ABSTRACT: Tomorrow, Tuesday, 22 February 2011, the City Council will hold a Special Meeting at 5:00 P.M. at City Hall Council Chambers to “Authorize staff to circulate a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a search firm for a new City Administrator.” The Agenda is reproduced with link to Adenda Item Packet.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Special Meeting
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 -- 5:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
East side of Monte Verde Street between Ocean and Seventh Avenues
Live video streaming available at:
www.ci.carmel.ca.us
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Pledge of Allegiance
IV. Orders of Council
A. Authorize staff to circulate a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a search firm for a new City Administrator.
V. Adjournment
The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea does not discriminate against persons with disabilities. Carmel-by-the-Sea City Hall is an accessible facility. The City of Carmel-by-the-Sea telecommunications device for the Deaf/Speech Impaired (T.D.D.) number is 1-800-735-2929.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at Carmel-by-the-Sea City Hall, on the east side of Monte Verde Street, between Ocean and 7th Avenues, during normal business hours.
ADDENDUM:
Special Meeting Feb 22 2011 Packet
Includes, as follows:
NOTICE OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Agenda Item Summary
RFP City Administrator Recruitment
DRAFT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR RECRUITMENT, February 2011
Proposed List of Firms to Receive RFPS
1. Bob Murray & Associates (Roseville, CA)
2. William Avery & Associates, Inc. (Los Gatos, CA)
3. Peckham & McKenney (Sacramento, CA)
4. Teri Black & Company (Los Angeles, CA)
5. Ralph Andersen & Associates (Rocklin, CA)
6. CSI Human Resources Group, LLC (Monterey, CA)
Municipal Code Chapter 2.08 CITY ADMINISTRATOR
1 comment:
I agree this is the obvious first step to repairing Carmel's damaged "laughingstock" reputation among peninsula cities. I also feel a parallel track is in play due to the long-term nature of this long known about but nothing done about management problem. Until the political winds blow this council out and newly elected council persons are seated, untainted by this despicable affair and aggravated by this council's procrastination, the laughingstock reputation will be with us and deservedly so - the unwillingness of many councils to honestly confront this issue and just recently the months of closed door activity then business as usual and a public silence with little to no regard for constituents.
This council does not get Carmel. They voted to extend holiday lights into March contrary to the spirit of Ordinance 96 and the efforts of the late Jim Holliday. They voted against circulating RFPs for the Indoor Forest Theater foregoing an opportunity to show good faith and inclusiveness. They dredged up paid parking in the middle of the Guillen crisis, wasting everyone's time, for an idea which was resoundingly defeated a few years earlier. This council is out of touch with Carmel's traditions. They don't get Carmel and they definitely do not get public service.
Post a Comment