State Farm General Insurance Company vs City of Carmel-By-The-Sea: OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

ABSTRACT: RE: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MONTEREY

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA; and DOES 1 through I 0, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: 16CV002381 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS On March 7, 2017, Ashley Stander, Law Offices of Geordan Goebel, Attorneys for Plaintiff, submitted to the Superior Court of California, County of Monterey, OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS. 1. STATE FARM'S COMPLAINT IS BASED UPON THE CITY'S VIOLATION OF ITS OWN ORDINANCE. 2. THE CITY'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS FRIVOLOUS AND IN BAD FAITH. 3. CONCLUSION. The City's frivolous sanctions motion should be denied. Plaintiff's complaint is brought in good faith, and is supported by the facts and the law. The OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS document copy is embedded.

16cv002381 Opposition to Motion for Sanctions 3-7-2017 by L. A. Paterson on Scribd

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF MONTEREY
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA; and DOES I through I 0, inclusive, Defendants.
Case No.: 16CV002381
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS