PUBLIC COMMENT BY MAYOR BURNETT:
A 1 percent sales tax would raise Carmel 's sales-tax rate to 8.25 percent, the
same level it was before July 1, 2011, Mayor Jason Burnett said in his
newsletter.
(Carmelmay put tax on ballot, LARRY PARSONS Herald Staff Writer, 06/11/2012)
COMMENT COURTESY OF PLEASANTON WEEKLY NEWS:
COMMENT COURTESY OF PLEASANTON WEEKLY NEWS:
Effective July 1, 2011, the one percent sales and use tax
rate increase that was approved with the state budget and effective April 1,
2009, will expire lowering the statewide base tax rate from 8.25 percent to
7.25 percent.
As part of a 2008-09 budget agreement, the state Legislature
temporarily increased the General Fund portion of the sales and use tax rate by
1% in April 2009, with the increase to
expire at midnight June 30, 2011.
Betty T. Yee, a member of the state Board of Equalization, said the sales and use tax rate inCalifornia
has ranged from 8.25% to 10.75%, depending on whether additional regional
voter-approved sales taxes applied. Now the range is 7.25% to 9.75%.
Betty T. Yee, a member of the state Board of Equalization, said the sales and use tax rate in
PUBLIC COMMENT BY MAYOR BURNETT:
Mayor Jason Burnett said Wednesday that merchants largely
testified that visitors to Carmel
generally are from areas with higher sales taxes and they don't take the local
tax rate into consideration when making purchases.
COMMENT COURTESY OF THE TAX FOUNDATION:
1. Taxes matter to business. Business taxes affect business
decisions, job creation and retention, plant location, competitiveness, the
transparency of the tax system, and the long-term health of a state’s economy.
Most importantly, taxes diminish profits. If taxes take a larger portion of
profits, that cost is passed along to either consumers (through higher prices),
employees (through lower wages or fewer jobs), or shareholders (through lower
dividends or share value). Thus a state with lower tax costs will be more
attractive to business investment, and more likely to experience economic
growth.
2. States do not enact tax changes (increases or cuts) in a
vacuum. Every tax law will in some way change a state’s competitive position
relative to its immediate neighbors, its geographic region, and even globally.
Ultimately it will affect the state’s national standing as a place to live and
to do business. Entrepreneurial states can take advantage of the tax increases
of their neighbors to lure businesses out of high-tax states.
SALES TAX IN CONTEXT
Prior to the early 2009 tax increases, Californians already paid some of the
highest state-local taxes in the United States . As reported in the
2008 edition of the Tax Foundation's State-Local Tax Burdens study,
Californians paid 10.5% of their income on state-local taxes, the sixth highest
burden in the country; the national average was 9.7%. That translated into a
payment of $5,028 per capita in state-local taxes.
Tax Year 2012
State
|
State Rate/
Sales Tax Rank
|
Average Local Rate
|
Combined
|
Rank of Combined Rate
|
7.25%/1
|
0.86%
|
8.11%
|
12
|
- 5.00% for the state general fund
- 0.25% for the state general fund effective 2004 (shifted from Bradley-Burns local tax)
- 0.50% distributed to local health/welfare programs
- 0.50% distributed to local public safety programs
- 0.75% Bradley-Burns tax, returned to the local jurisdiction where the sale occurred (this tax was 1% prior to 2004, when 0.25% was shifted to the state)
- 0.25% Bradley-Burns tax returned to the county where the sale occurred for transportation purposes
- 1.00% increase effective April 1, 2009, to the state general fund
Additionally, local governments can add up to 2% in local
add-on sales taxes; a 0.5% transportation sales tax is quite common. Prior to
April 1, 2009, the average local add-on sales tax was 0.71%, leading to an
average state sales tax of 7.96%, the fifth highest state-local average in the
country. With the increase, California has the
second-highest state-local average sales tax rate in the country, behind only Tennessee .
No comments:
Post a Comment