Lawsuit claiming multiple fraud
conspiracies in the Michigan election. The challenge asks the Board of
Elections to conduct an audit of the election, prohibit the certification of
the election, and order a new election to be held.
CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, Jr., Plaintiff,
-vs
CITY OF DETROIT; DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; JANICE M. WINFREY, in her
official capacity as the CLERK OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and the Chairperson of
the DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION; CATHY M. GARRETT, in her official capacity as
the CLERK OF WAYNE COUNTY; and the WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS,
Defendants.
November 8, 2020
Order, MARKMAN, J., joins the statement of ZAHRA, J. VIVIANO, J. (dissenting): CHERYL A. COSTANTINO and EDWARD P. McCALL, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v CITY OF DETROIT, DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION, DETROIT CITY CLERK, WAYNE COUNTY CLERK, and WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF CANVASSERS, Defendants-Appellees, and MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.
Order
November 23, 2020
Michigan Supreme Court
Lansing, Michigan
MARKMAN, J., joins the statement of ZAHRA, J. VIVIANO, J. (dissenting).
On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and the motion to file supplemental response are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. ZAHRA, J. (concurring).
SOURCES:
Michigan Detroit Election Challenge | Democracy Docket
Michigan | Democracy Docket
No comments:
Post a Comment