Sunday, May 02, 2021

Breaking: Prominent Virologist, Biological Warfare Specialist Calls Out Career Bureaucrats And Says There Needs To Be Medical & Criminal Justice On U.S. Pandemic Response

NATIONAL SECURITY
Breaking: Prominent Virologist, Biological Warfare Specialist Calls Out Career Bureaucrats And Says There Needs To Be Medical & Criminal Justice On U.S. Pandemic Response
by AND Magazine Staff April 29, 2021

Calls on Congress for real, non-partisan accountability

Dr. Stephen Hatfill, a prominent Virologist, Doctor and Biological Warfare Specialist, via a press release, called for Congress to hold accountable those who were involved in the “decisions that financially ruined millions of individuals and businesses, crippled the U.S. economy, facilitated the preventable death of over 500,000 of our citizens, and destroyed all confidence in our medical research institutions and government.”


From a front-row seat, I watched in disbelief as a small number of senior federal employees defied orders and their oaths, only to join forces with a biased mainstream media and clueless State Governors, to systematically ignore and destroy a validated National Pandemic Response Plan that had its origins and testing in 2000 1, crafted into its final form in 2005, and updated in 2017.

In response, the Americans whose lives have been tragically disrupted and permanently altered, need to have an accountability of what went wrong and who was involved in the decisions that financially ruined millions of individuals and businesses, crippled the US economy, facilitated the preventable death of over 500,000 of our citizens, and destroyed all confidence in our medical research institutions and government.

Summary


The evidence and legal testimony of Rick Bright indicates that his decisions and insubordinate actions together with the actions of Janet Woodcock MD at the FDA, incorrectly limited the use of Hydroxychloroquine to hospitalized late-phase patients. This created a single point failure for the entire National Pandemic Plan. The negligence of some members of the COVID-19 Task Force in responding to the science concerning HCQ (Dr. Fauci) and the eager participation of the biased mainstream media in this is a matter, is a matter on record. 16

COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease

APRIL 24, 2021
The Zombie Apocalype Is Coming, but It Won't Look Like The Walking Dead
Bill Hennessy

A new report published by Microbiology and Infectious Disease is raising alarms. The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines could trigger an avalanche of early-onset Alzheimer’s and other degenerative neurological diseases.

REFERENCE:
Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
J. Bart Classen, MD*



ABSTRACT 

Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients...The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases. The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit

EXCLUSIVE: Sharyl Attkisson investigates Covid Origins

 

 
EXCLUSIVE: Sharyl Attkisson investigates Covid Origins
Sharyl Attkisson Published April 24, 2021
(9:52)

REFERENCE:
Sharyl Attkisson Investigates: Did Covid-19 Originate at Wuhan Institute of Virology?
Posted By Ian Schwartz On Date April 27, 2021

Vaccine Companies Own Data Shows ZERO Difference in Stopping Covid, But May Cause Mad Cow Disease

 

 
REFERENCE:

Saturday, May 01, 2021

Americans Unite, Giuliani: DOJ Prosecutors ‘Invaded’ His iCloud Account in 2019 While He Was Defending Trump For Impeachment Sham & Biden’s Shameful ‘Attack on Our Democracy’ Rhetoric

WEEKEND LONG READ 
Can the veterans of the old conservative wars come to a truce? 
By Michael Anton May 1, 2021


Whatever happens to America, Americanism will live on in the hearts not just of those on the Right but also the vast majority of middle Americans or Deplorables or whatever you want to call them. They love their country, its history, its foundations, its principles, its Constitution, its great documents and speeches, its symbols, and its heroes. All of these, and more, can and should be used to rally them to fight for a better future. The 1776 Commission’s report is useful in that regard. Brion McClanahan’s attack on it . . . isn’t.

POST 
By Debra Heine April 29, 2021

“That warrant was completely illegal,” the former mayor told Carlson. “The only way that you can get a search warrant is if you can show that there’s some evidence that the person is going to destroy the evidence, or is going to run away with the evidence. Well, I’ve had it for two years and I haven’t destroyed it.”


ELECTIONS 
His shameless descriptions of January 6 desecrate the memory of those lives lost in real attacks against this country and serve to justify the ongoing attack on our democracy he is perpetrating. 
By Julie Kelly April 29, 2021 

The “attack on our democracy” began last year and the facts aren’t in dispute. A new leader was chosen and installed by a self-serving cabal of powerful interests; no one even tries to hide it anymore. The “shadow campaign” to rig the 2020 election isn’t described as cheating or an actual “attack on our democracy” that seized control from tens of millions of voters but as a successful attempt to “save” the election.

Joe Biden’s ahistorical and shameless descriptions of January 6 not only desecrate those lives lost in real attacks against this country—they serve to justify the ongoing attack on our democracy perpetrated by Biden himself.

PLAINTIFF’S CLASS-ACTION COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION Sid Miller, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Tom Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Jsqzi1b1HmCyaJC0aBX-54K4_-eyj5W6/view?usp=sharing 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
Sid Miller, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
Tom Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants.
Case No. 4:21-cv-00595
PLAINTIFF’S CLASS-ACTION COMPLAINT

DEMAND FOR RELIEF 

Plaintiff Miller respectfully requests that the court: 

a. certify a class of all farmers and ranchers in the United States who are currently excluded from the Department’s interpretation of “socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher;” 

b. award the declaratory relief described in paragraphs 19, 20, 23, and 28; 

c. permanently enjoin Secretary Vilsack and his successors from implementing any racial exclusions or discriminatory racial preferences in Department of Agriculture programs; 

d. award costs and attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988; 

e. award all other relief that the Court may deem just, proper, or equitable. 

Dated: April 26, 2021

REFERENCE:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL SUES BIDEN ADMIN TO END RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FARMERS AND RANCHERS
SATURDAY, MAY 1, 2021
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, America First Legal (AFL) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas to stop the Biden Administration from administering a program created by Congress in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 that discriminates against American citizen farmers and ranchers based upon their race. Specifically, Sections 1005 and 1006 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 provide benefits to farmers and ranchers, but excludes many potential beneficiaries based solely upon their ethnicity or race.

BRIEF FOR AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PETITIONERS In the Supreme Court of Texas PATRICK VON DOHLEN, BRIAN GRECO, KEVIN JASON KHATTAR, MICHAEL KNUFFEKE, AND DANIEL PETRI, Petitioners, v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Respondent. On Petition for Review from the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1caWq3aQ1aIPQJD7CL_Gp-9PdY9m8SCie/view?usp=sharing 
No. 20-0725
In the Supreme Court of Texas

PATRICK VON DOHLEN, BRIAN GRECO, KEVIN JASON KHATTAR, MICHAEL KNUFFEKE, AND DANIEL PETRI, Petitioners,
v.
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Respondent.
On Petition for Review from the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio
No. 04-20-00071-cv
BRIEF FOR AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PETITIONERS

ARGUMENT 

I. The Government Cannot Discriminate Against Private Contractors Because of their Protected First Amendment Activities.

II. The City of San Antonio “Canceled” Chick-fil-A Because City Council Members Objected to Chick-fil-A’s Religious Beliefs.

III. The Texas Legislature Provided a State Law Remedy for San Antonio’s Unconstitutional Discrimination and It Should Be Given Full Force and Effect.


PRAYER 

The petition for review should be granted.

 April 28, 2021 

REFERENCE:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FILES BRIEF IN TEXAS SUPREME COURT TO REMEDY SAN ANTONIO’S CANCELLING OF CHICK-FIL-A
SATURDAY, MAY 1, 2021
WASHINGTON, DC – America First Legal filed a brief in the Supreme Court of Texas seeking to remedy the City of San Antonio’s decision to refuse government contracts to Chick-fil-A based on the city’s perception of Chick-fil-A’s religious views and company donations to organizations that support a traditional understanding of marriage–an outrageous violation of the First Amendment.