. Punitive Damages; 

d. Attorney's fees; 

e. Court costs; 

f. Pre- and post-judgment interest; 

g. Injunctive relief; or 

h. Any such other relief as this Honorable Court might deem appropriate and equitable. 

Temporarv Restraining Order 

In addition to the relief requested above, the Plaintiff requests that this Court issue a Temporary Restraining Order, restraining the Defendant from again bidding Twitter to remove, ban, or otherwise silence the Plaintiff at least until the results of the race for the U.S. Senate are announced-likely by November 4, 2020, the day after election day. 

A restraining order is necessary because: 

The Plaintiff has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the case, since the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth has admitted it silenced the Plaintiff. 

Absent an injunction, the Plaintiff would suffer an irremediable loss of rights during his campaign for the U.S. Senate. While the Plaintiff has already lost essential time and means to campaign during his race for the 2020 U.S. Senate seat, the Plaintiff would incur even more losses if the Defendant were permitted to continue to violate the Plaintiff's constitutionally-guaranteed rights; and 

Granting this restraining order will serve the public interest, as it will preserve the public's ability to hear political speech and consider a public petition. 

Granting this restraining order will no prejudice the Defendant-as no harm may come to the government being preventing from silencing peaceful political speech. 

Oct 20, 2020 COMPLAINT (Galvin) against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8471903 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Shiva Ayyadurai.(Casieri, Daniel) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/20/2020) (Kelly, Danielle). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/20/2020: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form) (Kelly, Danielle). (Entered: 10/20/2020)

Main Doc­ument Complaint

Attach­ment 1 Civil Cover Sheet

Attach­ment 2 Category Form

   

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N7LofT9qU1lsSaHdegSWvctbmANiGTOR/view?usp=sharing

AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
Nov 6, 2020 AMENDED COMPLAINT against William Francis Galvin, filed by Shiva Ayyadurai. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Ayyadurai, Shiva) (Entered: 11/06/2020)
Main Doc­ument Amended Complaint

Attach­ment 1 Exhibit

  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KuH8MQ0RYOxs9QEedKJEuUvtAw9HVZzK/view?usp=sharing 

[PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT
Apr 6, 2021 AMENDED COMPLAINT PROPOSED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Shiva Ayyadurai.(Ayyadurai, Shiva) (Entered: 04/06/2021)

Main Doc­ument Amended Complaint

 

May 20, 2021 Motion Hearing

   

https://drive.google.com/file/d/13zDyEhmlIik3PS6r3b-3EVpM1Ylm4IdI/view?usp=sharing

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM
REGARDING THE ELECTIONS INTERFERENCE OPERATIONS PLAYBOOK
FOR STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS
THAT ESTABLISHED THE INFRASTRUCTURE, PROCESSES & PROTOCOLS
DESIGNED BY TASSINARI, COHEN, NASED, TWITTER LEGAL ET AL
IN CAMBRIDGE, MA
FOR SURVEILLANCE & REPORTING OF “THREATS” VIA
THE TWITTER TRUSTED PARTNERSHIP
AND TWITTER PARTNER SUPPORT PORTAL (PSP) PROGRAM

May 21, 2021 DECLARATION Re Influence Operations Playbook by Shiva Ayyadurai. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amy Cohen Testimony, # 2 Exhibit Election Incident Coordination Guide, # 3 Exhibit Election Cybersecurity Playbook, # 4 Exhibit Election-Influence-Operations-Playbook-Part1, # 5 Exhibit Election-Influence-Operations-Playbook-Part2)(Ayyadurai, Shiva) (Entered: 05/21/2021)

Main Doc­ument Declaration

Attach­ment 1 Exhibit Amy Cohen Testimony

Attach­ment 2 Exhibit Election Incident Coordination Guide

Attach­ment 3 Exhibit Election Cybersecurity Playbook

Attach­ment 4 Exhibit Election-Influence-Operations-Playbook-Part1

Attach­ment 5 Exhibit Election-Influence-Operations-Playbook-Part2

REFERENCE:
Ayyadurai v. Galvin (1:20-cv-11889)
District Court, D. Massachusetts

Last Updated: May 25, 2021, 5:15 p.m. EDT

Assigned To: Mark Lawrence Wolf

Date Filed: Oct. 20, 2020

Date of Last Known Filing: May 21, 2021

Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other

Jury Demand: Plaintiff

Jurisdiction Type: U.S. Government Defendant

J.D. Vance Outlines The Strategy Needed to Fight Back Against Woke Capital

 

 

J.D. Vance Outlines The Strategy Needed to Fight Back Against Woke Capital 

May 18, 2021 

(21:21) 

REFERENCE:
THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE CENTER FOR THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE