HIGHLIGHTS of THE WEEKEND INTERVIEW:
“...Unfortunately, public pensions all over the country are
gobbling up more and more taxpayer money and producing nothing in return but
huge deficits. It's not even certain whether employees in their 20s and 30s
will retire with a pension, since many state and municipal pension systems are
projected to run dry in the next two to three decades.”
“That included Rhode
Island 's system until last year, when Ms. Raimondo
drove perhaps the boldest pension reform of the last decade through the state's
Democratic-controlled General Assembly. The new law shifts all workers from
defined-benefit pensions into hybrid plans, which include a modest annuity and
a defined-contribution component. It also increases the retirement age to 67
from 62 for all workers and suspends cost-of-living adjustments for retirees
until the pension system, which is only about 50% funded, reaches a more
healthy state.”
“Several states have increased the retirement age or created
a new tier of benefits for future workers, but reforms that only affect
not-yet-hired employees don't save much money. A lot of "people say we've
done pension reform when all they've done is tweaked something," Ms.
Raimondo points out. "This problem will not go away, and I don't know what
people are thinking. By the nature of the problem, it gets bigger and harder
the longer you wait."”
Updated March 23, 2012, 7:37 p.m. ET
The Democrat Who Took on the Unions
1 comment:
Gauging from the campaigns being waged by the 2012 candidates, I don't think we have any Gina Raimondos in Carmel ready to challenge the status quo conventional wisdom. It would be great and exciting it we did though. It would also be great if we had representatives thinking beyond increasing hotel and sales taxes and property parcel charge and selling off precious assets because we don't have the individual or collective creativity and leadership to think outside the box for lasting and real solutions to many council-made problems such as not managing city revenues as if those monies were the council members own money instead of somebody else's money.
Post a Comment